字幕列表 影片播放 列印所有字幕 列印翻譯字幕 列印英文字幕 >> DAVID J MALAN: All right, so this is CS50. >> 大衛·馬蘭:所有 沒錯,所以這是CS50。 And this is clearly a Friday. 而這顯然是一個星期五。 And this is the end of week one. 而這是一個星期的末端。 So you may recall that we left off, last time, with a cliffhanger of sorts. 所以,你可能還記得,我們不放過, 最後一次,有各種各樣的懸念。 Whereby we expose this lie, that no matter what you've been taught growing 我們藉以揭露這個謊言,沒有 不管你被教導成長 up, 1 divided by 10 is not, in fact, 0.1 or 0.100 or 0.10000. 向上,1除以10不是在 事實上,0.1或0.100或0.10000。 In fact, if we compile this program, as we did yesterday, with, 事實上,如果我們編譯這個 計劃,因為我們沒有昨天,有, make imprecision, and then do dot, slash, imprecision, 使不精確性,然後 做點,斜線,不精確, we learned that this is what's 1 divided by 10 actually is. 我們了解到,這是什麼 1除以10實際上是。 So that's not really quite the case. 所以這不是真的相當的情況下。 But this does hint at some fundamental limitation of computers. 但是,這確實暗示了一些 電腦的基本限制。 And indeed, among the things we're going to do 事實上,中 我們將要做的事情 today is take a look at why this has happened, what implications this has, 今天就來看看為什麼這有 事情發生了,有什麼意義這有, how humanity has failed to grasp this in some very 人類如何失敗 掌握這一些很 serious situations-- the result of the which 嚴重situations-- 在其結果 has been quite tragic and expensive-- and also 已經相當慘烈 和expensive--也 take a look at how we can actually defend 看看我們如何 實際上可以捍衛 against these kinds of limitations. 針對這些種類的限制。 So intuitively, perhaps, why is 1 divided by 10, 所以直覺,也許, 為什麼是1除以10, according to my computer here, not just 1/10, 0.10? 根據我的電腦 這裡,不只是的1/10,0.10? Yeah. 是啊。 What do you think? 你怎麼看? >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: The radix is different? >> 觀眾:基數是不同的? >> DAVID J MALAN: The what is? >> 大衛·馬蘭:該是什麼? Oh, the radix is different? 呵呵,基數是不同的? So not quite. 因此,不完全是。 It's actually more fundamental to the hardware. 它實際上更多 基本的硬件。 Other thoughts? 其他的想法? Yeah. 是啊。 AUDIENCE MEMBER: They represent numbers differently? 觀眾:他們 表示數字不同? DAVID J MALAN: So they-- Right. 大衛·馬蘭:所以they--權。 They represent numbers differently. 他們代表的數字不同。 Inaccurately, apparently. 不準確,很明顯。 So that is-- Well, differently from what? 這樣is--好, 不同於什麼? Or from whom? 或者從誰? From us? 從我們呢? AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yeah. 觀眾:是啊。 They don't use the decimal system to [INAUDIBLE]. 它們不使用小數 系統[聽不清]。 DAVID J MALAN: OK. 大衛·馬蘭:OK。 So in a sense, they don't use the decimal system. 因此,從某種意義上說,他們不 使用十進制系統。 Underneath the hood, everything is, indeed, binary, 在系統底層, 一切,的確,二進制, and that's related, in fact. 這就是相關的,其實。 But it's even a simpler explanation than that. 但是,它甚至更簡單 解釋比。 Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: They only have so many bits. >> 觀眾:他們 只有這麼多的位。 They can only store up to a certain extent, like with the decimals. 他們最多只能存儲一定 某種程度上,像小數。 >> DAVID J MALAN: Yeah. >> 大衛·馬蘭:是的。 This is what's really getting at it. 這是什麼真正得到它。 It turns out that computers typically, will always only 事實證明,計算機 通常情況下,將永遠只有 use a finite amount of information to represent something. 使用的信息的有限數量 代表什麼。 Right? 對嗎? After all, we only have a fixed amount of hard disk space. 畢竟,我們只有一個固定的 量的硬盤空間。 We only have a fixed amount of RAM, or computer memory. 我們只有一個固定量 的RAM,或計算機的內存。 And if you only have a fixed amount of something, 如果你只有一個 固定金額的東西, surely you can't actually count up to infinity or any number you want. 當然你不能真正計數 到無窮大或任何你想要的數字。 You, kind of, have to pick and choose what range 你有種,有 挑選什麼範圍 of values you're going to support. 值你要支持。 >> And so for instance, a week or two ago, when we talked about ASCII, >> 因此,例如,一兩個星期 以前,當我們談到ASCII, and we talked about 8 bits, or a byte, so to speak, 我們談了8位, 或字節,可以這麼說, the biggest number we could represent with 8 bits was what? 最大數我們可以 有8位表示是什麼呢? 255. 255。 And we can represent 256 total values but not if we spend one of them 我們可以表示256個總價值 但如果我們把其中的一個 on 0-- Well, but if we spend one of them on 0, 在0--好了,但如果我們 花其中的一個0, then the biggest number is, of course, 255. 那麼最大的數 是,當然,255。 >> So it turns out, that this is the case too, in this context. >> 所以,事實證明,這是 的情況下也一樣,在這種情況下。 We started talking, last time, about floating-point numbers, which 我們開始談,最後一次, 有關浮點數字, are different from integers, in that they have a decimal point 來自整數不同,在 他們有一個小數點 and, hopefully, some numbers after that, but they are too. 並希望一些數字 在這之後,但是它們太。 A computer is only typically going to use 32 bits, maybe 64 bits 一台計算機通常只打算 使用32位,也許64位 to represent a floating point value. 來表示一個浮點值。 So even though we've grown up learning mathematics and knowing 因此,即使我們已經長大了 學習數學和了解 that you can absolutely have an infinite number of numbers 你絕對可以有 數的無限數量 after the decimal point, not if you have finite memory. 小數點後不 如果你有有限的內存。 You, kind of, have to round, or pick and choose which 你有種,有圓形, 或者挑選哪些 numbers you're going to represent. 你會數來表示。 And so you can think of, in a sense, this being the computer's closest 所以,你能想到的,從某種意義上說, 這是計算機的最接近 approximation to the value 1/10 that it can get, with just 32 or so bits. 近似的值的1/10 它可以得到,只有32左右位。 And it's not just 1/10. 而且它不只是1/10。 >> For instance, if I change this to 1/3, which we think is even simpler. >> 舉例來說,如果我改變這 1/3,我們認為這是更簡單。 So 1 divided by 3. 因此,1除以3。 Let me save the file. 讓我保存文件。 Let me go ahead and recompile it. 讓我繼續前進,重新編譯它。 And let me re-run it. 讓我重新運行它。 Here too, apparently, 1/3 is not 0.3 and then an infinite number of 3's 在這裡,顯然,三分之一沒有0.3 然後3的無限數量 thereafter. 其後。 You have this imprecision at the end. 你有這樣的不精確性在最後。 So we humans are correct, and what you learned is, in fact, correct, 所以,我們人類是正確的,什麼 你了解,其實,正確的, but we're bumping up against some limitations. 但是我們撞了 針對一些限制。 >> And what I thought we'd do today, is begin >> 而我的想法 我們今天會做,是開始 by looking at, frankly, the tragic consequences of this 通過看,坦率地說,在 這種悲慘的後果 sometimes, when mankind does not quite implement 有時,人類的時候 並不完全實現 for this reality and these limitations. 針對這一現實,這些限制。 And we'll see a series of vignettes from the History Channel that takes 而且我們會看到一系列的小插圖 從歷史頻道的需要 a look at how things have gone wrong. 一起來看看如何事情已經出了問題。 It's about 8 minutes long, and we'll come back after this 這是約8分鐘之久, 我們將在這之後回來 and take a look at exactly what else can go wrong. 看一看在完全相同 還有什麼可能出錯。 If we could dim the lights-- 如果我們能昏暗的lights-- >> [VIDEO PLAYBACK] >> [視頻回放] >> -Computers, we've all come to accept the often frustrating problems that >> -Computers,我們都逐漸接受 經常令人沮喪的問題, go with them. 和他們一起去。 Bugs, viruses, and software glitches are small prices 錯誤,病毒,和軟件 故障都是小的價格 to pay for the convenience. 支付的便利。 But in high-tech and high-speed military and space program applications, 但是,在高科技和高速 軍事和航天計劃的應用, the smallest problem can be magnified into disaster. 可以最小的問題 被放大成災難。 On June 4, 1996, scientists prepared to launch an unmanned Ariane 5 rocket. 1996年6月4日,科學家準備 啟動一個無人阿麗亞娜5型火箭。 It was carrying scientific satellites designed 它攜帶的科學 衛星設計 to establish precisely how the Earth's magnetic field interacts 建立精確如何 地球的磁場相互作用 with solar winds. 與太陽風。 The rocket was built for the European Space Agency 火箭是專為 歐洲航天局 and lifted off from its facility on the coast of French Guiana. 並從其工廠升空 在法屬圭亞那的海岸。 >> -And about 30 seconds into the flight, they first >> - 和大約30秒後進入 飛行中,他們首先 noticed something was going wrong. 發現了一些打算錯了。 That the nozzles were swiveling in a way they really shouldn't. 使噴嘴被旋轉 在某種程度上,他們真的不應該。 Around 40 seconds into the flight, clearly the vehicle was in trouble, 約40秒後進入飛行, 明確了車輛遇到了麻煩, and that's when they made the decision to destroy it. 而當他們提出的 決定摧毀它。 A Range Safety Officer with tremendous guts pressed the button, 隨著一系列安全主任 巨大的勇氣按下按鈕, blew up the rocket before it could become a hazard to public safety. 炸毀了火箭之前,它可能 成為危害公眾安全。 >> -This was the maiden voyage of the Ariane 5, >> - 這是處女 阿麗亞娜5的航程, and its destruction took place because of a flaw 它破壞了 地方,因為一個缺陷 embedded in the rocket's software. 嵌在火箭的軟件。 -The problem on the Ariane was that there 在-The問題 阿麗亞娜是,有 was a number that required 64 bits to express, 是一個數字,需要 64位表示, and he wanted to convert it to a 16 bit number. 他想轉換 它以一個16位的數。 They assumed that the number was never going to be very big, 他們假定數 從來沒有將是非常大的, that most of those digits in the 64 bit number were 0's. 大多數的這些數字中 64位數字是0。 They were wrong. 但他們錯了。 >> -The inability of one software program to accept >> 一-The無力 軟件程序接受 the kind of number generated by another was at the root of the failure. 所產生的那種數 另一種是在失敗的根源。 Software development had become a very costly part of new technology. 軟件開發已經成為一個 的新技術非常昂貴的部分。 The Ariane 4 rocket had been very successful, so much of the software 阿麗亞娜-4火箭一直非常 成功的,那麼多的軟件 created for it was also used on the Ariane 5. 創造這也是 用在阿麗亞娜5。 >> -The basic problem was that the Ariane 5 was faster, accelerated faster. >> -The基本的問題是,阿麗亞娜 5增快,加速快。 And the software hadn't accounted for that. 而且軟件早已不是 佔了這一點。 >> -The destruction of the rocket was a huge financial disaster, >> 火箭-The破壞 是一個巨大的金融災難, all due to a minute software error. 全因一分鐘,軟件錯誤。 But this wasn't the first time data conversion problems 但是,這是不是第一次 實時數據轉換問題 had plagued modern rocket technology. 一直困擾現代火箭技術。 >> -In 1991, with the start of the First Gulf War, >> -in 1991,在開始 第一次海灣戰爭中, the Patriot missile experienced a similar kind 愛國者導彈 經歷了類似的一種 of number conversion problem. 數轉換的問題。 As a result, 28 people, 28 American soldiers 其結果是,28人, 28美國士兵 were killed and about 100 others wounded, 被打死,約 100人受傷, when the Patriot, which was supposed to protect against incoming scuds, 當愛國者,這是應該 以防止傳入的飛毛腿導彈, failed to fire a missile. 沒有發射導彈。 >> -When Iraq invaded Kuwait and America launched Desert Storm in early 1991, >> - 當伊拉克入侵科威特和美國 在1991年年初推出沙漠風暴, Patriot missile batteries were deployed to protect Saudi Arabia and Israel 愛國者導彈部署 保護沙特阿拉伯和以色列 from Iraqi Scud missile attacks. 從伊拉克飛毛腿導彈攻擊。 The Patriot is a US, medium-range surface-to-air system 愛國者是美國,中程 表面對空氣系統 manufactured by the Raytheon company. 由雷神公司製造。 >> -The size of the Patriot interceptor, itself, is about, roughly 20 feet long. >> 愛國者攔截-The大小, 本身就是約,約20英尺長。 