字幕列表 影片播放
,
HOME OF THE PBS NEWSHOUR,
WEEKNIGHTS ON PBS.
JOHN: THERE'S A CLASS OF TOXIC
CHEMICALS SO PERVASIVE THAT THEY
ARE FOUND IN FOOD, SOIL, WATER,
AND IN THE BLOOD OF MOST PEOPLE
IN AMERICA.
EARLIER THIS MONTH, THE EPA
PROPOSED THE FIRST-EVER
REGULATORY STANDARD TO LIMIT THE
QUANTITY ALLOWED IN DRINKING
WATER.
ALI ROGIN LOOKS AT THE GROWING
HEALTH CONCERNS ABOUT THESE
CHEMICALS.
ALI: PFAS, SOMETIMES CALLED
FOREVER CHEMICALS, REPEL FIRE,
WATER, OIL AND STAINS AND HAVE
BEEN USED SINCE THE 1940S IN A
WIDE VARIETY OF EVERYDAY
PRODUCTS.
YOU CAN FIND THEM IN NONSTICK
COOKWARE, FAST FOOD WRAPPERS,
CLOTHES, AND COSMETICS.
BUT THESE MAN MADE CHEMICALS
DON'T BREAK DOWN EASILY, AND A
NUMBER OF THEM HAVE BEEN LINKED
TO SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEMS.
FOR MORE ON THEIR IMPACT, WE
TURN TO ERIN BELL.
SHE'S AN ENVIRONMENTAL
EPIDEMIOLOGIST AT THE STATE
UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY
WHO STUDIES HUMAN EXPOSURE TO
THESE TOXINS.
ERIN, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR
JOINING US.
JUST HOW WIDESPREAD ARE THESE
CHEMICALS?
ERIN: THESE CHEMICALS HAVE BEEN
DETECTED IN THE DRINKING WATER
AND SOIL IN EVERY STATE OF THE
UNITED STATES, AND IT IS ALSO
BEING DETECTED IN MANY COUNTRIES
ACROSS THE WORLD.
A NUMBER OF HEALTH CONCERNS ARE
RELATED TO EXPOSURE TO THESE
CHEMICALS.
THEY INCLUDE IMPACT ON THE
IMMUNE SYSTEM.
FOLKS WITH HIGHER EXPOSURES
ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE THYROID
CHANGES, CHANGES IN KIDNEY
FUNCTION, AS WELL AS HIGHER
CHOLESTEROL.
WE'RE ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT
IMPACTS ON CHILDREN WITH REGARDS
TO LOW BIRTH WEIGHT AND
NEURODEVELOPMENT IN THOSE
CHILDREN.
AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER
HEALTH OUTCOMES WHERE THE
LITERATURE IS MORE MIXED.
WE SOMETIMES SEE AN ASSOCIATION,
OTHER TIMES WE SEE LESS OF AN
ASSOCIATION AND WE HAVE MORE
WORK TO DO.
THESE WOULD INCLUDE INFERTILITY
FACTORS AROUND ULCERATIVE
COLITIS AND OTHER AUTOIMMUNE
DISEASES.
ALI: AND ARE THESE THINGS THAT
PEOPLE CAN DETERMINE BY TAKING A
BLOOD TEST?
I MEAN, HOW HOW DOES ONE TEST TO
SEE WHERE THEIR LEVELS ARE?
ERIN: THAT'S CORRECT.
SO FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL, WE
MEASURE CONCENTRATIONS IN THEIR
BLOOD, AND THAT IS THE BEST WAY
TO DETERMINE THE INDIVIDUAL
LEVEL OF EXPOSURE FOR PEOPLE WHO
HAVE LIVED IN COMMUNITIES OR
FOR PEOPLE IN OCCUPATIONS THAT
HAVE THESE HIGHER EXPOSURES.
UNFORTUNATELY, THERE'S NO
CONSISTENT GUIDANCE OR COVERAGE
FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR
TESTING FOR PFAS IN YOUR BLOOD.
IF YOU CONTACT YOUR LOCAL HEALTH
DEPARTMENT, THEY WILL LET YOU
KNOW IF THERE ARE PROGRAMS AT
THE STATE LEVEL SPONSORED
THROUGH STATE HEALTH
DEPARTMENTS, IF THEY HAVE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOU TO GET
TESTED.
BUT THIS IS A SITUATION THAT
WE'RE STILL WORKING ON IN TERMS
OF MAKING SURE THERE'S COVERAGE
FOR PEOPLE TO GET TESTED IF THEY
WISH TO KNOW WHAT THEIR LEVELS
ARE.
ALI: NOW, THE EPA, AS WE
MENTIONED IN THE INTRODUCTION,
IS PROPOSING A NEW REGULATION
PERTAINING TO PFAS IN WATER.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT EXACTLY
THIS PROPOSAL WOULD DO?
ERIN: THERE ARE 12,000 CHEMICALS
IN THE FAMILY OF PFAS.
