Name: 【TED】Dan Pallotta: 我們對慈善的思想是完全錯誤 (The way we think about charity is dead wrong | Dan Pallotta)
Uploaded: 2013-05-01T14:38:40.000Z
Duration: 18 min 55 s

Being gay and fathering triplets is by far

同時身為同性戀者和三胞胎的爸爸

the most socially innovative, socially entrepreneurial thing

The real social innovation I want to talk about

I want to talk about how the things we've been taught to think

我想講的是我們從小怎樣被灌輸

are actually undermining the causes we love

其實它們潛意識破壞我們所愛護的

and our profound yearning to change the world.

以及我們潛在去改變世界的渴望

But before I do that, I want to ask if we even believe

我說這個以前﹐我想問一下我們其實相不相信

that the nonprofit sector has any serious role to play

A lot of people say now that business will lift up the developing economies,

很多人說既然一般的企業幫助促進發展中的經濟體

and social business will take care of the rest.

那麼就由社會型企業來負責餘下的那部分

But it always leaves behind that 10 percent or more

但同時, 它亦會放棄10%或以上的

and there are some issues for which you just can't develop

the kind of money measures that you need for a market.

I sit on the board of a center for the developmentally disabled,

我是一個專門針對成長發展障礙的中心的董事

for whom there is no other market coming.

And so if we really want, like Buckminster Fuller said,

所以,尤如Buckminster Fuller (美國哲學家、建築師及發明家)說的

如果我們想要一個服務於所有人

not come close to finding a cure for breast cancer,

to ending homelessness in any major city?

還未解決大城市中無家可歸的問題?

Why has poverty remained stuck at 12 percent

our organizations are tiny up against them,

我們的團體相比之下猶如螳臂當車

and we have a belief system that keeps them tiny.

而且我們有一套信仰體系讓它們顯得更渺小

and one for the rest of the economic world.

against the [nonprofit] sector in five different areas,

它在五個方面歧視了非牟利團體

So in the for-profit sector, the more value you produce,

你在非牟利團體裡面製造的價值越多

But we don't like nonprofits to use money

to incentivize people to produce more in social service.

激勵人們在公益服務上創造更多

We have a visceral reaction to the idea that anyone

我們對某些人通過幫助別人而獲利良多

would make very much money helping other people.

Interesting that we don't have a visceral reaction

但有趣的是我們對於那些賺賺得盆滿缽溢

to the notion that people would make a lot of money not helping other people.

而又不去幫助別人的人又不厭惡

You know, you want to make 50 million dollars

selling violent video games to kids, go for it.

We'll put you on the cover of Wired magazine.

我們會讓你登上Wired 雜誌的封面

But you want to make half a million dollars

但如果你想靠治好患瘧疾的小孩

and you're considered a parasite yourself. (Applause)

And we think of this as our system of ethics,

but what we don't realize is that this system

it gives a really stark, mutually exclusive choice

between doing very well for yourself and your family

to the brightest minds coming out of our best universities,

可以每年把數以千計能影響世界的人們

who could make a huge difference in the nonprofit sector

marching every year directly into the for-profit sector

就像數以千計直接送到牟利企業的人們一樣

because they're not willing to make that kind of lifelong economic sacrifice.

因為他們並不願意放棄經濟上的長期損失

Businessweek did a survey, looked at the compensation packages

《商業週刊》雜誌做了一項調查

把不同工商管理碩士(MBAs)的收入進行統計

and the median compensation for a Stanford MBA,

斯坦福大學的MBA，在三十八歲時的收入中位數

with bonus, at the age of 38, was 400,000 dollars.

Meanwhile, for the same year, the average salary

同時，一家資產為五百萬以上的美國醫療慈善機構的

for the CEO of a $5 million-plus medical charity in the U.S.

行政總裁平均收入是二十三萬美元

was 232,000 dollars, and for a hunger charity, 84,000 dollars.

而一家致力解決飢饉問題的慈善機構的總裁收入是八萬四千美元

Now, there's no way you're going to get a lot of people

with $400,000 talent to make a $316,000 sacrifice

現在放棄三十一萬六， 而當一家飢饉救助會的總裁

every year to become the CEO of a hunger charity.

Some people say, "Well, that's just because those MBA types are greedy."

有些人會說， "都是因為那些MBA貪婪"