Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • >>> GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. I'M MELANIE COHEN, THANK YOU

  • VERY MUCH FOR ATTENDING, THOSE IN PERSON AND ONLINE.

  • AT USUAL, LET ME GIVE YOU THE ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES FOR THOSE

  • HUD EMPLOYEES WHO WANT TO GET CREDIT FOR THIS, TRAINING

  • CREDIT. PLEASE SEND ME AN EMAIL AND

  • WE'LL MAKE SURE WE PUT YOU ON THE LIST.

  • FOR HUD EMPLOYEES HERE, PLEASE SIGN THE SIGN-IN SHEET AND WE'LL

  • MAKE SURE YOU GET TRAINING CREDIT.

  • LET ME START BY SAYING -- WE KEEP CHANGING THE FORMAT A

  • LITTLE BIT. THIS HAPPENS TO INVOLVE ME BEING

  • THE PRESENTER. I'M GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT A

  • NEW AREA OF THINKING, WHICH IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN WE

  • NORMALLY DO. AND IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE

  • BIT MORE OF A PRESENTATION, BUT HOPEFULLY IT'S A PRESENTATION IN

  • A DIFFERENT WAY THAT YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THAT'S GOING TO SPUR SOME

  • IDEAS AND SOME NEW THINKING FOR YOU.

  • SO DESIGN THINKING. I DON'T KNOW IF PEOPLE ARE TOO

  • FAMILIAR WITH THAT IDEA OR NOT. I DON'T KNOW IF A LOT OF PEOPLE

  • HAVE EVEN HEARD ABOUT IT, SO LET'S DO THIS.

  • LET'S GO TO THE FIRST SLIDE, THE NEXT SLIDE, WHICH TALKS ABOUT

  • THE RIGHT BRAIN AND THE LEFT BRAIN.

  • I'M NOT SURE, AGAIN, IF PEOPLE ARE TOO FAMILIAR WITH THIS IDEA,

  • BUT LET ME TALK TO YOU A MINUTE ABOUT WHAT THE RIGHT BRAIN IS

  • AND THE LEFT BRAIN. IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE SLIDE,

  • WHAT YOU SEE IS THE LEFT BRAIN, THAT'S ALL ABOUT ANALYTICAL

  • THINKING, RATIONAL THINKING, SORT OF STRAIGHT-LINE FUNCTIONS

  • AND WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT IT, YOU GET THE VISUALIZATION OF

  • PEOPLE IN THEIR CUBICLES, RIGHT? ISN'T THAT KIND OF THE IDEA YOU

  • SEE? AND THEN WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT

  • RIGHT BRAIN, DESIGN THINKING IS KNOWN AS THE AREA OF THE RIGHT

  • BRAIN AND SO WHAT THAT INVOLVES IS, IT'S MORE ARTISTIC, MORE

  • INVOLVED WITH INTEGRATING DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS AND MORE

  • INVOLVED WITH IDEAS. WHEN YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THAT

  • SLIDE, WHAT YOU SEE IS SORT OF THIS HAPPY PLACE WHERE PEOPLE

  • AREN'T REALLY TIED UP TO BOUNDARIES.

  • RIGHT? THERE ARE NO BOUNDARIES THERE

  • BECAUSE IT'S THE WHOLE IDEA OF THINKING NEW, THINKING

  • DIFFERENT, INTEGRATING IDEAS AND LOOKING BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF

  • YOUR OWN AREA. SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE

  • BECAUSE WHAT I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU VERY BRIEFLY IS JUST SORT OF

  • THE FOUNDATIONS OF WHERE DESIGN THINKING CAME FROM.

  • AND LET ME JUST MENTION, BECAUSE I SEE A COUPLE OF PEOPLE TAKING

  • NOTES. NO NEED TO TAKE NOTES.

  • I'LL BE SENDING OUT SLIDES FOLLOWING THE PRESENTATION, SO

  • IT'S MORE IMPORTANT, REALLY, THAT YOU GET THE GIST OF AND AN

  • UNDERSTANDING FOR WHAT'S BEING SAID BECAUSE YOU WILL GET ALL

  • THE NOTES LATER. SYSTEMS THINKING.

  • IF ANYONE IS FAMILIAR WITH SYSTEMS THINKING, THAT'S THE

  • IDEA THAT BELIEFS ARE ABOUT WHOLISM.

  • IT'S THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE THAT CREATE THE WHOLE, OKAY?

  • THAT'S REALLY THE MAIN THOUGHT BEHIND SYSTEMS THINKING.

  • BUT DESIGN THINKING IS SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT

  • ALTOGETHER, BUT ITS FOUNDATIONS CAME FROM SYSTEMS THINKING, SO I

  • WANTED YOU TO GET THE SENSE OF WHERE THAT IDEA CAME FROM.

  • SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE BECAUSE I WANT TO START TALKING

  • ABOUT THE WHOLE IDEA OF TALKING ABOUT DESIGN THINKING, THINKING

  • IN A DIFFERENT WAY, AND THINKING GENERALLY, BECAUSE THAT'S OFTEN

  • HARD. THERE'S A COUPLE SLIDES THAT I

  • HAVE A LITTLE BIT LATER IN THE PRESENTATION WHICH WILL REALLY

  • LAY OUT FOR YOU THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE WAY WE THINK THROUGH

  • PROBLEMS AND THE WAY WE TALK ABOUT PROBLEMS.

  • BUT LET'S TALK ABOUT PROBLEMS REALLY BRIEFLY NOW BECAUSE WHAT

  • I WANT TO GIVE YOU DEFINITIONS FOR AND IDEAS ABOUT ARE WHAT

  • WICKED PROBLEMS ARE AND IF PEOPLE ARE REALLY ADDRESSING

  • WICKED PROBLEMS. MOST PROBLEMS WE TALK ABOUT

  • GENERALLY ARE NOT WICKED PROBLEMS, THEY'RE JUST GENERAL

  • EVERYDAY ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS.

  • BUT WICKED PROBLEMS HAVE NO DEFINITIVE FORMULATION, RIGHT?

  • THEY'RE VERY ILL-STRUCTURED, SO THE IDEA IS, IT'S NOT REALLY YOU

  • HAVE A BEGINNING AND YOU HAVE AN END.

  • WHAT YOU HAVE IS THIS KIND OF COMPLEX THING THAT'S HAPPENING,

  • OKAY? AND WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT

  • PROBLEMS YOURSELF AND YOU THINK ABOUT THE PROBLEMS THAT YOU FACE

  • AND YOU THINK ABOUT THE PROBLEMS IN YOUR ORGANIZATION, THERE

  • PROBABLY IS A LITTLE BIT OF A BEGINNING AND AN END TO THEN, SO

  • THEY'RE NOT NECESSARILY WICKED PROBLEMS.

  • I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH EACH ONE OF THESE, BUT I'M JUST GOING

  • TO HIGHLIGHT A COUPLE OF THESE THUNTION.

  • WICKED PROBLEMS ARE ESSENTIALLY UNIQUE.

  • THEY'RE NOT THE EVERYDAY PROBLEM THAT YOU FACE IN YOUR OFFICE,

  • THE EVERYDAY ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEM.

  • WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE PROBLEMS THAT YOU ENCOUNTER

  • EVERY DAY AT YOUR OFFICE, ARE THEY REALLY KIND OF THE SIMILAR

  • PROBLEM OVER AND OVER AGAIN, BUT IT HASN'T REALLY BEEN SOLVED

  • CORRECTLY? IT'S SORT OF MUTATING IN A

  • DIFFERENT DIRECTION, BUT IT'S REALLY NOT SO SIGNIFICANTLY

  • FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU JUST TRIED TO SOLVE

  • BEFORE? A LOT OF TIMES, THAT'S WHAT THE

  • PROBLEMS ARE. AND NUMBER NINE ON THIS LIST,

  • MANY STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES ABOUT THE PROBLEM, SO YOU HAVE A

  • LOT OF DIFFERENT THOUGHTS AND IDEAS AND INPUTS INTO WHAT THAT

  • PROBLEM IS ALL ABOUT. OKAY?