And it weighs about 2000 pounds. 而且它的重量約2000磅。 And it carries a warhead of about-- I think it's roughly 150 pounds. 同時還可以進行about--的彈頭 我認為這是約150磅。 And the warhead, itself, is a high explosive, 和彈頭本身, 是一種高爆炸藥, which has fragments around it. 它有它周圍的碎片。 The casing of the warhead is designed to act like buckshot. 彈頭的外殼是 設計像鹿彈。 >> -The missiles are carried, 4 per container, >> -The導彈 進行,4%的集裝箱, and are transported by a semi-trailer. 並通過半拖車被運送。 >> -The Patriot anti missile system goes back at least 20 years now. >> -The愛國者反導彈系統 追溯到現在至少需要20年。 It was originally designed as an air defense missile 它最初的設計 作為防空導彈 to shoot down enemy airplanes. 擊落敵人的飛機。 In the First Gulf War, when that war came along, 在第一次海灣戰爭, 當戰爭來了, the Army wanted to use it to shoot down scuds, not airplanes. 陸軍希望用它來 擊落飛毛腿導彈,而不是飛機。 The Iraqi Force was not so much of a problem, 伊拉克隊還是沒有 這麼多的問題, but the Army was worried about scuds. 但陸軍擔心飛毛腿導彈。 And so they tried to upgrade the Patriot. 因此,他們試圖 升級愛國者。 >> -Intercepting an enemy missile traveling at mach five >> -Intercepting敵人 導彈行駛在馬赫5 was going to be challenging enough. 將要進行足夠的挑戰。 But when the Patriot was rushed into service, 但是愛國者的時候 被衝進服務, the Army was not aware of an Iraqi modification that made 陸軍不知道的 ,使得伊拉克修改 their scuds nearly impossible to hit. 他們的飛毛腿導彈幾乎是不可能的打擊。 >> -What happened, is the scuds that were coming in, were unstable, >> - 什麼事,是飛毛腿的 要來的,是不穩定的, they were wobbling. 他們搖晃。 The reason for this, was the Iraqis, in order 這樣做的原因, 是伊拉克人,為了 to get 600 kilometers out of a 300 kilometer range missile, 讓600公里出 300公里的射程導彈, took weight out of the front warhead and made the warhead lighter. 把重出前彈頭 並提出彈頭更輕。 So now, the Patriot's trying to come at the scud, and most of the time, 所以,現在,愛國者的苦思 在飛毛腿,並且大多數時候, the overwhelming majority of the time, it would just fly by the scud. 絕大多數的 時間,它只是由飛毛腿飛。 >> -Once the Patriot system operators realized the Patriot missed its target, >> - 一旦愛國者系統運營商 實現了愛國者偏離目標, they detonated the Patriot's warhead, to avoid possible casualties if it 他們引爆了愛國者彈頭, 為了避免可能的人員傷亡,如果它 was allowed to fall to the ground. 被允許倒在地上。 >> -That was what most people saw, those big fireballs in the sky, >> - 那是大多數人所看到的, 那些大火球在天空中, and misunderstood as intercepts of Scud warheads. 和誤解為 飛毛腿彈頭的攔截。 Although in the night skies, Patriots appeared 雖然在夜間 天空,愛國者亮相 to be successfully destroying scuds, at Dhahran, 要成功地 摧毀飛毛腿導彈,在達蘭, there could be no mistake about its performance. 有可能是沒有錯 關於它的性能。 There, the Patriot's radar system lost track of an incoming Scud, 在那裡,愛國者的雷達系統 失去了進入的飛毛腿的軌道, and never launched, due to a software flaw. 永不推出, 由於軟件缺陷。 It was the Israelis who first discovered that the longer the system was on, 這是誰首先發現了以色列人 該系統不再是上, the greater the time discrepancy became, due to a clock embedded 越大時間差異 成為,由於一個時鐘的嵌入式 in the system's computer. 在系統的計算機。 >> -About 2 weeks before the tragedy in Dhahran, >> - 關於前2週 悲劇發生在宰赫蘭, the Israelis reported to the Defense Department, 以色列人報 國防部, that the system was losing time, that after about 8 hours of running, 該系統是浪費時間, 該後約8小時的運行, they noticed that the system was becoming noticeably less accurate. 他們注意到,該系統 變得明顯不太準確。 The Defense Department responded by telling all of the Patriot batteries 國防部回應 告訴所有的愛國者電池 to not leave the systems on for a long time. 不離開系統 上很長一段時間。 They never said what a long time was. 他們從來不說什麼很長一段時間了。 8 hours? 8小時? 10 hours? 10小時? 1000 hours? 千小時? Nobody knew. 沒有人知道。 -The Patriot battery stationed at the barracks -The愛國者電池 駐紮在軍營 at Dhahran, and its flawed internal clock, had been on over 100 hours 在宰赫蘭的,其有缺陷的內部 時鐘,已經在超過100小時 on the night of February 25. 2月25日的晚上。 >> -It tracked time to an accuracy of about 1/10 of a second. >> - 它跟踪時間精度 約一秒的1/10。 Now 1/10 of a second is an interesting number 現在1/10秒是 一個有趣的數字 because it can't be expressed in binary, exactly. 因為它不能 按二進制,沒錯。 Which means, it can't be expressed, exactly, 這意味著,它不能 表示,準確地說, in any modern digital computer. 在任何現代數字計算機。 It's hard to believe, but use this as an example. 很難相信,但 使用這個作為一個例子。 Let's take the number, 1/3. 讓我們來數的1/3。 1/3 cannot be expressed in decimal, exactly. 三分之一不能表示 十進制,沒錯。 1/3 is 0.333 going on for infinity. 1/3是0.333持續了無窮大。 There's no way to do that, with absolute accuracy, in decimal. 有沒有辦法做到這一點,有 絕對精度,十進制。 That's exactly the same kind of problem that happened in the Patriot. 這正是相同種類的 問題發生在愛國者。 The longer the system ran, the worse the time error became. 該系統運行更長的 更糟糕的時間誤差成了。 >> -After 100 hours of operation, the error in time was only about 1/3 of a second. >> -After運行100小時,誤差 在時間只有一秒鐘的約1/3。 But in terms of targeting a missile traveling at mach 5, 但是,在針對一個方面 導彈5馬赫旅行, it resulted in a tracking error of over 600 meters. 它導致了跟踪 對600多萬米的錯誤。 It would be a fatal error for the soldiers at Dhahran. 這將是一個致命的錯誤 對於戰士在宰赫蘭。 >> -What happened, is a Scud launch was detected by early-warning satellites, >> - 什麼事,是飛毛腿發射是 通過預警衛星探測, and they new that the Scud was coming in their general direction. 他們新的飛毛腿是 即將在他們的大方向。 They didn't know where it was coming. 他們不知道有人來了。 >> -It was now up to the radar component of the Patriot system, >> 現在 - 它要由雷達 愛國者系統的組成部分, defending Dhahran, to locate and keep track of the incoming enemy missile. 保衛達蘭,定位和保持 跟踪來襲的敵方導彈。 >> -The radar was very smart. >> -The雷達是非常聰明的。 It would actually track the position of the Scud 它實際上跟踪 飛毛腿的位置 and then predict where it probably would be, 然後預測哪裡 它很可能是, the next time, the radar sent a pulse out. 接下來的時間,該 雷達發送的脈衝輸出。 That was called the range gate. 這被稱為距離門。 >> -Then, once the Patriot decides enough time has >> - 然後,一旦愛國者 決定時間已夠 passed to go back and check the next location for this detected object, 傳遞回去檢查下 具體地址為檢測對象, it goes back. 它可以追溯到。 So when it went back to the wrong place, it then sees no object 因此,當它回到了錯 地方,然後看到沒有對象 and it decides that there was no object, it was a false detection, 和它決定,沒有 對象,這是一個錯誤的檢測, and drops the track. 和下降的軌道。 The incoming Scud disappeared from the radar screen, 傳入飛毛腿消失 從雷達屏幕上, and seconds later, it slammed into the barracks. 幾秒鐘後,它 撞上了軍營。 The Scud killed 28 and was the last one fired during the First Gulf War. 飛毛腿殺害28是最後一個 第一次海灣戰爭期間,人開火。 Tragically, the updated software arrived at Dhahran the following day. 可悲的是,更新的軟件 抵達宰赫蘭的第二天。 The software flaw had been fixed, closing 軟件缺陷有 得到修復,閉合 one chapter in the troubled history of the Patriot missile. 在陷入困境的一章 愛國者導彈的歷史。 >> [END PLAYBACK] >> [結束播放] >> DAVID J MALAN: So we'll take a look at some similar limitations in just a bit. >> 大衛·馬蘭:所以我們就來看看 一些類似的限制,只是有點。 But first, let's transition to a few FYI's. 但首先,讓我們來 過渡到一些僅供參考的。 So one-- this weekend, there will be super sections, 因此,埃德蒙頓這個週末,有 將超級部分, which are meant to supplant regularly scheduled sections, which 這意味著可以取代 定期的部分,這 will start up a week hence. 將一個星期,因此啟動。 Take a look at the CS50's website for more information on those. 看看在CS50的網站 對於這些詳細信息。 They will also be filmed and streamed live for those unable to attend. 他們也將被拍攝下來,流 住那些無法參加。 Problem set 1 is on the course's website already, 問題1是關於 當然,本已網站, and we'll take a look at that in just a little bit. 我們將看看 在只是一點點。 And office hours too, will take place this Monday through Thursday. 而辦公時間也將採取 至週四把這個星期一。 >> So this was the most canonical program we looked at last time. >> 因此,這是最典型 節目中,我們看了最後一次。 It's like the simplest program you can write in C, 這就像最簡單 程序,你可以用C寫的, and even that's a bit of a bold claim. 即使這是一個有點大膽索賠。 Right? 對嗎? Because there's a lot of seeming complexity to this. 因為有很多的 似乎複雜此。 So let's take a quick look at what some of these elements 所以,讓我們快速瀏覽一下 什麼一些這些元件中的 were and then try to provide a mental model for how 分別為,然後嘗試提供 如何的心理模型 these simplest of programs work, and then we'll start 這些簡單的程序 工作,然後我們將開始 looking at things ever more complex. 看事情越來越複雜。 So this line here, highlighted now, in yellow, what did we say, last time, 因此,這條線在這裡,現在強調的, 在黃色的,沒有大家說什麼,最後一次, that this does for us? 這為我們做? What's the purpose it serves? 什麼是它服務的目的是什麼? Anyone from farther back? 任何人從更遠了? Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: [INAUDIBLE] >> 觀眾:[聽不清] DAVID J MALAN: Good. 大衛·馬蘭:好。 So it gives you access to commands, or let's 所以,它給你的訪問 為命令,或讓我們 call them functions, that someone else wrote, that are declared, 給他們打電話的功能,有人 別人寫的,被聲明, so to speak, in some other file. 可以這麼說,在一些其他的文件。 So we'll see exactly what a .h file is versus a .c file, eventually. 所以我們會看到什麼.h文件 是對.c文件,最終。 But for now, just know that printf, for instance, 但現在,只知道 該printf的,例如, is among the functions that have been declared in some other file, somewhere 是其中已被功能 在其他文件中聲明,在某處 else on the cloud's hard drive that allows us to access printf and use it 否則雲計算的硬盤驅動器上 允許我們訪問printf和使用 without having to reinvent that wheel ourselves. 而不必重新發明 那個輪子自己。 Meanwhile, main. 同時,主要的。 What was the analog of main, last week? 什麼是主要的,上週的模擬? Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: Green flag is clicked. >> 觀眾:綠旗點擊。 >> DAVID J MALAN: Yeah. >> 大衛·馬蘭:是的。 Scratch's, when green flag clicked. 划痕的,當綠旗點擊。 It's like the puzzle piece that kicks things off. 這就像一塊拼圖 該踢東西了。 And so similarly, did the world decided some years ago that in C, 所以同樣,做世界 幾年前的決定C, and a bunch of other languages, if you want to write a program, 和一堆其他語言, 如果你想編寫一個程序, your first function has to be called, main. 你的第一個功能 已被調用,主。 And it has to look like this. 而且它有看起來像這樣。 But we'll come back, another time, to what, int, 但是,我們會回來的, 另一次,是什麼,INT, and, void, mean in that context. 並且,無效的,意味著在這方面。 For now, the curly braces are kind of like Scratch's puzzle piece shape 就目前而言,花括號樣 像划痕的拼圖形狀 that encapsulates some number of lines. 它封裝線的一些數字。 And among on the lines here, is this one here. 而就在電線之間 在這裡,這是一個在這裡。 printf is a function whose purpose in life is to print a formatted string. printf的是,其目的在一個函數 生活是打印的格式化字符串。 