WELCOME BACK TO "A LATE SHOW."

歡迎回到 "深夜秀"。

HE IS THE CHIEF GENERAL NEWS ANCHOR FOR CNBC AND THE HOST OF

他是CNBC的首席新聞主播，也是CNBC的主持人。

"THE NEWS WITH SHEPARD SMITH."

"新聞與SHEPARD SMITH。"

PLEASE WELCOME TO "A LATE SHOW" SHEPARD SMITH!

請歡迎來到 "晚間秀 "SHEPARD SMITH!

SHEP.

SHEP：

GOOD TO SEE YOU.

很高興見到你。

>> STEVE!

>> 史蒂夫！

GOOD TO SEE YOU, TOO, THANK YOU.

很高興見到你，太，謝謝你。

>> Stephen: YOU KNOW, I WANT YOU TO KNOW, SHEP, AND I'M NOT

>> 你知道嗎，我想讓你知道，SHEP，我不是。

JUST BLOWING SECONDHAND SMOKE UP YOUR ASS, HERE.

只是吹二手菸 你的屁股，在這裡。

I TIVO YOUR SHOW.

我看了你的節目

>> TIVO?

>> TIVO?

>> Stephen: WHATEVER.

>> Stephen:什麼的。

I DVR IT.

我把它錄下來了。

I'M GRANDPA.

我是GRANDPA。

YOU YOUNG KIDS WITH YOUR NEW TERMS I DON'T UNDERSTAND.

你們這些年輕人的新名詞我不懂。

I DID NOT REALIZE HOW MUCH I MISSED SHEPARD SMITH UNTIL

我沒有意識到我有多想念謝帕德-史密斯，直到... ...

SHEPARD SMITH WAS BACK, BABY.

謝潑德-史密斯回來了，寶貝。

>> HEY!

>> 嘿！

IT'S NICE TO BE BACK OVER ON A DIFFERENT CHANNEL.

回到不同的頻道真好

I LIKE IT HERE.

我喜歡這裡。

>> Stephen: CNBC.

>> Stephen:CNBC。

>> FIRST IN BUSINESS WORLDWIDE!

>> 全球業務量第一!

>> Stephen: IT'S THE FIRST NAME IN SHARK TANKS.

>> 它是鯊魚罐頭的第一個名字。

WE HAVE A SLEW OF TANKS FILLED WITH SHARKS OVER THERE.

我們那裡有一連串裝滿鯊魚的罐子。

YOU HAVE TO DO SOMETHING.

你必須做點什麼。

YOU WERE ON THE AIR LAST NIGHT UNTIL HOW LATE?

你昨晚一直到多晚都在直播？

>> ABOUT 4:00 EASTERN.

>> 東經4點左右。

>> Stephen: HAVE YOU BATHED SINCE THEN?

>> Stephen:從那以後你洗過澡嗎？

>> UH, SPIT SHINED, A LITTLE SPONGY THING.

>> 呃，唾沫星子閃閃發光，一個小海綿的東西。

>> Stephen: SURE.

>> Stephen: SURE.

>> THERE'S NO TIME.

>> 沒有時間。

YOU GOTTA DO THE NEWS.

你必須做新聞。

>> Stephen: A LITTLE WATER ON THE BACK OF THE NECK, A COUPLE

>> 史蒂芬: 脖子後面有一點水，有幾處

OF ROSE PEDALS, READY TO GO.

玫瑰踏板，準備好了。

>> BOOM.

>> BOOM.

>> Stephen: LAST NIGHT WAS NOT THE NIGHT THAT THE DEMOCRATS

>> Stephen:昨晚並不是民主黨人的夜晚。

WERE NECESSARILY HOPING FOR.

我們必須希望：

THERE WAS A LOT OF HOPE FOR ANOTHER BLUE WAVE, EVEN

有很多的希望，另一個藍色的波浪，甚至是。

SOMETHING LIKE THE BLUE WAVE IN 2018.

在2018年，類似於藍波的東西。

BUT THE DELAY IN THE REPORTING ITSELF, LIKE, NOT KNOWING

但在報告本身的延遲，如，不知道

EVERYTHING YET, THAT'S NOT ABNORMAL, RIGHT?

一切都不正常，對吧？

WE'RE IN A-- >> NO!

WE'RE IN A-- >> NO!

>> Stephen: IT'S A PERFECTLY NORMAL SITUATION, ESPECIALLY

>> 斯蒂芬：這是一個完全正常的情況，特別是。

NORMAL FOR COVID.