  • SO KIND OF THINK THROUGH THE PROBLEMS YOU HAVE, THINK THROUGH

  • WHAT WICKED PROBLEMS ACTUALLY ARE, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO

  • THROUGH SOME PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUES AND I'M GOING TO SHOW

  • YOU -- AND, OF COURSE, FEEL FREE TO ASK QUESTIONS ANY TIME

  • BECAUSE THAT SORT OF ADDS TO THE WHOLE INTEREST OF THIS.

  • SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. NOW, THIS IS THE TRADITIONAL

  • PROBLEM-SOLVING METHOD, OKAY? THE WATERFALL METHOD.

  • WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS -- AND THIS DOESN'T WORK FOR A WICKED

  • PROBLEM. SO WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS WE SPEND

  • A LOT OF TIME, BUT A FINITE TIME, GATHERING THE DATA OF WHAT

  • THE PROBLEM IS, RIGHT? WE GATHER SO MUCH DATA.

  • THEN WE SPENT ANOTHER FINITE AMOUNT OF TIME ANALYZING THAT

  • DATA, RIGHT? AND THEN WE BEGIN TO FORMULATE A

  • SOLUTION. BUT EACH OF THESE ARE DISCRETE

  • ACTIVITIES. THAT'S THE WATERFALL PIECE.

  • THEY'RE EACH DISCRETE ACTIVITY MUCH, AND THEN WHAT WE DO IS

  • IMPLEMENT SOME SOLUTION. NOW, IN THE INTERIM, THAT'S WHAT

  • I'M JUST SHOWING YOU RIGHT NOW IS THE TRADITIONAL

  • PROBLEM-SOLVING METHOD. IN THE INTERIM, WHAT SOMETIMES

  • HAPPENS IS -- AND LET ME JUST MENTION TOO, THIS IS A VERY

  • RATIONAL MODEL. THIS IS WHAT NORMALLY GETS DONE,

  • BUT IN THE INTERIM, SOMETIMES THE PROBLEMS CHANGES AND

  • SOMETIMES YOU GET NEW DATA. SOMETIMES YOUR ANALYSIS BEGINS

  • TO TAKE ON DIFFERENT SHAPE, BUT YOU HAVEN'T TAKEN ANY OF THAT

  • INTO EFFECT BECAUSE YOU'RE BUSY ON THE NEXT STEP.

  • SO WHAT I WOULD SUGGEST TO YOU, THIS IS A VERY RATIONAL MODEL

  • AND THIS IS WHAT WE DO EVERY DAY AND THIS IS WHAT'S DONE ALMOST

  • ALL THE TIME, IT'S DOOMED TO FAIL, OKAY?

  • THIS IS DOOMED TO FAIL. SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE.

  • WHAT'S DESIGN THINKING ANYWAY? SO I TALKED TO YOU JUST VERY

  • BRIEFLY ABOUT WHAT SYSTEMS THINKING IS.

  • DESIGN THINKING HAS A NUMBER OF DEFINITIONS AND PICTURES AND

  • WE'LL GO THROUGH THAT. HERE'S THE IDEA BEHIND IT.

  • IT'S THE IDEA OF INTEGRATING ANALYTICAL THINKING WITH

  • ABDUCTIVE THINKING. OKAY?

  • AND I'LL EXPLAIN WHAT THAT IS. BUT IT'S THE IDEA OF, WHEN YOU

  • THINK ABOUT ISSUES, YOU CAN EITHER DO ONE OF TWO THINGS.

  • YOU CAN EITHER USE STATISTICS AND TRENDS AND QUANTITATIVE

  • ANALYSIS AND SURVEYS AND HISTORICAL DATA, WHICH IS GOING

  • TO PRODUCE SOME SORT OF RELIABLE RESULT, RIGHT?

  • IT ALWAYS PRODUCES A RELIABLE RESULT BECAUSE YOU'RE USING

  • ACTUAL ANALYTICS. OR, OR, WHAT DESIGN THINKING IS,

  • YOU CAN BEGIN TO GET A BETTER UNDERSTANDING AND FRAMING OF

  • WHAT THE REAL PROBLEM IS BY UNDERSTANDING THE CONTENT AND

  • THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM. WHICH IS WHAT MOST PEOPLE DON'T

  • DO. MOST PEOPLE HAVE A PROBLEM AND

  • THEY LOOK FOR A QUICK SOLUTION. YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT

  • IT, IS THAT WHAT OFTEN HAPPENS? YOU SORT OF -- YOU HAVE A

  • PROBLEM, YOU WANT TO SOLVE IT, AND YOU WANT TO MOVE ON TO

  • WHATEVER THE NEXT THING IS, BUT YOU DON'T TAKE THE TIME TO

  • REALLY THINK ABOUT AND UNDERSTAND THE COMPLEXITY OF

  • WHAT THAT PROBLEM IS ALL ABOUT. AND THAT'S THE IDEA BEHIND

  • DESIGN THINKING. IT'S THE IDEA OF UNDERSTANDING

  • THE PROBLEM, SORT OF -- I USE PROTOTYPING, BUT I USE

  • PROTOTYPING IN A DIFFERENT WAY. I DON'T MEAN PROTOTYPING LIKE

  • PROTOTYPING SYSTEMS OR PROTOTYPING, YOU KNOW, A

  • PRODUCT. I MEAN PROTOTYPING SOLUTIONS, SO

  • THAT YOU CAN TAKE THAT POTENTIAL PILOT SOLUTION, SEE IF THAT

  • SOLVES THE PROBLEM. NORMALLY IT WON'T SOLVE THE

  • PROBLEM, SO YOU NEED TO CONTINUE TO ADJUST THAT BECAUSE THE

  • PROBLEM CONTINUES TO MUTATE, AND THEN COME UP WITH SOMETHING

  • ELSE. SO IT'S REALLY AN ITERATIVE TYPE

  • OF APPROACH, WHICH IS SOMETHING VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE

  • TRADITIONAL PROBLEM-SOLVING. SO IF WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT

  • SLIDE, PLEASE. AND WHAT THAT IS IS ESSENTIALLY

  • I JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU SOME DEFINITIONS BECAUSE, REALLY

  • BECAUSE I'M AN ACADEMIC AND I LOVE DEFINITIONS.

  • BUT THAT'S NOT REALLY THE PART OF IT.

  • I WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND, ALTHOUGH I'M EXPLAINING IT, I

  • WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT SOME OF THE DEFINITIONS ARE.

  • SO IT'S DEFINED AS THE ABILITY TO COMBINE EMPATHY FOR THE

  • CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM. THAT'S REALLY KEY.

  • EMPATHY FOR THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM, UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE

  • PROBLEM REALLY IS, THE FOUNDATION OF THE PROBLEM BEFORE

  • YOU RUN AND TRY TO GET A SOLUTION BASED ON WHAT YOU THINK

  • THE PROBLEM IS AND IT'S ABOUT CREATING, RECREATING, AND

  • GENERATING INSIGHTS INTO THAT, ANALYZING THE SOLUTIONS AND

  • REVISING THOSE SOLUTIONS. SO IT'S A CONSTANT REVISION OF

  • THE SOLUTIONS BECAUSE YOU'RE CONTINUALLY REEXAMINING THE

  • PROBLEM. OKAY?

  • CAN WE GET TO THE NEXT SLIDE? THIS IS ANOTHER DEFINITION.

  • THIS IS A DEFINITION THAT'S USED MORE APPROPRIATELY OR REALLY IN

  • THE PRIVATE SECTOR BECAUSE IT LOOKS AT MARKET OPPORTUNITIES,

  • BUT IT'S THE IDEA -- THIS IS WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO IN THE

  • PRIVATE SECTOR BECAUSE THEY'RE CONSTANTLY LOOKING AT MARKET

  • SHARE, INCREASING MARKET SHARE, AND THEY'RE LOOKING AT

  • PROFITABILITY. BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THOSE

  • SORTS OF IDEAS CANNOT BE INSTITUTED IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR

  • BECAUSE THAT'S THE IDEA OF RECREATING AND RECREATING VALUE,

  • AND THE IDEA IS YOU HAVE TO CONTINUALLY RECREATE VALUE FOR

  • SOMETHING TO BE EFFECTIVE. CAN WE GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE?

