Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

由 AI 自動生成
  • The existence of God has been fiercely debated for centuries

    幾個世紀以來,上帝的存在一直被激烈地爭論著。

  • but regardless of what you think or feel is true

    但不管你怎麼想怎麼覺得都是對的

  • can we use math, the universal, unbiased language

    能不能用數學這個通用的、不帶偏見的語言來表達?

  • to come to a conclusion?

    來得出結論?

  • Can math prove God's existence?

    數學能證明上帝的存在嗎?

  • The most famous argument in favour of a God-made world

    最著名的支持上帝創造世界的論點。

  • using logic and reasoning is the "argument by design"

    曉之以理,動之以情,是為 "設計論證"

  • Simply put, given how complex and amazing

    簡單的說,既然複雜而又驚人的

  • everything around us is

    周圍的事物都是

  • can we really believe that

    豈有此理

  • dumb luck put it together?

    運氣好就能湊齊?

  • Even from a scientist perspective

    即使從科學家的角度來看

  • life is amazing

    人生真奇妙

  • incredibly rare

    稀奇古怪

  • and took a monumental amount of steps

    並採取了大量的步驟

  • chance-happenings and time to come about

    時來運轉

  • So, a religious person may argue:

    所以,宗教人士可以認為。

  • "Doesn't it seem much more plausible

    "這不是顯得更有道理嗎?

  • that there was some driving force behind it all?"

    這一切背後有什麼推動力?"

  • This type of argument is called

    這種類型的爭論被稱為

  • reductio ad absurdum

    歸謬法

  • which simply means it attempts to

    簡單來說就是它試圖

  • disprove a statement by showing

    否定

  • it inevitably leads to absurd

    貽誤戰機

  • or impractical conclusions

    或不切實際的結論

  • In this case

    在這種情況下

  • it suggests that 1) if there is no God, humans developing is very unlikely

    這說明:1)如果沒有上帝,人類發展的可能性很小。

  • 2) humans did develop

    2)人類確實發展了

  • therefore, 3) it is unlikely that there is no God

    是以,3)不可能沒有上帝。

  • but let's take this logic one step further

    但是,讓我們把這個邏輯再往前推一步吧

  • and imagine a universe before anything has been created

    暢想宇宙萬物,萬物未生

  • Here, we have a base box

    在這裡,我們有一個基礎箱

  • where we have our two possibilities of

    其中我們有兩種可能

  • God existing and no God existing

    有神無神

  • On the other side are possibilities are that

    另一方面,有可能是

  • humans exist or that humans don't exist

    人類存在還是不存在

  • If no God is true

    如果沒有神是真的

  • then most would agree that human existence takes a lot of specific factors to come about

