Name: 美國科技支柱為何面臨危機？ (Why America’s tech backbone is now at risk)
Uploaded: 2025-12-24T17:10:31.000Z
Duration: 59 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。學這些英文用法：晶片,論點,中國,美國,資料,科技,對手,全球,世界,競爭,中心,寄給,特別,實際,不足,回應,威脅,重點,服務,奇怪,市場,觀點,明顯,國家,做出,決定,成為,重要,認為

情態副詞

There's something also, particularly for David Sacks's argument that really what matters is being able to have the world run on the American technology backbone as opposed to the Chinese backbone.

還有一個重點，特別是針對 David Sacks 的論點，他認為真正重要的是要讓世界運行在美國科技骨幹上，而不是中國骨幹。

轉承詞

Because of China's chip shortages right now, they can't build data centers around the world the way the United States can.

因為中國現在面臨晶片短缺，他們無法像美國一樣在全球各地建立資料中心。

They don't have enough chips for their own domestic market, let alone to build Huawei chip data centers in third countries across the globe.

他們自己的國內市場就已經晶片不足了，更不用說要在全球第三國家建立華為晶片資料中心了。

Sending them a whole bunch of H200s would actually allow China to serve the rest of the world to a much greater degree.

寄給他們一大堆 H200s，實際上會讓中國更能服務全世界。

So the most basic argument David Sacks is making got to have the world run on American technology, is put at risk by this decision, and

所以 David Sacks 所做的最基本的論點，也就是要讓世界運行在美國科技上，這個論點因為這個決定而受到威脅，

I haven't heard him respond to the obvious point that giving them more chips actually means they will be a bigger competitor, not a lesser competitor in terms of building an alternative to the American stack globally.

我沒聽過他針對一個很明顯的觀點做出回應，那就是給他們更多晶片，實際上意味著他們將成為一個更大的競爭對手，而不是一個較小的競爭對手，在建立全球性替代美國堆疊的方面。