COVID正常。

>> WELL, IT IS, BUT IT'S NORMAL-NORMAL, NORMAL.

>> 嗯，是的，但這是正常的，正常的，正常的。

YOU VOTE AND THEN YOU COUNT.

你投票，然後你算。

IT'S JUST IN THE PAST WE DIDN'T TAKE THAT MUCH ATTENTION TO THE

只是在過去，我們沒有那麼多的注意到

FACT THAT IN SOME PLACES IT TAKES LONGER.

事實上，在一些地方，它需要更長的時間。

>> Stephen: TELL ME THAT AGAIN, YOU VOTE.

>> Stephen:再告訴我一次，你投票。

>> AND THEN COUNTING.

>> 然後再計算。

>> Stephen: I THOUGHT IT WAS VOTE, DECLARE WHO WON, AND THEN

>> 斯蒂芬：我以為是投票，宣佈誰贏了，然後。

STOP COUNTING.

停止計算。

>> THAT'S THE COVID NEW.

>> 這是COVID新。

>> Stephen: WHAT SURPRISED YOU ABOUT LAST NIGHT?

>> Stephen:昨晚有什麼讓你吃驚的事？

ANYTHING?

任何事情？

WHAT WERE YOU PAYING MOST ATTENTION TO?

你最注意的是什麼？

>> I WASN'T PAYING THAT MUCH ATTENTION TO THE POLLS EXCEPT,

>> 我並沒有注意到那麼多的民意調查，除了。

YOU KNOW, WE TALKED TO A LOT OF PEOPLE ON THE RIGHT AND ON THE

你知道，我們跟很多人在右邊和右邊的。

LEFT BEFORE TO KIND OF GET READY TO PREPARE FOR WHAT'S GOING TO

離開之前，有點準備好準備什麼，將是

GO ON.

去吧

AND THEY-- THEY HAD THEIR OWN POLLING AND THEY KNOW THEIR

他們有自己的民意調查，他們知道自己的。

THINGS.

事情。

AND, REALLY, BOTH SIDES WERE SAYING THIS MAY BE AN EARLIER

而且，說真的，雙方都說這可能是更早的。

NIGHT THAN WE THOUGHT.

比我們想象的要晚。

BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU PREPARE FOR EVERYTHING AND HOPE IT GOES

但是，你知道，你要做好準備，希望一切順利。

SHORT, BUT IT DIDN'T.

短，但它沒有。

IT WENT LONG, AND WE'RE A NATION DIVIDED, NOT NEW INFORMATION.

它持續了很久，我們是一個國家分裂，而不是新的資訊。

>> Stephen: WHAT ABOUT THE POLLS?

>> Stephen:民意調查呢？

LIKE, I-- I THINK THAT SOME PEOPLE WERE SURPRISED THAT THERE

就像，我... ... 我想，有些人很驚訝，有

WASN'T A BROADER SWEEP BY THE DEMOCRATS, BASED ON WHAT THE

難道民主黨沒有進行更廣泛的掃蕩，根據的是什麼？

POLLS WERE.

民意調查是：

IS IT TIME JUST TO HOLD POLLSTERS DOWN IN THE BATH TUB

現在是時候了，只需要把花粉放在浴缸裡就可以了。

UNTIL THE BUBBLES STOP COMING UP?

直到氣泡停止出現？

( LAUGHTER ) SHOULD WE JUST NOT HAVE ANY

（笑）我們是否應該只是沒有任何

POLLING ANYMORE?

民意調查了嗎？

BECAUSE SOME PEOPLE WERE TAKEN BY SURPRISE BY THIS.

因為有些人被這個嚇到了。

PEOPLE-- I'M NOT GOING TO SAY ANYBODY I KNOW WAS CHECKING

人 - 我不會說任何人，我知道是檢查。

FIVE30EIGHT, TWO MINUTES SITTING RIGHT HERE WITH ME.

530Eight，兩分鐘坐在這裡與我。

YOU DON'T KNOW, SHEPPARD, BUT MY WIFE IS SITTING HERE.

你不知道，Sheppard，但我的妻子就坐在這裡。

DO YOU WANT TO SAY HI.

你想打招呼嗎？

>> HI!

>> 嗨！

>> NICE TO SEE YOU.

>> 很高興見到你。

>> NICE TO SEE YOU.

>> 很高興見到你。

>> Stephen: THERE YOU GO.

