Name: 「這一切...都為了錢」：川普攻擊言論自由，執行長們如何趁機大撈一筆？ ('All of this... is about money': How CEOs try to cash in as Trump attacks free speech)
Uploaded: 2025-11-17T17:03:19.000Z
Duration: 10 min 2 s

情態副詞

He's no longer only targeting comedians that he doesn't like.

他不再只針對他討厭的喜劇演員。

程度副詞

He said it on his way back from London on Air Force One and he repeated it just now in the Oval Office.

他是在從倫敦搭 Air Force One 回來的路上說的，剛剛在橢圓形辦公室又重申了一次。

他們說 97% 是負面的，所以給我 97 分。

They'll take a great story and they'll make it bad.

他們會把一個很棒的報導搞砸。

See, I think that's really illegal personally when somebody is given 97% of the stories are bad about a person that's no longer free speech, that's no longer anything, that's just cheating.

你看，我個人認為當一個人被告知 97% 的報導都是關於他的負面消息時，這已經不是言論自由了，那已經不是任何東西了，那就是 cheating。

So he called network newscasts illegal and it's not free speech and it's cheating.

所以他稱新聞節目是違法的，不是言論自由，而且是 cheating。

And this is in addition to what he said on Air Force One yesterday.

這還是在他昨天在 Air Force One 上說的話之外。

I read someplace that the networks were 97% against me.

我在某處讀到，電視網對我的評價是 97% 的負面。

I got 97% negative and yet I won it easily.

我得到 97% 的負面評價，但我還是輕鬆贏了。

我贏了所有七個搖擺州，而且是普選票。

They give me only bad publicity or press.

I mean if they're getting a license, I would think maybe their license should be taken away.

我的意思是，如果他們有執照，我認為或許應該吊銷他們的執照。

The President there saying about TV news networks because he doesn't like what they report, maybe their license should be taken away.

那裡的總統說電視新聞網，因為他不喜歡他們的報導，或許應該吊銷他們的執照。

Now we should note first that this 97% figure is wrong.

現在我們應該先注意到，這個 97% 的數字是錯的。

And that figure comes from a non scientific, frankly non credible analysis done by a far right pro Trump group looking at the NBC, CBS and ABC evening news broadcast.

而且這個數字是來自一個非科學、坦白說不可信的分析，由一個極右翼、支持川普的團體，針對 NBC、CBS 和 ABC 的晚間新聞節目所做的。

So to be crystal clear, just to reiterate the point here, this is the President of the United States threatening to use the power of the presidency, the Federal Communications Commission or FCC to remove or change news in news networks, removing it from the airwaves theoretically because their coverage is not pro Trump enough.

所以要說清楚一點，重申一下重點，這就是美國總統威脅要動用總統職權、聯邦通訊委員會（FCC）的力量，來撤銷或改變新聞頻道的新聞內容，理論上是從空中撤播，因為他們的報導不夠挺川普。

It's just factually what he is saying now.

這就是他現在說的，事實就是如此。

And these threats frankly can no longer just be discounted as mere talk because it has been only two days now since President Trump's hand picked chair of the fcc, Brendan Carr went on a far right wing podcast and told local TV channels out there very clearly that they should stop airing the show of Jimmy Kimmel, a late night comedian with a show on ABC and a critic of President Trump.

而且這些威脅坦白說不能再被視為只是說說而已，因為距離川普總統親自挑選的 FCC 主席 Brendan Carr 在一個極右翼的Podcast上，明確告訴地方電視臺應該停止播放 ABC 旗下節目、也是川普總統的批評者之一的脫口秀主持人 Jimmy Kimmel 的節目，才不過兩天。

They have a license granted by us at the FCC and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest.

他們獲得了我們 FCC 的執照，這意味著他們有義務以公共利益為目的來營運。

We can do this the easy way or the hard way.

我們可以選擇簡單的方式，也可以選擇困難的方式。

Well, they say it has to do with comments he made on Monday night, Jimmy Kimmel.

嗯，他們說這跟他在週一晚上，Jimmy Kimmel 的評論有關。

We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to, to score political points from it.

我們週末創下新低，MAGA 陣營拼命想把殺死 Charlie Kirk 的這個 kid 形容成跟他們不一樣的人，並盡一切努力從中獲取政治利益。

In between the finger pointing, there was grieving.

在互相指責的同時，也有悲傷。

On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism.

週五，白宮將國旗降半旗，這引來了一些批評。

But on a human level, you can see how hard the President is taking this.

