Name: 振作起來美國正處於 "經濟戰爭 "的邊緣 (Brace Yourself: America is On the Verge of “Economic WAR”)
Uploaded: 2025-08-13T18:17:02.000Z
Duration: 24 min 31 s

過去簡單式

This is not just a trade war, this is an economic war that the United States waged against the rest of the world.

這不僅僅是一場貿易戰，這是美國對世界其他國家發動的一場經濟戰。

If you have been wondering how does world war 3 looks like, well, this is world war 3.

如果您一直想知道第三次世界大戰是什麼樣子，那麼，這就是第三次世界大戰。

And just like world war 2 changed the course of history and established a new world order, the current trade war is going to establish a new world order.

正如第二次世界大戰改變了歷史進程並建立了新的世界秩序一樣，當前的貿易戰也將建立新的世界秩序。

With this trade war, Donald Trump wants to fundamentally change the entire economic landscape of the world.

唐納德-特朗普希望通過這場貿易戰從根本上改變整個世界的經濟格局。

And a lot of people look at what's happening and they don't understand because other countries are retaliating.

很多人看到發生的這一切都不理解，因為其他國家也在報復。

China is retaliating, they have set up tariffs against US goods, Japan, South Korea, the rest of the world.

中國正在進行報復，他們對美國、日本、韓國和世界其他國家的商品徵收關稅。

But if you zoom out and think about it, there is a very clear strategy why Trump doing all of this.

但如果你把視線拉遠，仔細想想，特朗普做這一切是有非常明確的策略的。

If you don't understand the final goal, if you can't zoom out and take a look at the big picture, everything that Donald Trump is doing makes absolutely no sense.

如果你不瞭解最終目標，如果你不能放大並縱觀全局，唐納德-特朗普所做的一切就完全沒有意義。

I am not trying to defend Trump, I am not trying to judge Trump, I am not trying to defend his actions, but what I am trying to do is to figure out what is the grand plan.

我不是要為特朗普辯護，我不是要評判特朗普，我也不是要為他的行為辯護，但我想做的是弄清楚大計劃是什麼。

And in this video, you will find out that the final goal of everything that Trump is doing is to pay off the US government debt.

在這段視頻中，你會發現特朗普所做的一切的最終目的都是為了償還美國政府的債務。

So here in this video, let's try to figure out how exactly Donald Trump wants to use this trade war in order to pay off the entire debt of the United States and create a new world order that is much more favorable to the United States and how you can take advantage out of it.

是以，在這段視頻中，讓我們試著弄清楚唐納德-特朗普究竟想如何利用這場貿易戰來償還美國的全部債務，並建立一個對美國更有利的新世界秩序，以及你如何從中獲益。

If you are ready, give this video a thumbs up and let's get right into it.

如果您準備好了，請為這段視頻豎起大拇指，讓我們開始吧。

The world has turned into a place that we call corporatocracy, where corporations are ruling the world.

這個世界已經變成了我們所說的公司統治世界的地方。

It's not about nations, it's not about the governments, but rather it's about corporations.

這不是國家的問題，也不是政府的問題，而是企業的問題。

Companies such as Amazon, Apple, TSMC, Nvidia, Aramco, these are the corporations that are ruling the world.

亞馬遜、蘋果、臺積電、英偉達、阿美石油公司，這些都是統治世界的企業。

It doesn't matter who is the president of a certain country or what kind of laws they have.

誰是某個國家的總統或他們有什麼樣的法律並不重要。

The final goal of any corporation is to maximize the profit no matter what tools they are going to use.

無論使用什麼工具，任何公司的最終目標都是實現利潤最大化。

And it doesn't matter whether it's an American company or it's a European company or it's an Asian company.

無論是美國公司、歐洲公司還是亞洲公司，這都無關緊要。

No matter what the origins of that company is, at the end of the day, those corporations are going to run behind the profits.

無論該公司的起源如何，最終，這些公司都會在利潤的背後運行。

It's not about the loyalty, it's not about the continent, it's not about the countries.

這與忠誠無關，與大陸無關，與國家無關。

If we can make as much money as possible in that particular place, we are going to go there.

