Name: 全面戰爭：戰錘 III》--關於全新 DLC、補丁和 Betas 的開發哈拉--下一步是什麼？ (Total War: WARHAMMER III - Dev Chat on an all-new DLC, Patches & Betas - What's Next?)
Uploaded: 2025-03-29T16:09:58.000Z
Duration: 22 min 14 s

基礎被動語態

Hi everyone, I'm Steve Coleman, Senior Community Manager on Total War, and once again I am joined by some of our wonderful Warhammer 3 dev team to talk a little bit about patches, betas, and a little bit more.

大家好，我是《全面戰爭》的高級社區經理史蒂夫-科爾曼（Steve Coleman），《戰錘 3》開發團隊的一些成員將再次與我一起討論補丁、測試和其他一些問題。

I am joined by Will, and I am also joined through the magic of magic, Vasil and Radoslav from our Sofia studio in Bulgaria.

威爾和保加利亞索非亞工作室的瓦西里和拉多斯拉夫也通過神奇的魔法加入了我的行列。

If you just tell us who you are, what you do, and some things you've worked on.

如果你能告訴我們你是誰，你是做什麼的，以及你做過的一些事情。

I'm William, William Hogstad, and I'm a Warhammer 3 DLC designer.

我叫威廉，威廉-霍格斯塔德，是《戰錘 3》DLC 設計師。

I've worked at the company for five, six years roughly, working on mostly mainline DLC for Warhammer 3.

我在公司大概工作了五、六年，主要負責《戰錘 3》的主線 DLC。

Recently, my focus has been primarily on our patching efforts, the interim content, the .x patches, 5.3, 5.2, 6.1, which is hopefully in your hands by now, and making those extra bits of content to tide you over while you wait for our more major releases.

最近，我的工作重心主要放在我們的補丁工作、臨時內容、.x 補丁、5.3、5.2 和 6.1（希望你們現在已經拿到這些補丁）上，並製作了一些額外的內容，以便在你們等待我們更重要的版本時讓你們渡過難關。

Hey, so my name is Vasil, and I've been working as a lead DLC designer over Warhammer DLC projects.

嘿，我叫瓦西里，是《戰錘》DLC 項目的首席 DLC 設計師。

And I've been with CA for a while now, for a few years back, and I'm very excited to join the Warhammer team.

我加入 CA 有一段時間了，有幾年了，我很高興能加入《戰錘》團隊。

Yes, hello, my name is Radoslav, I'm a principal tech designer working on Total War.

你好，我叫拉多斯拉夫，是《全面戰爭》的主要技術設計師。

I've recently joined the DLC team after finishing up with Total War Feral, and now I'm working with various people on both patching efforts and DLC efforts.

在結束了《全面戰爭：野性》的工作後，我最近加入了 DLC 團隊，現在我正與不同的人一起工作，負責補丁工作和 DLC 工作。

Great, thank you guys, and thank you for joining us today.

很好，謝謝你們，謝謝你們今天參加我們的節目。

But for now, I'm going to send you back into the ether.

但現在，我要把你送回虛無縹緲的世界。

We'll come back to you in a little bit, we're just going to chat with Will about the patches.

我們稍後再跟你聊，我們要跟威爾談談補丁的事。

So, patch 6.1 has just recently dropped for Warhammer 3, bringing with it some refreshes for Kislev, Tzeentch, and Grand Café, as well as some new units, because everybody loves free stuff.

最近，《戰錘 3》剛剛發佈了 6.1 補丁，帶來了基斯列夫、天災和大咖啡館的一些更新，以及一些新組織、部門，因為每個人都喜歡免費的東西。

And the usual bug fixes and tweaks to the core game that always come with these patches.

此外，這些補丁還會對核心遊戲進行常見的錯誤修復和調整。

So what's your approach to these patches at the moment?

那麼你目前是如何處理這些補丁的？

So how are you figuring out what you're going to do, when you're going to do it, and how you're going to do it?

那麼，你是如何確定要做什麼、何時做以及如何做的呢？

So right now, kind of the core of our strategy is something new to chew on.

是以，現在，我們的戰略核心就是要琢磨一些新東西。

A new extra gubbin attached to something that already exists to give you a little bit more to play with.

在已經存在的東西上附加一個新的額外部件，讓你有更多的東西可以玩。

And how we arrive at what to do is primarily something that we figure out through the help of the PX team, that's the player experience team, whose job it is to go through all those conversations everywhere out there and distill that down into something digestible for us in design to eat and go, we think we can solve this problem that lots of people are having.

