The argument from repetition (argumentum  ad nauseam or argumentum ad infinitum) is  

訴諸反覆（argumentum ad nausem 或 argumentum ad infinitum）是

a logical fallacy that occurs when  someone repeatedly asserts a point,  

一種邏輯謬誤，當有人反覆斷言某個觀點時，

irrespective of contradiction  or lack of supporting evidence,  

無論是否矛盾或缺乏支持證據，

in the belief that the repetition will  make the argument more persuasive or true.

相信重複會使論證更有說服力或更真實，就會發生這種邏輯謬誤。

This fallacy is based on the idea  that a statement becomes true,  

這種謬論基於這樣一種觀點：一個陳述

or at least more believable,  the more it is repeated.

被重複得越多，就會變得真實，或至少更可信。

Everyday Example: A company  claims that its juice cleanse  

日常範例：一家公司聲稱其排毒果汁

is a "miracle detoxifier." Despite a lack of  scientific evidence supporting detox claims,  

是「奇蹟解毒劑」。儘管缺乏支持排毒主張的科學證據，但

the company's advertisements repeat the assertion  incessantly across various media platforms.

該公司的廣告在各種媒體平台上不斷重複這項主張。

The repetition is used as a strategy to embed  the idea in the consciousness of the public,  

重複是一種將這個想法植入公眾意識的策略，

hoping that consumers will accept the claim  as true simply because it has been stated  

希望消費者能夠接受這一說法，因為它被

so frequently and confidently, not because  any substantive evidence has been provided.

如此頻繁地、自信地陳述過，而不是因為提供了任何實質證據。