We've got an economic system that no longer works well enough for everybody.

我們的經濟體系已經不能很好的為大家服務了。

Many people ask, How does my child have a better life than I do in the developed world and can't now that they can't come up with an answer?

很多人問，在發達國家，我的孩子怎麼會比我過得好，現在想不出答案？

Nor can the political on technocratic elites that make the decisions.

決策的技術官僚精英的政治上也不能。

They don't have an answer either.

他們也沒有答案。

So the economy we have evaporating consent for democracy, for the rule of law, for the concept of universal human rights.

所以，我們的經濟對民主、對法治、對普遍人權概念的認同在不斷蒸發。

Ah, third crisis again.

啊，又是第三次危機。

Not well enough, Understood.

不夠好，明白了。

But there is what I call the crisis of algorithmic control Elites and states are increasingly able to use the vast asymmetries of power and information between them and us to not only know our thoughts and behaviors, as you will know if you use Google or Facebook or Amazon, but increasingly to predict them and therefore to control them.

但有我所說的算法控制危機，精英和國家越來越能夠利用他們和我們之間巨大的權力和資訊不對稱，不僅知道我們的想法和行為，就像你使用谷歌或Facebook或亞馬遜就會知道的那樣，而且越來越能夠預測它們，從而控制它們。

On this triple crisis off economic Stasis off falling consent for the old institutions on for rising use of algorithmic and machine control of human beings constitutes to me, ah, whole a big thing that we can link together starting in 2000 and eight, with the Lehman Brothers crisis morphing into the 2011 uprisings from Egypt to Spain to Greece occupy Wall Street.

在這三重危機中，經濟停滯不前，舊機構的同意度下降，對我來說，算法和機器對人的控制的使用上升，啊，整個一個大事情，我們可以從2000年和8年開始聯繫在一起，雷曼兄弟的危機演變成2011年的起義，從埃及到西班牙到希臘佔領華爾街。

I know the attack on truth and the war on truth, I came to the conclusion that the crisis of the neo liberal system has resulted in a crisis of the neo liberal self.

我知道對真理的攻擊和對真理的戰爭，我得出的結論是新自由主義制度的危機導致了新自由主義自我的危機。

Neoliberalism, for me is the coercive introduction by the state off market norms of behavior.

新自由主義，對我來說就是國家強制引入市場行為規範。

It's all parts off everyday life.

這都是日常生活中的一部分。

Michelle Fuko writing at the dawn of the neo liberal era, Warner's what We will become entrepreneurs of the self as the neoliberal system embedded itself into our lives we increasingly conformed on.

米歇爾-福科在新自由主義時代的黎明寫道，華納的什麼我們將成為自我的企業家，因為新自由主義制度嵌入我們的生活，我們越來越符合上。

Performed into this Kabuki theater style of interaction, we became two dimensional in the literal sense of Homo economic us for Mill and Co.

演繹成這種歌舞伎劇場式的互動，我們成了字面意義上Homo經濟我們為Mill和公司的二維。

And Homo economics was a thought experiment.

而荷馬經濟學是一個思想實驗。

What if people on Lee judged everything in terms off market interactions?

如果李上的人用市場外的互動來判斷一切呢？

But the Selves we built to cope with the violent introduction of neoliberalism were Selves that actually did non metaphorically interact in this way.

但我們為了應對新自由主義的暴力引入而建立的自我，是實際上非隱喻性地以這種方式互動的自我。

A great example of that would be supposed someone in your town decides that they want to build a new library, from the local newspaper to the library in to the local councilor.

一個很好的例子是，假設有人在你的城市決定，他們想建立一個新的圖書館，從當地報紙到圖書館在到當地議員。

The question would be, Is it good for the economy of Swindon or whatever?

問題是，這對斯溫頓的經濟還是什麼都好？

We learned not to ask the question.

我們學會了不問問題。

Is it Is it good just because we want to read more books?

難道僅僅因為我們想多看書就好嗎？

It's almost become a knee jerk that we that we reduce everything to the Homo economic form of questioning.

這幾乎成了我們的膝蓋，我們把所有的事情都歸結為Homo經濟形式的質疑。

But the problem here became that the outcome will be that we became eminently governable.

但這裡的問題變成了，結果將是我們變成了可治理的極品。

Who has agency in that photograph?

那張照片裡誰有代理權？

Everybody's just taking photos of him.

大家都在給他拍照

There's one person with agency in that photograph.

那張照片裡有一個人有代理權。

Hannah Arendt called this the temporary alliance of the elite on the mob, and that's what we're seeing all over the world.

漢娜-阿倫特稱這是精英階層對暴民的暫時性聯盟，這也是我們在世界各地看到的。

What the elite wants could be summed up by one word.

精英們想要的，可以用一個詞來概括。

Chaos.

混亂。

Chaos from which they prosper.

混亂，他們從中繁衍生息。

If you are Renaissance Technologies.

如果你是萬麗科技。

Robert Mercer, Trump's biggest backer, to the tune of Million's releases, Technologies has a machine that understands the world better than anybody else does.