And by formatted, I mean you can plug in placeholder values, 而到格式化的,我的意思是你 可以在佔位符值堵塞, and you can specify how many decimal points, how many numbers to print 你可以指定多個小數 點,有多少數字打印 after a decimal point and the like. 後一個小數點等。 And printf, of course, takes one or more arguments or parameters, 和printf,當然,需要一個 以上參數或參數, otherwise known, more simply, as inputs. 否則已知的,更簡單地說,作為輸入。 >> So printf, like a lot of functions, takes inputs. >> 所以printf的,想了很多 函數的輸入參數。 And those inputs are embraced by the two parentheses here. 而這些輸入被接受 由兩個括號這裡。 And inside of those is one input. 而那些裡面是一個輸入。 It's a string, as we've called it, which is just a sequence of characters, 這是一個字符串,因為我們已經把它稱為, 這是一個字符的只是一個序列, like a word, or a phrase, or a whole essay even, in between double quotes. 像一個字,或短語,或整個 文章甚至在雙引號之間。 And that's what's going to influence the behavior of printf because, of course, 這就是發生了什麼事情來影響 當然,printf的行為,因為, it's just a generic print function. 它只是一個普通的打印功能。 It's not going to know what to print, unless you tell it. 它不會知道是什麼 打印,除非你告訴它。 And then, some minutiae. 然後,一些細枝末節。 What did we say this weird sequence of symbols is? 那麼,我們能說這個奇怪 的符號序列是? Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: New line. >> 觀眾:新行。 >> DAVID J MALAN: New line. >> 大衛·馬蘭:新行。 So it turns out, you can't just hit, enter, when you're writing the program. 所以,事實證明,你不能只打, 進入,當你寫的程序。 Generally, the compiler is going to get a little confused as to what you mean. 通常,編譯器是會得到 有點困惑,你的意思。 Rather, you have to literally say, give me a new line here. 相反,你必須從字面上 說,給我一個新的生產線在這裡。 And so /n is what we generally call an escape character. 所以/ N是我們一般 調用一個轉義字符。 So n, for new line. 因此n,新線路。 And the compiler knows that when it sees /n, 而編譯器知道 當它看到/ N, it should actually induce the computer, ultimately, or printf, in this case, 它實際上應該誘導計算機, 最終,或printf,在這種情況下, to print out an actual new line, like hitting the, enter, 打印出一個新的實際 行,像打了,進入, key on your keyboard. 鍵盤上的鍵。 And lastly, what did we say this piece of syntax is for? 最後,做什麼我們說 這一塊的語法是什麼? What does it represent? 這是什麼代表什麼呢? Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: [INAUDIBLE] >> 觀眾:[聽不清] >> DAVID J MALAN: It's just the end of the line. >> 大衛·馬蘭:這只是 該行的末尾。 It's the end of the statement. 它是語句的末尾。 And realize that we don't put them everywhere. 並認識到我們不 把它們無處不在。 We certainly don't put them at the ends of every line. 我們當然不會把他們 在每行的末端。 For instance, there's none on the first line, there's none on the line 舉例來說,有沒有對 第一行,有沒有上線 with, main, there's none after the curly braces, 有,主,有沒有 花括號後, but you'll start to see and get familiar with where it's called for. 但你會開始看到並獲得 熟悉的地方,它被稱為為。 And it's almost always after a function call or a statement, some action 它是一個功能之後幾乎總是 致電或發表聲明,一些行動 that you're actually taking. 你的確服用。 >> And know now, especially if among those less comfortable, >> 而現在知道,特別是如果 在那些不太舒服, these are the kinds of stupid things that you'll end up accidentally banging 這些都是種愚蠢的事情 你會最終不小心撞 your head against the wall over. 你的頭撞牆了。 Because you'll be logically confident in some problem 因為你會在邏輯上 相信在某些問題 you've solved for a problem set, and the damn thing just 你已經解決了問題 集,該死的東西只是 won't compile or even run. 將無法編譯,甚至運行。 And so often, early on, it's going to be because you missed a parenthesis, 所以通常情況下,在初期,它會 是因為你錯過了一個括號, or you missed a semicolon. 或者你錯過了一個分號。 And so just be mindful of these kinds of things, 所以只是留心 中,這樣的東西 and try not to get frustrated by them because very quickly does this 並盡量不要被沮喪 因為他們很快做到這一點 become old hat. 成為舊帽子。 But it's very easy to get frustrated early on, as a result. 但它很容易得到 受挫早上,作為一個結果。 >> So now, let's take a look at how this line is actually working >> 所以,現在,讓我們來看看如何 這條線是實際工作 and then look at a slightly more complicated one. 再看看一個稍微 更複雜的之一。 So we have over here, the ability to draw on this screen. 所以我們在這裡,在 能夠得出這樣的屏幕上。 And let's suppose that this is my computer screen, 讓我們假設 這是我的電腦屏幕, but I am writing the, hello program, and I have not implemented, printf. 但我寫的,你好程序, 而我還沒有實現,printf的。 Someone else has implemented, printf. 別人已經實施,printf的。 Who would like to claim to have implemented, printf? 誰願意自稱 已經實施了,printf的? If we may? 如果我們可能嗎? All right, what's your name? 好吧,你叫什麼名字? >> STUDENT 1: [? Copal. ?] >> 學生1:[?柯巴。 ?] >> DAVID J MALAN: Copal, come on up. >> 大衛·馬蘭:Copal的,拜託了。 Come on up. 上來吧。 All right. 好的。 So we have, here, some name tags, since we'll make a little game of this. 因此,我們有,在這裡,一些名稱標籤, 因為我們會做出這樣的小遊戲。 And we will call you, printf. 我們會打電話給你,printf的。 And if you want to come over here, what I've just drawn on the screen, 如果你想要到這裡來, 我剛剛在屏幕上繪製, it's quite simply, there's me, this. 這是相當簡單的,還有我,這。 >> All right, so, hello my name is, printf, if you'd like to put that on. >> 所有的權利,所以,你好我的名字是, printf的,如果你想要把那。 All right. 好的。 And if you can go stand by the computer screen 如果你可以去展台 通過在計算機屏幕 as though you are the function that came with this computer system. 就好像你是功能 來到這個計算機系統。 And your purpose in life is to actually print something. 而你的人生目標是 實際打印的東西。 But much like the program we just had on the screen, here, 但是,就像節目我們 剛剛在屏幕上,在這裡, we're going to have to actually give you some input. 我們將不得不 實際上給你一些意見。 >> And so, if my input, here, is apparently, what is passed to printf, >> 所以,如果我的輸入,在這裡, 顯然,什麼是傳遞給printf, let's kind of mock it up like this. 讓我們種的譏笑它是這樣的。 I'm going to literally write on a piece of paper, "hello, world," 我將字面上寫上 一張紙,“你好,世界” backslash N. And to be clear, what I've just drawn on this piece of paper, 反斜線N.而且要明確,什麼樣 我剛剛畫在這張紙上, looks like this. 看起來是這樣的。 So when I run this program, and this yellow line of code gets executed, 所以,當我運行這個程序,而這 代碼黃線被執行, it's as though I, the hello program, am handing some input off to a function 就好像我,hello程序, 我交給一些輸入開了一個功能 that someone else wrote. 別人寫的。 >> And if you, with your finger, could actually, with your finger, >> 如果你與你的手指, 居然可以,用你的手指, draw on the screen whatever it is you have been handed, 在屏幕上繪製什麼 這是你一直在流傳, the effect, ultimately, is to see exactly that, on the screen. 的效果,最終,是 看到正是這樣,在屏幕上。 And a Little corner case here. 和一個小角落的情況下在這裡。 And good, we shouldn't see the, new line, at this point. 而良好的,我們不應該看到 的,新線,在這一點上。 It would be incorrect for you to explicitly draw the newline. 這將是不正確的你 明確地得出新行。 But if we kept writing words on the screen, they would end up below that. 但是,如果我們不停地寫上的字 屏幕上,他們最終會低於。 >> So thank you very much, but stick around here for just one moment. >> 所以,非常感謝你,但堅持 這裡只是一個瞬間各地。 We now need one other volunteer, if we could, 我們現在需要一個其他 志願者,如果我們能, that's going to need to play the role of-- It's only people in the orchestra 那將需要發揮的作用 of--這只是人們在樂團 right now. 現在。 How about-- OK. 如何about--確定。 Right here. 就在這裡。 Come on up. 上來吧。 What's your name? 你叫什麼名字? >> STUDENT 2: [? Ivay. ?] >> 學生2:[? Ivay。 ?] DAVID J MALAN: Sorry? 大衛·馬蘭:對不起? STUDENT 2: [? Ivay. ?] 學生2:[? Ivay。 ?] DAVID J MALAN: Ethan, come on up. 大衛·馬蘭:阮經天,上來吧。 No? 沒有? Did I get that wrong, even after you said it twice? 難道我得到的錯誤,甚至 你說了兩遍之後? Come on up. 上來吧。 It's hard to hear up here. 這是很難聽到了這裡。 OK. 確定。 And I'm sorry, what's your name? 我很抱歉,你叫什麼名字? >> STUDENT 2: [? Ivay. ?] >> 學生2:[? Ivay。 ?] >> [? DAVID J MALAN: Ivay. ?] OK. >> [?大衛·馬蘭:Ivay。 ?]確定。 For now, if you don't mind, you are GetString. 現在,如果你不 心,你的GetString。 >> STUDENT 2: OK. >> 學生2:確定。 Cool. 酷。 DAVID J MALAN: So if you would like to stand here for just a moment, 大衛·馬蘭:所以,如果你想 站在這裡只是一瞬間, let's take a look at a slightly more complex program, that 讓我們來看看一個稍微 更複雜的程序,即 now has three lines of code. 現在有三行代碼。 So we have, one, state your name using printf; two, a call to GetString, 因此,我們有,其一,說明用你的名字 printf的;二,一個電話給GetString, followed by an assignment to a variable called, string s, or called s; 隨後分配到一個 變量調用,字符串s,或稱為S; and then another call to, printf, but this time with two inputs. 然後再次調用,printf的, 但是這次使用兩個輸入。 >> So we've already done state your name, or rather, we've >> 因此,我們已經做狀態 你的名字,或者更確切地說,我們已經 already done a printf call. 已經做了printf的電話。 So I'm going to write, State your name. 所以我會寫,說出你的名字。 And so, what I'm going to pass, printf, in just a moment, 所以,有什麼我要去 通,printf的,在短短的時刻, is quite simply, this. 是很簡單,這一點。 So if you want to go ahead and draw this on the screen, that's your input now. 所以,如果你想繼續前進,得出這樣的 在屏幕上,這是現在你的輸入。 All right. 好的。 And forget string, we now have our own line of code here. 而忘記字符串,我們現在有 我們自己的行代碼在這裡。 So in, GetString, we need to actually call, GetString. 所以,GetString的,我們需要 實際調用,GetString的。 So your purpose in life is to just walk out into the orchestra, if you could, 所以,你的人生目標是只走 外面的樂團,如果你能, and get someone's name. 並得到某人的名字。 But let's give you something to put it on. 但是,讓我們給你 東西把它。 If you want to, go ahead and get a string, 如果你想,去 進取,得到一個字符串, get someone's name on that piece of paper, if you could. 得到某人的名字上 一張紙,如果你能。 >> All right. >> 好的。 And we'll see, in just a moment, whose name we're getting. 我們將看到,在短短的時刻, 他的名字我們得到。 Meanwhile, what I'm going to have ready, is a blank piece 同時,我所要 有現成的,是一張空白 of paper, in which, I'm going to store whatever value it 紙,其中,我要去 存儲任何值它 is that GetString is returning to me, I, being a string variable called, s. 是,GetString的是返回給我, 我,作為一個所謂的字符串變量,S。 All right. 好的。 So what do you have here? 所以,你有什麼嗎? Nik. 聶。 All right. 好的。 So we have Nik's name here. 因此,我們有聶的名字在這裡。 So this is what literally has been returned 因此,這是字面上 已返回 to me, so to speak, by GetString. 對我來說,可以這麼說,通過GetString的。 >> I, now, am going to execute the left-hand side >> 我,現在,我準備 執行左手側 of that expression, where I simply copy down, for today's purposes, Nik. 那表情,在這裡我簡單的 抄下來,今天的目的,聶。 So now, I have a variable called, s, storing Nik's name. 所以,現在,我有一個變量 所謂,S,存儲聶的名字。 I've already handed to printf, a previous argument. 我已經交給 printf的,以前的說法。 But in our third and final line of code, I actually have to hand printf 但是,在我們的第三個,也是最後的行 代碼,我實際上是手的printf something a little different-- "hello, %s," backslash n. 東西有點different-- “你好,%S,”反斜線ñ。 >> And so the last line I'm going to send-- the last thing I'm >> 這樣一來,最後一行我要去 到send--的最後一件事,我 going to write down now, is this. 