Name: 審判芝加哥七人組的十大事實正確與錯誤之處 (Top 10 Things The Trial of the Chicago 7 Got Factually Right and Wrong)
Uploaded: 2020-10-23T21:57:10.000Z
Duration: 12 min 46 s

基礎被動語態

riots were started by the Chicago Police Department.

騷亂是由芝加哥警察局發起的。

And today we're counting down our picks for the top 10 things.

而今天我們就來細數一下我們所選的十大事情。

The trial of the Chicago Seven got factually right and wrong site.

芝加哥七人組的審判得到了事實的對錯網站。

Counselor, with his second count of contempt standing, Daphne O'Connor to break my heart was way out of line, Mr Counselor, the demonstrators attacked the police and the police responded for this list.

律師，與他的第二個計數蔑視站，達芙妮-奧康納打破我的心臟是方式出線，律師先生，示威者攻擊警察和警察迴應這個名單。

We're looking at plot points from this historical legal drama that were true to real life or fictionalized for the sake of storytelling.

我們要看的是這部歷史律政劇中的情節，這些情節都是真實的，或者是為了講故事而虛構的。

What did you think of the trial of the Chicago seven?

你對芝加哥七人組的審判有什麼看法？

The film portrays Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin as a couple of jokers who treat the trial almost like performance art.

影片將阿比-霍夫曼和傑瑞-魯賓描繪成一對小丑，他們幾乎將審判當成了行為藝術。

And the record should reflect the defendant.

They see it as an opportunity to attract the media and more young people to the Yippie movement, undermining the no nonsense judge around every turn.

他們認為這是一個吸引媒體和更多年輕人参與到義賣運動中來的機會，處處破壞著無理取鬧的法官。

One such example is when they appear in court wearing judicial robes, much to Judge Hoffman's annoyance.

其中一個例子就是當他們穿著司法長袍出現在法庭上，讓霍夫曼法官很是惱火。

In real life, Hoffman and Rubin did show up in robes one day, although they were not wearing police uniforms underneath, as depicted in the film.

在現實生活中，霍夫曼和魯賓確實有一天穿著長袍出現，不過他們下身並沒有像電影中描述的那樣穿著警服。

Upon taking the robes off, they used them toe wipe their feet.

脫下長袍後，他們用長袍來擦腳。

This actually sounds like something that Sasha Baron Cohen might do if he were on trial, making his casting as Abby all the more brilliant.

這其實聽起來像是薩沙-巴倫-科恩如果在受審時可能會做的事情，讓他扮演艾比的角色更加精彩。

FBI agent Daphne O'Connor Wrong, Played by Caitlin Fitzgerald Gaffney.

FBI探員達芙妮-奧康納錯，凱特琳-菲茨傑拉德-加夫尼扮演。

O'Connor is an undercover FBI agent who has a sort of romance with Jerry Rubin after buying him a drink at a bar.

奧康納是一名FBI臥底探員，在酒吧請傑瑞-魯賓喝酒後，他與傑瑞-魯賓產生了某種戀情。

It's a Tom Collins I know it's kind of a country club drink, but they're delicious.

這是湯姆-柯林斯酒，我知道這是一種鄉村俱樂部的飲料，但它們很美味。

Despite coming to empathize with Rubens, cause O'Connor takes the stand and breaks his heart.

儘管來同情魯本斯，但因為奧康納出面，傷了他的心。

The demonstrators attacked the police and the police responded, much like Rooney, Mara's character in the social network, Daphne O Connor, is purely a creation of Aaron Sorkin.

示威者攻擊警察，警察也做出了迴應，就像魯尼一樣，馬拉在社交網絡中的角色達芙妮-奧康納，純粹是亞倫-索金的創作。

Granted, there are a few undercover agents who got close to the Chicago seven standing Daphne O'Connor to Break My Heart was way out of line.

雖說有幾個臥底接近了芝加哥七站達芙妮-奧康納，讓他傷透了心，但這也太離譜了。

Irwin Bake and William Frappe Aly infiltrated the Vets for Peace and the Students for a Democratic Society.

Irwin Bake和William Frappe Aly滲透進了 "和平志願軍 "和 "民主社會學生會"。

Rubin was personally duped by Robert Pearson, a Chicago police officer who went undercover as his bodyguard.

魯賓是被芝加哥警察羅伯特-皮爾森親自欺騙的，皮爾森是他的臥底保鏢。

Yet there are no reports indicating that Rubin had a 93 hour fling with an FBI agent.

然而並沒有任何報道表明魯賓與FBI探員有93小時的曖昧關係。

Nothing is more dangerous than a crowd of people who are moving.

最危險的莫過於一群正在移動的人。

It's like trying to redirect the Mississippi River.

這就像試圖改變密西西比河的流向。

Number eight Judge Julius Hoffman's incompetence, right?

八號法官朱利葉斯-霍夫曼的無能，對吧？

You're not gonna let the jury hear his testimony?

你不打算讓陪審團聽到他的證詞？

Not unless you condemn unstated to May, which you have not thus far done that this witness Are you any good?

除非你對梅進行無條件的譴責，而你到目前為止還沒有這樣做... ...這個證人，你有什麼好處嗎？

It's not uncommon for biopics to vilify authority figures, but Judge Julius Hoffman was every bit as antagonistic as Franklin.

傳記片醜化權威人物並不罕見，但朱利葉斯-霍夫曼法官和富蘭克林一樣，每一個人都是對立的。

Jealous portrayal site Mr Counselor, with his second count of contempt, described as quote, impetuous and rude and Joseph Golden's 1974 book, The Benchwarmers, the 74 year old Judge Hoffman prevented the jury from examining certain evidence that would have benefited the Chicago seven.

