Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • "Eggs and Cholesterol: Patently False and Misleading Claims"

  • For decades, "on the basis of concerns from the American Heart Association and consumer groups,"

  • "the Federal Trade Commission carried out successful legal action - upheld by the Supreme Court -"

  • "to compel the egg industry to (cease and) desist from false and misleading advertising"

  • "that eggs had no harmful effects on health."

  • See, anti-cholesterol attacks on eggs resulted in severe economic loss through a reduction in egg consumption,

  • so the egg industry created a "National Commission on Egg Nutrition"

  • to combat the anti-cholesterol, anti-egg publicity with ads like this,

  • exclaiming there is "no scientific evidence whatsoever that eating eggs in any way increases the risk of heart attack,"

  • which the U.S. Court of Appeals found patently false and misleading.

  • Even the tobacco industry wasn't that brazen,

  • instead just trying to introduce the element of doubt,

  • arguing that the relationship between smoking and health remains an open question.

  • The egg ads made 7 claims, each of which, in truth and in fact,

  • was determined to be -bleep.

  • The Court determined the egg industry ads were, and are,

  • false, misleading, deceptive.

  • In fact, legal scholars view what the tobacco industry tried to do as the same

  • as what the American Egg Board's National Commission on Egg Nutrition tried to do.

  • As with the egg ads, the tobacco industry did more than just espouse one side of a genuine controversy,

  • but just denied the existence of scientific evidence.

  • Over the last 36 years, the American Egg Board has spent hundreds of millions of dollars

  • to convince people eggs are not gonna to kill themand it's working.

  • "In combination with aggressive Nutrition Science and Public Relations efforts,"

  • "research shows that the advertising has been effective"

  • "in decreasing consumers' concerns over eggs and cholesterol/heart health."

  • This is from their internal strategy documents I got a hold of.

  • Currently they're targeting moms.

  • Their approach is to "surround moms wherever they are."

  • They pay integration fees for egg product placement in TV shows.

  • To integrate eggs into The Biggest Loser, for example, could be a million dollars.

  • But getting some kids story time reading program to integrate eggs

  • may only take half a million, though.

  • The American Egg Board keeps track of who is and is not a "friend-of-eggs"

  • They pays scientists $1500 to sit and answer questions like,

  • "What studies can help disassociate eggs from cardiovascular disease?"

  • From the beginning, their arch nemesis was the American Heart Association,

  • over which they fought a major battle over cholesterol.

  • In documents retrieved through the Freedom of Information Act,

  • we see even the USDA repeatedly chastising the egg industry for misrepresenting

  • the American Heart Association position. In a draft letter to magazine editors,

  • the egg industry tried to say that the "American Heart Association changed its recommendations"

  • "to approve an egg a day in 2000, and eventually eliminated its number restrictions on eggs in 2002,"

  • to which the head of USDA's poultry research and promotion programs had to explain,

  • "the 'change' in 2000 wasn't a change at all."

  • "Nothing in the guidelines or recommendations was changed."

  • What happened is that in response to a question posed by someone planted in the audience,

  • Heart Association reps acknowledged that even though eggs are

  • the most concentrated source of cholesterol in the diet,

  • since an individual egg has less than 300mg of cholesterol,

  • technically an egg could fit under the 300 mg daily limit.

  • And in 2002, they just eliminated the specific mention of eggs for consistency sake.

  • But the American Heart Association insists that they haven't changed their

  • position and continue to warn consumers about eggs.

  • Here's from the AHA website at the time.

  • If one egg has 213 and the limit (dietary cholesterol intake) for people with normal cholesterol is 300

  • you could fit in an egg, if you cut down on all other animal products.

  • You could have an egg for breakfast, and then if you add some coffee, some skinless turkey breast, etc.

  • you could end up...510, nearly twice the recommended limit.

  • So if you are gonna to eat an egg you need to substitute

  • vegetables for some of the meat, drink your coffee black, and you'll watch for hidden eggs in baked goods.

  • And the limit for folks with high cholesterol is 200mg a day,

  • which may not even allow a single egg a day.

  • This is how the Senior Director of Nutrition education at the American Egg Board's Egg Nutrition Center

  • characterized the American Heart Association guidelines:

  • "Maybe I'm being overly sensitive, but this reads like:"

  • 'if you insist on having those deadly high cholesterol eggs your penalty will be'

  • 'to eat vegetables and you can't even have the yummy steak and creamy coffee you love.'

  • 'Really it's not worth eating eggs.'

  • 'Oh, and if you think you'll be able to enjoy some delicious baked goods,'

  • 'forget it, the deadly eggs are there too!'"

"Eggs and Cholesterol: Patently False and Misleading Claims"

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

雞蛋和膽固醇。明顯虛假和誤導性的說法。 (Eggs and Cholesterol: Patently False and Misleading Claims)

  • 139 10
    冽風 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字