要現在寫下來,是這樣的。 So the two lines of code, or rather the last line of code, 所以兩行代碼,或 而代碼的最後一行, calls for two inputs-- one, this, and two, this. 要求兩inputs-- 之一,這和兩個,這一點。 So if our printf function can now take these as input, 所以,如果我們的printf函數 現在可以把這些作為輸入, let me clear the screen for you. 讓我清除屏幕為您服務。 Actually no, you can go ahead. 其實也沒什麼,你可以繼續。 We'll leave it up, since it's on the same program. 我們會離開它,因為 它是在相同的程序。 We should see, hello, Nik. 我們應該看到,你好,聶。 All right. 好的。 So this was quite a few hoops to jump through, just 因此,這是相當多的 箍跳通過,只 to write, state your name, and, hello, Nik. 寫,說明你的 名稱和,你好,聶。 But this simple idea of message passing, of input passing and output receiving, 但消息傳遞的這個簡單的想法, 輸入的傳球和輸出接收的, is exactly the model we're going to have for even the most complex functions. 正是我們將不得不模型 即使是最複雜的功能。 So thank you so much to you both. 所以,謝謝你這麼多,你倆。 We have a lovely stress ball here for you. 我們有一個可愛的壓力 球在這裡為你。 And thank you to our GetString and printf volunteers alike. 謝謝你對我們的GetString 和printf志願者的一致好評。 Thank you. 謝謝。 All right. 好的。 Thank you to you both. 謝謝你們。 >> So we've been talking about thus far, mostly about strings. >> 因此,我們一直在談論 迄今為止,大部分是關於串。 And it turns out that C can actually understand a few different data types. 而事實證明,C能實際 了解幾個不同的數據類型。 In fact, let's take a look at these here. 事實上,讓我們 一起來看看這些在這裡。 So C, and a lot of languages, understand things called chars. 因此,C,和很多語言, 認識事物稱為字符。 A char is generally a single byte, or eight bits. 一個char通常一個是 單字節或8位。 And it represents a single character, like the letter A, or the capital 它代表一個字符, 像字母A或資本 letter A, or the lowercase letter A, or an exclamation point, 字母A,或小寫字母 A,或感嘆號, or any character that you can type on your keyboard, and sometimes even more. 或任何字符,你可以鍵入 你的鍵盤,有時甚至更多。 We also happen to see floats. 我們也碰巧看到彩車。 A float is, generally, a 32-bit value, or four bytes 浮子是,一般情況下, 32位值,或四個字節 because again, one byte is eight bits. 因為再次,一個字節是8比特。 >> So a float is a floating point value, something with a decimal point. >> 所以一個float是一個浮點值, 大一些的小數點。 And indeed, that's what the movie was talking 事實上,這就是 這部電影是說 about when they spoke about floating point values, some fixed number of bits ,當他們談到浮動 點值,一些固定位的數目 being used to represent a real number. 被用於表示一個實數。 But there's also things called doubles. 但也有東西叫做雙打。 These exist in Java, if you've taken APCS, 這些存在於Java中, 如果你已經採取了APCS, and a double, as the name thankfully suggests, is twice as big as a float. 和雙,正如其名字令人欣慰 顧名思義,是兩次大如浮動。 It's still a real number, it just has more bits 它仍然是一個實數, 它只是有更多的位 with which to be ever more precise, or to store even larger numbers. 與要更加精確, 或存儲更大的數字。 int is easy. int是容易的。 We talked about that last time. 我們談到了這最後的時間。 It's just an integer. 這只是一個整數。 And it's generally 32 bits, or four bytes. 而且它是一般32 位,或四個字節。 >> And so, if you have, let's see now, 32 bits-- and we did this in week 0, >> 所以,如果你有,我們現在看到的, 32 bits--我們0週這樣做, ever so briefly-- if you have 32 bits, what's the biggest 曾經如此briefly--,如果您有 32位,什麼是最大的 number you can represent as an integer? 數可以表示為一個整數? Give or take? 給予或採取? It's like 4 billion, and that's only if we're 這樣4十億, 而這只有當我們 representing positive numbers only. 僅代表正數。 If you have 32 bits, and you want to represent negative numbers as well, 如果你有32位,並且要 表示負數為好, your range is, essentially, negative 2 billion to positive 2 billion. 你的範圍是,從本質上講,負 2十億轉正2十億。 But generally, we'll start at 0 go up to 4 billion. 但是總體來說,我們將開始 在0升至4十億。 >> You don't have to know precisely, but we can see this, in fact, if I just >> 你不必準確地知道,但 我們可以看到這一點,事實上,如果我只是 open up a little calculator, here. 開了一個小計算器,點擊這裡。 I can do 2 the 32, and that's exactly how big, 我可以做2的32,和 這正是有多大, how many values you can represent, with 32 bits. 有多少價值,你可以 表示,具有32位。 And it's roughly 4 billion. 而且它的約4十億。 So we'll keep seeing that number in a few different places. 因此,我們會繼續看到這個數字 在幾個不同的地方。 But if you need longer numbers than that, 但是如果你需要更長的 數比, it turns out there's something called a long long. 原來有 一些所謂的很長很長。 And a long long is generally 64 bits, which 而一個很長很長的 通常64位,這 means it's an order of magnitude even bigger than an int. 意味著它是一個數量級 比int更大。 >> So I can't even pronounce the biggest number that you can represent, >> 所以,我甚至不能發音最大 你可以代表數字, but it's markedly bigger. 但它明顯更大。 Now as an aside, historically, if an int is 32 bits, 現在,順便說一句,從歷史上看, 如果一個int是32位, and a long long is 64 bits, how big is a long, not a long long? 和很長很長為64位,怎麼樣 大是一個長期的,而不是一個很長很長? You'd think it's longer than an int but maybe less long than a long long, 你會認為這是比int長 但也許少長不是很長很長, but it actually depends. 但它實際上依賴。 >> And so it turns out one of the frustrations too, >> 所以它變成一顆顆 過的挫折, with writing code on certain systems, is that not all of these data types 對某些系統編寫代碼, 是,並不是所有的這些數據類型的 have pre-determined values. 有預先確定的值。 Sometimes it's this many bits. 有時候,這多少位。 Sometimes it's that many bits. 有時候,很多位。 So you actually have to know, sometimes, what hardware 所以,你居然要知道, 有時,哪些硬件 you're running your software on. 您正在運行的軟件。 Thankfully, other languages and other data types that now exist, 值得慶幸的是,其他語言和 現在還存在著其他的數據類型, allow you to be more precise. 讓您更精確。 Well, we saw string, and we saw bool, too, 好了,我們看到的字符串, 而我們看到的布爾也 but it turns out those come only with the CS50 library. 但事實證明,這些都 只與CS50庫。 So those are not built into C. Those instead, 因此,那些不建 到C.這些替代, come in that file called CS50.h, that we'll eventually 進來叫該文件 CS50.h,我們最終會 peel back the layers of. 剝開的層。 But for now, they're just additional data types. 但現在,他們只是 附加數據類型。 A bool is a true or false, and a string is a sequence of characters, 一個布爾值是真還是假,和 串是字符序列, like a word. 就像一個字。 Now printf, we've seen, has placeholders, %s is one. 現在printf的,我們已經看到,有 佔位符,%S就是其中之一。 And you might be able, to now, infer from these other examples, how 你也許可以,到現在為止, 從這些其它實例中,如何推斷 you could have a placeholder for different data types. 你可以有一個佔位符 對於不同的數據類型。 For instance, take a guess, if you wanted to print out a single char using 例如,以此來猜測,如果你 想使用打印出單個字符 printf, the placeholder is probably %c. printf的,佔位符大概%C。 And if you want to print out an integer with the placeholder, %i. 如果你想打印出 整數的佔位符,%我。 %lld is a long long decimal value, but long long, so that maps to that. %LLD是一個很長很長的十進制值, 但很長很長,所以映射到這一點。 And then %f for floating point value or for a double, 然後%f浮點 點值或雙, so sometimes they're re-used in different contexts. 所以有時候他們重新使用 在不同的上下文。 So we'll see and use some of those over time. 所以我們會看到和使用 其中一些隨著時間的推移。 And printf and other functions also support others' escape sequences, 和printf等功能也 支持別人的轉義序列, and sometimes, these are necessary. 有時,這些都是必要的。 So backslash n is a new line. 所以反斜杠n是一個新的生產線。 Backslash t, does anyone want to take a stab? 反斜杠T,沒有任何人 要採取刺? AUDIENCE MEMBER: Tab. 觀眾:標籤。 DAVID J MALAN: Tab. 大衛·馬蘭:標籤。 So if you actually want to print out a tab, not 所以,如果你真的想 打印出標籤,而不是 a fixed number of spaces but an actual tab character, you don't hit your, 的空間的固定號碼,但實際的 製表符,你不打你, tab, key on the keyboard, generally, you actually do backslash t. 標籤上,在鍵盤上鍵,通常, 你其實反斜杠噸。 Backslash double quote, why would I ever want that? 反斜杠雙引號, 為什麼我會永遠想的? Right? 對嗎? Why can't I just type a double quote on my keyboard? 為什麼我不能只是輸入 我的鍵盤上雙引號? AUDIENCE MEMBER: Because, otherwise, it's 觀眾: 因為,否則,它是 going to think it's the end of like your print [? text. ?] 會認為這是結束 對喜歡您的打印[?文本。 ?] >> DAVID J MALAN: Exactly. >> 大衛·馬蘭:沒錯。 Remember, with our printf examples, when we 請記住,我們的 printf的例子,當我們 were passing to printf in input, on the left of that input string 被傳遞的輸入對printf, 在該輸入字符串的左 and on the right of that input spring, of course, was a double quote. 並在該輸入的右 春天,當然,是一個雙引號。 If your own input has a double quote in the middle of that, 如果你自己輸入有雙重 報價在中間的那個, the computer might potentially get confused, as to, 計算機可能潛在地 感到困惑,因為到, does this double quote belong in the middle? 這是否雙引號 屬於中間? Does it belong with the left one? 它是否與左邊的歸屬? Does it belong with the right one? 是否有一個正確的歸屬? And so, if you want to make it super clear, you do backslash double quote, 所以,如果你想使超 明確的,你做的反斜線雙引號, so that it's escaped, so to speak, and it's not conflated for something else. 因此,它的逃脫了,可以這麼說,和 它不是混為一談別的東西。 And there's a few others here, backslash r, single quotes, 0, 而且還有其他幾個人在這裡, 反斜線R,單引號,0, that we may see over time, as well. 我們可以看到隨著時間的推移,以及。 And now, what about functions? 而現在,怎麼樣的功能呢? >> So actions that we can take thus far in this language, C, well, we've seen, >> 這樣我們就可以採取迄今的行動 在這種語言,C,好了,我們已經看到, printf, of course, and all of the others on the screen, printf的,當然,所有的 屏幕上的其他人的, here, that we'll use for the course's first few weeks only, 在這裡,我們將使用的 當然第一個只有少數幾個星期, come when the CS50 library. 來當CS50庫。 And they make it much easier, in C, to actually get user input. 他們能夠更容易,在 C,實際獲取用戶輸入。 It turns out that in C, and frankly in a few languages, 事實證明,在C和 坦率地說在幾種語言, it's a real pain in the neck to do something simple, like prompt the user 它在脖子上做一個真正的痛苦 簡單的東西,比如提示用戶 for keyboard, for his or her input. 為鍵盤,為他或她的輸入。 And so these functions make it easier. 所以,這些功能更容易。 >> And it also has error checking throughout, >> 它也有錯誤 在整個檢查, so that, when you recall on Wednesday, we 這樣一來,當你 記得上週三,我們 saw the, retry, warning, when I didn't cooperate, 看到了,重試,警告, 當我不配合, and I typed a word, instead of a number? 而我輸入一個字,而不是數字? We've done the heavy lifting early on to make sure the user cooperates. 我們早做了繁重 在確保用戶合作。 But these are just training wheels that we will eventually, 但這些都只是培訓 車輪,我們將最終, and quickly, take off. 並迅速,起飛。 >> So to recap, then, let's take a quick look, >> 因此,要回顧一下,然後, 讓我們快速瀏覽一下, much like we did with Scratch, at some canonical constructs in C. 就像我們有划痕,在沒有 C.在一些典型結構 This is meant to, sort of, be a whirlwind tour, 這是為了,排序 的,是一個旋風之旅, just so that you have a reference and that you've seen things at first. 只是讓你有一個參考 那你首先看到的東西。 But then we'll look at actual coding use some of these building blocks. 