and giant homes in California.

和加州的巨型住宅。

Influencers love to flaunt a lavish lifestyle

影響者喜歡炫耀奢侈的生活方式。

but what would actually happen to the planet

但實際上地球會發生什麼

if everybody lived like an influencer?

如果每個人都像一個有影響力的人一樣生活？

- Better yet, how many Earths would we need

- 更好的是，我們需要多少個地球？

to sustain the lifestyle of everyone saying,

來維持大家的生活方式說。

"Make sure you give this video a thumbs up.

"一定要對這個視頻豎起大拇指。

"Make sure you like, subscribe,

"請您務必點贊、訂閱。

"and you comp that merch below, bro."

"和你comp下面的商品，兄弟。"

- Let's start with-

- 讓我們從...

- Driving, the thing I hate most on Earth.

- 開車，是我在地球上最討厭的事情。

The most famous influencers live in America

最著名的影響者住在美國

where 6 million cars are purchased each year.

在那裡，每年有600萬輛汽車被購買。

And in the year 2015, Americans' combined driving length

而在2015年的時候，美國人的綜合駕駛長

was from Earth to Pluto and back 500 times.

是從地球到冥王星來回500次。

Most specifically though, influencers live here

不過最特別的是，影響者住在這裡

in the epicenter of the entertainment industry, La La Land.

在娛樂業的中心，拉拉樂園。

You might be a romantic and think of L.A.

你可能是一個浪漫的人，想到洛杉磯。

as the city of leading men swinging their arms

揮舞著手臂的城市的上司

and dancing on the big screen.

和大屏幕上的舞蹈。

But now it's more like beefcake men swinging something else

但現在更像是牛肉餅人在揮舞別的東西

on this small screen.

在這個小螢幕上。

In L.A., on average people drive 9.3 miles per day,

在洛杉磯，人們平均每天開車9.3英里。

which feels insane when you're from a place like Toronto,

當你來自多倫多這樣的地方時，感覺很瘋狂。

but it's actually 54% less

但實際上卻少了54%。

than the rest of Southern California.

比南加州其他地區。

This is because many Angelenos,

這是因為很多天使人。

which is what you're called when you live in L.A.

你住在洛杉磯的時候就叫這個名字了

which is kind of amazing, take public transit.

這是一種驚人的，採取公共交通。

But when is the last time you saw a vlogger

但是，你最後一次看到一個vlogger是什麼時候？

or YouTuber on a bus?

還是優步在公車上？

They'd be like, "Oh my God, is this on?

他們會說，"哦，我的上帝，這是怎麼回事？

"Do I look okay? (gasps)

"我看起來還好嗎？（喘氣）

"It's taking a lot for me to tell you this,

"我花了很多時間才告訴你這些。

"and you know how much I love you guys.

"你知道我有多愛你們，

"Something really crazy happened to me.

"我身上發生了一件很瘋狂的事情。

"Like story time, okay.

"像故事時間，好吧。

"I had to take a bus."

"我只好坐公車。"

(dramatic instrumental music)

咍

- And the cream of the crop celebrities or influencers

- 還有那些精英名人或有影響力的人。

live here in the West L.A. hills, aka the Hollywood Hills.

住在這裡的西洛杉磯山，也就是好萊塢山。

According to public data, people who live here

據公開數據顯示，生活在這裡的人

drive the most out of everyone in all of L.A.,

開車的人最多，在整個洛杉磯。

and things add up quickly as any employee or friend

物以類聚，人以群分

also needs to drive up into these hills

也要開進這些山裡

to get to your house,

去你的房子。

leading to an average of 11.1 vehicle miles

導致平均每輛車行駛11.1英里。

traveled per day.

每天的旅行。

This is why we constantly see influencers making videos

這就是為什麼我們不斷看到有影響力的人制作視頻的原因

in their car like this.

在他們的車上這樣。

- Hi, sisters. - Hi.

- 嗨，姐妹們- 嗨，姐妹們

(group laughing)

（組笑）

- Oh my gosh, that was kind of scary.

- 哦，我的天哪，那是一種可怕的。

- Also, did you know that 20% of meals in America

- 還有，你知道美國有20%的飯菜

are actually eaten in the car?

其實都是在車上吃的？

(sighs) The American dream.

（嘆氣）美國夢。

- I feel guilty. (crunches)

- 我感到內疚。（仰臥起坐）

- But if we're all rich influencers,

- 但如果我們都是有錢的影響者。

we can afford to buy an electric vehicle

我們有能力購買電動車

like a Tesla, right?

像特斯拉，對吧？

Let's assume we can.