特朗普最大的支持者羅伯特-默瑟，以百萬的發行量，科技公司有一臺比任何人都更瞭解這個世界的機器。

It's a neural, linguistically programmed artificial intelligence on it can trade volatilities better than anybody else.

它是一個神經的、語言編程的人工智能，在它上面可以比別人更好地交易波動率。

Ergo, the more volatility there is, the better Steve Bannon on Breitbart's bright but trades on fear on chaos.

Ergo，波動性越大，史蒂夫-班農對Breitbart的光明，但在混亂的恐懼上進行交易，就越好。

That's what it reports.

這就是它的報告。

All rapes in Sweden.

瑞典的所有強姦案。

Art Migrant rapes for format for Breitbart's the MAWR, the better for business on for the Coke industries.

藝術移民強姦為格式為Breitbart的MAWR，更好的業務上為可樂行業。

They didn't back Trump, where they backed the Republicans in the last election.

他們沒有支持特朗普，在上次選舉中他們支持共和黨。

Again, you could say What if you are an avowed anarcho capitalist who believe the government should literally not exist on that the survival of the fittest should literally govern everybody's lives.

同樣，你可以說，如果你是一個公開的無政府資本主義者，相信政府不應該存在，適者生存應該從字面上控制每個人的生活。

Then again, what you want is chaos, and this guy Trump is just the wrecking ball.

話又說回來，你要的是混亂，而特朗普這傢伙就是個破壞球。

He is the chaos engine.

他是混沌引擎。

But what do the mob want?

但是，黑幫想要什麼？

What are the people holding the chanting, The C word?

持誦的人是什麼人，C字？

Hillary Clinton?

希拉里-克林頓？

On the rest.

在其他方面。

What do they want?

他們想要什麼？

Well, what when you interview them, What they want is white supremacy, misogyny, homophobia, climate denial, anti anti vaccination.

好吧，當你採訪他們， 他們想要的是白人至上，厭惡女性，同志， 氣候否認，反反疫苗接種。

That's that's their meat and drink of their ideology.

這就是他們的意識形態的肉體和飲料。

But our rent in the full quote says something I think we should learn from, she says about the Nazis.

但我們的租在完整的行情說，我認為我們應該學習，她說納粹。

What the mob wanted on what Goebbels gave them was access to history, even at the price of destruction, a pregnant phrase.

暴徒想要的是戈培爾給他們的是進入歷史的機會，甚至是以毀滅為代價，一句懷孕的話。

They want the reversal of history, the man I interviewed on the Trump inauguration who could not accept climate change, could not accept it because he was a cattle farmer from Tennessee, he says.

他們想要逆轉歷史，我在特朗普就職典禮上採訪的那個人不能接受氣候變化，不能接受氣候變化，因為他是田納西州的牛農，他說。

If climate change is right, I have to give up my I have to pay a tax on if I have to pay a tax.

如果氣候變化是對的，我必須放棄我的我要交稅，如果我要交稅。

My Children don't get my wealth at the end.

我的孩子到最後也得不到我的財富。

So climate change can't be writing.

所以氣候變化不能寫。

Haven't you heard about the camel skeleton that has been recently found under the Antarctic?

難道你沒聽說過最近在南極下面發現的駱駝骨架嗎？

We are asked to be sympathetic to such people toe worry about the bleak lives that they live in flyover country in America on about their supposed poverty.

我們被要求同情這樣的人，以擔心他們生活在美國的飛越國對他們所謂的貧困的淒涼生活。

But there's enough evidence drawn from surveys that it's not poverty or bleakness on its own that is, driving people in this direction.

但從調查中得出的證據足以證明，促使人們向這個方向發展的，並不是貧窮或黯淡本身。

It is the desire to reverse history, just as aren't predicted.

這是扭轉歷史的願望，就像沒有預測一樣。

But what makes it possible for them?

但是，是什麼讓他們成為可能呢？

Toe win.

來吧，贏。

As I say, the important thing about this picture is that we're looking at a state where Onley elites have agency.

正如我所說，這幅圖的重要意義在於，我們看到的是一個安利精英擁有代理權的狀態。

This is not an aberration from the neoliberal era.

這不是新自由主義時代的畸形現象。

Trump himself is merely a national neoliberal.

特朗普本人只是一個國家新自由主義者。

He is.

他是。

This is Thatcherism, in one country because of the crisis of the global economy.

這就是撒切爾主義，在一個國家，因為全球經濟的危機。

It's become necessary for the elites to compete with each other using deregulation rather than to cooperate with each other using deregulation.

對於精英們來說，用放松管制來相互競爭，而不是用放松管制來相互合作，已經成為必要。

That's what trumpism Boston, Yaro, Orban, Brexit to me is.

這就是我眼中的王牌主義波士頓、亞羅、歐爾班、布雷克特。

But what they're required to play on is a thing that neoliberalism itself created a folk religion of fatalism.

但他們需要發揮的是新自由主義本身創造的一種民間宗教宿命論的東西。