如果我們能在那個地方儘可能多地賺錢，我們就會去那裡。

We are going to rename ourselves, we are going to re-register ourselves, we are going to change everything possible in order to maximize the profits.

我們要重新命名，我們要重新註冊，我們要改變一切可能的方式，以實現利潤最大化。

And for the last 20, 30, or probably even 40 years as the world started moving away from the tariffs and signing free trade agreements between the countries, corporations re-established their entire global supply chain in such a way where they are manufactured their products in one place, they are registered in a completely different place, and they pay taxes in some kind of an island where the tax rate is 0% or maybe closer to that.

在過去的 20 年、30 年甚至 40 年裡，隨著世界各國開始摒棄關稅，簽署自由貿易協定，企業重新建立了自己的全球供應鏈，在一個地方生產產品，在另一個完全不同的地方註冊，在某個稅率為 0% 或接近 0% 的小島上納稅。

And shareholders are in entirely different continents.

而股東們所在的大陸完全不同。

And everybody is making money and no one is paying taxes.

每個人都在賺錢，卻沒有人納稅。

And those corporations are taking full advantage out of the entire planet, and that's the kind of a world that we are living in right now.

這些公司正在充分利用整個地球，這就是我們現在生活的世界。

And that's why if you look at some of these corporations, they are much more powerful than countries.

這就是為什麼如果你看看其中一些公司，它們比國家要強大得多。

Check Apple for example, that's worth around 3 trillion dollars, or maybe 3.5 trillion dollars.

以蘋果公司為例，它的市值約為 3 萬億美元，也可能是 3.5 萬億美元。

It's worth much more than some entire countries out there.

它的價值遠遠超過外面的一些國家。

It's much more powerful to be the president or the CEO of Apple than the president of any of those little small countries.

當蘋果公司的總裁或首席執行官比當任何一個小國的總統都要有權勢得多。

The way those corporations work is that you build a product or a service, and then your job is to sell as much as possible of that product.

這些公司的運作方式是，你製造一種產品或服務，然後你的工作就是儘可能多地銷售這種產品。

The more you sell, the more profit you are going to make.

現在，你身上裝滿了大量現金。

You take that cash and you reinvest it back into the profits or the products or the services that you have built.

你把這些現金重新投入到你所創造的利潤、產品或服務中去。

So you are actually designing much better products or services.

是以，你實際上是在設計更好的產品或服務。

And now you can sell those services to even more people or you can charge those people a much higher price which will lead to much higher profits, which will give you more resources to invest in more products and services.

現在，你可以把這些服務賣給更多的人，或者向這些人收取更高的價格，從而獲得更高的利潤，這將使你有更多的資源投資於更多的產品和服務。

And if you repeat this entire cycle over time, you are going to grow substantially.

如果你長期重複整個循環，你就會大幅增長。

And within the entire process, you don't even have to make a lot of money.

在整個過程中，你甚至不需要賺很多錢。

Like you can literally run at a loss for 20, 30, even 50 years until you dominate the entire market.

就像你真的可以虧損 20 年、30 年甚至 50 年，直到主宰整個市場。

That was the strategy that Amazon followed, and right now Amazon has more plans than some entire countries.

這就是亞馬遜遵循的戰略，現在亞馬遜的計劃比一些國家還多。

Amazon has more plans than even airlines who are in the business of actually having planes and flying people from one place to another.

亞馬遜的計劃甚至比航空公司還多，因為航空公司的業務就是擁有飛機，把人們從一個地方飛到另一個地方。

The only question remains is that where can you actually sell most of your products.

唯一的問題是，你能在哪裡賣出大部分產品。

That is the most fundamental important question that you have to ask yourself.

這是你必須問自己的最基本的重要問題。

That's where the United States has all the leverage.

If you look at the entire US consumer market, it's something around 22 or 23 trillion dollars.

放眼整個美國消費市場，大約有 22 或 23 萬億美元。

And this is the largest market in the world.

So if you are a company, selling in the United States or having access to the US market is the most important asset or the most important market regardless of what you produce, whether you are producing oil, whether you are producing cars, technology, services, banking industry, it doesn't matter.

