Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • WITH TOWERING VOLCANOES, SWIRLING DUST STORMS,

  • AND PLUMES OF SUBLIMATING DRY ICE AT ITS POLES,

  • THE SURREAL LANDSCAPE OF MARS HAS CAPTURED THE EARTHLY IMAGINATION FOR CENTURIES.

  • BUT WHAT WOULD IT TAKE TO MAKE IT HABITABLE?

  • AS IN, A PLACE WHERE WE COULD BREATHE, WALK AROUND WITHOUT OUR BLOOD BOILING, OR EVEN

  • GROW CROPS AND ENJOY BLUE SUNSETS?

  • THERE HAVE BEEN SOME WILD PROPOSALS ABOUT HOW TO MAKE MARS MORE SUITABLE FOR HUMANS

  • FROM NUKING THE POLES TO HIJACKING A FLEET OF COMETS

  • IN ORDER TO KICKSTART A NEW CLIMATE.

  • SO, HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO TERRAFORMING MARS?

  • TERRAFORMING IS A TERM THAT WAS COINED IN SCIENCE FICTION.

  • BUT TODAY, THE IDEA IS BEING THROWN AROUND BY A HANDFUL OF ACTUAL SCIENTISTS.

  • - Terraforming, put simply, is changing the atmosphere and climate of a planet

  • so that it can support human life.

  • Without the need for spacesuits.

  • TO SURVIVE ON MARS, THAT IS, WITHOUT EXTENSIVE EQUIPMENT AND RE-SUPPLY FROM EARTH,

  • WE'D NEED TO BE ABLE TO DO A FEW SIMPLE THINGS:

  • BREATHE, STAY CONSCIOUS, AND NOT FREEZE TO DEATH.

  • IF WE CAN FIGURE OUT THOSE THREE HURDLES, WE’D HAVE THE LUXURY OF WORRYING

  • ABOUT LONGER-TERM CONCERNS, LIKE HOW TO GROW FOOD, OR

  • SHIELD OURSELVES FROM RADIATION.

  • TRUE, MARS DOESN’T SOUND THAT HOSPITABLE, BUT AFTER MULTIPLE MISSIONS WEVE FOUND

  • CLUES THAT THIS WASN'T ALWAYS THE CASE.

  • - We see evidence that there was liquid water

  • running over the surface of Mars.

  • The atmosphere must have been thicker so that greenhouse trapping of heat from the sun would

  • warm the planet and allow liquid water.

  • - Most of Mars' atmosphere escaped to space over the last four billion years.

  • TO RESTORE IT TO A VERSION THAT’S MORE LIVABLE

  • FOR HUMANS, WE'D HAVE TO ADDRESS BREATHING FIRST.

  • ON EARTH, WE HAVE A DELICIOUS ATMOSPHERE MADE OF AROUND 21% OXYGEN, 78% NITROGEN,

  • AND A LITTLE BIT OF EVERYTHING ELSE.

  • It wouldn't need to be exactly that mix, but we would need a very similar amount of oxygen.

  • There certainly is enough water locked up in ice on Mars to get some O2 for you.

  • Unfortunately, there probably isn't enough nitrogen that we could easily get to, to build

  • up an Earth-like, mostly-nitrogen atmosphere.

  • If you're willing to wear a gas mask, then the gases could be pretty much anything which

  • isn't corrosive or acidic.

  • You'd have to carry oxygen on your back.

  • That could be an intermediate step.

  • OKAY, FINE – I’LL AGREE TO WEAR A DJ MARSHMELLO MASK FOR A LITTLE WHILE

  • IF I COULD SKIP THE SPACE SUIT.

  • SO, THAT BRINGS US TO OUR OTHER GOALS: STAYING AWAKE AND WARM.

  • AND IT TURNS OUT, THESE TWO ACTUALLY GO HAND IN HAND.

  • IF YOU STEPPED OUTSIDE ON MARS TODAY, YOU’D PASS OUT INSTANTLY

  • AND DIE SHORTLY AFTER, AS THE LOW PRESSURE LITERALLY PULLED THE OXYGEN

  • OUT OF YOUR BLOOD.

  • TEMPERATURES ON MARS SIT, ON AVERAGE, AT A CHILLY −63°C/−81°F.

  • BUT, IF WE COULD THICKEN THE ATMOSPHERE BY ADDING SOME MASS TO IT, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO

  • KICKSTART A GREENHOUSE EFFECT THAT WOULD STABILIZE THE TEMPERATURE,

  • AND STAVE OFF SOME OF THAT DEADLY RADIATION, AS WELL.

  • THAT’S THE ESSENCE OF TERRAFORMING.

  • So the question becomes, is there enough CO2 anywhere on Mars that we can mobilize it

  • and put it back into the atmosphere?

  • - In terms of the very first sort of easy baby steps of terraforming Mars,

  • would be the release of the easily accessible CO2.

  • Now, this is the south pole of Mars here.

  • It's kind of hard to see there, but this is some water ice, but mostly CO2 ice down here

  • if you started making the planet warmer, you would sublimate more of it.

  • Or you could just nuke it.

  • - The fast way is to drop thermonuclear weapons over the poles.

  • - That would only double the atmospheric pressure on Mars.

  • So we would go from 6% of the Earth's atmosphere to 12%.

  • And that's so not enough to heat up the planet.

  • OTHER SOURCES OF THAT DESIRABLE ATMOSPHERE FOR TERRAFORMING COULD BE HIDING IN MARTIAN

  • MINERALS AND DUST... BUT THEYRE TRICKY TO UNLOCK.

  • Carbon-bearing minerals have to be heated up to several hundred degrees,

  • so you'd have to strip mine the planet globally in order to mobilize that CO2.