>> Stephen:你去那裡。

WHAT'S POLLING WORTH, SHEP, FOR THE NEWS PEOPLE?

什麼是民意調查的價值，SHEP，為新聞的人？

NOT FOR CAMPAIGNS, BUT FOR NEWS PEOPLE.

不是為了競選，而是為了新聞人。

>> WELL, WE CAN FIND OUT WHAT PEOPLE ARE MOST INTERESTED IN

>> 好吧，我們可以看看人們最感興趣的是什麼。

THROUGH THE POLLING.

通過投票。

AND THEN WE CAN COVER THOSE THINGS AND TRY TO GIVE THEM MORE

然後我們可以覆蓋這些東西，並試圖給它們更多的。

CLARITY, MORE INFORMATION, MORE BREADTH AND DEPTH OF REPORTING.

清晰度，更多的資訊，更多的報告廣度和深度。

THE PART ABOUT WHEN WE COVER WHO IT IS THEY'RE INTO, THAT'S A

當我們報道他們喜歡的是誰的時候，那是一個很好的例子。

HORSE RACE AND I FEEL THAT'S MORE FOR US THAN ANYBODY ELSE.

賽馬，我覺得這對我們來說比任何人都重要。

IT DOESN'T SERVE ANY USEFUL PURPOSE IN THE END.

它並沒有起到任何有用的目的在結束。

THE ISSUES ARE IMPORTANT TO KNOW KNOW.

問題是重要的，要知道知道。

HOW THEY'RE FEELING EVERY MINUTE IS PROBABLY JUST OUR OWN

他們每時每刻的感受，可能只是我們自己的感受。

SELF-INDULGENCE.

自我放縱。

WE OUGHT TO JUST SKIP IT.

我們應該只是跳過它。

>> Stephen: SPEAKING OF WHAT WE SHOULD FOCUS ON AND WHAT WE

>> 斯蒂芬：談到我們應該關注什麼，我們應該做什麼？

SHOULDN'T FOCUS ON, ONE OF THE THINGS I LIKE ABOUT WATCHING

我不應該把注意力集中在我喜歡看的東西上

"THE NEWS WITH SHEPARD SMITH" WEEK NIGHTS ON CNBC.

"新聞與SHEPARD SMITH "周夜在CNBC。

>> THANK YOU.

>> 謝謝你。

>> Stephen: IT FEELS LIKE THE NEWS.

>> Stephen:這感覺就像新聞。

LIKE, I REALLY FEEL LIKE I'M JUST GETTING SORT OF-- I DON'T

就像，我真的覺得我只是得到某種... ... - 我不知道

WANT TO SAY BASIC FACTS BECAUSE YOU GO IN-DEPTH ON CERTAIN

想說基本的事實，因為你深入地在某些方面

STORIES.

故事：

BUT IT FEELS LIKE COMFORT FOOD IN THAT I DON'T FEEL LIKE I'M

但它感覺像舒適的食物，我不覺得我是

BEING SOLD WHEN I WATCH YOUR NEWS.

當我看你的新聞時被賣了。

WHAT DO YOU THINK-- WHAT'S YOUR MANDATE, SELF-IMPOSED, FOR HOW

你覺得... 你有什麼要求，自設的，如何？

YOU WANT TO DO THE NEWS?

你想做新聞？

>> IT'S OUR WHOLE-- IT'S OUR WHOLE TEAM, AND IT REALLY COMES

>> 這是我們的整個 - 這是我們的整個團隊，它真的來了。

THROUGHOUT THE COMPANY.

貫穿整個公司。

WE WANT TO FIND THE FACTS, PRESENT THE NEWS WITHOUT THE

我們希望找到事實，發佈新聞，而不需要。

PUNDITS, AND GIVE IT SOME DEPTH AND BREADTH IN AREAS WHERE WE'RE

在我們所處的領域，給它一些深度和廣度。

FOCUSING, AND MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T TALK DOWN TO PEOPLE, AND

專注，並確保我們不對人說話，和。

REMEMBER THAT THERE'S MORE HAPPENING BESIDES WHATEVER'S

請記住，還有更多的發生在什麼的旁邊。

COMING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE PEOPLE WHO LOVE IT OR

從白宮出來的人和愛它的人，或者...

HATE IT.

討厭它。

YOU KNOW, THERE ARE IMPORTANT ISSUES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.

你知道，全國各地都有重要的問題。

THERE'S COVID.

有科維德。

THERE'S RACIAL INJUSTICE.