但從人性的角度來看，你可以看到總統對這件事有多麼難過。

My condolences on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk.

對於您失去朋友 Charlie Kirk，我深表哀悼。

May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?

請問，先生，您個人在這一天半的時間裡，感覺如何？

And by the way, right there, you see all the trucks?

對了，你看到那邊所有的卡車了嗎？

They've just started construction of the new border room for the White House, which is something they've been trying to get, as you know, for about 150 years.

他們剛開始建造白宮新的邊境房間，你知道的，這件事他們已經努力了大概 150 年了。

Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief construction.

是的，他正處於悲傷的第四個階段，正在建造。

There have been a lot of interpretations and frankly, some downright fabrications about what Kimmel specifically said in terms of his characterization of the shooter, the assassin.

關於 Kimmel 如何形容槍手、刺客，有非常多的詮釋，坦白說，有些根本是捏造。

But let us assume for the purpose of argument, the absolute purity of, of his critics.

但為了論證起見，我們就假設他的批評者絕對是出於純粹的動機。

The question is, are they upset that this comedian invoked a horrific act of violence to make jokes?

問題是，他們是因為這位喜劇演員拿一個可怕的暴力事件來開玩笑而生氣嗎？

Because I don't recall any of these voices expressing any dismay after former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband was brutally attacked by a home intruder with a hammer, resulting in Paul Pelosi's lifelong debilitating injuries.

因為我不記得有任何聲音在眾議院前議長裴洛西的丈夫被入侵者用錘子殘酷攻擊，導致保羅·裴洛西終身殘疾後，表達過任何遺憾。

The President's son joked about it, posting a Paul Pelosi Halloween costume.

總統的兒子對此開玩笑，還發布了保羅·裴洛西的萬聖節服裝。

And others mined this vicious attack for fun.

其他人則從這次惡毒的攻擊中找樂子。

We'll stand up to crazy Nancy Pelosi who ruined San Francisco.

我們要站出來對抗搞垮舊金山的瘋婆子裴洛西。

So are they upset because they say Kimmel was misrepresenting, lying, lying about the shooter's political views?

所以他們生氣是因為他們說 Kimmel 誤述、說謊、謊報槍手的政治觀點嗎？

Now, Kimmel's defenders say he was not saying that this was a MAGA person, but

現在，金莫的辯護者說他並沒有說這是個 MAGA 人，但

even if he had been saying it, here's the question.

Are lies consistently problematic for the Trump administration and its allies?

謊言對川普政府及其盟友來說，是一貫的問題嗎？

If you count the legal votes, I easily win in Springfield, they're eating the dogs.

如果你們計算合法選票，我在 Springfield 輕易獲勝，他們正在吃狗。

The people that came in, they're eating the cats.

Or is what's going on with Kimmel's show right now all because, as President Trump said on Air Force One yesterday, all these TV networks do is, quote, hit Trump, therefore they should have their licenses taken away.

還是金莫的節目現在會這樣，是因為川普總統昨天在 Air Force One 上說的，所有這些電視網做的就是，引述，打擊川普，是以應該吊銷他們的執照。

We should note it is an American right to mock any president.

我們應該注意到，嘲笑任何總統都是一種美國的權利。

In fact, during the Biden years, then FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said political satire is One of the oldest and most important forms of free speech.

事實上，在拜登執政期間，時任 FCC 委員 Brendan Carr 說政治諷刺是言論自由中最古老、最重要的形式之一。

It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people into discussion.

它挑戰當權者，同時利用幽默吸引更多人參與討論。

In January, Carr, who is now the chairman of the fcc, said, quote, free speech is the bedrock here, here to both of those sentiments.

一月份，現在是 FCC 主席的 Carr 說，引述，言論自由是這裡的基石，對這兩種情緒都是如此。

But then this week, Carr went on that right wing podcast and said it was time for local TV stations to, quote, step up and declare that this, quote, garbage, meaning the Kimmel show, is not something they want on their airwaves.

但這週，Carr 上了那個右翼的Podcast，說現在是時候讓地方電視臺，引述，挺身而出，宣稱這個，引述，垃圾，指的是 Kimmel 的節目，是他們不希望在自家頻道上播出的。

Moments ago, Trump, Trump called Ren Nikar a, quote, courageous person.

幾分鐘前，川普，川普稱 Ren Nikar 為，引述，一位有勇氣的人。

Nexstar is the largest owner of local TV stations in the entire United States.

Nexstar 是全美國最大的地方電視臺擁有者。

Nexstar is also trying to purchase its largest rival, Tegna, for $6.2 billion.