他們的工作就是對所有的對話進行分析，並將其提煉成可供我們設計人員消化的東西，然後說："我們認為我們可以解決很多人遇到的這個問題。

Or, we see that a lot of people are happy about this and want to see more of it, or unhappy about this thing and want to see it improved.

或者，我們看到很多人對這件事感到高興，希望看到更多這樣的事情，或者對這件事感到不滿，希望看到它得到改進。

And those help inform us in a very qualitative way.

這些都有助於為我們提供高質量的資訊。

We can't just always go in our guts, we need some hard data, and PX are the perfect team for providing that to us.

我們不能總是憑感覺行事，我們需要一些確鑿的數據，而 PX 正是為我們提供這些數據的最佳團隊。

So the things that have come in the past, in 5.1, 5.2, etc., as well as 6.1, has that all come through from the PX team?

那麼，過去在 5.1、5.2 等版本以及 6.1 版本中出現的內容都是 PX 團隊提供的嗎？

Has that all been based on the feedback that they've gathered for you?

這些都是基於他們為你收集的反饋嗎？

Or do you often find things out in the wild world yourselves?

還是你們經常自己到野外去找東西？

We take things to PX as well, because we're all people and we see things, we read about our own game.

我們也會把東西帶到 PX，因為我們都是人，我們會看到一些東西，我們會閱讀自己的比賽。

I mean, you can't prevent yourself from going on your own forums at some point.

我的意思是，你不能阻止自己在某些時候上自己的論壇。

And when we see something that really jumps out to us, we like to sneakily go to PX and go, hey, do you have any more info on this?

當我們看到一些讓我們眼前一亮的東西時，我們喜歡偷偷地去 PX 問："嘿，你們有關於這個的更多資訊嗎？

And some of the things have come from our side of the pond as well, on that front.

在這方面，有些事情也來自我們這邊。

I think, for example, the deeps was very much a Mitch-led, this was something he was excited about, this was something he really wanted to do.

我認為，舉例來說，"深淵 "在很大程度上是米奇主導的，這是他感到興奮的事情，這是他非常想做的事情。

But of course, we funnel it through the appropriate channels anyway.

當然，無論如何，我們都會通過適當的管道輸送。

Looking forward, now that 6.1 is out there, is there anything you guys have already got planned for 6.2?

展望未來，既然 6.1 已經發布，你們是否已經為 6.2 計劃了什麼？

Or anything else that you're looking at for future?

或者還有什麼你正在考慮的未來？

So, at the moment, of course, seeing as this is being recorded before the release of 6.1, it's a little bit early to say exactly what we're doing in 6.2.

當然，目前我們是在 6.1 版本發佈前錄製的，所以現在說 6.2 版本的具體內容還為時尚早。

We're still in the ideation phase on that.

不過，我還是能說幾句大白話的。

Up until this point, we've been thinking a lot about what little extra gubbins can we add for you.

在此之前，我們一直在考慮能為大家添加什麼額外的小玩意兒。

But for 6.2, what we'd like to do is take that focus and bring it down to what core game system can we do some improvements for.

但對於 6.2 版，我們想做的是把重點放在我們可以改進哪些核心遊戲系統上。

And some examples of what we think about when we say that is things like, can we improve the situation around ancillaries for everyone?

當我們這樣說時，我們會想到一些例子，比如，我們能否為每個人改善輔助設施的情況？

This was something that we originally wanted to do in 5.3, but we weren't happy enough with the results to put that out there yet.

這本來是我們想在 5.3 中實現的，但我們對結果還不夠滿意，所以還沒有公佈。

Some other things that are hot topics, especially because this is something that the PX team have been telling us about, is people are talking a lot about control, people are talking a lot about corruption, and there's a lot of strong opinions on that.

還有一些熱門話題，特別是因為這是 PX 團隊一直告訴我們的，那就是人們經常談論控制，人們經常談論腐敗，對此有很多強烈的意見。

And that is something that we are considering right now.

這也是我們目前正在考慮的問題。

I think the way I'm going to frame this is it is too early for us to say exactly how we'll approach it, because it's a very volatile space.

我想我要說的是，現在說我們將如何處理這個問題還為時過早，因為這是一個非常不穩定的領域。

It's a big core system shared with all the factions in the game.

這是遊戲中所有派別共享的一個大型核心系統。

We know, for example, that when we moved to Warhammer 3, we changed corruption entirely from the system where it was a percentage division inside the province to having this more tabulated, you have a set specific discrete number that can go to 100.

例如，我們知道，當我們轉到《戰錘 3》時，我們完全改變了腐敗的系統，從省內部的百分比劃分變為更表格化，你有一個可以達到 100 的特定離散數字。

And we did that originally because we had this consistent complaint of people really don't like it when they can't remove all the corruption in the province.