我們假設可以。

Buying a Tesla is still actually worse for the environment

買特斯拉其實對環境還是比較惡劣的。

than taking public transit,

比乘坐公車。

and charging it still relies on the current power grid.

而充電還是要靠現在的電網。

Also, I am aware of the irony of me filming this in our car.

另外，我也意識到我在我們的車裡拍這個的諷刺。

I mean, we're influencers after all.

我的意思是，我們畢竟是有影響力的人。

♪ Nobody's perfect ♪

沒有人是完美的

- And since we're in Cali, it's not that bad.

- 因為我們是在卡利，它不是那麼糟糕。

California has amazing renewable energy sources.

加州擁有驚人的可再生能源。

In 2018 only 3.3% of the power grid came from coal

2018年，電網中只有3.3%的電力來自煤炭

and 0.16 came from crude oil,

而0.16來自原油。

compared to the rest of America where 13.1% comes from coal

與美國其他地區相比，13.1%來自於煤炭。

and 36.4 from crude oil.

和36.4來自原油。

So charging a Tesla in L.A. is pretty green

所以，在洛杉磯給特斯拉充電是非常環保的。

compared to the rest of America and even the world.

與美國其他地區乃至世界相比。

But California still relies pretty heavily on natural gas,

但加州仍然相當依賴天然氣。

not to mention the raw materials

何況是原料

it takes to make a Tesla in the first place.

它需要在第一時間製造特斯拉。

When you add it all up,

當你把所有的事情加起來。

it starts taking a toll on the Earth.

它開始對地球造成傷害。

Based on eco footprint calculations,

基於生態足跡的計算。

we would need 4.3 Earth to sustain a world

我們需要4.3個地球來支撐一個世界

where everyone had the same driving lifestyle

在那裡，每個人都有同樣的駕駛生活方式

as an influencer.

作為一個影響者。

That's just based off of driving

這只是基於駕駛

in some pretty ideal conditions.

在一些相當理想的條件下。

But what about their- - Mansions?

但是他們的---豪宅呢？

Huge houses require a lot of energy and electricity.

巨大的房子需要大量的能源和電力。

To start, Americans consume 15% of the world's energy

首先，美國人消耗了全球15%的能源

and 20% of the world's electricity,

和全球20%的電力。

but make up only 4% of the world's population.

但只佔世界人口的4%。

For context, the people of India and Sub-Saharan Africa

就背景而言，印度和撒哈拉以南非洲的人民

consume only 10% of the world's electricity

耗電量僅佔世界的一成

but make up 33% of the world's population.

但佔世界人口的33%。

Influencers tend to flaunt these large, gorgeous,

影響者往往會炫耀這些大而華麗的。

costly homes, but the true cost is on the Earth.

昂貴的房子，但真正的代價是在地球上。

Take just air conditioning for example.

僅以空調為例。

More than half of the air conditioning units in the world

世界上一半以上的空調機都是如此

are in China and the U.S.,

是在中國和美國。

and keeping them running uses 2.5 times more electricity

而維持它們的運行則需要2.5倍的電力。

than the whole continent of Africa uses in a year.

比整個非洲大陸一年的用量還要多。

One study I found calculated that 6% of all electricity

我發現的一項研究計算出，6%的電

in the U.S. is used for air conditioning,

在美國是用於空調的。

and air conditioning our homes causes

導致我們的家庭和空調

more than 100 million tons

億噸以上

of carbon dioxide emissions every year.

每年的二氧化碳排放量。

Not to mention the cement or concrete that's needed

更不用說要用水泥或混凝土了。

to build these large homes as, surprisingly,

以建造這些大型住宅為，竟然。

concrete accounts for 5% of global carbon dioxide emissions

混凝土佔全球二氧化碳排放量的5%

and is the second most consumed substance

並且是第二大消費的物質

on Earth after water.

在地球上水後。

But a lot of these influencers do their best.

但這些影響者很多都是盡力而為。

They carpool.

他們拼車。

They don't always eat meat.

他們並不總是吃肉。

They are minimalists.

他們是極簡主義者。

Is that what this is?

是這樣的嗎？

This looks like an evil villain's lair in a Disney movie.

這看起來像迪士尼電影裡的邪惡反派的巢穴。

Even if we assume that these influencers never eat meat

即使我們假設這些有影響力的人從來沒有吃過肉。

and that they have some energy efficient appliances

和他們有一些節能電器

in their home, you can run a calculation to find out

在他們的家中，你可以進行計算，以找出

that if we all drove and had mansions like L.A. influencers

如果我們都開著車，有豪宅 像洛杉磯的影響者。

we would need 10.9 Earths to sustain the lifestyle.

