UN rejects resolution calling for immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

聯合國拒絕接受呼籲立即在加沙停火的決議。

U.S. blocks resolution calling for immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

美國阻止要求加沙立即停火的決議。

Rejects versus blocks.

拒絕與阻止。

And UN versus U.S.

聯合國與美國

Maybe like lots of different nations rejected this thing but U.S. blocks is like, no it was America.

也許很多不同的國家都拒絕了這件事，但美國區塊鏈就像，不，是美國。

Like the whole world doesn't want to come to peace or compromise.

就好像全世界都不想達成和平或妥協一樣。

Where this one makes it seem like it's just the U.S. that doesn't want to compromise.

而這篇報道讓人覺得只是美國不想妥協。

I think you could look at this in the headline.

我覺得你可以從標題上看這個問題。

People will post the headline and say like they don't want a ceasefire.

人們會貼出標題，說他們不希望停火。

But the context is they don't want a ceasefire given the terms of the agreement.

但根據協議條款，他們不希望停火。

This makes it feel more anti-peace.

這讓人感覺更加反和平。

What about the added context that the vast majority of UN nations supported the resolution?

那麼，聯合國絕大多數國家都支持這項決議的附加背景又是什麼呢？

Yeah.

是啊

I see.

我明白了

Okay yeah that makes a big difference.

好吧，是的，這就大不一樣了。

When most of them wanted to.

當他們中的大多數人想

You're right they both leave out very important detail which 10 votes against and 145 in favor right.

你說得對，他們都忽略了非常重要的細節，即 10 票反對和 145 票贊成。