B1 中級 14804 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
Every country on earth, at the moment,
is reforming public education.
There are two reasons for it.
The first of them is economic.
People are trying to work out
how do we educate our children
to take their place in the economies of 21st century,
How do we do that?
Given that we can't anticipate
what the economy would look like
at the end of next week,
as the recent turmoil is demonstrating.
How do we do that?
The second one though is cultural.
Every country on earth is trying to figure out
how do we educate our children
so that they have a sense of cultural identity
so that we
can pass on the cultural genes of our communities
while being a part of the process of globalisation.
How do we square that circle?
The problem is they are trying to meet the future
by doing what they did in the past.
On the way they are alienating millions of kids
who don't see any purpose in going to school.
When we went to school,
we were kept there with a story
which was if you worked hard and did well
and got a college degree,
you would have a job.
Our kids don't believe that.
And they are right not to, by the way.
You are better having a degree than not.
But it's not a guarantee anymore.
And particularly not if the route to it marginalises
most things you think are important about yourself.
Some people say we have to raise standards
as if this is a breakthrough.
Like really? Yes, we should.
Why would you lower them?
I haven't come across an argument that
persuades me alluringly.
But raise them? Of course, we should raise them.
The problem is
that the current system of education
was designed and conceived and structured
for a different age.
It was conceived
in the intellectual culture of the Enlightenment.
And in the economic circumstances
of the Industrial Revolution.
Before the middle of the 19th century,
there were no systems of public education.
Not really.
You could get educated by the Jesuits
if you had the money.
But public education paid for from taxation,
compulsory to everybody,
and free at the point of delivery.
That was a revolutionary idea.
And many people objected to it.
They said
It's not possible for many street kids,
working class children
to benefit from public education.
They are incapable of learning to read and write
Why are we spending time on this?
So they are all sort of built into it.
A whole series of assumptions
about social structure and capacity
It was driven by the economic imperative of the time.
But running right through it,
was an intellectual model of the mind.
which was essentially
the Enlightenment view of intelligence.
That real intelligence consists in
capacity of certain type of deductive reasoning,
and the knowledge of the classics originally
what we come to think of as academic ability.
And this is deep in the gene pool of public education
There are two types of people.
Academic and non-academic.
Smart people and non-smart people.
And the consequence of that is
that many brilliant people think they are not.
Because they are being judged
against this particular view of the mind.
So we have twin pillars
Economic and intellectual
And my view is
that this model has caused chaos
in many people's lives
It's been great for some.
There have been people
who have benefitted wonderfully from it.
But most people have not.
Intead they suffered this.
This is the modern epidemic.
And it's as misplaced
and it's as fictitious.
This is the plague of ADHD.
Now this is a map of instances of ADHD in America.
Or the prescription for ADHD.
Don't mistake me.
I don't mean to say that there is no such thing as
Attention Deficit Disorder.
I am not qualified to say that there is such a thing.
I know that a great majority of
psychologists and pediatricians
think that there is such a thing.
But it's still a matter of debate.
What I do know for a fact is
that it's not an epidemic.
These kids are being medicated as routinely
as we had our tonsils taken out.
And on the same whimsical basis
and for the same reason, medical fashion.
Our children are living
in the most intensely stimulating period
in the history of the Earth.
They are being beseiged with information
and calls for their attention from every platform.
computers,
from iPhones,
from advertising hoardings,
from hundreds of television channels.
And we are penalising them now,
for getting distracted.
From what?
Boring stuff.
At school, for the most part.
It seems to me that it's not a coincidence totally.
that the incidence of ADHD has risen
in parallel with the growth of standardised testing.
Now these kids are being given
Ritilin and Adderall and all manner of things,
often quite dangerous drugs.
to get them focussed and calm them down.
But according to this, Attention Deficit Disorder
increases as you travel east across the country.
People start losing interest in Oklahoma,
they can hardly think straight in Arkansas,
and by the time they get to Washington
they've lost it completely.
And there are separate reasons for that, I believe.
It's a fictitious epidemic.
If you think of it, the arts,
and I don't say this exclusively of the arts.
I think it's also true of science.
and of maths.
But let me
I say about the arts particularly