  • SO THIS ONE ALSO -- I'VE GOT A LOT OF SLIDES CALLED "WHAT IS

  • DESIGN THINKING," SO THIS ONE IS IS THE IDEA THAT YOU HAVE SOME

  • PROJECT, RIGHT? SOMEBODY HAS AN IDEA, LIKE

  • SOMEBODY HAS AN IDEA IN YOUR OFFICE.

  • SOMETHING HAPPENS WHICH IS THE SQUIGGLY STUFF IN THE CENTER.

  • WHO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THAT STUFF, BUT THAT'S -- KNOWS WHAT

  • THAT STUFF IS, BUT THAT'S THE THINKING THAT GOES O ITERATIVE

  • SORT OF THINKING AND IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR, MONEY FOLLOWS.

  • IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR WHAT'S GOING TO FOLLOW IS VALUE, RIGHT?

  • VALUE FOR THE CITIZEN. SO THAT'S REALLY THE IDEA TO

  • KEEP IN MIND. SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE.

  • THIS ACTUALLY GOES THROUGH SORT OF A -- THE DIFFERENT PHASES OF

  • IT. I'M NOT GOING TO EXPLAIN IT ALL

  • TO YOU BECAUSE I WANT TO SPEND MORE TIME ON THE NEXT SLIDE, BUT

  • THE IDEA IS, AND WHAT I JUST TALKED ABOUT, IS THAT IT'S

  • ITERATIVE. IT'S NOT PROBLEM, SOLUTION,

  • YOU'RE DONE. OKAY?

  • IT'S RECREATING AND UNDERSTANDING WHAT THE PROBLEM

  • IS, WHAT THE SOLUTION IS YOU CAME UP WITH, AND LOOKING AT

  • THAT SOLUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM, IN THE CONTEXT OF

  • THE ENVIRONMENT, AND REVISING THAT SOLUTION.

  • OKAY? SO IT'S A CONSTANT STATE OF

  • THINKING THROUGH THE ISSUES. NOW, I'M GOING TO SPEND MORE

  • TIME ON THE NEXT ONE, SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.

  • BECAUSE THIS IS REALLY ONE OF THE KEY SLIDES HERE.

  • SO THINK TO YOURSELF, WHEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM IN YOUR

  • ORGANIZATION, WHAT WORDS DO YOU EVEN USE?

  • HOW DO YOU THINK ABOUT PROBLEMS? DO YOU TALK ABOUT, WE HAVE A

  • PROBLEM, WE NEED TO SOLVE IT? WE HAVE A PROBLEM, WE NEED TO

  • SOLVE IT. OR DO YOU TALK ABOUT, WE HAVE A

  • PROBLEM, WE REALLY NEED TO UNDERSTAND IT AND WE REALLY NEED

  • TO FRAME IT IN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON AND WE

  • NEED TO LOOK AT THE ENTIRE ENVIRONMENT?

  • HOW MANY PEOPLE DO THAT? YOU KNOW, YOU CAN JUST NOD.

  • VIRTUALLY, I HOPE YOU'RE NODDING VIRTUALLY, BUT THINK ABOUT IT.

  • THINK ABOUT HOW THAT WORKS. THINK ABOUT THE LANGUAGE THAT

  • YOU USE. DO YOU START WITH, ALREADY, SORT

  • OF A COHERENT PLAN OR DO YOU WORK WITH A BLANK PIECE OF

  • PAPER? A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T WORK WITH

  • A BLANK PIECE OF PARTNERSHIP BECAUSE A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER

  • IS HARD TO WORK WITH. I WANT -- ISN'T IT EASIER TO

  • HAVE SORT OF A DRAFT OR A STRAW MAN OR SOMETHING, AND THEN

  • COMMENT ON THAT? RIGHT?

  • ISN'T THAT WHAT MOST PEOPLE DO? THEY COMMENT ON SOMETHING THAT

  • ALREADY EXISTS. THEY DON'T START WITH A BLANK

  • PIECE OF PAPER BECAUSE THAT TAKES A LOT OF -- THAT'S A LOT

  • OF HARD WORK TO START WITH A BLANK SHEET.

  • NOW, DO YOU FUNCTION WITH THE EXISTING PARADIGM?

  • WHICH MEANS, ARE YOU SORT OF EXISTING IN THE ENVIRONMENT THAT

  • YOU'RE IN AND YOU'RE MAYBE CREATING SOME SORT OF SOLUTION

  • THAT FITS WITHIN THAT ENVIRONMENT?

  • OR ARE YOU TRYING TO COME UP WITH SOMETHING COMPLETELY

  • DIFFERENT AND NEW? ARE YOU WILLING TO TAKE THAT

  • RISK AND COME UP WITH SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, HASN'T

  • BEEN SEEN BEFORE, AND YOU'RE WILLING TO SAY, OKAY, THIS --

  • I'M GOING TO THINK ABOUT THIS THING IN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT

  • WAY AND WE'RE GOING TO ACHIEVE SOMETHING NEW THAT WE'VE NEVER

  • ACHIEVED BEFORE, OKAY? THINK THROUGH YOUR OWN PROBLEMS

  • IN YOUR OWN ORGANIZATIONS AND THINK ABOUT THAT.

  • PARADIGM ACCEPTING, OKAY? SO WHEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM IN

  • YOUR ORGANIZATION, DO YOU SOMETIMES SAY, WELL, YOU KNOW,

  • THIS IS KIND OF THE WAY IT IS, AND I'M GOING OFF TO WORK WITHIN

  • THIS ENVIRONMENT AND I'LL COME UP WITH SOME SOLUTION WITHIN

  • THIS ENVIRONMENT? IT MAY NOT BE LONG-LAST, MAY NOT

  • BE LONG-TERM, IT MAY BE SHORT-TERM, BUT IT WILL FIT THE

  • ISSUE NOW AND THEN I CAN MOVE ON TO THE NEXT THING.

  • OR, ARE YOU SORT OF LOOKING AT IT IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW WHAT?

  • THIS ENVIRONMENT IS NOT A GOOD ENVIRONMENT.

  • WE NEED TO CHANGE THIS FUNDAMENTALLY AND WE NEED TO

  • SHIFT THAT PARADIGM TO SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, YOU KNOW,

  • BECAUSE I KNOW IN THE FUTURE, IF WE CAN DO THAT, THIS WILL BE A

  • BETTER PLACE TO BE. OKAY?

  • SO KIND OF THINK THROUGH THAT. THE IDEA OF PATTERNS AND

  • TEMPLATES. THAT'S THE SAME KIND OF THING AS

  • DO YOU WORK WITH SOMETHING THAT EXISTS ALREADY AND SORT OF

  • COMMENT ON THAT, OR DO YOU GO TO SOMETHING COMPLETELY NEW AND

  • DIFFERENT? SO, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, I'M NOT

  • ASKING ANYBODY TO RAISE THEIR HAND AND SAY, YEAH, WE STICK

  • WITH WHAT'S HERE AND THEN WE JUST KIND OF MAKE INCREMENTAL

  • CHANGES. OR YOU KNOW WHAT?

  • IN OUR PLACE, WHAT WE'VE DONE IS FORGOTTEN EVERYTHING THAT'S

  • HERE, WE START WITH A BLANK SHEET AND WE MOVE FORWARD FROM

  • THERE. IT'S NOT ABOUT WHAT YOU DO RIGHT

  • NOW SO MUCH, BUT IT'S ABOUT HOW YOU THINK ABOUT DOING THINGS IN

  • THE FUTURE AND IT'S ABOUT HOW YOU THINK ABOUT SOLVING PROBLEMS

  • IN THE FUTURE. OKAY?

  • I WAS JUST THINKING THERE'S NO MICROPHONE OUT HERE, SO THE

  • PEOPLE ON THE INTERNET ACTUALLY CAN'T HEAR WHAT YOU SAY, BUT GO

  • AHEAD AND SAY IT. I'LL REPEAT THE QUESTION.

