as demonstrated by the scientific literature. Dr. Jubbal, MedSchoolInsiders.com.

正如科學文獻所證明的那樣。Jubbal博士，MedSchoolInsiders.com。

This is going to be an interesting video, mostly because of the comments from viewers.

這將是一個有趣的視頻，主要是因為觀眾的評論。

Most of you will find this interesting, but a small portion will be deeply offended by

你們中的大多數人會發現這很有趣，但有一小部分人會被深深冒犯

the data. After all, the year is 2021 and being offended is one of the most widely practiced

的數據。畢竟，今年是2021年，被冒犯是最廣泛的做法之一。

sports across hyperwoke social justice warriors eager to virtue signal how truly woke they

在運動中遇到過度清醒的社會正義戰士，急於向他們發出真正清醒的信號。

are. First, what is IQ? IQ stands for Intelligence

是。首先，什麼是智商？IQ是智力的縮寫

Quotient, a standardized test with numeric scoring designed to assess human intelligence.

商數，是一種標準化的測試，以數字計分，旨在評估人類的智力。

The concept of measuring one's IQ arose in the 1910's, by either Wilhelm Stern or Lewis

測量一個人的智商的概念產生於1910年代，由威廉-斯特恩或劉易斯提出。

Terman, depending on which source you believe. The population's average is 100 with a standard

特曼，取決於你相信哪個來源。人口的平均數是100，標準是

deviation of 15. This means approximately two thirds of the population scores between

偏差為15。這意味著大約有三分之二的人的分數介於

85 and 115, and 2.5% are above 130, and 2.5% are below 70.

85和115，還有2.5%是在130以上，2.5%是在70以下。

It's important to note that while IQ tests have a high degree of reliability, meaning

值得注意的是，雖然智商測試有很高的可靠性，但意味著

you'll score similarly by repeating the test, the validity of the test is limited to the

你通過重複測試會得到類似的分數，測試的有效性僅限於

types of intelligence that are necessary to do well in academic work. It does not account

在學術工作中表現良好所需的智力類型。它並沒有說明

for creativity or social intelligence, among other valid and important forms of intelligence.

為創造力或社會智力，以及其他有效和重要的智力形式。

The Simon-Binet IQ Scale classifies scores as the following:

西蒙-比奈特智商表將分數分為以下幾類。

Over 140 – Genius or almost genius 120 – 140 – Very superior intelligence

超過140 - 天才或幾乎是天才 120 - 140 - 非常卓越的智力

110 – 119 – Superior intelligence 90 – 109 – Average or normal intelligence

110 - 119 - 高級智力 90 - 109 - 平均或正常智力

80 – 89 – Dullness 70 – 79 – Borderline deficiency in intelligence

80 - 89 - 無精打采 70 - 79 - 邊緣性智力不足

Under 70 – Feeble-mindedness So how important are IQ scores? When asked

70分以下--弱智 那麼智商分數有多重要呢？當問及

his IQ, Stephen Hawking replied, "I have no idea. People who boast about their IQ are

他的智商，霍金回答說："我不知道。誇耀自己智商的人是

losers." Well said, Dr. Hawking. Well said. Here are the professions with the highest

失敗者。"說得好，霍金博士。說得好。以下是職業中最高的

average IQ, taken from a variety of sources, including Robert Hauser's "Meritocracy, Cognitive

平均智商，取自各種資料，包括羅伯特-豪瑟的《功利主義，認知》。

Ability, and the Sources of Occupational Success". At the top of the list, in the low 130's,

能力，以及職業成功的來源"。排名第一，在130分以下。

are either physicians and surgeons, or professors and researchers, depending on the study you

他們要麼是醫生和外科醫生，要麼是教授和研究人員，這取決於你的研究。

look at. The range amongst physicians and surgeons is tightly clustered, whereas the

看一下。內科醫生和外科醫生之間的範圍是緊緊地聚集在一起，而

range for professors and researchers is broader. Below that, in the high 120's are lawyers,

教授和研究人員的範圍則更廣。在這之下，處於120年代高位的是律師。

followed by accountants in the low 120's. Pharmacists average around 120 and nurses

緊隨其後的是低至120的會計師。藥劑師平均在120左右，護士

in the high 110's. You can find a link to the full list with more professions in the

在高110年代。你可以找到一個鏈接到完整的名單，其中有更多的職業。

description. So what does this mean? Not much, actually.

描述。那麼這意味著什麼呢？實際上，沒有多少。

It appears that, on average, those with higher IQ's gravitate to more intellectually stimulating

看來，平均而言，那些智商較高的人傾向於更多的智力刺激。

work. Cue the keyboard warriors enraged in protest that their work isn't as intellectually

工作。鍵盤俠們被激怒了，抗議他們的工作在智力上不盡如人意。

stimulating as that of a professor or researcher. Curious to know more, I dug further into intelligence,

刺激，就像教授或研究人員那樣刺激。由於好奇想知道更多，我進一步挖掘了情報。

wealth, and happiness. Can you take a guess what I found?