嫉妒的描繪網站律師先生，他的第二項藐視罪，被描述為報價，急躁和粗魯，約瑟夫-戈爾登的1974年書，板凳加熱器，74歲的霍夫曼法官阻止陪審團審查某些證據，這將有利於芝加哥七人。

Your parents received this note this morning in their mail they call the police.

你的父母今天早上收到了這張紙條，他們在郵件中報警了。

As in the film, the families of two young jurors received threatening letters allegedly from the Black Panthers, which the defense claimed were forgeries.

如電影中，兩名年輕陪審員的家屬收到了據稱來自黑豹組織的威脅信，被告方稱這些信是偽造的。

Judge Hoffman showed them the letters leaning one toe.

霍夫曼法官向他們展示了靠著一個腳趾頭的信件。

Do you still feel you can render a fair and impartial verdict?

你還覺得自己能做出公平公正的判決嗎？

No, sir, you're dismissed from this jury.

不，先生，你被開除出陪審團。

According to attorney Gerald Lefcourt, Judge Hoffman was quote pro government on a mission, viewing the defense team as the quote enemy from Day one.

據律師Gerald Lefcourt說，霍夫曼法官是報價親政府的任務，從第一天起就把辯護團隊視為報價敵人。

As such, the judge issued 175 counts of contempt of court throughout the trial.

是以，在整個審判過程中，法官發出了175項藐視法庭的指控。

Richard Schultz was sympathetic to the defendant's wrong.

理查德-舒爾茨對被告的錯誤表示同情。

Although he was a junior prosecutor, the film suggests that Richard Schultz sympathized with the Chicago seven.

雖然他是一名初級檢察官，但影片表明，理查德-舒爾茨同情芝加哥七人組。

We're all on the same team, in a sense, I guess, but in a much truer sense, were not.

我們都是一個團隊，在某種意義上，我想，但在更真實的意義上，不是。

While Schultz does his job, he doesn't get much joy from it.

雖然舒爾茨做了他的工作，但他並沒有從中得到多少樂趣。

Meanwhile, lead prosecutor Tom Foreign shows little empathy for the defendants.

同時，首席檢察官Tom Foreign對被告人幾乎沒有表現出同情心。

It's Schultz who pleads with Judge Hoffman to have mercy on Bobby Seale leading to his mistrial.

是舒爾茨懇求霍夫曼法官對鮑比-西爾手下留情，導致他的無效審判。

I'm issuing an order declaring a mistrial.

我現在發佈命令，宣佈無效審判。

Several people have argued that Schultz was far more hotheaded than scene in the movie, earning a reputation as Quote the government's pit bull.

有幾個人認為，舒爾茨在電影中遠比場面火爆，贏得了引用政府的坑爹名聲。

Respect for the phone defendant David Dellinger went as far as to call Schulz.

尊重電話被告大衛-戴林格竟然給舒爾茨打電話。

Some would also debate that Farron was the more restrained of the two, although he did make plenty of controversial comments.

也有人會爭論說，法倫是兩人中比較剋制的，雖然他確實發表了很多有爭議的言論。

Number six David Dellinger punched a martial wrong.

六號大衛-戴林格打了一個武錯。

David Dellinger is depicted as a radical pacifist who wanted to keep the protests peaceful.

大衛-戴林格被描繪成一個激進的和平主義者，他希望保持抗議活動的和平。

Dillinger is finally pushed to his limits when Judge Hoffman throws out key testimony calling him a quote thug.

迪林傑終於被逼到了極限，霍夫曼法官拋出了關鍵證詞，稱他為報價暴徒。

If we're guilty, why not give us a trial?

如果我們有罪，為什麼不給我們一個審判？

Marshals see the defense if we're guilty, which you have clearly decided.

如果我們有罪，法警就會看到辯方，這一點你已經明確決定了。

Culminates in Dillinger, punching a martial and apologizing before being dragged out?

終極在迪林格，打了一個武夫，道歉後才被拖出去？

Dillinger never used physical violence in court.

迪林傑在法庭上從未使用過身體暴力。

This isn't to say Dillinger never threw a punch in his life.

這並不是說迪林傑一生都沒有出過拳。

He showed great remorse for knocking out another man in college, which may have inspired the scene.

他因為在大學裡打倒了另一個男人而表現出極大的悔意，這可能是這一幕的靈感來源。

Throughout the trial, however, Dillinger stuck by his pacifist worldview that said he was escorted out at one point for interrupting a witness.

然而，在整個審判過程中，迪林格堅持他的和平主義世界觀，說他一度因為打斷證人而被護送出去。

It was at this point that Dillinger made his snake and Nazi comments about Schulz number five.

就在這時，迪林格對舒爾茨五號發表了他的蛇和納粹言論。

陪審團沒有聽到拉姆齊的聲音。

Clark's testimony right in investigation by our criminal division led to the conclusion that the riots were started by the Chicago Police Department.

克拉克的證詞在我們刑事部的調查中得到了正確的結論... ...暴亂是由芝加哥警察局發起的。

In the film, the cases seemingly blown wide open.

在電影中，這些案件似乎被炸開了鍋。

When Attorney General Ramsey Clark takes the stand, he recounts, telling the president over the phone that the Chicago PD likely started the riots.

當司法部長拉姆齊-克拉克出庭作證時，他回憶說，他在電話中告訴總統，芝加哥警察局很可能是騷亂的始作俑者。

The jury isn't present to hear this bombshell, however, and Judge Hoffman decrees that his testimony will not be shared.

然而，陪審團並沒有到場聽這個炸彈，霍夫曼法官下令，他的證詞不會被分享。

字幕列表影片播放

審判芝加哥七人組的十大事實正確與錯誤之處 (Top 10 Things The Trial of the Chicago 7 Got Factually Right and Wrong)

present

general

scene

trial