這就是種族不公。

THERE'S SOCIAL TENSION.

有社會張力。

THERE'S THE HAVES AND HAVE THE-NOTES, INCOME DISPARITY.

有的有的有的有的有的，收入差距。

AND THEN THERE IS CLIMATE WHICH IS EVENTUALLY GOING TO MAKE THE

然後是氣候，這可能會使我們的生活變得更美好。

SCIENTISTS SAY ALL OF THIS LOOKS LIKE A CAKEWALK.

科學家說，所有這些看起來像一個蛋糕步行。

WE HAVE TO DO ALL OF THAT.

我們必須做所有的事情。

WE'RE STILL YOUNG.

我們還年輕。

WE'RE A START-UP WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED COMPANY, BUT WE'RE

我們是一家成熟公司中的新公司，但我們是

ROLLING LIKE A START-UP, AND WE'RE JUST GETTING BETTER EVERY

像初創公司一樣滾動，而我們正在變得越來越好。

DAY.

天。

I FEEL LIKE WHAT JOURNALISTS DO IS IMPORTANT, IF WE DO IT WELL.

我覺得記者做的事情很重要，如果我們做得好的話。

>> Stephen: DO YOU GET ALONG WELL WITH OTHER PEOPLE AT CNBC.

>> Stephen:你和CNBC的其他人相處得很好嗎？

BECAUSE SOME OF THOSE GUYS LOOK LIKE REAL TOOLS.

因為有些人看起來像真正的工具。

>> NO, THEY'RE JUST REALLY SMART.

>> 不，他們只是很聰明。

>> Stephen: REALLY?

>> Stephen:真的嗎？

THEY ACT LIKE THEY'RE REALLY SMART.

他們的行為就像他們真的很聰明。

PEOPLE THINK I'M SMART AND I MOSTLY JUST HAVE A GOOD MEMORY.

人們認為我很聰明，我只是記憶力好。

JOE KERNAN'S A GOOD GUY?

JOE KERNAN是個好人？

>> I DON'T KNOW JOE.

>> 我不認識喬。

WE WORK DIFFERENT HOURS.

我們的工作時間不同。

( LAUGHTER ) BUT I THINK HE'S A GOOD GUY.

（笑）但我認為他是一個好人。

WHERE DID YOU GO?

你去哪了？

I HEAR HE'S A GREAT GUY.

我聽說他是個不錯的傢伙。

I'VE NEVER COME TO A PLACE-- STEPHEN, FOR REAL-- WHERE YOU

我從來沒有來過一個地方... 史蒂芬，真的... ...

COME IN AND THEY TREAT YOU ALREADY LIKE FAMILY.

進來，他們就像對待家人一樣對待你。

IT'S SUCH A CLICHE THING.

這真是個好東西。

THIS IS A BIG COMPANY BUT IT ROLLS SMALL.

這是一個大公司，但它滾小。

EVERYBODY HAS EACH OTHER'S BACK.

每個人都會支持對方。

IT'S NOT THE OLD STAB YOU IN THE BACK, LOOK AT THE NEW GUY COMING

後面的不是你，看新人來了

IN.

IN：

WE'RE EXCITED AND IT'S BECAUSE OF THE MISSION.

我們很興奮，這是因為我們的使命。

THERE'S A PLACE IN LIFE FOR JUST FINDING OUT WHAT'S HAPPENING AND

生命中有個地方，可以讓你知道發生了什麼事，然後...

TELLING PEOPLE ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY DON'T CARE WHAT YOU THINK.

因為他們不在乎你的想法，所以才會告訴別人。

I KNOW THEY DON'T CARE WHAT I THINK.

我知道他們不在乎我的想法。

MY WHOLE FAMILY DOESN'T CARE WHAT I THINK.

我全家人都不在乎我的想法。

( LAUGHTER ).

（笑）：

>> Stephen: I WANT TO-- I WANT TO ASK YOU WHAT THINK ABOUT ONE

>> 我想... 我想問問你對一個人的看法。

THING.

事情。

I DON'T WANT TO TALK A LOT ABOUT FOX NEWS BUT THAT'S WHERE, OF

我不想談很多關於福克斯新聞，但這是在哪裡，的。

COURSE, WHERE WE ALL GOT TO KNOW YOU.

當然，我們都是在這裡認識你的。

WHAT DO YOU THINK-- YOU'RE AN O.G. FOX NEWS GUY FROM '95?