財富，和幸福。你能猜一猜我發現了什麼嗎？

Jay Zagorsky from Ohio State University analyzed a sample of 7,500 adults between the ages

來自俄亥俄州立大學的傑伊-扎戈爾斯基（Jay Zagorsky）分析了7500名年齡在25歲以下的成年人的樣本。

of 33 and 41. The analysis initially confirmed findings similar to other studies linking

的33和41。該分析初步證實了與其他研究類似的發現，即把

higher intelligence with higher income. More specifically, every point increase in IQ was

智力越高，收入越高。更具體地說，智商每增加一點就

associated with approximately $200-$600 more income per year. For example, someone with

與每年大約多200-600美元的收入有關。例如，一個擁有

an IQ of 130 would earn approximately $12,000 more than someone with an IQ around 100. Not

智商為130的人將比智商為100左右的人多賺大約12,000美元。不是

surprisingly, those with higher intelligence scores also had greater wealth, meaning a

令人驚訝的是，那些智力分數較高的人也有更多的財富，這意味著一個

higher average net worth. But when performing multivariate regression

平均淨資產較高。但在進行多變量回歸時

models and controlling for various factors, such as divorce, years spent in school, type

模型，並控制各種因素，如離婚、在學校度過的年限、類型

of work, and inheritance, there was no link between IQ and net worth.

在工作和繼承方面，智商和淨資產之間沒有聯繫。

Other studies have found a correlation between IQ and income, meaning those with higher IQs

其他研究發現，智商和收入之間存在關聯，即那些智商較高的人

tend to make more money each year. These studies find little correlation between IQ and wealth,

傾向於每年賺更多的錢。這些研究發現智商和財富之間沒有什麼關聯。

however, meaning those in the yacht club aren't on average smarter than those who aren't.

然而，這意味著那些在遊艇俱樂部的人並不平均比那些不在遊艇俱樂部的人更聰明。

I find that data questionable. When you look at some of the wealthiest people in the world,

我覺得這個數據值得懷疑。當你看到世界上一些最富有的人時。

including Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffett, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison,

包括傑夫-貝佐斯、沃倫-巴菲特、伊隆-馬斯克、馬克-扎克伯格、比爾-蓋茨、拉里-埃裡森。

Larry Page, and other highly successful entrepreneurs, it's hard to argue they aren't all incredibly

拉里-佩奇和其他非常成功的企業家，很難說他們不都是令人難以置信的。

intelligent. Their immense wealth and high degree of intelligence would surely skew the

聰明。他們巨大的財富和高度的智力肯定會使

data, resulting in something statistically significant. But of course, the data sets

數據，產生了一些具有統計學意義的東西。但當然，這些數據集

we're looking at don't take these individuals into account.

我們所看到的是沒有把這些人考慮在內。

What about happiness? Do those with higher IQ tend to be happier than those with lower

幸福感呢？智商高的人是否比智商低的人更快樂？

IQ? In a 2012 review by Veenhoven and Choi, it

智商？在2012年Veenhoven和Choi的一篇評論中，它

was concluded that on the micro-level of individuals, there was no correlation between IQ and happiness.

得出的結論是，在個人的微觀層面上，智商和幸福之間沒有關聯。

But at the macro-level, meaning the average IQ amongst nations, there was a strong positive

但在宏觀層面上，即國家之間的平均智商，有一個強大的正向作用。

correlation. The researchers concluded, "together these findings mean that smartness of all

相關性。研究人員總結說："這些發現共同意味著，所有的聰明才智

pays more than being smarter than others." You would think that smarter people should

比起比別人更聰明，付出更多"。你會認為，更聰明的人應該

be happier. There is good evidence that IQ predicts more than just performance in school,

更快樂。有很好的證據表明，智商預測的不僅僅是在學校的表現。

but also success at work, health, and longevity. But these positive effects could be offset

但也包括工作上的成功、健康和長壽。但這些積極影響可能被抵消

by negative effects, namely in expectations. As the authors write, "school-smart people

由負面影響，即在預期。正如作者所寫的，"學校聰明的人

could expect more of life and therefore end up equally happy as the less smart, who expect

可以對生活有更多的期待，是以最終與不太聰明的人同樣幸福，他們期待的是

less." They raise other theories too, such as the development of school-intelligence

少"。他們也提出了其他理論，如學校智能的發展

involving opportunity costs, namely less time spent on sports or socializing, which are

涉及機會成本，即花在運動或社交上的時間減少，而這些時間是

also important to leading a satisfying life. And why would smarter nations be happier?

對過上滿意的生活也很重要。而為什麼更聰明的國家會更幸福？

One possible explanation is that both IQ and happiness depend on shared factors, such as

一種可能的解釋是，智商和幸福感都取決於共同的因素，例如

adequate nutrition and health care. If this video sparked curiosity, I'm glad,

充分的營養和保健。如果這個視頻引發了人們的好奇心，我很高興。

and I hope you join me here again, so please be sure to hit the like and subscribe buttons.

我希望你能再次加入我的行列，所以請你一定要按下喜歡和訂閱按鈕。

It's unfortunate that as we grow into adulthood, our childlike curiosity is beaten out of us.

不幸的是，當我們成長為成年人時，我們孩子般的好奇心被打掉了。

I find that one of the most rewarding experiences is to get reconnected with that childlike

我發現，最有益的經驗之一是重新連接到那個像孩子一樣的人。

wonder and explore where your curiosity leads you. If this video offended you, examine what

懷疑和探索你的好奇心所指向的地方。如果這個視頻冒犯了你，請檢查一下

meaning you're assigning to the data. And as Mae West famously said, "those who are

你所賦予數據的意義。正如Mae West的名言，"那些

easily shocked should be shocked more often." If you enjoyed this video, check out my video

容易被震驚的人應該更經常被震驚。"如果你喜歡這個視頻，請查看我的視頻

on the competitiveness of medical school versus law school versus nursing school and other

關於醫學院與法學院與護士學校及其他學校的競爭力問題。

professions, or my video exploring the research on whether money can buy happiness. Much love,

職業，或我的視頻，探索關於金錢是否能買到幸福的研究。非常愛你。

and I'll see you guys there.

我將在那裡見到你們。