是以，如果你是一家公司，在美國銷售或進入美國市場是最重要的資產或最重要的市場，無論你生產什麼，生產石油也好，生產汽車也好，生產技術也好，生產服務也好，生產銀行業也好，都沒有關係。

If you want to build such a company that is going to grow and dominate and worth trillions of dollars, then you have to win over the US market.

如果你想建立這樣一家公司，使其不斷髮展壯大並佔據主導地位，使其價值達到數萬億美元，那麼你就必須贏得美國市場。

Because not a single market in the world comes even close.

因為世界上沒有一個市場能與之相提並論。

Now let's take the biggest competitor of the United States, the entire European Union that has the second largest market.

現在，讓我們來看看美國最大的競爭對手--擁有第二大市場的整個歐盟。

And if you look at their numbers, it's something around 13 or 14 trillion dollars.

如果你看看他們的數字，大約是 13 或 14 萬億美元。

So what are you going to choose if you had an option to sell your product in the United States or the European Union.

那麼，如果您可以選擇在美國或歐盟銷售產品，您會如何選擇呢？

Now forget about all the moral principles, forget about loyalty, forget about everything.

現在，忘掉所有的道德原則，忘掉忠誠，忘掉一切。

Think about how those corporations are thinking.

Are you going to choose to sell your product in the European Union or you will choose to sell your product in the United States.

您是選擇在歐盟銷售產品，還是選擇在美國銷售產品？

There is literally no comparison or whatsoever, you are not even going to think.

根本沒有什麼可比性，甚至連想都不用想。

If you had to choose one of those options, you are certainly going to go with the United States.

如果你必須從這些選項中選擇一個，你肯定會選擇美國。

China isn't that far behind from the European Union, it's around 10 trillion dollars, but it's nowhere close to the United States.

中國與歐盟的差距並不大，大約有 10 萬億美元，但與美國相比還差得遠。

So the entire market of the United States is as big as the European market and China combined.

是以，美國整個市場的規模相當於歐洲市場和中國市場的總和。

But what is easier, one country or one entire union that consists of 28 countries and China.

但哪個更容易呢？是一個國家，還是由 28 個國家和中國組成的整個聯盟。

Of course, it's much easier to just agree with the United States and sell your product in the US.

當然，與美國達成一致並在美國銷售產品要容易得多。

And that's where the leverage of the United States comes into the picture.

Because if you look at every other market in the world, they don't stand a chance.

因為放眼世界其他所有市場，他們都沒有機會。

I'm not even going to talk about the United Kingdom.

The UK market is so tiny, it's so small that it doesn't even compete either with the European Union or China, and it's far, far away from the United States.

英國的市場太小了，小到根本無法與歐盟或中國競爭，而且距離美國也很遠很遠。

Countries such as Japan and India stands no chance whatsoever.

日本和印度等國根本沒有機會。

So if you're a company that is located in Japan, what are you going to choose if you had an option to build your product and sell your product only in Japan or only in the United States?

那麼，如果你是一家位於日本的公司，如果你可以選擇只在日本生產和銷售你的產品，或者只在美國銷售你的產品，你會如何選擇？

In fact, even if you had the option to sell your product in the European Union and China or just the United States, you will most likely choose to sell your product only in the United States because that is the biggest market, that is the most stable economy.

事實上，即使你可以選擇在歐盟和中國銷售產品，或者只在美國銷售產品，你也很可能只選擇在美國銷售產品，因為美國是最大的市場，是最穩定的經濟體。

Because the next day, something could go wrong between the relationship between China and the European Union.

因為第二天，中國和歐盟之間的關係就可能出問題。

These two countries don't actually go along.

The European Union always claims to be on the side of freedom and human rights.

歐洲聯盟總是聲稱站在自由和人權一邊。

On the other side, China has a completely different system of ruling its country, which is why someday these two countries can fall apart.

另一方面，中國有著完全不同的治國體系，這就是為什麼總有一天這兩個國家會分崩離析。

That's why you as a country, you'll most likely just go and choose the United States.