你覺得你是95年的福克斯新聞記者嗎？

>> '96.

>> '96.

>> Stephen: '96.

>> 史蒂芬：96年。

IS THE MISSION OF FOX NEWS NOW AS YOU SEE IT THE SAME AS WHEN

福克斯新聞的使命現在和你看到的一樣嗎？

YOU STARTED?

你開始了？

DO YOU RECOGNIZE IT AS THE ONE YOU STARTED AT?

你還記得是你開始的那家嗎？

>> I CERTAINLY RECOGNIZE THE NEWS DIVISION WHERE I WORKED.

>> 我確實記得我工作過的新聞部。

JENNIFER GRIFFIN AND JOHN ROBERT, THEY WANT TO DO THE SAME

詹妮弗-格里芬和約翰-羅伯特，他們想做同樣的事情。

THING THAT JOURNALISTS I KNOW EVERYWHERE WANT TO DO.

我認識的記者們都想做的事情。

THEY WANT TO SEEK THE TRUTH, FIND THE TRUTHING, TELL THE

他們想尋求真相，發現真相，講述真相。

TRUTH, GIVE IT CONTEXT AND PERSPECTIVE.

真理，給它以背景和視角。

THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT TO DO LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE.

這就是他們想做的事，就像其他人一樣。

AS FOR THE REST OF IT, THE WHOLE MEDIA LANDSCAPE HAS CHANGED.

至於其他的，整個媒體的格局已經改變了。

EVERY COMPANY IS DIFFERENT THAN WHEN I FIRST STARTED.

每個公司都和我剛開始的時候不一樣。

WE OPERATE ON SO MANY MORE PLATFORMS.

我們在更多的平臺上營運。

BUT THE MISSION OUGHT TO BE THE SAME, AND OURS AT CNBC IS THE

但我們的任務應該是一樣的，我們在CNBC的任務也是一樣的。

SAME.

同樣的。

IT'S STICK TO THE TRUTH AND TELL IT STRAIGHT.

堅守真理，直言不諱。

AND I'M REALLY LOVING IT.

我真的很喜歡它。

>> Stephen: LET ME-- LET ME ASK YOU SOMETHING ELSE ABOUT

>> Stephen:讓我... ... 讓我問你一些關於... ...

CNBC.

CNBC。

FOX CALLED ARIZONA FOR BIDEN EARLY.

福克斯公司早早地就打電話給亞利桑那州的比登。

>> YUP.

>> YUP。

>> Stephen: I DID NOT EXPECT THAT FROM THE HANNITY NETWORK.

>> 斯蒂芬：我沒想到漢尼迪網絡會這樣。

CAN YOU TALK ME THROUGH WHAT GOES INTO A NEW NETWORK CALLING

你能告訴我一個新的網絡叫什麼嗎？

SOMETHING?

什麼東西？

>> YOU GET A DIVORCE FROM SOME PLACE AND YOU HAVE TO KEEP

>> 你從某個地方離婚，你必須保持

TALKING ABOUT IT?

談論它？

I WILL -- >> Stephen: WELL, WE ALL-- WE

我會的 -- >> Stephen:好了，我們都 - 我們

ALL STILL KIND OF FIND YOUR EX-WIFE FASCINATING.

都還是有點覺得你的前妻很迷人。

( LAUGHTER ).

（笑）：

>> WELL, I KNOW.

>> 好吧，我知道了。

>> Stephen: DON'T GET ME WRONG.

>> Stephen:不要誤解我的意思。

SHE IS A BITCH, BUT THAT'S KIND OF FUN!

她是一個婊子，但這是一種樂趣！

( LAUGHTER ) TH>> I MEAN THAT DECISION DESK,

（笑） TH>>我的意思是，決策書桌。

LOOK BACK, THEY'VE ALWAYS-- THEY'VE ALWAYS BEEN REALLY GOOD.

回頭看看，他們一直... ... 他們一直都很優秀。

THEY'RE GOOD AT WHAT THEY DO.

他們很擅長他們的工作。

THEY'RE AGGRESSIVE.

他們是攻擊性的。

THEY RUN THAT THING KIND OF LIKE A CAMPAIGN OPERATION.

他們把那件事當做競選活動來做。

THEY'RE GOOD AT IT.

他們很擅長。

THEY CALLED ARIZONA FIRST.

他們先打電話給亞利桑那州。

>> Stephen: IT OFTEN LOOKS LIKE A CAMPAIGN.