    那麼大多數人都會認為,人類的存在是需要很多特定的因素來實現的。

  • so let's make up a tiny probability

    湊合著用吧

  • and say that there's a 1/4 billion billion chance

    並說有1/4十億的可能性。

  • of humanity coming into existence

    人類的誕生

  • in a world with no God

    無神論世

  • and if God is real

    如果上帝是真實的

  • even though we don't know that God would make humans

    即使我們不知道上帝會讓人類

  • certainly He could

    定能

  • so let's give it a higher probability

    那就提高概率吧

  • of 1/4 million

    1/4萬

  • Of course, if we examine the evidence

    當然,如果我們考察證據

  • we know we exist

    我們知道我們存在

  • so we can get rid of the other row

    這樣我們就可以把另一行去掉

  • and as many of you who have used the "argument by design" point out

    正如許多使用過 "設計論證 "的人所指出的那樣。

  • a human-made world with God

    人間有神

  • seems much, much more likely rationally and statistically

    從理性和統計學上看,似乎更有可能

  • and while this is true in some ways

    雖然在某些方面確實如此

  • it forgets an important point

    顧此失彼

  • that we have assumed there are only two major theories

    我們假設只有兩個主要理論。

  • but we know this isn't true

    但我們知道這是不正確的

  • many societies have believed in multiple gods

    多神信仰

  • and given there are some aspects of this life that

    並考慮到生活中的某些方面。

  • aren't merely as beautifully complex

    不僅僅是美麗複雜

  • or seemingly intentional

    或似有若無

  • perhaps a variety of squabbling gods

    諸葛孔明

  • created the world

    創世

  • Mathematician Jordan Ellenberg uses

    數學家喬丹-埃倫伯格使用

  • the probability of 1/400,000

    四十萬分之一的概率

  • that universe with multiple gods would create humans

    多神的宇宙會創造人類

  • but it's important to remember

    但要記住

  • that the exact numbers don't actually matter

    虛虛實實

  • What does matter is that we can agree

    重要的是,我們可以同意

  • rationally, that a universe with more gods

    宇宙中神靈較多

  • has a higher chance of creating humans

    有較高的機會創造人類

  • then one with a single God

    渾然一體

  • or none at all

    或根本沒有

  • it's also important to remember that

    還必須記住

  • we're not comparing the probability

    我們不是在比概率

  • of gods or no gods existing

    有無神靈

  • we're asking ourselves

    我們在問自己

  • if the God option is true

    如果上帝選項為真

  • what is the likelihood of Him making humans?

    他製造人類的可能性有多大?

  • and then we're asking separately

    然後我們分別問

  • if the multiple gods option is true

    如果多神選項為真

  • what is the likelihood that they would make humans?

    它們製造人類的可能性有多大?

  • now, let's take this even further

    現在,讓我們更進一步

  • to theories of us simply living in a simulation

    我們只是生活在模擬中的理論。

  • like that of the Sims

    模擬人生

  • Which individuals like Elon Musk

    哪些個人喜歡埃隆-馬斯克

  • and Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom believe

    和牛津大學哲學家尼克-博斯特羅姆認為

  • as technology advances

    隨著技術的進步

  • it's almost a certainty that future humans

    幾乎可以肯定的是,未來的人類

  • will make extremely realistic human simulations

    將做出極其逼真的人體模擬

  • based on the world that we live in

    基於我們所處的世界

  • to study these humans like we study mice

    像研究小白鼠一樣研究這些人

  • scientists already use simulations

    科學家已經使用模擬

  • to understand nature and human behaviour

    瞭解自然和人類行為

  • but in the future it's possible

    但將來有可能

  • that the human test subjects

    人類測試對象

  • will be conscious and think they are real

    會有意識地認為自己是真實的

  • so we can give this scenario

    所以我們可以給這種情況

  • a fairly high probability

    極有可能

  • again, the exact number doesn't matter

    虛虛實實

  • just that we can agree it's very likely

    只不過大家都認為很有可能

  • that advanced humans would create these kinds of simulations

    先進的人類會創造這種模擬

  • compared to the probability of a God or gods

    比起神的可能性來

  • randomly deciding to make humans

    隨機決定讓人類

  • when they don't need to

    趁其不備

  • or could make millions of other animals

    或可製造出數以百萬計的其他動物

  • or other aspects of the universe

    宇宙的其他方面

  • after all, humanity is obsessed with humans

    人性終究是人的,人之常情

  • so as you can see

    可見

  • while maths can, in fact, show that

    而事實上,數學可以證明

  • the existence of life is evidence that God exists

    生命的存在就是上帝存在的證據

  • compared to no God

    堪比無神

  • the same maths shows

    同理

  • more compiling evidence that we're simulation by much smarter people

    更多的證據表明,我們是由更聰明的人模擬。

  • special thanks to audible for supporting this episode

    特別感謝audible對本集的支持

  • to give you a free 30-day trial at audible.com/asap

    在audible.com/asap給你一個30天的免費試用期。

  • this week we wanted to recommend the book

    本週我們要推薦的書是

  • 'How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking' by Jordan Ellenberg

    喬丹-埃倫伯格的《如何不犯錯:數學思維的力量》。

  • which was the main source of this episode

    這是本集的主要來源

  • and an incredible read on the hidden beauty and logic of our world

    和一個令人難以置信的閱讀我們的世界的隱藏的美麗和邏輯。

  • through the lens of maths

    數學觀

  • but in a way that is accessible to everyone

    但以人人都能接受的方式

  • you can get a free 30-day trial at audible.com/asap

    你可以在audible.com/asap獲得30天的免費試用期。

  • and choose from a massive selection

    並從大量的選擇中選擇

  • we love them as they are great when you're on the go

    我們喜歡他們,因為他們是偉大的,當你在走的時候

  • and subscribe for more weekly science videos

    並訂閱更多每週科學視頻

The existence of God has been fiercely debated for centuries

幾個世紀以來,上帝的存在一直被激烈地爭論著。

字幕與單字
由 AI 自動生成

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