但是,我們來看看實際的編碼 使用其中的一些積木。 So much like in Scratch, when we had statements like, 所以,就像在刮, 當我們已經報表喜歡, say or, wait, in C, we do have functions as well, like printf. 或者說,等待,在C,我們確實有 功能以及,如printf。 >> If we want to express a condition in C, it's similar, in spirit, >> 如果我們想表達的條件 在C,它是類似的,在精神上, to that puzzle piece that looked like this in Scratch. 該拼圖的 看起來是這樣的划痕。 But instead, we literally just write, if. 但是相反,我們 從字面上只寫,如果。 And then, in parentheses, we put a condition, 然後,在括號 我們把一個條件, where that condition is what we'll call, again, a boolean expression. 其中,該條件是我們將 打電話,再次,一個布爾表達式。 And again, this is sort of pseudocode. 再次,這是有點偽的。 And, in fact, the // is a comment. 而且,事實上,//是註釋。 It's just English words to myself. 這只是英語單詞我自己。 But this is the general structure of an, if, condition. 但是,這是一般 的一個,如果,條件結構。 But we'll see concrete examples in just a moment. 但是,我們會看到具體的 例子在短短的時刻。 >> If you want to have a two-way fork in the road, >> 如果你想有一個 兩路的岔路口, much like we did with our volunteer on Wednesday, you can have an, else if. 就像我們與我們的志願者在做 週三,你可以有一個,否則,如果。 And if you want to have a third and final condition, or default situation, 如果你想有一個第三和 最後一個條件,或者默認的情況下, you can have just an else block, there. 你可以只是一個其他塊,還有。 And similarly, with boolean expressions, you can, and, them together. 同樣,用布爾表達式, 你可以,而且,它們在一起。 And we saw on Wednesday, that it's not a single ampersand, 而且我們看到在週三,即 它不是一個單一的符號, it's two, for lower-level reasons that we'll eventually see and play with. 它的2,為低級別的原因 我們最終會看到和發揮。 Or-ing things together is 2 vertical bars. 的OR-ing的東西放在一起 是2豎條。 On a US keyboard, this is generally a key 根據美國的鍵盤,這 通常是一個關鍵 with the Shift key above your Enter key or Return key. 與上面的Shift鍵 您的Enter鍵或Return鍵。 >> Then there's these things that we'll use maybe once or twice. >> 此外,還有這些東西 我們將使用也許一次或兩次。 They are functionally equivalent to what you can do with an, if, else if, 它們是功能上等同於 你可以用做的,如果,否則,如果, else if else, construct, but they're called a switch. 否則,如果其他人,建設, 但他們稱為交換機。 They look very different, but we'll see in some of our distribution code, 他們看起來非常不同,但我們會 看到我們的一些分配代碼, for a future problem set, most likely, that it's sometimes just a prettier 對於未來的習題集,最有可能的, 它有時只是一個漂亮 way of expressing a whole bunch of conditions, 表達一個整體的方式 一堆條件, without having a lot of curly braces and a lot of parentheses and indentation. 無需大量的花括號和 很多括號和縮進的。 But they give us no more power than we have already. 但他們給我們沒有更多的 功率比我們已經。 And now loops. 現在循環。 And this one, we'll look at a little more slowly. 而這其中,我們來看看 在慢一點。 But then, we'll start to use these, especially for those already familiar. 但隨後,我們將開始使用這些, 特別是對於那些已經熟悉。 This is the canonical way, if incredibly arcane way, to write a loop in C. 這是規範的方式,如果難以置信 神秘的方式,用C編寫一個循環 >> Now a loop in Scratch was pretty straightforward. >> 現在,在划痕一個循環是 很簡單。 You have a, forever, block. 你有一個,永遠塊。 You have a, repeat, block with just a number you have to type in. 你有一個,重複,塊與 只是一個數字,你必須輸入內容。 And with the, for loop, you can implement both of those ideas, 而伴隨著,for循環,可以 同時實現這些想法, but it's a little more technical. 但它是一個多一點的技術。 But frankly, it's also relatively simple. 但坦率地說,這也是 相對簡單。 Once you know the order of operations, you literally 一旦你知道的順序 操作,你從字面上 are just going to plug in values and tell the computer what to do. 只是要在價值觀堵塞 並告訴計算機做什麼。 So here's an example. 因此,這裡有一個例子。 This is a loop that, quite simply, counts from one number up 這是一個循環的是,相當 簡單地說,從一個人數多達計算 through another. 通過另一個。 And just by glancing at it, even if you have 而就掃一眼 它,即使你有 no prior experience with this language, what number 沒有以往的經驗 這種語言,什麼號碼 does it probably start counting at? 它可能開始計數? OK, 0. OK,0。 And I'm guessing that's because you see that there's an int and an i, 我猜那是因為你 看到有一個int和我, which is a variable. 這是一個變量。 It's initialized to 0. 它初始化為0。 >> And then later, it looks like we're passing printf, a value. >> 再後來,它看起來像 我們傳遞的printf,一個值。 And, in fact, I made a little typo here. 而且,事實上,我在這裡做一個小錯字。 But that's easily fixed. 但是,這容易固定。 Let me add in ,i here. 我要補充的,我在這裡。 We now have printf being passed that placeholder value. 我們現在有printf的存在 通過該佔位符值。 And what's going to count up through? 這有什麼經歷來算呢? AUDIENCE: 50. 聽眾:50。 50. 50。 49. 49。 DAVID J MALAN: 49. 大衛·馬蘭:49。 So 50, at first glance, seems right. 所以50,乍一看,似乎是正確的。 But that, it turns out, is going to be our condition that we keep checking. 但是,事實證明,將是 我們的條件,我們繼續檢查。 And we're going to stop once i is no longer less than 50. 而且我們要停止一次 i是不再小於50。 So this loop, conversely, should execute, so long as i is less than 50. 所以這個循環中,反之,應 執行,只要i小於50。 But as soon as it becomes 50, or 51, or worse, it should stop automatically. 但只要它變為50,或51, 或者更糟,它應該自動停止。 All right. 好的。 >> So what actually happens here? >> 那麼究竟是什麼發生在這裡? So this is the order of operations for a loop. 因此,這是秩序 操作為一個循環。 One, you have the so-called initialization. 一,你有 所謂初始化。 This yellow highlighted chunk of code is executed first, 這種黃色高亮塊 代碼首先執行, and it has the effect that, per Wednesday, you probably imagine. 並且它有一個,每效果 週三,你可能想像。 It creates a variable called i and it stores in that variable the value 0. 它創建了一個名為i和它的變量 在變量存儲值0。 So i is 0 at this point in the story. 所以i為0,在這一點上的故事。 >> The next thing that happens in this construct, >> 接下來的事情, 發生在這個結構, is that the condition gets checked. 是該條件被檢查。 So I check immediately, is i less than 50? 於是我立即檢查, 為i小於50? And of course, the answer for now is, surely, yes. 當然,答案 現在來看,毫無疑問,是的。 Yes, because i is 0, and that's surely less than 50. 是的,因為我是0, 這是肯定小於50。 Then what happens, is that this line of code gets executed. 然後發生了什麼,是這 行代碼被執行。 And in fact, if there's multiple lines of code in those curly braces, 而事實上,如果有多個 的代碼中的那些大括號線, they all get executed one after another. 他們都得到執行此起彼伏。 >> And in the effect here, is apparently, to print out >> 並且在這裡的效果,是 顯然,打印出 the number i, which is going to be 0, and then 1, and then 2. 的編號i,這是會 為0,然後1,然後2。 But why? 但是,為什麼? Why does it get incremented? 它為什麼會得到增加? Well, the fourth thing that happens is that this syntax 那麼,第四件事, 碰巧的是,這個語法 gets executed, after the semicolon. 被執行,分號之後。 i++ is a shorthand way of saying; take the value of i, and add 1 to it; 我++是一個說速記的方式; 取的i的值,並把它加1; and then the next time around, add 1 to it; and the next time around, 再下一次,加 1到它;而下一次, add 1 to it. 其加1。 >> So if we keep going, what's going to happen >> 因此,如果我們繼續下去, 什麼會發生 next is I'm not going to initialize i ever again. 接下來就是我不打算 以後再初始化我。 If I kept initializing i to 0, this example 如果我一直在初始化 i到0,本實施例 would never end because i would be stuck at 0. 永遠不會結束,因為 我會停留在0。 But what is going to happen is that the condition will be checked, 但什麼事情發生是 該條件將被檢查, the line of code will get executed, the i will be incremented, 該行代碼會被執行, 在我將增加, condition will be checked, code will get executed. 條件將被檢查, 代碼會被執行。 And it kept cycling again, and again, and again, 它再次保持騎自行車, 又一次,又一次, until i++ induces a value of 50. 直到我++誘導值50。 >> The condition then says, is 50 less than 50? >> 條件接著說, 比50 50少了呢? The answer, of course, is no, and so the whole code stops executing. 當然,答案是否定的, 所以整個代碼停止執行。 And if you have more code on the screen down below, that's what happens next. 如果你有在屏幕上更多的代碼 向下跌破,那接下來會發生什麼。 It pops out of these curly braces and continues to print more after that. 它彈出來,這些花括號和 繼續打印後更多。 >> So a joke now, from FoxTrot, that you'll perhaps now understand. >> 所以,現在開個玩笑,從狐步舞,那 你也許現在明白了。 It's always funny. 它總是有趣的。 It's like the chuckles kind of percolate, 這就像笑 樣的過濾, and then you realize you shouldn't be laughing at humor like this. 然後你意識到你不應該 是笑的幽默是這樣。 But there is some takeaway here, pedagogically, too. 但是,有一些外賣 在這裡,教學法,太。 So it turns out that I'm missing a piece of syntax, 所以,事實證明,我 缺了一塊的語法, or FoxTrot's missing a piece of syntax here. 或狐步舞的失踪 一塊語法在這裡。 What's missing, that we've had in every other example, thus far? 現在缺少的,我們已經有 在每一個其他實施例,從而多遠? Return, is there, so that's something else, 返回,在那裡,所以 這是別的東西, that we'll come back to before long. 我們再回過頭來不久。 What's missing, though? 缺少了什麼有關係嗎? Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: The initialization of [INAUDIBLE]. >> 觀眾:該 初始化[聽不清]。 >> DAVID J MALAN: OK. >> 大衛·馬蘭:OK。 So yeah. 所以呀。 So actually, this is-- Well, and count is initialized 所以實際上,這個is--嘛, 和計數初始化 up above, or rather, declared up above. 上述起來,或者說,上述宣布了起來。 So this is another way of doing it. 因此,這是做的另一種方式。 But not in one line it's valid though. 但不是在一條線是有效的,但。 How about here? 怎麼在這裡? >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: Is it the curly braces? >> 觀眾:是不是大括號? >> DAVID J MALAN: Yeah. >> 大衛·馬蘭:是的。 So the curly braces are missing. 因此,大括號丟失。 But this code, I mean, to their credit, is actually, syntactically valid. 但是這個代碼,我的意思是,他們的信用, 實際上,語法上有效。 It turns out, you don't need the curly braces 事實證明,你不 需要花括號 if you only have one line of code that you want to execute inside of the loop. 如果你只有一行代碼 要在循環內執行。 Now we always, in class and in all of our distribution code, 現在我們總是在課堂上和 我們所有的分銷代碼, include the curly braces anyway, just for clarity's sake. 包括大括號 無論如何,僅僅是為了清楚起見。 But realize that in textbooks and online examples, 但要意識到,在教科書 和網上的例子, you may very well see curly braces missing sometime. 你很可能看到大 牙套有時失踪。 And that's OK, if what you have indented and intended 這沒關係,如果你 已經縮進和預期 is just a single line of code, and not multiple lines of code, potentially. 是代碼只是一個單一的線,而不是 多行代碼,潛在的。 All right. 好的。 So related to the issue of imprecision, is an issue of overflow, 所以相關的問題 不精確,溢出的問題, in the sense that, similarly, do integers have limits to them 在這個意義上,類似地, 確實整數必須限制他們 just like floating point values? 就像浮點值? In the world a floating point values, we can only be so precise, 在世界上的浮點 價值觀,我們只能是如此精確, after which, sometimes bad things can happen, 在此之後,有時 不好的事情都可能發生, and our programs can be buggy and error. 而我們的方案可以是越野車和錯誤。 Now even with integers, you can run into problems. 現在,即使是整數, 你會遇到的問題。 Now an integer doesn't have a decimal point or numbers after it. 