>> 斯蒂芬：它經常看起來像一個競選活動。

>> WELL...

>> 好吧...

YOU KNOW, THAT'S YOUR OBSERVATION.

你知道，這是你的觀察。

I'M OVER HERE NOW.

我現在在這裡。

HI!

嗨！

( LAUGHTER ) >> Stephen: EXACTLY.

（笑） >> 斯蒂芬：正是如此。

IT'S YOU AND THE TANKS AND THE SHARKS.

是你和坦克和鯊魚。

YOU'RE GREAT.

你是偉大的。

>> YEAH.

>> 是的。

>> Stephen: FLORIDA IS A STATE YOU KNOW WELL.

>> Stephen:佛羅里達州是你很熟悉的一個州。

HOW LONG DID YOU LIVE THERE, SHEP?

你在那裡住了多久，SHEP？

>> MY MOM WAS THERE 35 YEARS.

>> 我媽媽在那裡呆了35年。

I WORKED THERE FOR EIGHT OR NINE.

我在那裡工作了八九天。

>> Stephen: WHAT DOES NO ONE GET ABOUT FLORIDA, SHEP?

>> 史蒂芬：為什麼沒人能瞭解佛羅里達州，SHEP？

>> THAT IT'S NOT ONE THING.

>> 這不是一件事。

FLORIDA-- YOU KNOW, THE FARTHER SOUTH YOU GO IN FLORIDA, THE

佛羅里達州 -- 你知道，你在佛羅里達州越往南走，越是

FARTHER NORTH OF ARE, THERE ARE THE NORTHEASTERNER WHO LIVE

更遠的北邊，有生活在東北的人。

SOUTHEAST.

東南：

THERE ARE THE PEOPLE FROM ATLANTA AND NASHVILLE AND NEW

有來自亞特蘭大、納什維爾和紐澤西的人。

ORLEANS WHO LIVE IN THE NORTHWEST AND THE PEOPLE IN

住在西北部的奧爾良人和住在西北部的人的

JACKSONVILLE.

傑克遜維爾。

THERE'S THE I-FOUR CORRIDOR.

那是一四號走廊。

IN SOME WAYS IT'S LIKE AMERICA-- IT'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE--

在某些方面，它像美國 - 這是一個很多不同的人 -

IT IS ROLLING A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS COAST TO COAST TO COAST.

它是滾滾而來的很多不同的方式，從海岸到海岸。

>> Stephen: IT LOOKS LIKE THE DEMOCRATS ARE LESS LIKELY TO

>> Stephen:看起來民主黨人似乎不太可能做到。

FLIP THE SENATE.

翻轉參議院。

AND REPUBLICANS MAY HAVE PICKED UP A FEW SEATS IN THE HOUSE.

共和黨在眾議院的席位也增加了一些。

THERE'S STILL A LOT OUTSTANDING.

還有很多出彩的地方。

IT'S HARD TO KNOW AT THIS POINT.

這點上很難知道。

HAS, HAS-- WE DON'T KNOW WHO IS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT YET.

HAS，HAS -- 我們不知道誰會成為總統呢。

BUT IF IT IS GOING TO BE JOE BIDEN, HAS TRUMP, IN YOUR

但是，如果它將是喬-比登，特朗普，在你的。

OPINION, PROVEN THAT YOU ACTUALLY DON'T NEED A CONGRESS

意見，證明你實際上不需要國會。

ON YOUR SIDE TO GET THINGS DONE?

在你身邊完成任務？

BECAUSE HE HAS MADE SUCH EXTENDED USE OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS

因為他擴大了行政命令的使用範圍。

THAT I KNOW OBAMA AND BUSH USED THEM, TOO, BUT TRUMP HAS RAISED

我知道奧巴馬和布什也使用它們，但特朗普已經提出了

IT TO A NEW ART.

它到一個新的藝術。

IS THE PRESIDENCY, IN YOUR OPINION, TOO POWERFUL?

在你看來，總統是否過於強勢？

>> I-- WHAT I'VE SEEN IS THAT EVERYTHING ABOUT SOCIETAL NORMS

>> 我... 我所看到的是，關於社會規範的一切。

WAS NOT WRITTEN DOWN, AND THERE WAS A WAY THAT POLITICIANS AND

沒有寫下來，而且有一個方法，讓政治家和。

LEADERS SORT OF FOLLOWED AND ALWAYS HAD FOR OVER TWO

領導人有點跟風，一直有兩個多月了。

CENTURIES.

世紀。