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] >> YOU KNOW, THE QUESTION -- SO

  • THE QUESTION IS, WHEN YOU HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM REPEATEDLY,

  • OFTENTIMES YOU WOULD LOOK BACK AT PRIOR SOLUTIONS AND USE THOSE

  • PRIOR SOLUTIONS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM.

  • ESSENTIALLY WHAT'S HAPPENED IS YOU HAVEN'T SOLVED THE PROBLEM.

  • RIGHT? BECAUSE YOU'VE USED REPEATEDLY

  • THE SAME SOLUTIONS OVER AND OVER AGAIN, AND THAT PROBLEM HASN'T

  • BEEN INVOLVED. IT MAY HAVE BEEN SOLVED

  • INITIALLY IN THE SHORT TERM. NOW, IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT

  • EFFICIENCY IN THE SHORT TERM, YOU ANYWAY SOLVE THE PROBLEM --

  • MAY SOLVE THE PROBLEM IMMEDIATELY, BUT IF YOU'RE

  • LOOKING AT ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY ALONG THE -- IF

  • YOU'RE LOOKING AT ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS FOR THE LONG TERM,

  • YOU ACTUALLY ARE NOT DOING ANY FAVORS TO YOUR ORGANIZATION BY

  • USING THE SAME SOLUTIONS OVER AND OVER AGAIN BECAUSE

  • ESSENTIALLY WHAT'S HAPPENED IS THAT SAME SOLUTION IS NOT AS

  • EFFECTIVE. BECAUSE IT HASN'T REALLY BEEN

  • THOROUGHLY THOUGHT THROUGH. AND -- THAT WAS A GREAT

  • QUESTION, AND SO, AGAIN, OPEN IT UP TO WHATEVER QUESTIONS YOU MAY

  • HAVE. THE LAST THING ON THIS CHART IS

  • WHEN YOU -- THE LANGUAGE YOU USE IS REALLY KEY.

  • HOW OFTEN DO YOU USE THE WORDS, YOU KNOW, "WE NEED TO HAVE A

  • DETAILED PLAN OF ACTION, WE NEED TO HAVE A BLUEPRINT."

  • "BLUEPRINT" IS USED A LOT. "WE NEED TO HAVE A BLUEPRINT."

  • DO YOU EVER SAY, "WE NEED SOME BROAD APPROACH TO SOLVE THIS

  • PROBLEM. WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW THIS

  • PROBLEM IS DESIGNED SO WE UNDERSTAND THE COMPLEXITY SO

  • THAT IT DOESN'T HAPPEN AGAIN." THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN AS OFTEN AS

  • SAYING, "WE NEED A PLAN, A DETAILED PLAN," WHICH IS ONE OF

  • THE WORST THINGS YOU CAN ACTUALLY HAVE BECAUSE THAT SORT

  • OF BOUNDS YOU INTO YOUR BOX, SO TO SPEAK.

  • SO THE NEXT SLIDE, I LIKE PICTURES A LITTLE BIT.

  • I LIKE WORDS EVEN MORE, BUT I LIKE PICTURES A LITTLE BIT.

  • SO I WANTED YOU TO GET THE SENSE OF IN THIS SLIDE IS WHAT DESIGN

  • THINKING IS IS NOT JUST HAVING A PROBLEM AND A SOLUTION AND NOT

  • JUST UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM VERY SINGLE-MINDED, FOCUSED KIND

  • OF THING, AND THEN DEVELOPING A SOLUTION.

  • IT'S THIS ITERATIVE KIND OF PROCESS WHERE YOU UNDERSTAND THE

  • PROBLEM, YOU FRAME THE PROBLEM, YOU GET THE CONTEXT, YOU HAVE

  • EMPATHY FOR THE PROBLEM, YOU DEVELOP A SOLUTION, YOU

  • PROTOTYPE THAT, YOU PILOT IT, AND IN THE INTERIM, THE PROBLEM

  • MAY SHIFT SO YOUR SOLUTION KEEPS CHANGING, SO YOU'RE CONSTANTLY

  • LOOKING AT WHAT THAT PROBLEM AND SOLUTION IS.

  • IT'S A CONSTANT PROCESS. OKAY?

  • LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. SO AGAIN, YOU SHOULD

  • REALLY-FOR-WHAT DESIGN THINKING IS -- REALLY KNOW WHAT DESIGN

  • THINKING IS NOW A LITTLE BIT, RIGHT?

  • MAYBE NOT. HERE'S SOME VERY BASIC IDEAS FOR

  • IT. IT'S COLLABORATIVE, AND THE IDEA

  • IS, IT'S THIS WHOLE IDEA OF HAVING DIFFERENT COMPLEMENTARY

  • EXPERIENCES, SO WHAT YOU WOULD HAVE IN AN ORGANIZATION IS YOU

  • DON'T WANT PEOPLE WITH ALL THE SAME SKILLS WORKING TOGETHER ON

  • SOMETHING, RIGHT? THAT'S NOT VERY EFFECTIVE.

  • IT'S THE IDEA OF HAVING PEOPLE WITH THE COMPLEMENTARY SKILLS

  • WORKING TOGETHER WHO CAN CREATE SOMETHING NEW.

  • IF EVERYONE IS OF THE SAME BRAIN OR THE SAME THOUGHT, YOU'RE

  • GOING TO GET KIND OF WHAT YOU GOT, WHICH WAS YOUR OWN IDEA IN

  • THE BEGINNING, RIGHT? WHICH IS NOT VERY EFFECTIVE.

  • ABDUCTIVE THINKING, WHICH IS SOMETHING I MENTIONED AT THE

  • BEGINNING, THE IDEA OF FINDING NEW OPTIONS TO FIND NEW AND

  • BETTER SOLUTIONS TO NEW PROBLEMS.

  • IT'S REALLY THINKING THROUGH THAT PROBLEM.

  • EXPERIMENTAL, WHICH IS WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT, WHICH IS THE IDEA

  • OF YOU NEED TO EXPERIMENT WITH THE SOLUTION, RIGHT?

  • BECAUSE MAYBE THE SOLUTION YOU CAME UP WITH ISN'T REALLY THE

  • SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM BECAUSE, ONE, THE PROBLEM EITHER KEEPS

  • ARISING, OR TWO, THE PROBLEM MUTATES AND CHANGES IN SOME WAY

  • THAT IT MAKES IT DIFFERENT SO YOU NEED TO KEEP VARYING THE

  • SOLUTION. IT'S PERSONAL, SO WHAT THAT

  • MEANS, YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, REALLY, THE CONTEXT OF THE

  • PROBLEM. YOU CAN'T JUST SEE A PROBLEM ON

  • THE SURFACE. I MEAN, YOU CAN CERTAINLY, YOU

  • CAN JUST SEE A PROBLEM ON ITS SURFACE, BUT THAT'S WHEN YOU

  • HAVE INEFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS. THAT'S WHEN IT DOESN'T WORK, AND

  • I THINK THAT EVERYBODY HERE WOULD HAVE AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE

  • THEY WERE FACED WITH A PROBLEM, THEY CAME UP WITH A SOLUTION,

  • AND IT EITHER BACKFIRED, DIDN'T WORK, IT WAS VERY SHORT TERM,

  • AND THAT PROBLEM JUST RESURFACED AGAIN BECAUSE ESSENTIALLY WHAT

  • YOU DID WAS, YOU DIDN'T THINK IT THROUGH ENOUGH AND IT WAS REALLY

  • LIKE PUTTING A BAND-AID ON SOME FESTERING SORE THAT NEEDED

  • SOMETHING MORE SYSTEMATIC TO GET RID OF.

  • IT'S INTEGRATIVE, WHICH IS THE IDEA OF UNDERSTANDING THE

  • LINKSES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH PROBLEM, AND IT'S FRAMING.

  • FRAMING THE PROBLEM IN A CERTAIN WAY.

  • LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE, WHICH IS -- WE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT

  • THE WATERFALL, THAT STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS WHERE PEOPLE SPEND A LOT

  • OF TIME IN ONE OF THOSE AREAS. WHAT THIS IS, IT'S THE

  • WATERFALL, BUT WHAT'S BEEN ADDED TO IT IS THE DESIGN THINKING

  • PIECE OF IT, WHICH IS THIS WHOLE IDEA OF RE-EVALUATING EACH STEP

  • OF THAT PROCESS AND COMING UP WITH NEW WAYS OF THINKING ABOUT

  • HOW AM I GATHERING THE DATA, WHAT AM I EVEN DOING WITH THAT.