現在的整數不具有 小數點或之後的數字。 It's just a natural number, typically. 它只是一個自然數,一般。 So what could go wrong with an int? 那麼,什麼可以去錯了一個int? If I'm using an int to count, what could go wrong? 如果我用一個int來 計數,有什麼可以去錯了嗎? Seems a lot simpler. 似乎簡單了很多。 Yeah. 是啊。 >> AUDIENCE MEMBER: If the number gets [INAUDIBLE] >> 觀眾:如果 數字變[聽不清] >> DAVID J MALAN: Yeah. >> 大衛·馬蘭:是的。 What if you count so high, that you can't express that really big number. 如果算上如此之高,你有什麼 無法用語言表達的真正的大數目。 Right? 對嗎? At some point, you're going to exceed the boundaries 在某些時候,你會 超過界限 of a 32-bit value or a 64-bit value. 的一個32位值或64位的值。 Now again, I'm not sure how to pronounce a 64-bit value, 現在,再次,我不知道怎麼樣 發音一個64位的值, but I know with a 32-bit integer, the biggest value it can be, 但我知道,有一個32位整數, 它可以是最大的值, if it's only positive values, is roughly 4 billion. 如果它是唯一積極的 值,是約4十億。 So if I try to count to 5 billion, something's going to happen. 所以,如果我嘗試數到5十億, 事情將要發生。 But let's see what, in fact, can happen. 但是,讓我們看看,其實都有可能發生。 In the world of integer overflow, where you, in a sense, 在整數世界 溢出,在那裡你,從某種意義上說, overflow the capacity of an integer, what might happen? 溢出的能力 整數,會發生什麼事情? >> So here's a binary number, it's a throwback to 0. >> 所以這裡有一個二進制數, 這是一個倒退到0。 It's all 1's, and the placeholders there, are powers of 2, 這是全1,和佔位符 在那裡,有2的冪, so this is binary. 所以這是二進制的。 So these are 8, 1 bits on the screen. 因此,這些都是8,1位在屏幕上。 And if you recall or you quickly do the math, 如果你還記得或 你快做數學題, what value is being represented here with these eight 1 bits? 什麼樣的價值正在被代表 這裡這八個1位? 255. 255。 And even if you weren't quite sure of the math, you could do it out. 即使你是不是很確定 數學的,你可以做出來。 Or you could just kind of reason through it, 或者你可以只種 原因通過它, wait a minute, if I'm representing an 8 bit value, 等一下,如果我 較8位值, and I've got 256 possible values, but the first of which is 0, 我已經得到了256個可能的值, 但其中第一是0, I just know that the biggest is going to be 255, 我只知道, 最大的將是255, and that's what this one might be. 而這正是這一個可能。 >> So suppose I try to add 1 to this value. >> 因此,假設我嘗試添加1到這個值。 What would you do in grade school when adding a 1, and it 你會在年級做 加入學校的時候1,而且 doesn't really fit because you have to carry the 1? 並不真正適合,因為 你必須隨身攜帶的1? What is this number going to become when you add 1? 這是什麼數將 當你加1變成什麼? It's going to become 0. 這將變為0。 Right? 對嗎? Because if you had more bits-- and I'll try to, kind of, type it out here-- 因為如果你有更多的bits--,我會 嘗試,種,它這裡 - 打出來 if we had more bits, what we could do here is add the 1, 如果我們有更多的位,我們 可以在這裡做的是添加1, and then we'd get this. 然後我們會得到這一點。 Whoops. 哎呦。 We'd have a 1 bit all the way over here. 我們希望有一個1位一路看過來。 >> But if this is a finite value, it's only 8 bits, >> 但是,如果這是一個有限 值,這是只有8位, and that's pre-determined by the computer, 這就是預先確定 由計算機, that 1 is effectively not there. 這1實際上是不存在的。 It just kind of falls off a cliff. 正中下懷它掉下懸崖。 And so if you add 1 to 255, what value do you apparently get? 所以,如果你添加1到255,有什麼 值你顯然得到什麼呢? 0. 0。 And so numbers accidentally, and perhaps, unintentionally, 所以意外的數字, 或許,無意間, end up wrapping around like this. 最終披著這樣。 So what can be the implication of this? 那麼什麼可以是這意味著什麼呢? Well, there's a few different things. 嗯,有一些不同的東西。 So one, it does end up looking like 0, unintentionally, 所以之一,它最終看起來 如0,無意間, but you can kind of see, even in the real world, 但你可以種看, 即使在現實世界中, for better or for worse, manifestations of this idea of a limit. 是好還是壞, 表現這種思想的限制。 For instance, any of you who have ever played Lego Star Wars, 例如,任何你誰 玩過樂高星球大戰, does anyone happen to know the maximum number of coins 沒有人知道發生 硬幣的最大數目 you can collect in Lego Star Wars? 您可以在樂高星球大戰收集? Take a guess based on today's leading questions. 以基於猜測 當今領先的問題。 It's bigger than 256 or 255. 這是大於256或255。 It's 4 billion. 它的4間十億。 So it turns out, and there's some people-- 所以,事實證明,和 有一些people-- some googling confirmed last night-- have gotten 4 billion gold coins, 一些谷歌上搜索確認最後night-- 已經得到了4個十億金幣, or whatnot, in Lego Star Wars. 或者諸如此類的東西,在樂高星球大戰。 Though apparently, there's a way to trick the game, 雖然很明顯,有 一種方法來欺騙遊戲, there's a bug or feature, that lets you just accrue lots and lots of points. 有一個錯誤或功能,可以讓你 只是累積很多很多的點。 But the largest possible value, according 但最大的可能 值,根據 to this screen shot of someone I found online, is indeed, 4 billion. 這個屏幕截圖的人,我 網上找到的,確實是,4個十億。 >> Now why is that? >> 現在,這是為什麼? It's precisely 4 billion, probably because someone decided, 這正是4個十億, 可能是因為有人決定, who was writing this game, that they could do 4 billion, 誰在寫本場比賽, 他們可以做4組十億, something, something, something, like the value I put up 什麼,什麼,什麼, 像值我忍了 with the calculator earlier, but it's just a little cleaner for humans 用計算器較早,但 它只是一個少許清潔劑對人類 to say the maximum number of coins-- or studs, 說的最大數量 的coins--或螺栓, as they call them-- that you can collect is 4 billion. 他們稱之為them--你 可以收集4十億。 And so, why is this? 所以,這是為什麼? How is the LEGO game implementing the counter 如何為樂高遊戲 實施反 that's keeping track of the number of coins you have? 那就是維持軌道的 硬幣有多少? They're using what? 他們使用的是什麼? AUDIENCE MEMBER: It stops counting after 4 billion. 觀眾:它停止 4個十億後計數。 DAVID J MALAN: It stops counting after 4 billion, 大衛·馬蘭:它停止 4個十億計數後, which means you can infer, as a programmer, 這意味著你可以 推斷,作為一個程序員, that they're probably using a 32 bit integer. 他們很可能 使用32位的整數。 Like the programmer literally just typed, int, in his or her code, 就像程序員真的只是 類型化,INT,在他或她的代碼, and that's the type of variable that they're using to store someone's code. 這就是可變的類型 他們使用存儲別人的代碼。 So there's other manifestations of these kinds of limits. 因此,有其他表現 這些類型的限制。 >> So I have not played this game-- and I was reading up on the history >> 所以,我沒有玩過這個game-- 而我讀了歷史 to confirm as much-- but in the original version of Civilization, where 確認作為much--但在 文明,那裡的原始版本 you apparently interact with each other and can wage war or have peace, 你顯然與每個互動 另外,可以發動戰爭或和平, Gandhi was supposed to be one of the most peaceful characters, as I 甘地被認為是一個 最和平的角色,因為我 understand it, in the first version of Civilization. 理解,在第一 版本文明。 And in fact, on a scale of 1 to 10, his aggressiveness was just a 1. 而事實上,在範圍為1至10, 他的侵略性只是一個1。 So ever so mildly aggressive, apparently. 所以永遠是那麼溫和 侵略性,顯然。 >> But at some point, you can apparently install democracy in your geography. >> 但是,在某些時候,你可以很明顯 在地理上安裝民主。 And if you install democracy into your version of the game, 如果你安裝的民主 到你的遊戲版本, then your aggression level goes down. 那麼你的攻擊水平下降。 It's a good thing. 這是一個很好的事情。 People are more tranquil apparently, in that situation. 人們更安靜 顯然,在這種情況下。 But apparently, someone did not have an, if, condition 但很顯然,有人做 沒有一個,如果,條件 in the original version of the code. 在代碼中的原始版本。 >> So Gandhi's aggression level went from positive 1, minus 2, to negative 1, >> 所以,甘地的侵略水平由去 正1,負2,負1, but the game doesn't understand negative numbers. 但遊戲不 了解負數。 So what happened was Gandhi's aggression level went from 1, to 0, to negative 1, 所以,事情的經過是甘地的侵略 從1級去了,到0,負1, which had the effect of wrapping around to being 這具有的效果 折回是 the most aggressive character in the game, at a value of 255, 最積極的角色 在比賽中,以255的值, on a scale of 1 to 10. 上的比例為1至10。 And since then, there's been more incarnations of this game, 從那時起,還有的是 更化身這場比賽, and they've kept it as a sort of Easter egg, 他們已經把它作為 一種復活節彩蛋的, that Gandhi is apparently so terribly aggressive. 甘地顯然是 這麼可怕的攻擊性。 But it was the result of a very simple programming error 但它是一個結果 很簡單的編程錯誤 in that very early version of the game. 在遊戲中的該非常早期版本。 >> Now more disturbingly, more recently, the Boeing 787 >> 現在更令人不安的是,多 最近,波音787 was documented as having a bug, not the kind of device 被記錄為具有 錯誤,不是那種設備 you particularly want to have a bug. 你特別想有一個bug。 And the symptoms, that I'll read here, from an article online, 且症狀,我會讀 在這裡,從網上的文章, was this, a model 787 airplane that has been powered continuously 是這樣的,一個模型787飛機 已連續供電 for 248 days can lose all alternating current, AC, 248天就失去了所有 交變電流,交流, electrical power, due to the generator control units, 電功率,由於 發電機控制單元, GCUs, simultaneously going into fail-safe mode. GCUs,同時 進入故障安全模式。 So this was a warning issued when this problem was discovered. 因此,這是發出警告 當這個問題被發現。 This condition is caused by a software counter, 這種情況是由於 通過軟件計數器, internal to the GCUs, so an integer or a variable, 內部的GCUs,所以 整數或一個變量, that will overflow after 248 days of continuous power. 248之後溢出 連續功率天。 Boeing is in the process of developing a GCU software upgrade that 波音是在過程中 開發GCU軟件升級 will remedy the unsafe condition. 將彌補的不安全狀態。 >> So much like the missile scenario, wherein >> 那麼像導彈 方案中,其中, they had some kind of variable that was counting, and counting, 他們有一些類型的變量 被計數,計數, and counting, but gradually overflowing the boundaries of its capability, 和計數,但漸漸溢滿 其能力的界限, similarly did the damn airplane have a variable overflow 同樣做了該死的飛機 具有可變的溢出 after enough time of running. 經過足夠的時間運行。 And so the tongue-in-cheek way of working around this issue 這樣一來,舌頭在臉頰的方式 解決此問題的工作 is to truly, reboot, your plane every 247 days, so that the memory gets wiped 是真正的,重新啟動,你的飛機每 247個天,使得存儲器被擦拭 and the variable goes back to 0. 和可變回到0。 But realize, this is a very large incarnation of software, 但要意識到,這是一個非常 大型化身軟件, but especially as we hear about Apple's operating systems going into cars, 但特別是當我們聽到蘋果 操作系統進入汽車, and self-driving cars from Google, and any number of incarnations of software 並從谷歌自駕車車, 任意數量的軟件的化身 in our daily lives, TVs and watches, and more, 在我們的日常生活中,電視 和手錶等, realize were surrounded by software, all of which is written by us humans. 實現由軟件所包圍, 所有這一切都寫的是我們人類。 >> And as we'll all soon discover, it's very easy and very typical >> 正如我們都會很快就會發現, 它很容易和非常典型 to make mistakes when writing software. 編寫軟件時犯錯誤。 And if you don't catch them, some bad things can happen. 如果你不抓住他們, 一些不好的事情都可能發生。 Now sometimes, some funny things can happen, 現在有時,一些 有趣的事情都可能發生, or at least sometimes we know to expect some badness. 或者至少有時候我們 知道會發生一些不良。 So 0 divided by 0, from grade school, is generally a bad thing. 