because they are victims of this mentality currently.
Particularly.
The arts,
especially address the idea of aesthetic experience.
An aesthetic experience is
one in which your senses are operating at their peak.
When you are present in the current moment,
When you are resonating with the excitement
of this thing that you are experiencing.
When you are fully alive.
An anaesthetic is when you shut your senses off.
And deaden yourself to what's happening.
And a lot of these drugs are that.
We are getting our children through education
by anaesthetising them.
And I think we should be doing the exact opposite.
We shouldn't be putting them to sleep.
We should be waking them up.
to what they have inside of themselves.
But the model we have is this.
I believe we have a system of education
that is modeled on the interests of Industrialism
and in the image of it.
I will give you a couple of examples.
Schools are
still pretty much organized on factory lines.
So ringing bells,
separate facilities,
specialised inter-separate subjects.
We still educate children by batches.
We put them through the system by age group.
Why do we do that?
Why is there this assumption that
the most important thing kids have in common
is how old they are.
It's like the most important thing about them
is their date of manufacture.
Well I know kids who are much better than other kids
at the same age and different disciplines.
Or different times of the day.
Or better in smaller groups than in large groups.
Or sometimes they want to be on their own.
If you are interested in the model of learning,
you don't start from this production line mentality.
It's essentially about conformity
and increasingly it's about that.
as you look at the growth of standardised testing
and standardised curricula,
and it's about standardisation.
I believe we got to go in the exact opposite direction.
That's what I mean by changing the paradigm.
There is a great study done recently,
of divergent thinking,
published couple of years ago,
Divergent thinking isn't the same thing as creativity.
I define creativity
as the process of having original ideas,
that have value.
Divergent thinking isn't a synonym.
But it's an essential capacity for creativity.
It's the ability
to see lots of possible answers to a question.
Lots of possible ways of interpreting a question.
To think what Edward de Bono would call "laterally",
to think not just in linear or convergent ways.
To see multiple answers not one.
I mean, there are tests for this.
One kind of cod example would be
People might be asked to say,
How many uses can you think of for a paper clip?
Routine questions.
Most people might come up with 10 or 15.
People who are good at this might come up with 200.
And they do that by saying well,
could the paper clip be 200 ft tall
and made out of foam rubber?
Does it have to be paper clip as we know it, Jim?
Now there are tests for this.
They gave them to 1,500 people
in a book called Break Point & Beyond,
and on the protocol of the test,
if you scored above a certain level,
you would be considered genius at divergent thinking.
OK?
So my question to you is,
what percentage of the people tested of the 1500
scored genius level for divergent thinking?
And you need to know one more thing about them.
These were kindergarden children.
So what do you think?
What percentage genius level?
80%? Thank you.
80%. OK.
98%.
Now the thing about this was that
it was a longitudinal study.
So they retested the same children 5 years later.
Age of 8 to 10.
What do you think? 50%?
They retested them again 5 years later.
Ages 13 to 15.
You can see a trend here, can't you?
Now, this tells an interesting story.
Because you could've imagined it going the other way, couldn't you?
You start off not being very good,
but you get better as you get older.
But this shows two things.
One is we all have this capacity.
and two, it mostly deteriorates.
And now a lot of things
have happened to these kids as they have grown up.
A lot.
One of the most important things that happen to them
I am convinced that,
by now, they've become educated.
They spent 10 years in school
being told there's one anwer
it's at the back.
And don't look.
And don't copy.
Because that's cheating.
I mean, outside schools,
that's called collaboration.
But inside schools.
This isn't because teachers want it this way.
It's just because it happens that way.
It's because it's in the gene pool of education.
We have to think differently about human capacity.
We have to get over this old conception of
academic, non-academic,
abstract, theoretical
vocational.
And see it for what it is.
A myth.
Secondly, you have to recognize that
most great learning happens in groups.
That collaboration is the stuff of growth.
If we atomise people and separate them
and judge them separately,
we form a kind of disjunction
between them and their natural learning environment.
And thirdly,
it's crucially about the culture of our institutions.
The habits of the institution
and the habitats that they occupy.
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

【TED】Ken Robinson:改變教育典範 Changing Education Paradigms - RSA Animate

14804 分類 收藏
VoiceTube 發佈於 2013 年 7 月 17 日
看更多推薦影片
  1. 1. 單字查詢

    在字幕上選取單字即可即時查詢單字喔!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