  • AM I LOOKING AT THE DATA AND FORGETTING ABOUT IT?

  • AM I LOOKING AT THE DATA, LOOK AT NEW DATA, I COME UP WITH NEW

  • IDEAS. IT'S THAT WHOLE IDEA OF

  • CONTINUALLY AND ITERATIVE PROCESS ON HOW YOU THINK THROUGH

  • PROBLEMS. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS SO FAR

  • BEFORE I GET INTO SOME OTHER STUFF?

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ]

  • >> OKAY. SO TO RESTATE THE PROBLEM, THE

  • QUESTION WAS, HOW WOULD YOU USE DESIGN THINKING IN THE FIRM

  • FIXED PRICE CONTRACTING METHODOLOGY?

  • >> WELL, OR JUST GETTING AWAY FROM THE NOT FIRM FIXED PRICE,

  • WHICH IS WHERE, YOU KNOW, I'VE SEEN SYSTEMS GO OUT OF CONTROL

  • IN TERMS OF HOW MUCH SUPPORT THEY NEED AND HOW LONG -- HOW

  • MUCH IT GOES ON AND DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEET NEEDS.

  • >> OKAY. SO --

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] >> YES, YOU DO HAVE A CONFLICT

  • OF INTEREST. [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ]

  • >> RIGHT, OKAY. SO I'M TRYING TO REPHRASE THE

  • QUESTION SO THAT EVERYBODY CAN UNDERSTAND IT, PARTICULARLY ME,

  • IN TERMS OF TRYING TO ANSWER IT. SO IT'S ABOUT WHEN YOU HAVE A

  • FIRM FIXED CONTRACT AND IT'S NOT -- IT'S NOT ABOUT WHEN YOU

  • HAVE -- OKAY. BECAUSE WHAT --

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] >> WELL, ACTUALLY, I CAN'T EVEN

  • ANSWER A QUESTION LIKE THAT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL

  • ABOUT. THAT'S, THAT'S A QUESTION THAT

  • WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE ADMINISTRATIVELY THROUGHOUT AN

  • ORGANIZATION TO DETERMINE THAT. I'M TALKING ABOUT WHEN YOU

  • HAVE -- THIS IS A TECHNIQUE THAT YOU WOULD USE WHEN YOU HAVE

  • ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS IN YOUR OFFICE, WHICH ARE USUALLY -- AND

  • I'LL GET INTO IT IN A MINUTE -- WHICH ARE USUALLY INTERPERSONAL,

  • WHICH ARE USUALLY -- WHICH ARE VERY MUCH INTERPERSONAL USUALLY

  • IN ORGANIZATIONS. WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT -- AND

  • LET ME TALK A MINUTE ABOUT DESIGN THINKING AGAIN AND IF WE

  • COULD GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. BECAUSE WHAT I WANT -- I WANT

  • YOU TO GET THE IDEA OF NEEDING TO THINK THROUGH PROBLEMS IN A

  • DIFFERENT WAY. OKAY?

  • IT'S NOT ABOUT THE TECHNIQUES YOU USE WHEN SOME ADMINISTRATIVE

  • SORT OF THING IS IN PLACE NECESSARILY.

  • IT'S THE IDEA, WHEN YOU'RE FACED WITH A PROBLEM, HOW DO YOU THINK

  • THROUGH THAT SOLUTION? OKAY?

  • SO THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS, AND I'VE TALKED

  • ABOUT A LOT OF THESE THINGS, BUT I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT SOME

  • MORE AS WE GET FURTHER IN. IT'S REALLY NOT ABOUT THE --

  • IT'S NOT AS MUCH ABOUT THE PROBLEM, BECAUSE YOU NEED TO

  • UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM IN ITS WHOLE TOTALITY.

  • IT'S MORE ABOUT THE SOLUTION. ALL RIGHT?

  • IT'S THE HUMAN CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM.

  • IT'S ABOUT PARADIGM SHIFTING VERSUS STICKING WITHIN THE

  • PARADIGM THAT YOU HAVE. IT'S THE RIGHT BRAIN THAT WE

  • TALKED ABOUT AND IT'S ABOUT T-SHAPED THINKING AND I'M GOING

  • TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT T-SHAPED THINKING IS.

  • I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY IS FAMILIAR WITH THAT OR NOT, BUT

  • IT'S THE IDEA OF COMBINING ANALYTICAL THINKING, WHICH IS

  • THE VERTICAL LEG OF THE "T," AND HORIZONTAL THINKING, WHICH IS

  • THAT INTUITIVE, EMPATHETIC SORT OF THINKING.

  • SO CAN WE GO TO THE NEXT ONE? SO THE "T," I WANT YOU TO MAKE

  • SURE YOU SEE THE "T" REALLY CLEARLY HERE.

  • THE T-SHAPED THINKING, SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

  • SO CRITICAL THINKING IS CONCERNED WITH VALUE STATEMENTS,

  • JUDGMENTS, YES AND NO, VERY ANALYTICAL.

  • NOW, LATERAL THINKING, WHICH IS THE TOP PART OF THAT "T," THE

  • TOP PART OF THE "T," IS ABOUT JUDGED -- ABOUT IDEA GENERATION.

  • YOU NEED TO COMBINE BOTH OF THOSE THINGS, THE ANALYTICAL AND

  • THE CREATING NEW IDEAS. LET ME GIVE YOU EXAMPLES BECAUSE

  • THIS WILL MAKE IT A LITTLE BIT EASIER.

  • SO SOMEONE WHO IS A PURELY VERTICAL THINKER, WHICH IS THE

  • BOTTOM PART OF THE "T," THAT'S KIND OF THE NITPICKER.

  • THAT'S SORT OF LIKE SOMEBODY WHO'S REALLY JUST INTO ANALYSIS

  • AND FACTS. IT'S EITHER THIS OR IT'S NOT.

  • OKAY? THAT'S SORT OF A NITPICKY

  • PERSON. THAT'S A PURE ANALYTICAL

  • THINKER. IF YOU'RE A PURE LATERAL

  • THINKER, WHICH IS THE TOP PART OF THE "T," THAT'S SOMEBODY

  • WHO'S INTO DAY DREAMING, INTO IDEA AFTER IDEA AFTER IDEA WHEN

  • NOTHING IS EVER IMPLEMENTED. OKAY?

  • I THINK WE'VE ALL SEEN PEOPLE LIKE THAT.

  • WE ALL KNOW PEOPLE LIKE THAT. MAYBE SOME OF US ARE PEOPLE LIKE

  • THAT, ONE OR THE OTHER? OKAY.

  • THE IDEA IS YOU NEED TO INTEGRATE BOTH OF THOSE THINGS

  • TO BE SUCCESSFUL. IF THAT'S A NEW IDEA FOR YOU,

  • THEN GREAT, THE T-SHAPED THINKER, SO THINK ABOUT THAT.

  • THINK. THINK IS THE KEY HERE, THINKING.

  • OKAY? SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE,

  • WHICH IS THE BOX. YOU NOTICE HERE, SOMETIMES YOU

  • FEEL CAUGHT IN THAT, LIKE YOU'RE IN THE BOX?

  • THEY SAY GET OUT OF THE BOX, BUT YOU CAN'T GET OUT OF THE BOX,

  • REALLY, CAN YOU? BECAUSE YOU'RE IN THE BOX.

  • IT'S HARD TO GET OUT OF THE BOX. BUT THE KEY THING HERE IS EVEN

  • IF THE BOX WERE TO FLIP OVER -- [ SCREAM ]

  • >> OKAY, YOU STILL CAN'T GET OUT OF THE BOX.