因此,0除以0,從等級 學校,一般是一件壞事。 It's undefined. 這是不確定的。 And it turns out-- and let's see if my mic can pick this up-- that Apple 而事實證明out--,讓如果我們看 我的麥克風可以選擇此up--蘋果 had some fun with this recently. 曾與這一些有趣的最近。 So I have an iPhone here. 所以,我有一個iPhone在這裡。 I'm going to talk to Siri and ask her to give me the answer to 0 divided by 0. 我要談的Siri,問她 給我的答案0除以0。 What is 0 divided by 0? 什麼是0除以0? >> SIRI: Imagine that you have 0 cookies, and you split them evenly >> SIRI:假設您有0 餅乾,和你平分他們 among 0 friends. 在0朋友。 How many cookies does each person get? 多少餅乾確實每個人得到什麼呢? See? 看到了嗎? It doesn't make sense. 它沒有意義。 And Cookie Monster is sad that there are no cookies. 而且餅乾怪獸是悲哀 有沒有餅乾。 And you are sad that you have no friends. 而你傷心, 你有沒有朋友。 DAVID J MALAN: It's kind of obnoxious. 大衛·馬蘭:這是一種令人厭惡的。 So this is what was just said there. 所以這就是剛才說有。 It's indeterminate, it's not defined, and indeed, many programming languages 這是不確定的,它沒有定義, 而事實上,許多編程語言 or, really, compilers will detect when you, in a program, 或者,真的,編譯器會 當您,檢測程序, try to divide 0 by 0. 試圖除以0 0。 More fun than this though, is that apparently, Cookie Monster 更多樂趣比這雖然是 ,顯然,餅乾怪獸 is on Twitter these days. 是在Twitter上的這些日子。 And he replied to this, with this, which is absolutely adorable. 他回答了,這一點, 這是絕對可愛。 But let's take a quick look at a couple of other constructs, 但是,讓我們快速瀏覽一下 一對夫婦的其他構造, and then put some of this code to use, in good ways. 然後把一些這方面的 代碼中使用,以良好的方式。 So it turns out, besides for loops, there's 所以,事實證明,除了 對循環,有 something called a while loop, that looks different and is implemented 一種叫做while循環,即 看起來不同的,是實現 a little differently-- and we'll eventually see examples-- 一個小differently--和 我們最終會看到examples-- but in some sense, it's simpler because it 但在某種意義上, 它的簡單,因為它 doesn't allow you to initialize and update within the boundary of the loop. 不允許初始化和 環路的邊界之內更新。 You can still implement it. 你仍然可以實現它。 So you can do the exact same things with a while loop, as with a for loop, 所以,你可以做同樣的事情 與while循環,與一個for循環, but your syntax, ultimately-- as we'll eventually 但你的語法,ultimately-- 因為我們最終會 see-- is going to be different. see--將是不同的。 There's even a do while loop, which is actually a little different, 甚至還有一個do while循環,這 其實是有一點不同, in that whereas a for loop and a while loop always 在而一個for循環 和while循環總是 check their condition first, if you read this thing top to bottom, 首先檢查自己的條件,如果 你看過這個東西從上到下, it kind of looks like it's going to check it's condition last because it's 那種看起來它會 檢查它的情況最後,因為它是 truly the last line of code. 真正的最後一行代碼。 And indeed, that's going to be useful in certain programs that we write, 事實上,這將是有益的 在我們編寫某些程序, if you want to just blindly do something and eventually check the condition. 如果你想只是盲目地做一些事情 最終檢查的條件。 That's not necessarily a bad thing. 這不一定是壞事。 If we want variables, we can do it in a couple of different ways. 如果我們想要的變量,我們可以做 它在幾個不同的方式。 And we saw in the FoxTrot cartoon, one way of doing it, 而我們的狐步舞看見 卡通,做的一種方法, where you declare your variable, like int counter semicolon, 在這裡你聲明的變量, 如int計數器分號, and then later-- maybe the next line, maybe 10 lines later-- 然後later--說不定下 行,也許10線later-- you actually initialize it. 你居然初始化。 So these 2 lines of code declare a variable of type int 因此,這2行代碼 聲明一個int類型的變量 and call it counter, so it gives me enough bits to hold an int. 並稱之為反,所以它給 我足夠的位來容納一個int。 And then eventually, it puts the value 0 into that variable. 然後最終,它把 值0到該變量。 It arranges the 0's and 1's in a pattern, that we know from last week, 它排列0和1的在一個 模式,我們知道上週, represents the number we know as 0. 代表我們所知道的0號。 Or frankly, you can do this much more succinctly, just like this. 或者坦白地說,你可以做這麼多 更簡潔地說,就這樣。 >> Now we also have the ability to call functions. >> 現在,我們也有 能夠調用函數。 And in fact, here's a 2 line program, or an excerpt thereof, 而事實上,這裡有一個2線 程序,或它們的摘錄, that allows us to actually write some code that 這使我們能夠真正 編寫一些代碼, gets a string from the user-- much like our volunteer a moment ago-- 得到來自user--字符串多 就像我們的志願者一時ago-- storing the result in a variable called name, 結果存儲到 一個名為名稱的變量, and then-- much like with our volunteer with printf-- prints out those values 和then--很像我們的志願者 與printf--打印出這些值 by passing in two arguments, the string, followed by the variable 通過傳遞兩個參數, 串,其次是可變 called, name, itself. 叫,名稱本身。 So let's take a look, before we come back to Mario there, 因此,讓我們來看看,前 我們再回過頭來馬里奧那裡, at a couple of now, examples of this. 在一對夫婦的這個現在的例子。 >> I'm going to go ahead and open up, let's say, function-0.c. >> 我要繼續前進,開 了,讓我們說,功能0.c。 And as always, this code is available on the course's website, 和往常一樣,這個代碼是 可在球場上的網站, so you can play along at home and look at it later. 這樣你就可以在一起玩 回家看它以後。 But here's the program in it's essence, from line 17 to 22. 但這裡有一個程序在它的 本質上,從線17至22。 The main program is where the program is always going to start. 主程序所在 計劃總是會啟動。 This program, apparently, is going to print out your name, colon. 這一方案,顯然,是怎麼回事 打印出你的名字,冒號。 It's then going to call GetString, just like we did with our volunteers. 它隨後將打電話的GetString, 就像我們做了與我們的志願者。 And then, this is interesting, it's going to call PrintName. 然後,這是有趣的, 它會調用PrintName。 It turns out, all this time, there seems to be a function called PrintName. 事實證明,這一切的時候,有 似乎是被稱為PrintName函數。 That prints someone's name. 可打印某人的名字。 We didn't need to use printf from yesteryear, there's PrintName. 我們並不需要用printf從 昔日,有PrintName。 >> But that's misleading because PrintName does not >> 但是,這是誤導 因為PrintName不 come with C. People did not invent it some 40 or 50 years ago, 配備了C.人們不 一些40年或50年前發明了它, I did, instead. 我這樣做,而不是。 And in fact, if I scroll down further, notice 而事實上,如果我滾動 進一步下降,通知 how I can write my own functions in C. We'll eventually 我怎麼能寫我自己 在C函數我們最終會 explain why we keep saying, void, in a few places, 解釋為什麼我們一直在說, 無效,在少數地方, but for today, let's just look at the name. 但今天,讓我們 光看這個名字。 >> On line 24, if you want to create your own function, >> 在第24行,如果你想 創建自己的功能, you literally write the name of the function. 你從字面上寫的 功能的命名。 I chose PrintName. 我選擇了PrintName。 In parentheses, you then specify what kinds 在括號,你 然後指定哪幾種 of inputs, and how many you want this function to take. 投入,有多少你 希望此功能可走。 In this case, I want to take 1 variable called, name, 在這種情況下,我想帶 1變量調用,名稱, and it's going to be of type, string, so it's going 而這將是 型,字符串,因此它會 to be some sequence of characters. 是一串字符。 And then, this program-- much like in Scratch, 然後,這個program-- 就像在刮, you can have custom puzzle pieces-- is going to have this custom behavior. 你可以定制拼圖pieces-- 將有這種自定義行為。 It's going to call printf passing in, hello, placeholder, 這將調用printf 傳遞,你好,佔位符, and then it's going to plug in whatever the user called. 然後它會堵塞 在任何用戶調用。 >> So this is an example of what a computer scientist would >> 所以這是一個例子是什麼 計算機科學家會 call abstraction or functional decomposition, which are just 調用抽象或功能 分解,這只是 fancy ways of saying-- Is if you like this high level idea, 花哨的方式saying--是,如果 你喜歡這個高層次的想法, like I want functionality that prints someone's name, absolutely you 像我想功能, 打印某人的名字,絕對是你 can literally write printf and then pass in the arguments you want, 可以從字面上寫的printf然後 通過在你想要的參數, and the program will work, as it has since Wednesday. 並計劃將工作, 因為它有自週三。 But you can start to abstract away the notion of printing a name. 但是,你可以開始抽象掉 打印名的概念。 You can give it a name, like PrintName, and this 你可以給它一個名字, 像PrintName,和這 is this idea of layering from week 0. 這種想法從0週分層的。 >> Henceforth, I and you don't have to know or care how PrintName is implemented. >> 從今往後,我和你不必知道 或護理PrintName是如何實現的。 Yes it uses printf, maybe it doesn't, who knows what uses? 是的,它使用printf的,也許它 不,誰知道什麼用? Who cares? 誰在乎呢? Now I'm talking up here, instead of down here. 現在,我說在這裡, 而不是到這裡的。 And indeed, as our programs get more advanced and sophisticated, 事實上,作為我們的計劃獲得 更加先進和複雜, we're going to keep taking for granted that lower level puzzle pieces exist. 我們將繼續採取理所當然 較低級別的拼圖存在。 Because we wrote them or someone else did, so 因為我們寫了他們 或者別人沒有,所以 that we can then build on top of them. 我們可以再建在它們上面。 Let's take a look at this variant, function one. 讓我們來看看這個 變型,功能之一。 >> So this one's a little more advanced, but it turns out >> 所以這一塊是一個有點多 先進的,但事實證明, that in CS50's library, there's only a GetInt function. 在CS50的圖書館, 這裡只有一個調用getInt功能。 We didn't think, years ago, to implement a GetPositiveInt function. 我們沒有想到,幾年前,到 實現GetPositiveInt功能。 And that's a little annoying because if you guys are writing a program wherein 這是一個有點惱人,因為如果 你們正在編寫一個程序,其中 you want to get a positive integer from the user, 你想獲得一個積極的 從用戶的整數, you can absolutely use GetInt. 你完全可以使用調用getInt。 And you can absolutely check with the condition and maybe a loop 你完全可以用檢查 條件,也許一個循環 if that int is greater than 0 and yell at the user 如果int是更大 比0和罵的用戶 if he or she doesn't give you a positive number. 如果他或她不給 你正數。 But let's build this building block ourselves, a, 但是,讓我們建立這個 建築擋住自己,一, custom Scratch piece, if you will. 定制刮片,如果你願意。 I'm going to have a program here that ultimately, I 我將有一個程序 在這裡,最終,我 want to be able to call GetPositiveInt, and I want to be 希望能夠調用 GetPositiveInt,我想成為 able to print out whatever that int is. 能夠打印出什麼那int是。 But this is abstracted away now. 但是,這是現在的抽象化了。 It's just been given a high level name that says what it does, 它只是被賦予了很高的水平 名稱它做什麼, which is wonderful because it's very intuitive now to read. 這是美妙的,因為它是 非常直觀,現在讀。 And if I do care what's underneath the hood, let me scroll down. 如果我做不在乎什麼是底下 引擎蓋,讓我向下滾動。 And it's a little intimidating at first, especially 這是一個有點嚇人 在第一,尤其 if this is your first program, but let's take a look. 如果這是你的第一個程序, 但讓我們一起來看看。 >> I'm no longer saying, void, because it turns out functions, >> 我不再說的,無效的, 因為事實證明功能, much like GetString, can return a value to me. 就像GetString的,可 返回一個值給我。 They don't just have to print to the screen, 他們不只是有 打印到屏幕上, they can actually hand me something back. 他們實際上可以手 我的東西回來。 And whereas before PrintName, I didn't need anything back. 和而PrintName之前, 我沒回來需要什麼。 