我們將需要10.9個地球來維持生活方式。

- So hold up.

- 所以，等一下。

How are we calculating the amount of Earths?

我們如何計算地球的數量？

Using geographical locations and behavioral averages

使用地理位置和行為平均數

for income and neighborhood information,

以獲取收入和鄰里資訊。

we can measure an influencer's global hectares.

我們可以衡量一個影響者的全球公頃數。

This measurement looks at how much land, sea,

這種測量方式看的是陸地、海洋的多少。

and other resources are needed to produce

和其他資源的需要

what each person's global hectare will be per year.

每個人每年的全球公頃數是多少；

And there's many online calculators where you can figure out

而且有許多在線計算器，你可以計算出。

your own eco footprint.

你自己的生態足跡。

But we're actually gonna need a lot more Earths

但我們實際上需要更多的地球。

because influencers, and us right now, are using a service

因為影響者，和我們現在，正在使用的服務。

that emits a lot more carbon dioxide than you might think,

排放的二氧化碳比你想象的要多得多。

and that is- - Online video platforms.

那就是--在線視頻平臺。

The energy needed to store, deliver, distribute,

儲存、輸送、分配所需的能量。

and even watch online video leads to 0.4 kilograms

甚至看在線視頻導致0.4公斤的體重

of CO2 emissions per hour.

每小時的二氧化碳排放量；

In 2018, 228.8 million people in the U.S.

2018年，美國有228．

watched digital content for 82 minutes each day,

每天觀看數字內容82分鐘。

adding 1.3 billion kilograms of CO2

增加13億公斤的二氧化碳

to the atmosphere per year.

每年對大氣層的影響。

So if we all became online influencers,

所以，如果我們都成為網絡影響者。

our CO2 release would be astronomical.

我們的二氧化碳釋放將是天文數字。

Plus, we'd be uploading so much

另外，我們要上傳這麼多的東西

and then downloading so much,

然後下載這麼多。

so the servers and energy to cool the servers

所以服務器和能源冷卻服務器

would be insane.

將是瘋狂的。

Did you know that they're trying to put servers

你知道嗎，他們正試圖把服務器。

up in the Arctic so we don't have to spend as much money

在北極，所以我們不必花那麼多錢。

trying to cool them and as much energy trying to cool them?

試圖冷卻他們，並儘可能多的精力試圖冷卻他們？

Either way, uploading and downloading all this video

不管是哪種方式，上傳和下載這些視頻

would be really bad for the planet.

將是非常糟糕的地球。

Not to mention- - The closet.

更不用說衣櫃了

(sighs) Back in the closet, I see.

回到衣櫃裡，我明白了。

♪ Hello darkness, my old friend ♪

你好，黑暗，我的老朋友

- The fashion industry is the second most polluting industry

- 時尚行業是第二大汙染行業

in the world,

在世界上。

responsible for 10% of greenhouse gas emissions.

佔溫室氣體排放量的10%。

MIT calculated that the global impact

麻省理工學院計算出，全球影響

of producing polyester alone was somewhere around

僅生產聚酯的成本就約為1.5億美元。

706 million metric tons of carbon dioxide,

7.06億公噸二氧化碳；

or about what 185 coal-fired power plants emit in a year.

或約185家燃煤電廠一年的排放量。

Let alone selling the products.

更別說賣產品了。

So if 80% of people in the majority world

所以，如果多數世界80%的人

shopped like influencers in L.A.,

像洛杉磯的影響者一樣購物。

we would see a 77% increase in carbon dioxide emissions

我們將看到二氧化碳排放量增加77%。

associated with clothing production,

與服裝生產相關的。

a 20% increase in water usage, and 7% increase in land use.

用水量增加20%，土地使用量增加7%。

Who knew you'd have a gay man telling you to shop less.

誰知道你會有一個同志叫你少買點東西。

Usually, we just have girls being like,

通常情況下，我們只是有女孩被喜歡。

"Oh my God, be my gay best friend.

"天啊，做我的同志好友吧。

"Come shopping with me."

"和我一起去逛街吧。"

It's like, "Honey, if it ain't a circular economy,

這就像，"親愛的，如果不是循環經濟，。

"it ain't happening."

"這是不可能的。"

Not really killing it

不太致命

as the gay best friend right now, am I?

作為同志最好的朋友，現在，我是？

We'll include all that info in the final tally

我們會把所有的資訊納入最後的統計中去的

of global hectares, but before we get to that,

的全球公頃數，但在我們討論這個問題之前，。

let's talk about an influencer's favorite substance,

讓我們來談談一個影響者最喜歡的物質。

and I don't mean tummy tea.