  • THAT LOST A LITTLE EFFECT SOMEHOW, BUT THERE WAS A SCREAM

  • ASSOCIATED WITH THAT. BUT EVEN IF THE BOX WERE TO FLIP

  • OVER, YOU CAN'T GET OUT OF THE BOX BECAUSE THERE'S A GLASS LID

  • ALSO, RIGHT? SO THE IDEA IS, YOU SORT OF HAVE

  • TO CREATE CHALLENGES FOR YOURSELF, AND THAT'S THE IDEA OF

  • DESIGN THINKING. YOU CREATE CHALLENGES FOR

  • YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU'RE REALLY NOT TRAPPED IN THAT BOX.

  • YOU REALLY CAN GET OUT OF THAT BOX.

  • IT'S GLASS, RIGHT? YOU CAN SEE WHAT'S GOING ON

  • AROUND YOU, YOU REALLY CAN ESCAPE FROM IT.

  • BUT YOU HAVE TO THINK THROUGH HOW YOU'RE GOING TO DO THAT BY

  • UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITY OF EACH PROBLEM.

  • CAN WE GO TO THE NEXT ONE? NOW, I JUST TALKED ABOUT THE

  • BOX. I DON'T KNOW IF PEOPLE ARE

  • FAMILIAR WITH THIS NINE-POINT DIAGRAM.

  • HAVE PEOPLE SEEN THIS? IF I SAY TO YOU, THIS IS A

  • NINE-POINT DIAGRAM AND WE'VE TALKED A LITTLE BIT NOW ABOUT

  • THINKING DIFFERENT, T-SHAPED THINKING, DESIGN THINKING.

  • IF I SAY TO YOU, YOU TAKE THIS NINE-POINT DIAGRAM AND IN THREE

  • LINES, YOU NEED TO CONNECT ALL THE DOTS AND YOU CAN'T LIFT YOUR

  • PEN OFF THE PAPER, YOU'RE GOING TO KIND OF LOOK AT THAT AND SAY,

  • HMM, SURE, I CAN DO THAT. AND WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO IS

  • YOU'RE GOING TO START CONNECTING THE DOTS AND THERE'S ALWAYS

  • GOING TO BE SORT OF A DOT THAT'S LEFT OUT.

  • ISN'T THERE A DOT LEFT OUT, USUALLY?

  • SOMETIMES THERE'S TWO DOTS LEFT OUT DEPENDING ON WHAT WAY YOU'RE

  • MOVING THE PEN. AND YOU SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT?

  • I'LL GIVE YOU FOUR LINES. TAKE FOUR LINES AND TRY TO

  • CONNECT IT, AND YOU'RE KIND OF LOOKING IT AND YOU TRY AND YOU

  • DO A COUPLE OF THINGS. OKAY, I SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE

  • THINKING ABOUT IT. LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE.

  • SO WHAT THE NEXT SLIDE IS, IS MOVING OUTSIDE THAT BOX.

  • I NEVER SAID YOU WERE BOUND BY THE CONFINES OF THE DOTS.

  • I JUST SHOWED YOU NINE DOTS. RIGHT?

  • YOU SORT OF BOUND YOURSELF IF YOU WEREN'T ABLE TO FIGURE OUT

  • HOW TO CONNECT THE DOTS. RIGHT?

  • BECAUSE ONCE YOU GO OUT OF THE LINES -- I MEAN OUT OF THE

  • BOUNDARIES OF THE DOTS, YOU'RE ACTUALLY ABLE TO CONNECT THE

  • DOTS, RIGHT? SO THAT'S JUST REALLY SORT OF

  • THE IDEA OF, AGAIN, THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX.

  • OKAY? VERY SIMPLE EXERCISE, BUT, YOU

  • KNOW, EVEN AFTER WE JUST TALKED ABOUT THINKING IN A DIFFERENT

  • WAY, I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE STILL BOUND BY THE CONFINES

  • THAT WERE PRESENTED IN THOSE NINE DOTS.

  • RIGHT? WERE PEOPLE STILL SORT OF

  • THINKING ABOUT THAT? OKAY.

  • SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE. SO -- CAN EVERYONE SEE THIS

  • CLEARLY? OKAY.

  • SO THIS IS THE WHOLE IDEA OF REALLY THINKING CREATIVELY,

  • BEING UNORTHODOX AND NOT TIED TO CONVENTIONAL CONSTRAINTS.

  • NOW, DO YOU OR ANYBODY YOU KNOW OR ARE YOU -- AND YOU CAN RAISE

  • YOUR HANDS -- THAT SORT OF ZEBRA IN THE CENTER?

  • SEE THAT ZEBRA IN THE CENTER? ARE YOU WILLING TO BE THAT ZEBRA

  • IN THE CENTER? A LOT OF PEOPLE AREN'T WILLING

  • TO BE THAT ZEBRA IN THE CENTER, OKAY?

  • BUT THAT'S THE IDEA, TOO, OF THINKING OUTSIDE OF YOUR

  • BOUNDARIES, LOOKING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.

  • EVERYBODY IS LOOKING IN ONE DIRECTION AND YOU'RE THE ONE

  • LOOKING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT?

  • THERE'S A WHOLE BIGGER WORLD OUT THERE THAN JUST WHAT'S FACING

  • YOU RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, RIGHT?

  • LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE. AND THIS AGAIN IS THE IDEA OF

  • BEING MORE BEYOND OUT OF THE BOX, RIGHT?

  • DO YOU KNOW ANYBODY LIKE THAT? OR ARE YOU ANYBODY LIKE THAT?

  • OR HAVE YOU SORT OF DISREGARDED PEOPLE LIKE THAT?

  • THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS A LOT OF TIMES TOO, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE A

  • LOT OF TIMES THESE OUT-OF-THE-BOX, DESIGN-THINKING

  • PEOPLE ARE NOT THE MOST CONVENTIONAL AND THEY CAN KIND

  • OF SOMETIMES COME ON THE OTHER SIDE OF BUREAUCRACY AND WHAT

  • HAPPENS IS THEY END UP BEING THAT ONE THAT DOESN'T FIT IN,

  • RIGHT? OKAY?

  • SO JUST SORT OF UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT IS.

  • AND THEN LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE BECAUSE I TALKED A LOT ABOUT

  • THE BOX. YOU KNOW WHAT?

  • IT'S MORE THAN JUST THE BOX. YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT, WHEN

  • YOU THINK THROUGH PROBLEMS, YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT WHAT BOX AM

  • I ACTUALLY DEALING WITH, BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF BOXES, RIGHT?

  • THAT'S WHAT THIS IS DEPICTING. THERE ARE A LOT OF BOXES THAT

  • ARE THE ISSUE. IT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, I'M TRAPPED

  • IN ONE THING, THIS IS MY ONE PROBLEM, THIS IS MY ONE

  • SOLUTION. THERE'S A WHOLE WORLD OF STUFF

  • OUT THERE THAT YOU NEED TO CONSIDER WHEN YOU'RE

  • PROBLEM-SOLVING, OKAY? LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, AND

  • WHAT THIS IS IS ORGANIZATIONALLY, BECAUSE AGAIN,

  • THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION, YOU NEED TO LOOK

  • AT CULTURAL NORMS THAT EXIST IN ORGANIZATIONS, WHERE YOU ARE AND

  • WHERE YOU NEED TO GO. RIGHT NOW GENERALLY IN A LOT OF

  • ORGANIZATIONS, YOU HAVE THE PREVAILING SIDE, WHICH KNOWLEDGE

  • IS POWER, RIGHT? IF I KNOW SOMETHING AND YOU

  • DON'T, I'M THE MORE POWERFUL ONE, RIGHT?

  • AND I DON'T REALLY WANT TO SHARE THAT BECAUSE YOU MIGHT KNOW

  • SOMETHING TOO, RIGHT? THAT'S KIND OF THE PREVAILING

  • IDEA. YOU KNOW, I NEED TO BE PERFECT,

  • I NEED TO BE THE ONE WHO'S THE EXPERT ON IT.

  • I'M SORT OF ON MY OWN ON THIS. IT'S ALL ABOUT ME AND WHAT I

  • KNOW BECAUSE THAT GIVES ME SOME LEGITIMACY.

  • THAT'S KIND OF A PREVAILING IDEA.