I needed the side effect of something showing up on the screen, 我需要的副作用 東西顯示在屏幕上, but I didn't need a human to hand me something back. 但我並不需要一個人 遞給我的東西回來。 Here, with GetPositiveInt, like with GetInt, 這裡,與GetPositiveInt, 像調用getInt, I want to be handed something back. 我想交到東西回來。 So I'm saying not, void, on line 23, but int, 所以我說不是的,無效的, 在線路23,但整型, which says, this function that I am writing, 它說,該功能 我正在寫, called GetPositiveInt is going to hand me back an integer, not nothing, 稱為GetPositiveInt是要 遞給我回一個整數,沒有什麼, not void. 不作廢。 >> Meanwhile, it's going to take no inputs, so I've, kind of, reversed it. >> 同時,要採取不 投入,所以我,善良,推翻它。 I'm not giving GetPositiveInt any input, I want it to give me its output. 我不給GetPositiveInt任何 輸入時,我希望它給我的輸出。 And then what happens now? 然後現在會發生什麼? So here's how I can declare a variable. 因此,這裡就是我可以聲明一個變量。 I've done it outside of the loop, for reasons we'll eventually see, 我一直在循環之外做了, 對於原因,我們最終會看到, but this just gives me 32 bits called, n, 但是這只是給 我的32位調用,N, and I've pre-determining them to store integer. 我已經預先確定 他們存儲的整數。 And here's that, do while construct, and this is why it's useful. 而下面這一點,做while結構, 這就是為什麼它是非常有用的。 Literally do this, while n is less than 1. 從字面上做到這一點, 而n小於1。 So let's see what happens. 因此,讓我們看看會發生什麼。 I print out, please give me a positive int. 我打印出來,請 給我一個積極的INT。 I then get an int, using CS50's function and stored in n. 然後我得到一個int,使用CS50的 功能與存儲在n個。 >> And then, what line of code probably gets executed next, logically? >> 然後,什麼樣的代碼行可能 下一個被執行,邏輯? Which line number? 哪條線是多少? Yeah, so 31. 是啊,所以31。 You wouldn't know this until you've been told or sort of infer it, 你不會知道,直到你 被告知或排序的推斷是, but that's true. 但是這是真的。 It goes top to bottom and then keeps repeating. 不言而喻從上到下 然後不斷重複。 So if I have typed in say, the number negative 1, is n less than negative 1? 所以,如果我已經輸入中說,數 負1,為n比1負少? Yeah. 是啊。 Because negative 1 is less than 1. 因為負1小於1。 So what should happen? 那麼會發生什麼情況? I'm going to do this while n is less than 1, 我要做到這一點 而n是小於1, so I'm going to go back to line 28. 所以我打算回去線28。 >> And each time-- and let's run this-- make function 1 to compile it, >> 而每一個時間 - 讓我們運行this-- 讓功能1編譯它, and now dot slash function 1. 現在點斜線功能1。 If I type negative 1, it's going to keep yelling at me 如果我型負1,這是 要保持吼我 until I cooperate because each of my inputs is less than 1 直到我合作,因為每個 我的輸入小於1 and if it's while less than 1, I'm going to keep doing this. 如果它而小於1, 我將繼續這樣做。 If I finally give it a number like 50, thankfully, it says, thanks for the 50. 如果我終於給它一些像50, 值得慶幸的是,它說,感謝50。 Why? 為什麼呢? Because as soon as n is not less than 1, I stop getting stuck in this loop, 因為只要n是不小於 1,我停止陷在這個循環中, and this new keyword today, return, literally does that. 而這種新的關鍵字的今天, 返回時,從字面上做到這一點。 So I've just implemented, in a sense, the equivalent of GetString, 所以,我剛剛實施,在 感,GetString的相當於, where I'm handing back to whoever is using me, some value. 在那裡我遞回 不管是誰用我的,一定的價值。 It doesn't have to be a string, it's an int. 它並不必須是 一個字符串,它是一個int。 So a simple, quick example, but we'll soon 因此,一個簡單,快捷 舉例來說,但我們會很快 see some more sophisticated versions still. 看到一些更複雜 版本還在。 In fact, let's take a look at a numeric one, which is called return.c. 事實上,讓我們來看看一個 數字1,這是所謂return.c。 And this one's actually a little simpler. 而這其中實際上 簡單一點。 So this program's purpose in life-- let's compile and run it, 因此,在這個方案的目的 life--讓我們編譯並運行它, so make return, dot slash, return-- notice 所以要回報,點 斜線,return--通知 the program simply cubes the value 2. 程序簡單立方體的價值2。 It's pretty stupid, it's hard code, it doesn't take any inputs, 它是非常愚蠢的,這是很難 代碼,它沒有採取任何投入, but it does demonstrate another function that I've written myself. 但它確實說明另一個 我寫我自己的功能。 So here, I've declared a variable, called x, of type int, 所以在這裡,我宣布一個 可變的,所謂的類型為int x,, equal to the number 2, completely arbitrary. 等於數字2, 完全是任意的。 This is just some fluffy printing. 這僅僅是一些蓬鬆打印。 It says x is now, such and such, cubing dot dot dot. 它說,x是現在,這樣的和 這樣,多維數據點點點。 And the magic is apparently in line 21. 而神奇的是顯然的第21行。 I'm calling a function called, cube, I'm handing it a sheet of paper 我打電話調用的函數,立方體, 我交給它的一張紙 with the number 2 written on it, and what value, mathematically, 用數字2寫在上面, 和什麼樣的價值,數學, do I want to get out of it? 我想出來的嗎? Just as a sanity check? 正如完整性檢查? 8. 8。 Right? 對嗎? I want 2 cubed back, 2 to the power of 3, so 8 back. 我想2立方回,2〜 3的力量,所以8回。 >> So where is cube implemented? >> 那麼,是立方體實現? Well, notice it's implemented down here. 好吧,發現它在這裡實現了。 And just like before, logically, even though the syntax is probably 就如同之前,從邏輯上講, 即使語法可能是 very new to many of you, I want this function 很新,你們中許多人, 我想這個功能 to hand me back a sheet of paper with an int on it. 遞給我回來的片 紙,上面有一個int。 So I have an int, the name is arbitrarily, 所以,我有一個int,該 名字是隨意, but conveniently called cube. 可方便地稱為立方體。 The input to it, is n of type integer, so that's 輸入到它,是n 整型,所以這是 how I can pass in the number 2 on a sheet of paper. 我怎麼可以通過在數 2上一張紙。 And then it turns out C supports math, so you don't have x's for times, 然後事實證明C支持 數學,所以你不用X的的時間, you just use the asterisk for multiplication. 你只需要使用星號 乘法。 And this returns n times n times n, which is simply a cubed value. 而這個返回n次n次 N,這是一個簡單的立方值。 >> So where are we going with all of this? >> 那麼,我們要與這一切? This is definitely a whirlwind tour, rest assured, 這絕對是一個 旋風之旅,放心, that in the super sections and in problem set 1, 在超級節 而在問題設置1, you'll be walked through all this all the more. 你可以通過走 這一切全愈。 And in problem set 1, we'll transition from the graphical world of Scratch 而在問題設置1,我們將過渡 從頭開始的圖形世界 to something more command line in C. But we'll draw inspiration 到更多的東西命令行 在C.但我們會汲取靈感 from this here game from yesteryear, wherein 從此這裡的遊戲 從昔日的,其中, using C and the standard edition of the p set you'll implement Mario's pyramid. 使用C和的標準版 p將您將實現馬里奧的金字塔。 And in the hacker edition of the p set, if you so choose to elect, 而在的黑客版 p將,如果你選擇選舉, you will implement a bit more challenging pyramid with two peaks. 您將實現多一點 有兩個高峰挑戰金字塔。 You'll also implement an algorithm, a greedy algorithm. 您還可以實施 算法,貪婪算法。 It turns out there's some interesting logic 原來有 一些有趣的邏輯 behind the process of running a cashier's station 過程背後 運行出納站 and actually handing someone back change. 實際上交給 有人背的變化。 There is an algorithm that's fairly straightforward, that you might even 有一種算法,是相當 簡單的,你甚至可能 grasp intuitively when you first read it-- realizing that's what I've always 直觀地把握,當你第一次讀到 它 - 意識到這就是我一直 done any time I've given someone some money back-- that allows you to always 做我已經給了一些人的任何時間 錢back--,讓你永遠 minimize the number of paper notes or metal coins 最小化的數量 紙幣或金屬幣 that you're handing back to the user. 您正在移交給用戶。 And this, of course, is compelling because if you go to CVS or whatnot, 而這,當然,是引人注目 因為如果你去CVS或諸如此類的東西, you don't want to be handed a whole bunch of ones 你不想成為手 一大堆的人 or a whole bunch of pennies. 或者一大堆便士。 You want the fewest coins, probably, possible. 你想最少 硬幣,大概,可能。 >> Finally, you'll also be challenged to dabble in the world of water >> 最後,你也可以挑戰 在水世界玩水 and actually get an appreciation for a mapping between rates of flow, 而實際上得到升值 對於流動速率之間的映射, of like, water in a shower, just how much water is used. 都喜歡,水淋浴, 到底有多少水被使用。 And the allusion therein, will be this clip here, 而其中的典故, 將這個片段在這裡, which we'll end on for just 60 seconds, that 我們將結束對 短短60秒,即 paints a picture of low-flow shower heads. 描繪了一幅圖片 低流量的淋浴噴頭。 >> [VIDEO PLAYBACK] >> [視頻回放] -All right. - 所有權利。 I got everything here. 我在這裡得到的一切。 I got the Cyclone F Series, Hydra, Jetflow, Stockholm 我得到了旋風F系列, 水潤,Jetflow,斯德哥爾摩 Supersteam, you name it. Supersteam,你的名字。 >> -And what do you recommend? >> - 和你有什麼建議? >> -What are you looking for? >> - 什麼是你找誰? >> -Power man. >> -Power的人。 Power. 電源。 -Like Silkwood. 樣絲克伍事件。 -That's for radiation. - 這就是輻射。 -That's right. - 那是正確的。 -Now what is this? - 現在這是什麼? -That's the Commando 450. - 這就是特種兵450。 I don't sell that one. 我不賣這個。 >> -But that's what we want. >> - 但是,這就是我們想要的。 It's a commando 450. 這是一個突擊隊450。 >> -No believe me. >> - 不相信我。 It's only used in the circus. 它僅用於馬戲團。 It's for elephants. 這是大象。 >> -I'll pay anything. >> -I'll支付任何費用。 >> -What about Jerry? >> - 什麼對傑里? >> -He couldn't handle that. >> - 他不能處理。 He's delicate. 他細膩。 Oh yeah. 哦,是的。 [END PLAYBACK] [結束播放] DAVID J MALAN: All right. 大衛·馬蘭:好的。 That's if for CS50. 那如果CS50。 We'll see you next week. 我們會看到你下週。 >> SPEAKER 1: [? Scully ?], [? Ian, ?] as far as this outro project, >> 揚聲器1:[?斯卡利?],[?伊恩?] 只要這個尾奏項目, what have you guys come up with? 你有什麼傢伙想出了? >> SPEAKER 2: Well, we've given it a variety of thought, >> 揚聲器2:好了,我們已經給 它的各種思想, and we think that the best way to-- 我們認為,最好的辦法用於: >> SPEAKER 3: May I? >> 揚聲器3:我? >> SPEAKER 2: Yeah. >> 揚聲器2:是的。 By all means, actually. 通過一切手段,其實。 >> SPEAKER 3: So I think we can sum up our idea >> 揚聲器3:所以我覺得 我們可以總結一下我們的想法 for the outros with one word-- nothing. 對於一個word--什麼的片尾。 >> DAVID J MALAN: Nothing? >> 大衛·馬蘭:沒事? SPEAKER 3: Nothing. 揚聲器3:沒有。 DAVID J MALAN: What does that mean? 大衛·馬蘭:這是什麼意思? SPEAKER 3: The outros are about nothing. SPEAKER 3:片尾是關於什麼。 SPEAKER 2: Well, I mean, in philosophy, I mean, nothing is always something. 揚聲器2:嗯,我的意思是,在哲學, 我的意思是,沒有什麼是永遠的東西。 SPEAKER 1: So what's-- what's the premise? 揚聲器1:所以what's-- 有什麼前提? SPEAKER 3: So it's like life. 揚聲器3:所以它就像生活。 OK. 確定。 What did you do today? 今天你做了什麼? >> DAVID J MALAN: I got up, had breakfast, and came to work. >> 大衛·馬蘭:我站起來,有 早餐,來到工作。 >> SPEAKER 3: That's an outro. >> 揚聲器3:這是一個片尾曲。 SPEAKER 2: But, I mean, shouldn't something happen to him on the-- 揚聲器2:但是,我的意思是,不應該 事情發生在他身上的the-- SPEAKER 3: No, no, no, no. 揚聲器3:不,不,不,不。 Nothing happens. 什麼也沒有發生。 >> SPEAKER 1: So why are we watching? >> 揚聲器1:那麼,為什麼我們看什麼? >> SPEAKER 3: Because it's an outro for CS50. >> 揚聲器3:因為 這是一個尾奏的CS50。 >> DAVID J MALAN: Not yet. >> 大衛·馬蘭:還沒有。
B1 中級 中文 美國腔 馬蘭 大衛 代碼 導彈 功能 整數 第一週,繼續 (Week 1, continued) 1310 101 Ren-c Huang 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字