字幕列表 影片播放
The existence of God has been fiercely debated for centuries
幾個世紀以來,上帝的存在一直被激烈地爭論著。
but regardless of what you think or feel is true
但不管你怎麼想怎麼覺得都是對的
can we use math, the universal, unbiased language
能不能用數學這個通用的、不帶偏見的語言來表達?
to come to a conclusion?
來得出結論?
Can math prove God's existence?
數學能證明上帝的存在嗎?
The most famous argument in favour of a God-made world
最著名的支持上帝創造世界的論點。
using logic and reasoning is the "argument by design"
曉之以理,動之以情,是為 "設計論證"
Simply put, given how complex and amazing
簡單的說,既然複雜而又驚人的
everything around us is
周圍的事物都是
can we really believe that
豈有此理
dumb luck put it together?
運氣好就能湊齊?
Even from a scientist perspective
即使從科學家的角度來看
life is amazing
人生真奇妙
incredibly rare
稀奇古怪
and took a monumental amount of steps
並採取了大量的步驟
chance-happenings and time to come about
時來運轉
So, a religious person may argue:
所以,宗教人士可以認為。
"Doesn't it seem much more plausible
"這不是顯得更有道理嗎?
that there was some driving force behind it all?"
這一切背後有什麼推動力?"
This type of argument is called
這種類型的爭論被稱為
reductio ad absurdum
歸謬法
which simply means it attempts to
簡單來說就是它試圖
disprove a statement by showing
否定
it inevitably leads to absurd
貽誤戰機
or impractical conclusions
或不切實際的結論
In this case
在這種情況下
it suggests that 1) if there is no God, humans developing is very unlikely
這說明:1)如果沒有上帝,人類發展的可能性很小。
2) humans did develop
2)人類確實發展了
therefore, 3) it is unlikely that there is no God
是以,3)不可能沒有上帝。
but let's take this logic one step further
但是,讓我們把這個邏輯再往前推一步吧
and imagine a universe before anything has been created
暢想宇宙萬物,萬物未生
Here, we have a base box
在這裡,我們有一個基礎箱
where we have our two possibilities of
其中我們有兩種可能
God existing and no God existing
有神無神
On the other side are possibilities are that
另一方面,有可能是
humans exist or that humans don't exist
人類存在還是不存在
If no God is true
如果沒有神是真的
then most would agree that human existence takes a lot of specific factors to come about
那麼大多數人都會認為,人類的存在是需要很多特定的因素來實現的。
so let's make up a tiny probability
湊合著用吧
and say that there's a 1/4 billion billion chance
並說有1/4十億的可能性。
of humanity coming into existence
人類的誕生
in a world with no God
無神論世
and if God is real
如果上帝是真實的
even though we don't know that God would make humans
即使我們不知道上帝會讓人類
certainly He could
定能
so let's give it a higher probability
那就提高概率吧
of 1/4 million
1/4萬
Of course, if we examine the evidence
當然,如果我們考察證據
we know we exist
我們知道我們存在
so we can get rid of the other row
這樣我們就可以把另一行去掉
and as many of you who have used the "argument by design" point out
正如許多使用過 "設計論證 "的人所指出的那樣。
a human-made world with God
人間有神
seems much, much more likely rationally and statistically
從理性和統計學上看,似乎更有可能
and while this is true in some ways
雖然在某些方面確實如此
it forgets an important point
顧此失彼
that we have assumed there are only two major theories
我們假設只有兩個主要理論。
but we know this isn't true
但我們知道這是不正確的
many societies have believed in multiple gods
多神信仰
and given there are some aspects of this life that
並考慮到生活中的某些方面。
aren't merely as beautifully complex
不僅僅是美麗複雜
or seemingly intentional
或似有若無
perhaps a variety of squabbling gods
諸葛孔明
created the world
創世
Mathematician Jordan Ellenberg uses
數學家喬丹-埃倫伯格使用
the probability of 1/400,000
四十萬分之一的概率
that universe with multiple gods would create humans
多神的宇宙會創造人類
but it's important to remember
但要記住
that the exact numbers don't actually matter
虛虛實實
What does matter is that we can agree
重要的是,我們可以同意
rationally, that a universe with more gods
宇宙中神靈較多
has a higher chance of creating humans
有較高的機會創造人類
then one with a single God
渾然一體
or none at all
或根本沒有
it's also important to remember that
還必須記住
we're not comparing the probability
我們不是在比概率
of gods or no gods existing
有無神靈
we're asking ourselves
我們在問自己
if the God option is true
如果上帝選項為真
what is the likelihood of Him making humans?
他製造人類的可能性有多大?
and then we're asking separately
然後我們分別問
if the multiple gods option is true
如果多神選項為真
what is the likelihood that they would make humans?
它們製造人類的可能性有多大?
now, let's take this even further
現在,讓我們更進一步
to theories of us simply living in a simulation
我們只是生活在模擬中的理論。
like that of the Sims
模擬人生
Which individuals like Elon Musk
哪些個人喜歡埃隆-馬斯克
and Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom believe
和牛津大學哲學家尼克-博斯特羅姆認為
as technology advances
隨著技術的進步
it's almost a certainty that future humans
幾乎可以肯定的是,未來的人類
will make extremely realistic human simulations
將做出極其逼真的人體模擬
based on the world that we live in
基於我們所處的世界
to study these humans like we study mice
像研究小白鼠一樣研究這些人
scientists already use simulations
科學家已經使用模擬
to understand nature and human behaviour
瞭解自然和人類行為
but in the future it's possible
但將來有可能
that the human test subjects
人類測試對象
will be conscious and think they are real
會有意識地認為自己是真實的
so we can give this scenario
所以我們可以給這種情況
a fairly high probability
極有可能
again, the exact number doesn't matter
虛虛實實
just that we can agree it's very likely
只不過大家都認為很有可能
that advanced humans would create these kinds of simulations
先進的人類會創造這種模擬
compared to the probability of a God or gods
比起神的可能性來
randomly deciding to make humans
隨機決定讓人類
when they don't need to
趁其不備
or could make millions of other animals
或可製造出數以百萬計的其他動物
or other aspects of the universe
宇宙的其他方面
after all, humanity is obsessed with humans
人性終究是人的,人之常情
so as you can see
可見
while maths can, in fact, show that
而事實上,數學可以證明
the existence of life is evidence that God exists
生命的存在就是上帝存在的證據
compared to no God
堪比無神
the same maths shows
同理
more compiling evidence that we're simulation by much smarter people
更多的證據表明,我們是由更聰明的人模擬。
special thanks to audible for supporting this episode
特別感謝audible對本集的支持
to give you a free 30-day trial at audible.com/asap
在audible.com/asap給你一個30天的免費試用期。
this week we wanted to recommend the book
本週我們要推薦的書是
'How Not To Be Wrong: The Power of Mathematical Thinking' by Jordan Ellenberg
喬丹-埃倫伯格的《如何不犯錯:數學思維的力量》。
which was the main source of this episode
這是本集的主要來源
and an incredible read on the hidden beauty and logic of our world
和一個令人難以置信的閱讀我們的世界的隱藏的美麗和邏輯。
through the lens of maths
數學觀
but in a way that is accessible to everyone
但以人人都能接受的方式
you can get a free 30-day trial at audible.com/asap
你可以在audible.com/asap獲得30天的免費試用期。
and choose from a massive selection
並從大量的選擇中選擇
we love them as they are great when you're on the go
我們喜歡他們,因為他們是偉大的,當你在走的時候
and subscribe for more weekly science videos
並訂閱更多每週科學視頻