這就是為什麼作為一個國家，你們很可能會選擇美國。

對您來說，這是最安全的選擇。

Let's take an example of LVMH, the company that produces a lot of luxury brands such as Dior.

以生產迪奧等眾多奢侈品牌的 LVMH 集團為例。

And if you look at their sales, the largest market is of course Asia, but that's the entire Asian continent, that is China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Middle Eastern countries and so on and so forth.

如果你看看他們的銷售額，最大的市場當然是亞洲，但那是整個亞洲大陸，即中國、印度尼西亞、馬來西亞、泰國、中東國家等等。

And all of them are as much as just one single market of the United States.

所有這些市場都與美國的單一市場一樣重要。

And if you compare the United States with Europe, then I think LVMH will easily just abandon Europe, even though that LVMH is a French company.

如果將美國與歐洲相比，我認為 LVMH 很容易就會放棄歐洲，儘管 LVMH 是一家法國公司。

So if you actually force these countries and you put tariffs on all of these countries, every single one of them is going to choose and come to the United States, build their factories in the US because nobody can afford to lose the US market.

是以，如果你真的強迫這些國家，對所有這些國家徵收關稅，那麼它們中的每一個都會選擇來美國，在美國建廠，因為沒有人能承受失去美國市場的代價。

If one company is going to choose the United States, while their competitor is going to abandon the United States, over the next couple of years, one company is going to become insanely rich while the other company is going to go bankrupt or will lose a huge market share, which is why investors are going to sell the stock of the first company that abandoned the United States and will massively invest in the company that actually chose the United States and complied with the tariff or simply moved their manufacturing back to the United States.

如果一家公司選擇美國，而他們的競爭對手放棄美國，那麼在接下來的幾年裡，一家公司將變得富可敵國，而另一家公司將破產或失去巨大的市場份額，這就是為什麼投資者會拋售第一家放棄美國的公司的股票，而大量投資於真正選擇美國並遵守關稅或乾脆將生產遷回美國的公司。

This is the company that manufactures the most advanced chips out there.

So they manufacture chips for companies such as Apple, Nvidia, Qualcomm, AMD.

是以，他們為蘋果、Nvidia、高通、AMD 等公司生產芯片。

Do you see a trend in the clients of TSMC?

您認為臺積電的客戶有什麼趨勢嗎？

So if TSMC had to choose between literally choosing the Taiwanese market or the US market, they will easily just abandon Taiwan, they will not even do business in Taiwan, they will literally pack up their stuff and just go to the United States and manufacture everything in the US.

是以，如果臺積電必須在臺灣市場和美國市場之間做出選擇，他們很容易就會放棄臺灣，甚至不會在臺灣開展業務，他們會打包好東西直接去美國，在美國生產一切產品。

Especially when TSMC manufactures very high advanced technologies.

尤其是當臺積電生產非常先進的技術時。

But if you look at their sales, most of their sales are in North America, primarily the United States.

但如果你看看他們的銷售額，他們的大部分銷售額都在北美，主要是美國。

Of course, they sell a lot of cars in the UK as well, but if they had to choose between North America, the United States in particular, and UK, Jaguar is going to choose the United States because they are going to make far more money in the United States than they will ever make in the United Kingdom.

當然，他們在英國也銷售大量汽車，但如果必須在北美（尤其是美國）和英國之間做出選擇，捷豹會選擇美國，因為他們在美國賺的錢要比在英國賺的錢多得多。

Especially if you were let's say the head of Jaguar and Land Rover and you ask yourself, what's the trajectory?

特別是如果你是捷豹和路虎的負責人，你會問自己，發展的軌跡是什麼？

Well, if you look at the numbers, you know that's not the case, but will the US economy keep growing?

如果你看一下數據，就會知道情況並非如此，但美國經濟會繼續增長嗎？

So where are you going to make most of your money?

那麼，你打算從哪裡賺到最多的錢呢？

You will make it in the United States, so you will literally abandon the United Kingdom and you will move everything, every single manufacturing back to the United States.

你們將在美國取得成功，是以你們將放棄英國，將所有的一切、所有的製造業都遷回美國。