  • BUT IN TERMS OF MOVING FORWARD IN 21st CENTURY ORGANIZATIONS,

  • IT'S REALLY MORE ABOUT BEING COLLABORATIVE.

  • IT'S MORE ABOUT SHARING POWER. THE IDEA REALLY IS, YOU KNOW, IF

  • YOU HAVE PEOPLE WITH IDEAS THAT COME TOGETHER, YOU EACH MAY HAVE

  • TWO IDEAS, YOU COME TOGETHER AND YOU CAN LEAVE WITH SIX NEW

  • IDEAS. THAT'S THE WHOLE IDEA.

  • IT'S NOT THAT YOU'RE SO WONDERFUL BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE

  • IDEA. YOUR IDEA MAY NOT BE SO GREAT.

  • YOU NEED TO ACTUALLY DISCUSS IT AND YOU CAN COME UP WITH NEW

  • IDEAS. THAT AGAIN IS THE IDEA OF

  • LATERAL THINKING. AND IT'S MORE ABOUT "WE" THAN IT

  • IS ABOUT "I" AND "ME." THAT'S REALLY THE FUTURE OF

  • ORGANIZATIONS. OKAY, SO THIS IS ONE OF MY

  • FAVORITE SLIDES. IT'S ALMOST SELF EXPLANATORY,

  • BUT I'LL EXPLAIN IT ANYWAY. MAYBE IT'S NOT SELF EXPLANATORY.

  • IT IS TO ME. IN THE TYPICAL ORGANIZATION, YOU

  • HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL, RIGHT? THAT WOULD BE YOUR CURLY-HEADED

  • GIRL. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT REMINDS YOU

  • OF ANYBODY, BUT A CURLY-HEADED GIRL.

  • YOU HAVE THE ORGANIZATION WHICH IS DEPICTED HERE AT DANTE'S

  • INFERNO, A SWIRLING MESS OF CHAOS, RIGHT?

  • THEN YOU HAVE CONTINUAL DEMANDS THAT COME IN TO THE

  • ORGANIZATION, WHICH IS THE PERSON WITH THE SPEAR, RIGHT?

  • CONTINUAL DEMANDS AND NEW REQUESTS AND NEW THINGS COME

  • INTO THE ORGANIZATION, AND THEN ON TOP OF ALL THAT, YOU HAVE ALL

  • OF THOSE INTER-GROUP CONFLICTS, WHICH ARE THE PEOPLE FIGHT,

  • RIGHT? DOES THAT KIND OF DEPICT AN

  • ORGANIZATION GENERALLY? COULD BE ANY ORGANIZATION

  • ANYWHERE, ANYTHING. COULD BE A FAMILY, COULD BE

  • ANYTHING, RIGHT? IT'S A UNIT.

  • SO THAT'S SORT OF YOUR TYPICAL ORGANIZATION, BUT WHAT YOU WANT

  • TO GET TO -- THAT'S THE SAMPLE, BUT YOU WANT TO GET TO THE

  • ULTIMATE ORGANIZATION, WHICH IS ON THE NEXT SLIDE, AND SO WHAT

  • YOU HAVE HERE IS HAPPY PEOPLE, RIGHT?

  • YOU HAVE A MULTI-GENERATIONAL, THAT'S WHAT THE DIFFERENT THINGS

  • ARE SUPPOSED TO BE, WHETHER THEY'RE INSTALL OR LARGE,

  • MILLENNIAL -- SMALL OR LARGE, MILLENNIALS, BABY-BOOMERS, ALL

  • KINDS OF DIVERSITY IN ORGANIZATIONS, AND WHAT YOU WANT

  • TO GET TO WHICH IS WHAT YOU HAVE AT THE VERY BOTTOM, WHICH IS A

  • VERY HAPPY ORGANIZATION, RIGHT? \M \M

  • THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ULTIMATELY TRYING TO GET TO.

  • OKAY, THANK YOU. YOU GET THE GIST, RIGHT?

  • YOU GET THE GIST. YOU'RE TRYING TO GET TO SOME

  • SORT OF SENSE OF UNITY, RIGHT? THAT'S YOUR ULTIMATE

  • ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVE. SO THIS SLIDE -- AND I HOPE

  • YOU'RE THINKING TO YOURSELF AS YOU'RE LOOKING AT THESE SLIDES,

  • LIKE I'M NOT SURE I'VE SEEN PRESENTATIONS LIKE THIS BEFORE

  • WHERE THERE'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT -- THAT'S THE WHOLE

  • IDEA OF DESIGN THINKING, RIGHT? THEY'RE COLORFUL, JUST A LOT OF

  • PICTURES WITH WORDS ASSOCIATED WITH IT SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND.

  • YOU'RE GOING TO UNDERSTAND MORE IF I HAD AN EMPTY FRAME HERE

  • THAN IF I HAD 50 WORDS ON THE SCREEN.

  • SO YOU'RE GOING TO GET THAT A LOT MORE.

  • BUT HERE'S THE IDEA OF THE FRAME.

  • WE TALKED ABOUT FRAMING, RIGHT, IN THE VERY BEGINNING.

  • WE TALKED ABOUT HOW YOU FRAME THE PROBLEM.

  • THE FRAME IS THE KEY AND THE IDEA IS THIS WHITE SPACE IS SORT

  • OF A METAPHOR AND IT'S A CANVAS OF HOW YOU SOLVED THAT PROBLEM.

  • SO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO REALLY WELL, JUST LIKE IN A NICE GOLD

  • GILDED FRAME, IS FRAME THAT PROBLEM CORRECTLY SO THAT YOU

  • CAN USE THE WHITE SPACE IN THE CENTER TO ACTUALLY COME UP WITH

  • THE SOLUTION FOR YOUR MASTERPIECE.

  • OKAY? SO LET'S GO TO THE NEXT ONE.

  • SO NOW WHEN YOU'RE FACED WITH A PROBLEM, THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO

  • BE YOU. [ SCREAM ]

  • >> OKAY? THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE YOU.

  • YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT.

  • SO I HAVE A VERY SIMPLE EXERCISE TO SHOW YOU.

  • IT'S A VIDEO, AND LET ME JUST SET IT UP FOR YOU SO YOU CAN

  • UNDERSTAND. IF WE WERE SORT OF SET UP IN A

  • DIFFERENT WAY, WE'D BE ABLE TO DISCUSS IT A LITTLE BIT BETTER

  • IN SMALL GROUPS, BUT WE'RE NOT SET UP FOR THAT RIGHT NOW.

  • BEFORE I SHOW THE VIDEO, THOUGH, LET ME JUST ASK IF THERE ARE ANY

  • QUESTIONS HERE, IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS.

  • >> IT'S A QUESTION AND MAYBE A COMMENT.

  • SO DESIGN THINKING, YOU'RE CONSTANTLY REEXAMINING THE

  • PROBLEM, DOES IT INDICATE THAT YOU ARE NEVER QUITE SURE THAT

  • YOU HAVE THE SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM, THAT YOU HAVE SOLVED A

  • PROBLEM? SO YOU KEEP GOING BACK AND

  • LOOKING OVER IT AGAIN CONSTANTLY, RE-EVALUATING IT.

  • WOULD THAT BE A CORRECT WAY TO DESCRIBE DESIGN THINKING?

  • >> IT DEPENDS -- THE QUESTION IS, BECAUSE YOU ARE CONTINUALLY

  • REEXAMINING THE PROBLEM AND THE SOLUTION, DOES THAT MEAN YOU

  • DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND -- YOU DON'T REALLY CORRECTLY

  • UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM? YOU KNOW, IN A LOT OF WAYS, MOST

  • PROBLEMS -- AND AS WE TALKED ABOUT IN THE BEGINNING,

  • PARTICULARLY WICKED PROBLEMS, DON'T HAVE A REAL SOLUTION.

  • YOU'RE CONTINUALLY -- AND THAT'S BEST WHAT THIS IS USED FOR, BUT

  • IN MOST INSTANCES, YOU REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM

  • BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GIVING THE TIME TO IT, NOT GIVING YOURSELF

  • AND OTHERS THE TIME TO UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM.