Nexstar 也正試圖以 62 億美元收購其最大的競爭對手 Tegna。

If the FCC were to approve the sale, well, then nexstar would be violating an FCC rule of about owning too many more than 39% of local TV households.

如果 FCC 準許這項收購，那麼 Nexstar 將違反 FCC 一項關於擁有地方電視家庭超過 39% 的規定。

So Nexstar not only needs Carr's approval for this acquisition, they need Carr to change the FCC rule.

所以 Nexstar 不僅需要 Carr 同意這次收購，他們還需要 Carr 修改 FCC 的規定。

So it's perhaps not surprising that literally within hours of Brendan Carr announcing all this, telling local TV stations to jump, nextstar said, how high?

所以，也許並不令人意外的是，在 Brendan Carr 公佈這一切，告訴地方電視臺跳，Nexstar 就說，跳多高？之後的幾個小時內。

Disney owns abc and Disney pulled Kimmel from the airwaves for now.

Disney 擁有 ABC，而 Disney 暫時將 Kimmel 下架了。

Now we should also note that Iger, as he decides what to do with Jimmy Kimmel and his show, Iger also needs the Trump administration to approve ways for Iger to make even more money for Iger and for his stockholders.

現在我們也該注意到，Iger 在決定如何處理 Jimmy Kimmel 和他的節目時，他也需要川普政府準許 Iger 賺取更多錢的方式，為 Iger 和他的股東們。

Iger's trying to close in on a megadeal between Disney and Fubo.

Iger 正試圖敲定 Disney 和 Fubo 之間的一項超級交易。

Critics say that that merger would create a mega sports streaming monopoly.

批評者說，這項合併將會創造一個超級體育串流壟斷。

Right now, this merger is under a Justice Department antitrust review, and Iger needs Trump to approve it.

目前，這項合併正在接受司法部反壟斷審查，而 Iger 需要川普準許。

All of this at the end of it, is about money.

這一切的最終目的，都是為了錢。

It's about rich men and women who need the Trump administration's approval to make even more money.

這是關於富有的男女需要川普政府的準許來賺取更多錢。

And it's about a president and his minions openly using the powers of the presidency to silence speech and speakers that President Trump does not like.

這是關於一位總統和他的爪牙公然濫用總統權力來壓制川普總統不喜歡的言論和發言者。

Critics of his coming for the comedians, now coming for the journalists.

批評者說，他現在針對的是喜劇演員，接著又針對記者。

We should note this is the exact opposite of what President Trump claims to have stood for when he was running for office and when he took office.

我們應該注意到，這與川普總統競選時和上任時聲稱的立場完全相反。

It's the exact opposite of what he and his administration promised that they would do when it came to free speech.

這跟川普政府競選時和上任時承諾的，關於言論自由的立場，是完全相反的。

I will also sign an executive order to immediately stop all government censorship and bring back free speech to America.

我也會簽署行政命令，立即停止所有政府的審查制度，並將言論自由帶回美國。

Never again will the immense power of the state be weaponized to persecute political opponents and under Donald Trump's leadership.

在唐納·川普的領導下，國家巨大的權力將不再被武器化來迫害政治對手。

we will fight to defend your right to offer it in the public square.

我們會奮力捍衛你在公共場合表達意見的權利。

Now, at least one prominent Republican is sounding the alarm today.

現在，至少有一位著名的共和黨人今天發出了警訊。

If the government gets in the business of saying we don't say what you, the media have said, we're going to ban you from the airwaves.

如果政府介入，決定我們不能說你們媒體說過的話，我們就要把你們趕出廣播頻道。

If you don't say what we like, that will end up bad for conservatives.

如果你們說的話不合我們的意，這對保守派來說將是個壞結果。

This is all contrary to the spirit of the First Amendment.

這完全違背了美國憲法第一修正案的精神。

If a journalist cannot cover the president, if a comedian cannot make a joke about the president, an offensive joke even without fear for his job because the president will use the powers of his administration to lean on his rich bosses who want to make even more money, well, is that a country you want to live in?

如果記者不能報導總統，如果喜劇演員不能開總統的玩笑，即使是冒犯性的玩笑，也不用擔心失業，因為總統會動用行政權力去施壓他的富豪老闆，而這些老闆只想賺更多錢，那麼，這是一個你想居住的國家嗎？

字幕列表影片播放

「這一切...都為了錢」：川普攻擊言論自由，執行長們如何趁機大撈一筆？ ('All of this... is about money': How CEOs try to cash in as Trump attacks free speech)

figure

force

exact

obligation