Name: 怎麼樣... (How About That...)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T06:45:59.000Z
Duration: 10 min 7 s

*Pewdiepie was always kinda racist but now he's a hero to nazis*

* Pewdiepie總是有點種族主義，但現在他是一個納粹英雄 *

*Pewdiepie's fall shows the limits of 'lol just kidding'*

* Pewdiepie對"lol 只是開玩笑"一詞定義了新的下限 *

may I just say that if you're gonna call someone

you may want to double check if that's true or not

你可能要重複確認這是真的還是假的

because afterwards you can't go 'lol just kidding' (roasted)

因為以後，你不能只是用"lol 只是開個玩笑"來蒙混過關

the amount of cherry-picking that the media came out with after this whole thing

在媒體捏造這一切子虛烏有的事件

to prove this narrative that I'm somehow an anti-semite

只為了證明我不知何時成為了反猶太主義者之後

請繼續保持，這一切真是太可笑了

Vox發了一篇這樣的文，完全不諷刺

*recently he has been wearing Himmler style glasses*

*最近他一直戴著類似希特勒款式的眼鏡*

*and sporting a fashy [slang for fascist] Hitler youth haircut*

*和蓄著fashy [俗稱法西斯]希特勒青年時的髮型*

I'm going through a mid-life crisis here ok?

我要以此對付我的中年危機 好嗎？

I guess she read it on eh she read it off a headline

you once said in an interview that you found dressing up as a nazi arousing

你曾在接受採訪時說，你找到了一個能夠喚起心中納粹魂的裝扮

I read that on an online website so it must be true! (roasted)

因為我是從網路上看到的，所以它一定是真實事件！

so I made the apology video where I thought at least was from the heart

所以我做了，至少我認為是出自真心的道歉影片

and I admitted it that I didn't do everything like I'm not guilt-free in this situation by any means

我坦承我沒意圖從這些事件中以任何方式替自己脫罪

positivity from the internet and anyone that i think saw it

it was just amazing and I owe you guys my biggest thanks for all the support that I got from that video

我十分驚喜， 我想大大地感謝你們對於這個影片給我的所有支持

*Pewdiepie half-heartedly apologizes, calls media "motherfuckers"*

* Pewdiepie虛偽地道歉，稱媒體“趕羚羊 草枝擺”*

*Pewdiepie's "apology" for Nazi jokes shows that he still doesn't get it*

* Pewdiepie對於納粹笑話所發表的道歉顯示他仍未搞清楚重點

*trump and Pewdiepie are using the same playbook*

*川普跟pewdiepie用了相同的劇本*

so we basically went from "Pewdiepie is a nazi" to "Pewdiepie is trump"

所以我們基本上是從Pewdiepie是一個納粹去得到Pewdiepie是川普

we'll get there one day media i'm sure we'll get there one day

媒體，我相信總有一天這能夠得到證實，總有一天

and I want to point out not all media okay

我想指出，並非所有的媒體都是這樣好嗎

i've seen more and more balanced articles come out about this situation

我看到更多，更貼近真相的平衡報導出來對抗這種情況

even though it seems pretty dead at this point

即便它們在當前的風向不怎麼受到支持

the whole situation is a testimony of old media not understanding youtube

這整件事情顯示了那些舊式媒體不瞭解Youtube

the fucking senior editor of wall street journal

the senior editor of wall street journal tweeted

i'm sorry mike i'll try and cut it down next time a little bit for you

抱歉阿 Mike 我下次會把影片弄精簡一點的

so you don't have to spend so much time doing your journalist research

這樣你就不用花那麼多的時間做你的新聞採樣

maybe that will make it more interesting for you

senior editor huh how about that (roasted)

let's get into the wall street journal thing

讓我們談談有關華爾街日報的事情

there's one thing that I wanted to talk about that i didn't really do in my last video

有件事我一直想說，但我沒有在之前的影片裡提到

which was the fact that wall street journal went to the brands that i work with

就是華爾街日報在找我談話之前

跑去找跟我合作的企業尋求訪問

i know this because they didn't just talked to disney and youtube

我會知道這事是因為他們不只找了迪士尼，還去找Youtube

it shows to me that they were just after making the strongest headline and the strongest story

我的解讀是， 他們只在乎能不能做出最聳動的標題跟故事

that they could get without any regards of what kind of damage they would do in the process

他們可以絲毫不管過程中會造成怎樣的傷害

i mean why would wall street journal care about minimizing harm

也對，華爾街幹嘛在乎縮小傷害這種鳥事？

it's not like it's one of the fore-major section in the journalist's code of ethics (true)

道德考量又不是做出熱門報導所需的首要因素

i-i-i- mean why would wall street journal care about that?

they wanted that headline, they got the headline

他們想要這樣的頭條，他們也得到了頭條

*wall street journal should've tried to get a response from me (pewds) directly to begin with*

*華爾街日報應該直接找我本人訪問*

*not going to brands I work with first. Proves to me their maliciousness.*

*而不是去找我的合作企業，這只顯示你們喪盡天良*

christopher mims of the wall street journal tweeted back at me

華爾街日報的Christopher Mims回推我

*demonstrably false but anyway welcome to our post-truth age*

*事實證明你錯了，但歡迎聯絡我們的揭發真相報導*

he says *nothing, absolutely nothing gets printed in the wall street journal without an attempt to reach a mentioned subject for comment*

他說*沒有--絕對沒有-- 任何印在華爾街日報上的報導是經由上述手段得到的*

but then he goes and says *I have no idea about the chronology*

但隨後他又表示*我不知道訪問的先後順序*

christopher mims you demonstrated yourself false

so welcome to the post-truth age (roasted)

the other thing that i had a problem with which i already brought up

就是斷章取義或缺乏背景的問題

i think in the video there was one piece of context out of five in total

我認為，在一則影片中有著五個以上的段落

so if you think that's a balanced way of doing journalism, you tell me

所以，如果你認為這樣做報導算是中立的話，隨你說去吧

i have a big problem with the whole thing in general

because this whole thing wasn't a problem until it was brought up

因為這整件事本來是沒有問題的，直到它被不斷炒作

because my audience understand they were jokes

因為我的觀眾們都知道這只是個笑話

they weren't actually doing anyone any harm

它們並沒有真正對任何人造成傷害

but the way the wall street journal defended this was that

但華爾街日報為自己辯護的藉口是

字幕列表影片播放

怎麼樣... (How About That...)

context

elaborate

situation

demonstrate