  • - Mars has 140 trillion square meters.

  • So that's about a million billion tons of gas that we would need dug up out of the ground

  • and then vaporized, or somehow released from those minerals.

  • And the energy required to do that is staggering.

  • You'd need the equivalent of running 10,000 gigawatt nuclear power plants constantly

  • for 10 to 40 thousand years.

  • NOW, WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO USE SOMETHING MORE EFFICIENT – A SUPER GREENHOUSE GAS

  • LIKE HYDROCHLOROFLUOROCARBONS, FOR EXAMPLE

  • BUT WE’D NEED TO BUILD HUNDREDS OF FACTORIES

  • ON THE PLANET’S SURFACE TO PUMP OUT ENOUGH OF IT TO AFFECT THE CLIMATE.

  • THEN, OF COURSE, WE’D HAVE TO ADD BACK IN OUR CUSTOM COCKTAIL OF GASES TO ALLOW US TO

  • TAKE OFF OUR GAS MASKS AND OXYGEN TANKS, LET ALONE GROW ANY CROPS.

  • SO, LET’S INVESTIGATE OUR NEXT OPTION:

  • STEALING THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF AN ATMOSPHERE FROM COMETS.

  • There is a large source of nitrogen, oxygen,

  • hydrogen, et cetera, in the form of comets.

  • If you could redirect something like, depending on how big they are, ten thousand to a million

  • comets, and you were able to crash them into Mars on purposethat would be possible,

  • given the distribution of comets that we have now.

  • - If you've got a million kilometer-sized objects hitting Mars, that would be pretty damaging.

  • It would probably devastate the entire surface.

  • - But really what you would need would be an army

  • of self-replicating robots that could essentially attach what people call mass drivers, which

  • would be, let's say, a nuclear power plant on a comet, which could be fed by the water

  • of that comet and then would use that same water as propellant to act like a rocket,

  • and over the course of years, redirect those comets to eventually impact Mars.

  • SOUNDS LIKE SOME PRETTY HEAVY LIFTING.

  • BUT WITH A NEW GLOBAL ENTHUSIASM FOR SPACE EXPLORATION AT LOWER COSTS,

  • WE MIGHT SEE SOME OF THE TECHNICAL ADVANCES REQUIRED TO INCH US CLOSER

  • TO THIS VISIONLIKE AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATION AND IN-SPACE ASSEMBLY OF SPACECRAFT

  • SOONER THAN WE THINK.

  • BUT EVEN IF WE CAN BUILD AND MASTER ALL THIS TECHNOLOGY,

  • SHOULD WE CHARGE FORTH IN AGGRESSIVELY TAILORING THE SOLAR SYSTEM

  • TO OUR SPECIES' COMFORT ZONE?

  • AND HOW MUCH SHOULD WE PROMOTE THE IDEA OF HAVING A SPARE PLANET IN OUR BACKYARD?

  • - The danger in doing that is that we then

  • think that we can muck up the Earth and we have a place to go.

  • Given the difficulty of terraforming Mars, it's always going to be easier to keep the

  • Earth's environment habitable, to repair any damage we do, then to fix Mars.

  • SO WHILE WE WORK ON MAKING SURE OUR OWN PLANET'S

  • CLIMATE IS LIVABLE, ALL WE NEED TO DO TO FIX MARS UP IS FIGURE OUT HOW TO CREATE LEGIONS

  • OF ARTIFICIALLY INTELLIGENT ROBOTS,

  • WHICH CAN CREATE COPIES OF THEMSELVES OUT OF MARTIAN DUST,

  • TO HELP US SET UP MAJOR MINING OPERATIONS,

  • AND VAPORIZE A MILLION BILLION TONS OF ROCK.

  • OR BUILD HYDROCHLOROFLOUROCARBON FACTORIES.

  • OR CAPTURE, RE-DIRECT, AND CRASH LAND A MILLION COMETS ONTO THE PLANET’S SURFACE

  • WITHOUT COMPLETELY OBLITERATING IT.

  • SO HOW CLOSE ARE WE TO TERRAFORMING MARS?

  • Today, the emphasis is on getting a first human mission.

  • And even that is really hard and really expensive.

  • - Then we need to establish a scientific outpost, to show that there's some level of sustainability

  • on Mars as it is today.

  • Because we need to learn how to live on Mars as it is today before we can even begin to

  • think about terraforming.

  • The difficult part for me is seeing how we

  • get from the scientific outpost, that limit of 10 or 20 or 30 people, up to the kind of

  • 10,000 people that it would take in order to really start the terraforming project.

  • - And that really requires a city on Mars.

  • Is that a hundred years into the future?

  • 500 years?

  • To my mind anything beyond 30 years into the future is science fiction.

  • - I think the people who ultimately terraform Mars

  • are going to be Martians.

  • They will have been adapted by generations upon generations

  • of living in lower gravity.

  • They'll be a lot taller than us.

  • They might have different blood chemistry.

  • They will ultimately start to diverge somewhat as a species from us,

  • and evolution will slowly take over.

  • They're still going to be humans, they're still going to look like us, but

  • they'll be different enough from us that they'll be

  • easily identifiable as, "Oh, that's an Earther.

  • That's a Martian."

  • MARS MIGHT BE A LONG SHOT, BUT YOU CAN ORBIT

  • PLANET SEEKER BY HITTING THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON RIGHT NOW.

  • LET US KNOW WHAT YOU WANT TO LEARN ABOUT NEXT IN THE COMMENTS BELOW.

  • THANKS FOR WATCHING! SEE YOU NEXT TIME.

WITH TOWERING VOLCANOES, SWIRLING DUST STORMS,

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

我們離火星的地球化還有多近? (How Close Are We to Terraforming Mars?)

  • 2 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字