我不是指肚子茶。

I mean- - Oil.

我是說--石油。

Half the world's oil is consumed

世界上一半的石油被消耗掉了

by only 17% of the world's population.

僅佔世界人口的17%。

These countries are known as the OECD nations

這些國家被稱為經合組織國家。

and they are also responsible for 33%

他們也佔33%的責任。

of the world's CO2 emissions.

佔世界二氧化碳排放量的。

America itself produces 15% of the world's CO2 emissions,

美國自身產生的二氧化碳排放量佔世界的15%。

compared to Bangladesh who has half the population

與孟加拉國相比，孟加拉國的人口只有其一半

but only produces 1% of the world's CO2 emissions per year.

但每年產生的二氧化碳排放量只佔世界的1%。

Remember the sprawling mansions we mentioned earlier?

還記得我們之前提到的那些龐大的豪宅嗎？

People in Bangladesh do not live in these.

孟加拉國的人們並不生活在這些。

The 163 million people of Bangladesh

孟加拉國的1.63億人

live within their country,

住在本國境內。

which is the size of about Alabama.

其大小約為阿拉巴馬州。

Americans, on average, consume 10 liters of oil a day,

美國人平均每天要消耗10升石油。

but we Canadians fare even worse

但我們加拿大人更慘

at 10.2 liters of oil a day,

每天10.2升石油。

compared to a Bangladeshi who only uses

與孟加拉國人相比，他只使用

0.1 liters of oil per day.

每天0.1升油。

A lot of this oil is used up from flying,

這些油很多都是飛行時用掉的。

which is something that influencers love to do

這是影響者喜歡做的事情。

even during a global pandemic.

即使在全球大流行期間。

Ding.

叮。

Even if we keep the influencer lifestyle vegan,

即使我們保持影響者的生活方式素食。

we're also gonna assume

我們也要假設

that they're pretty much shopping only local.

他們幾乎只在當地購物。

They got those expensive L.A. grocery stores.

他們有那些昂貴的洛杉磯雜貨店。

We're gonna include a flight from New York to L.A.

我們將包括從紐約到洛杉磯的班機。

every two months,

每兩個月一次。

which I think is actually being kind of generous

其實我覺得這已經是很慷慨了

for influencer lifestyles when you study them,

為影響者的生活方式，當你研究他們。

but we're gonna put that in as a well.

但我們會把它作為一個井。

We discovered that if everyone lived like an influencer,

我們發現，如果每個人都像一個有影響力的人一樣生活。

we would need 12.9 Earths to sustain the lifestyle.

我們將需要12.9個地球來維持生活方式。

(crickets chirping)

（蟋蟀的鳴叫）

So what can we collectively take away from this?

那麼，我們共同能從中得到什麼啟示呢？

- Video to dissect the idea of the aspirational lifestyle

- 視頻來剖析理想生活方式的理念。

that affects all of us, including us.

影響到我們所有人，包括我們。

I mean, like I've got a fig tree back there.

我的意思是，就像我已經得到了一個無花果樹回到那裡。

I want it to look pretty.

我想讓它看起來很漂亮。

We're all impacted by the consumption habits

我們都受到消費習慣的影響。

we see online and in media.

我們在網上和媒體上看到的。

But if we all lived like Bangladeshis,

但如果我們都像孟加拉國人一樣生活。

we would only need this much of the Earth

我們只需要這麼多的地球

to sustain all life, which is astounding.

以維持一切生命，這是令人震驚的。

And in our current climate crisis,

而在我們目前的氣候危機中。

are these not in some ways an aspirational lifestyle?

這些是不是在某種程度上是一種令人嚮往的生活方式？

I know this can get complex and muddy

我知道這可能會變得很複雜和泥濘

when we talk about poverty or the quality of life,

當我們談論貧窮或生活品質時，我們要做的是：

but the Global Happiness Council found that in 2017,

但全球幸福理事會發現，2017年。

Americans were the unhappiest they'd ever been

美國人是有史以來最不快樂的人

since starting that initiative,

自啟動該倡議以來，。

even though they were working, eating, driving,

即使他們在工作、吃飯、開車。

and consuming more than ever.

和消費比以往任何時候都要多。

In fact, if we came together as a species

事實上，如果我們作為一個物種走到了一起

and evenly distributed our fuel and energy consumption

並平均分配我們的燃料和能源消耗

across the 7 billion people on this planet,

在這個星球上70億人中。

we would all have the same energy use

同舟共濟

as somebody in Switzerland in the 1960s.

作為上世紀60年代瑞士的某人。

Look at those gorg trams.

看那些高格電車

Look at those cute little outfits.

看那些可愛的小衣服。