  • SO OFTENTIMES, THE SOLUTION YOU COME UP WITH DOES NOT WORK

  • BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T THOROUGHLY THOUGHT OUT THE ENTIRE CONTEXT

  • OF THE PROBLEM. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THAT'S A

  • BAD THING, BECAUSE YOU'RE CONTINUALLY RE-EXAMINING.

  • IT ACTUALLY MEANS IT'S A GOOD THING BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT TRYING

  • TO PUT A SIMPLE BAND-AID ON A PROBLEM THAT YOU KNOW HAS REARED

  • ITS HEAD IN THE PAST AND YOU KNOW I'M COMING UP WITH A

  • SHORT-TERM SOLUTION BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO REAR ITS HEAD IN THE

  • FUTURE. I JUST DON'T HAVE TIME RIGHT NOW

  • TO THINK ABOUT IT, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT A LOT OF PEOPLE DO.

  • I DON'T HAVE THE TIME RIGHT NOW TO REALLY THINK THROUGH A GOOD

  • SOLUTION, SO I'M JUST GOING TO TRY TO GET A SHORT-TERM SOLUTION

  • FOR IT, AND THAT WILL WORK FOR HOWEVER LONG IT WORKS.

  • IT COMES BACK AGAIN. I MEAN, HOW MANY OF YOU HAVE THE

  • SAME PROBLEM THAT KIND OF, ORGANIZATIONALLY, HAVE THE SAME

  • PROBLEM THAT COMES BACK OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN?

  • AND IT'S BECAUSE IT HASN'T BEEN SOLVED REALLY THE FIRST TIME.

  • OKAY, ANY MORE -- [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ]

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] >> RIGHT.

  • THE ONLY REASON IT WAS LIKE THAT WAS BECAUSE THAT WAS THE WAY I

  • HAD SORT OF SET IT UP. IT DOESN'T NECESSARILY NEED TO

  • BE AT THE SAME 100 DAYS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE IT'S

  • CONSTANT, ITERATIVE. WHAT I WAS TRYING TO GET TO IN

  • THAT SLIDE WAS THAT AT EACH PHASE OF THE WATERFALL, IT'S AN

  • ITERATIVE PHASE. IT WOULD TAKE -- IT DOES TAKE

  • LONGER WITH DESIGN THINKING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS.

  • I MEAN, THE QUESTION YOU ASK YOURSELF, OF COURSE, IS AM I

  • WILLING TO INVEST THE TIME IT'S GOING TO TAKE TO REALLY THINK

  • THROUGH THAT PROBLEM AND TRY TO GET A GOOD SOLUTION TO IT,

  • KNOWING THAT A LOT OF THESE PROBLEMS DON'T HAVE A VERY EASY,

  • YES/NO/THIS IS THE ONE SOLUTION KIND OF THING.

  • SO THE QUESTION I WOULD HAVE FOR YOU, AND IF WE HAD AN

  • OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF TALK IN SMALL GROUPS AND TALK AMONG

  • YOURSELVES, BUT WHOEVER WOULD HAVE A RESPONSE TO THESE

  • QUESTIONS OR ANY ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS, DID THIS PROBLEM AND

  • SOLUTION SORT OF FIT THE IDEA OF DESIGN THINKING?

  • DO YOU THINK? AND SO PEOPLE ARE SHAKING THEIR

  • HEADS. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE

  • TO SAY HOW THEY THINK IT DID? BECAUSE THERE'S PEOPLE ALSO ON

  • THE INTERNET WHO ARE PROBABLY THINKING THROUGH THESE THINGS

  • TOO NOW THAT THEY HAVE SEEN THE SCENARIO.

  • DOES THIS ACTUALLY FIT INTO THE METHOD OF DESIGN THINKING?

  • DID THEY USE SOME OF THE TECHNIQUES WE JUST TALKED ABOUT

  • FOR DESIGN THINKING? IF ANYBODY SAW ONE OF THOSE

  • TECHNIQUES, IF THEY WANTED TO, YOU KNOW, OFFER THAT.

  • OR NOT. [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ]

  • >> RIGHT. SO SOMEONE HERE, FOR THE PEOPLE

  • ON THE INTERNET, SOMEONE HERE SAID THEY WERE FORCED TO GO

  • OUTSIDE OF THEIR NORMAL PROCEDURES TO THINK ABOUT HOW TO

  • SOLVE THE PROBLEM. DID ANYBODY NOTICE IN THAT ONE

  • CLIP WHERE THEY WERE ASKED, YOU KNOW, IS THIS GOING TO WORK, AND

  • THAT PERSON IMMEDIATELY SAID, WELL, IT WASN'T DESIGNED TO DO

  • THAT? RIGHT?

  • THAT'S NOT VERY MUCH DESIGN THINKING, IS IT?

  • THAT'S SORT OF LIKE THE USUAL, THIS IS NOT WHAT WE HAD PLANNED

  • FOR AND WE'RE GOING TO SORT OF STICK WITH OUR PLAN, AND I CAN'T

  • TELL YOU IT'S GOING TO WORK BECAUSE THAT'S NOT WHAT THE

  • DETAILED PLAN SAID IT WAS GOING TO DO, RIGHT?

  • WHICH GOES BACK TO THAT OTHER CHART WE TALKED ABOUT.

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ]

  • >> OKAY. AND SO FOR THE PEOPLE WATCHING

  • ON THE INTERNET, WHAT SOMEONE HERE SAID WAS, WHEN THEY PUSH

  • THE PROJECTOR OUT OF THE WAY, FORGOT WHAT THAT THING WAS

  • CALLED WHEN I FIRST SAW IT, WHEN THEY PUSHED THAT OUT OF THE WAY,

  • THEY SAID YOU KNOW WHAT? WE'RE NOT GOING TO JUST GO TO

  • WHAT WE HAVE HERE THAT'S ALREADY DESIGNED OUT, WE'RE GOING TO

  • DRAW THIS PROBLEM OUT ANEW AND WE'RE GOING TO THINK FRESH.

  • [ INAUDIBLE COMMENTS ] >> THE BULB BLEW OUT, OKAY,

  • WHICH IS -- WELL, WHICH IS, AGAIN, THOUGH, THE BULB BLEW OUT

  • SO THEY DIDN'T EVEN HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO THEIR OLD

  • THINKING, RIGHT? THEY WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE THAT

  • OPPORTUNITY. NOW, I UNFORTUNATELY HAVE TO END

  • JUST A FEW MINUTES EARLY BECAUSE THERE'S ANOTHER SESSION COMING

  • IN IMMEDIATELY AT 11:00, SO WHAT I'M GOING TO SAY IS I APPRECIATE

  • EVERYBODY COMING. I'M GOING TO BE SENDING THE

  • SLIDES OUT. I HOPE THAT YOU GOT SOMETHING

  • OUT OF THE SESSION, AND JOIN US NEXT MONTH, WE'RE DOING

  • SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT NEXT MONTH.

  • NEXT MONTH'S EVENT IS GOING TO BE ON OCTOBER 10th.

  • WE'RE NOT GOING WITH THE THIRD THURSDAY.

  • OCTOBER 10th, HUD AND THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ARE

  • COSPONSORING A MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER, IT'S GOING TO BE

  • OCTOBER 10th FROM 1:00 TO 3:00 HERE IN THE AUDITORIUM.

  • HER NAME IS ARIANNE DE BONBUZENE.

  • SHE WROTE A BOOK CALLED "THE FIRST 30 DAYS," WHICH IS GOING

  • TO TELL YOU HOW TO MAKE FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES IN YOUR LIFE

  • IN A 30-DAY PERIOD, SO I HOPE YOU CAN ATTEND THAT AND I HOPE

  • WE GET A WONDERFUL INTERNET AUDIENCE FOR THAT.

  • SO THANK YOU ALL FOR ATTENDING AND HAVE A GREAT DAY.

>>> GOOD MORNING, EVERYONE. I'M MELANIE COHEN, THANK YOU

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

A2 初級

什麼是思考的設計(OCIO Learning Session: Design Thinking...What is that? - HUD - 9/20/12)

  • 157 28
    Why Why 發佈於 2013 年 04 月 03 日
影片單字