B1 中級 美國腔 2313 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
What is the Paris climate conference?
Well, you can think of it as a dinner party for 25,000 people
and none of them really get along that well
and they have to save the world from total climate disaster
But will it actually work?
To start, let's take a look back the last 25 years of negotiations.
In 1992 in Rio de Janeiro the UN created a treaty to stabilize greenhouse gas levels so they wouldn't actually mess with the climate.
But the treaty mostly just said that
countries should figure out how to actually accomplish that goal using
other future treaties.
The Kyoto Protocol required industrialized countries to cut their GHG emissions... a little
but developing countries including China and India
weren't required to curb emissions at all and the US didn't ratify the treaty.
So that didn't really work.
After 12 years of negotiations dragged on
the big dinner party that was supposed to result in a planet saving deal actually
went pretty badly.
So last year, in Lima,
diplomats agreed on a new approach.
Let a country decide for itself how it will fight climate change
These countries specific pledges are called Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs.
So now we're in Paris
where diplomats hope to reach an agreement
that centers around countries INDCs.
But how can companies accountable
to those pledges... and what actually goes into them?
There are a bunch of different options on the menu
And, the prices vary dramatically.
So India leans over to the United States and says
"I got 300 million people without electricity"
"I think I'm just gonna stick with a bunch of the cheap coal."
And the U.S., kinda hypocritically says "No way India, you've got to try the green energy, it is phenomenal."
And India says "No, I really think I want the coal. You used to love it, you look great and I think I should give it a shot."
And then China leans over to Indian and deadpans " you should really try the green energy."
But if India think it deserves to use cheap and easy coal to
speed up its development and lift several millions out of poverty
Who is the U.S. or China to say that it shouldn't?
And that's just the first course.
There are plenty of other courses to be picked through and paid for.
How much effort do we put forth preventing climate change
by regulating power plants or replacing
fossil fuel subsidies with renewable energy subsidies versus adapting to it,
by saying, building seawalls
versus compensating those already screwed by it, by awarding emergency funding to repair
damage caused by natural disasters. The more we can mitigate climate change the
less we actually have to adapt to it but climate change is already hitting some communities
heavier than others.
Furthermore, can we make clean technology easy for developing countries to acquire?
And what does it even mean to be a developing country? How do we make sure
that countries have the strongest institutions and best information to
deal with climate change? And then, as with all dinners the tensest moment
arrives. What do we do with the bill? Poorer countries could develop cheaply and
sustainably if richer countries were covering a lot of the expense.
After Copenhagen, richer countries agreed to mobilize a hundred billion dollars annually
by 2020 in funding for countering climate change in developing countries.
But where exactly will the money come from and how much more will
be needed? All these questions are on the table in Paris. So what might actually be achieved?
In 2010, world leaders decided that we’d have to keep global warming below 2 degrees
Celsius or we'd be in for full-scale world felt. The bad news is that
there's no way any Paris agreement will achieve that, but the good news is that doesn't mean the
world has to end. If we continue things business as usual we would be in for 4.5
degrees of warming, but if countries committed to existing INDCs, that helps us
bring that down to about 3 degrees. Hotter than we want, but better than nothing.
And a Paris deal could at least start to figure out how to mobilize that money
and technology to make that follow through happen. And the better news is that even
if Paris totally flops and everybody's just hurling Brie and baugette at one another,
cities and private companies can take action to cut emissions and make a
difference. In fact, they are the real key players here, because diplomacy isn't
real climate action. How does an treaty matter if no one does what it says.
Grist will be in Paris this November and December covering the climate conference.
Check in with us then for all the policy news and baugettes you could ever want.
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

巴黎氣候高峰會到底在談什麼? (The Paris climate negotiations, explained)

2313 分類 收藏
羅紹桀 發佈於 2015 年 12 月 14 日    單凝 翻譯    Kristi Yang 審核
看更多推薦影片
  1. 1. 單字查詢

    在字幕上選取單字即可即時查詢單字喔!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