THE EPA HAS SUGGESTED THAT FOR
SIX OF THESE CHEMICALS, THERE
SHOULD BE A STANDARD FEDERAL
RULE THAT WOULD REQUIRE THAT
WATER UTILITIES TEST FOR THESE
SIX CHEMICALS.
AND IF THEY WERE ABOVE A CERTAIN
LEVEL, THAT THOSE LEVELS BE
MONITORED FOR AND COMPANIES BE
REQUIRED TO REDUCE THEIR
EXPOSURE IN THE WATER UTILITY.
ALI: NOW SIX OUT OF 12,000
DOESN'T SOUND LIKE A LOT.
ARE WE MISSING SOMETHING HERE?
ARE THESE VERY SIGNIFICANT
VERSIONS OF THESE CHEMICALS?
ERIN: SO THAT'S AN EXCELLENT
QUESTION.
AND THIS IS ONE OF THE
CHALLENGES WE HAVE IN THE FIELD.
OUT OF THE 12,000, WE'VE
OBVIOUSLY STUDIED VERY FEW OF
THEM.
SO THESE SIX ARE PARTICULARLY OF
CONCERN BECAUSE WE KNOW THE MOST
ABOUT THEM.
WE ALSO HAVE DETECTED THEM IN
HIGHER LEVELS IN DRINKING WATER
ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS QUITE LITERALLY A
DROP IN THE BUCKET.
IT IS JUST A VERY SMALL NUMBER.
THERE IS CONCERN IN THE
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY THAT WE
WILL NEVER CATCH UP IN TERMS OF
UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE HEALTH
EFFECTS ARE FOR THE MUCH LARGER
GROUP OF PFAS'S.
ALI: HOW IS IT THAT THESE
COMPANIES ARE ABLE TO CONTINUE
TO MANUFACTURE PRODUCTS WITH
THESE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS IN
THEM?
ERIN: SO HISTORICALLY, WHEN WE
TALK ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL
EXPOSURES AND REMOVING THEM FROM
PRODUCTION, WE FOCUS ON THEIR
PERSISTENCE.
THEY STAY IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND
IN OUR BODIES FOR A VERY LONG
TIME.
THE NEWER VERSIONS ARE NOT AS
LONG LASTING IN THE ENVIRONMENT,
HOWEVER, BECAUSE THEY ARE
STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED TO IN
ESSENCE DO THE SAME THING THAT
MADE THEM GOOD FOR PRODUCTION
AND FOR OUR CONSUMER PRODUCTS.
THEY'RE STILL RELATED TO SOME OF
THESE ADVERSE HEALTH OUTCOMES.
SO THEY'RE STILL BEING USED
BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT REGULATED
THEM AND WE STILL REQUIRE THEM
IN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS.
AND UNTIL THOSE RULES AND LAWS
CHANGE, THEN THAT WILL BE
ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
ALI: SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT
THIS EPA RULE, IF IT IS
APPROVED, IS STILL GOING TO TAKE
A FEW YEARS BEFORE IT'S FULLY
OPERATIONAL.
SO WHAT KIND OF THINGS CAN
PEOPLE DO IF THEY WANT TO BEGIN
REDUCING THEIR EXPOSURE NOW?
ERIN: THERE ARE A NUMBER OF
THINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN DO AND
COMMUNITIES CAN DO.
THE FIRST IS AWARENESS.
PLEASE BE SURE AND KEEP MINDFUL
OF WHAT MIGHT BE GOING ON IN
YOUR COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY IN
THE DRINKING WATER.
IF YOU ARE NOT SURE WHAT THE
LEVELS OF PFAS ARE IN YOUR
DRINKING WATER, YOU CAN CONTACT
YOUR LOCAL WATER UTILITY, YOUR
STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT, AS WELL
AS ANY UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE
RESEARCHERS THAT ARE IN THE
AREA.
IN TERMS OF REDUCTION, WE CAN
USE FILTERS ON OUR WATER SYSTEMS
AND IN OUR HOMES.
YOU ALSO WANT TO BE MINDFUL OF
WHAT YOU USE ON AN INDIVIDUAL
BASIS.
AGAIN, MINIMIZING FAST FOOD
WRAPPERS, THE WRAPPERS ARE LINED
WITH THESE MATERIALS AS WELL AS
MICROWAVE POPCORN IS ANOTHER
EXAMPLE.
POTS AND PANS HAVE THESE LININGS
.
AS THEY BECOME SCRATCHED THE
PFAS CAN LEACH INTO THE FOOD AND
CAUSE US MORE EXPOSURE.
SO AGAIN, BE MINDFUL OF THAT.
AND AS YOU REPLACE THEM WITH
THINGS THAT ARE NONSTICK WITH
THAT DON'T HAVE THE NONSTICK
CHEMICALS OR HAVE THE OTHER
TYPES OF COATINGS ON THEM THAT
WOULD POTENTIALLY HAVE THESE
CHEMICALS.
ALI: ERIN BELL WITH SUNY ALBANY,
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
ERIN: THANK YOU.