我們這樣做的初衷是，人們一直抱怨無法清除省內的所有腐敗現象。

They really like to wipe the slate clean, have no corruption.

他們真的喜歡一塵不染，沒有腐敗。

But now we have a different problem where a little bit of corruption can really snowball to zero or to 100 very easily.

但現在我們遇到了不同的問題，一點點腐敗就能像滾雪球一樣，輕而易舉地化整為零或化零為整。

And that's a topic where we're having a lot of discussions on this, whether how do we solve this?

這也是我們正在討論的一個話題，我們該如何解決這個問題？

And that's why I think it's a bit too early to give specifics, but these are the kinds of topics we're talking about right now.

是以，我認為現在說具體情況還為時過早，但這些都是我們現在正在討論的話題。

And I don't think we can put anything out there until we're quite happy with it, because it's such a core system.

我認為，在我們對它非常滿意之前，我們不能把任何東西放出去，因為它是一個如此核心的系統。

So we're going to have to be really sure about this one.

是以，我們必須非常確定這一點。

I don't know where you'll obviously be in your thought process for this, but maybe this will prompt people to give us a bit more feedback on that specific topic and maybe we'll get some valuable stuff out of it from there.

我不知道你們在思考這個問題的過程中會處於什麼位置，但也許這會促使人們就這個特定的話題給我們更多的反饋，也許我們會從中得到一些有價值的東西。

People may recognise your name from the 6.1 dev blog that went out just before 6.1.

人們可能會在 6.1 之前發佈的 6.1 開發博客中認出你的名字。

So obviously you did a lot of work on that, including the fantastic unit card placeholders, which was artistic...

很明顯，你在這方面做了很多工作，包括製作了精美的單元卡佔位符，這很有藝術性...

Crime, I think, is the word you're looking for.

我想，"犯罪 "才是你們要找的詞。

I'm very disappointed that they didn't make it into the patch.

我很失望它們沒有被加入到補丁中。

That aside, are there any kind of highlights from 6.1 or things that you particularly are proud of that you'd want to talk about?

除此以外，6.1 有沒有什麼亮點，或者您特別引以為豪的事情，您想談談嗎？

So when we were concepting a lot of the work for 6.1, there was definitely one feature, I think, above all else, that kind of really got the mental juices flowing.

是以，當我們為 6.1 版構思大量工作時，我認為最重要的肯定是一個功能，它真正激發了我們的靈感。

It was when we were talking about how do we do Atamans?

就在我們討論如何做阿塔曼時？

And Atamans, of course, are these provincial governors, and so they're meant to emphasise the power of interior Kislev.

當然，阿塔曼人是這些省的省長，所以他們是為了強調基斯里夫內部的權力。

And as we went through a lot of different variations on what can an Ataman do, we came to this idea of what if an Ataman lets you take a settlement, left-click it, and then right-click an enemy army nearby and have the settlement attack the army?

我們對 "阿塔曼 "能做什麼進行了大量研究，最後得出一個想法：如果 "阿塔曼 "能讓你佔領一個定居點，左鍵單擊它，然後右鍵單擊附近的敵軍，讓定居點攻擊敵軍，會怎麼樣？

And this idea of having a settlement attack an army instead of an army attack a settlement, which is the usual Total War flow, just immediately everyone who was talking about this eyes up.

讓一個定居點攻擊一支軍隊，而不是讓一支軍隊攻擊一個定居點，這是《全面戰爭》的慣用流程。

And the moment we knew we had that, we couldn't stop chasing that dream, essentially.

當我們知道我們擁有這個夢想的那一刻，我們就無法停止對夢想的追逐。

And it's a big technical challenge to achieve, but it was simply too interesting for us to let it go once we caught on to that idea.

要實現這一目標，在技術上是一個巨大的挑戰，但一旦我們發現了這一想法，就會覺得它太有趣了，不能輕易放棄。

From one round of big changes with the refreshes from 6.1 and the future in 6.2 to another side that we're actually working on, which is campaign AI changes.

從 6.1 的更新和 6.2 的未來帶來的一輪大變革，到我們正在進行的另一個方面，即活動人工智能變革。

Now, we've just recently run a beta on Steam, which has actually just finished.

現在，我們最近剛剛在 Steam 上進行了測試，測試剛剛結束。

We have another one that's going to be coming up in the near future.

在不久的將來，我們還將推出另一款產品。

And this has been headed up by Rado in Sofia.

這項工作由索非亞的雷達公司負責。