字幕列表 影片播放
>> I SO WISH THAT WE HAD A WOMAN
>> I SO WISH THAT WE HAD A WOMAN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,,
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,, AND WE CAME VERY TO DOING THAT
AND WE CAME VERY TO DOING THAT WITH WOMEN THAT ARE SO MUCH MORE
WITH WOMEN THAT ARE SO MUCH MORE QUALIFIED THAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE
QUALIFIED THAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE RUN LEFT THE OFFICE.
RUN LEFT THE OFFICE. THERE WAS A CERTAIN ELEMENT OF
THERE WAS A CERTAIN ELEMENT OF MISOGYNY THAT IS THERE.
MISOGYNY THAT IS THERE. >> Harris: THAT IS HOW SPEAKER
>> Harris: THAT IS HOW SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI SAYING SEXISM
NANCY PELOSI SAYING SEXISM PLAYED A ROLE IN
PLAYED A ROLE IN ELIZABETH WARREN’S 2020 LOSS AND
ELIZABETH WARREN’S 2020 LOSS AND CHOICE TO GET OUT JUST HOURS
CHOICE TO GET OUT JUST HOURS AFTER MORAN SAID THAT EVEN
AFTER MORAN SAID THAT EVEN RAISING THE ISSUE WILL GET YOU
RAISING THE ISSUE WILL GET YOU GARBED A WHINER.
GARBED A WHINER. MEANWHILE, PRESIDENT TRUMP TODAY
MEANWHILE, PRESIDENT TRUMP TODAY ON WHAT HE THINKS REALLY SANK
ON WHAT HE THINKS REALLY SANK WARREN’S WHITE HOUSE BID.
WARREN’S WHITE HOUSE BID. >> I THINK LACK OF TALENT WAS
>> I THINK LACK OF TALENT WAS HER PROBLEM.
HER PROBLEM. SHE HAD A TREMENDOUS LACK OF
SHE HAD A TREMENDOUS LACK OF TALENT.
TALENT. PEOPLE DON’T LIKE HER.
PEOPLE DON’T LIKE HER. SHE’S A VERY MEAN PERSON AND
SHE’S A VERY MEAN PERSON AND PEOPLE DON’T LIKE HER.
PEOPLE DON’T LIKE HER. >> Harris: SCOTT BOLDEN,
>> Harris: SCOTT BOLDEN, FORMER WASHINGTON, D.C.,
FORMER WASHINGTON, D.C., DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHAIRMAN WITH
DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHAIRMAN WITH ME NOW
ME NOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT?
WHAT TO MAKE OF IT? >> GOOD AFTERNOON.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. NOT SURPRISED THAT DONALD TRUMP
NOT SURPRISED THAT DONALD TRUMP WOULD SAY IT’S LACK OF TALENT.
WOULD SAY IT’S LACK OF TALENT. HE’S GOT A HISTORY OF
HE’S GOT A HISTORY OF MISOGYNISTIC COMMENTS.
MISOGYNISTIC COMMENTS. >> Harris: HOW IS THAT
>> Harris: HOW IS THAT MISOGYNISTIC?
MISOGYNISTIC? YOU KNOW WE ARE GOING TO GO BACK
YOU KNOW WE ARE GOING TO GO BACK AND FORTH ON THIS.
AND FORTH ON THIS. I KNOW IT THAT CAN LOOK LIKE BUT
I KNOW IT THAT CAN LOOK LIKE BUT TO SAY THAT SOMEBODY DOESN’T
TO SAY THAT SOMEBODY DOESN’T HAVE THE SKILL IS IT NECESSARILY
HAVE THE SKILL IS IT NECESSARILY ABOUT GENDER, IS IT?
ABOUT GENDER, IS IT? >> IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE FOR THE
>> IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE FOR THE SPEAKER WHO IS SAYING IT WAS
SPEAKER WHO IS SAYING IT WAS LACK OF TALENT BECAUSE NO ONE
LACK OF TALENT BECAUSE NO ONE OTHER THAN DONALD TRUMP COULD
OTHER THAN DONALD TRUMP COULD DENY THAT ELIZABETH WARREN WAS A
DENY THAT ELIZABETH WARREN WAS A TALENTED DEBATER, OUTPERFORM
TALENTED DEBATER, OUTPERFORM MANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC
MANY OF THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES ON THE DEBATES.
CANDIDATES ON THE DEBATES. >> Harris: WITH ALL DUE
>> Harris: WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, BERNIE SANDERS MIGHT
RESPECT, BERNIE SANDERS MIGHT FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY.
FALL INTO THAT CATEGORY. >> I’M NOT SURE THAT MEANS HE
>> I’M NOT SURE THAT MEANS HE HAS A HATE FOR WOMEN.
HAS A HATE FOR WOMEN. MEANS THAT HE BELIEVED SHE
MEANS THAT HE BELIEVED SHE WASN’T TELLING THE TRUTH AND I
WASN’T TELLING THE TRUTH AND I THINK THAT WAS OFF THE RECORD
THINK THAT WAS OFF THE RECORD AFTER THE DEBATE.
AFTER THE DEBATE. IN BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS,
IN BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS, IS THERE AN ELEMENT OF SEXISM IN
IS THERE AN ELEMENT OF SEXISM IN REGARD TO RUNNING FOR THE
REGARD TO RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENT?
PRESIDENT? I THINK SO BECAUSE WE’VE NEVER
I THINK SO BECAUSE WE’VE NEVER HAD A PRESIDENT THAT’S BEEN A
HAD A PRESIDENT THAT’S BEEN A WOMAN.
WOMAN. I THIS IS WHY WE HAVEN’T HAD A
I THIS IS WHY WE HAVEN’T HAD A FEMALE PRESIDENT, YOU’VE GOT TO
FEMALE PRESIDENT, YOU’VE GOT TO GET ONE MORE VOTE THAN THE NEXT
GET ONE MORE VOTE THAN THE NEXT GUY AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE MONEY.
GUY AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE MONEY. IN THE END, PEOPLE HAVE TO LIKE
IN THE END, PEOPLE HAVE TO LIKE YOU AND CONNECT WITH YOU AND
YOU AND CONNECT WITH YOU AND VOTE FOR YOU.
VOTE FOR YOU. SO THAT COMBINATION IS THE BEST
SO THAT COMBINATION IS THE BEST EXPLANATION I CAN SHARE WITH THE
EXPLANATION I CAN SHARE WITH THE VIEWERS BECAUSE LOOKING AT THE
VIEWERS BECAUSE LOOKING AT THE STATE LEVEL, LOOK AT THE FEDERAL
STATE LEVEL, LOOK AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, WE HAVE FEMALE SENATORS,
LEVEL, WE HAVE FEMALE SENATORS, WE HAVE FEMALE CONGRESSMEN,
WE HAVE FEMALE CONGRESSMEN, FEMALE LEADERS IN THE CABINET,
FEMALE LEADERS IN THE CABINET, HISTORICALLY NOT AS MANY AS WE
HISTORICALLY NOT AS MANY AS WE COULD’VE HAD BEFORE THE 19TH
COULD’VE HAD BEFORE THE 19TH AMENDMENT.
AMENDMENT. BUT YOU STILL HAVE THAT SUCCESS
BUT YOU STILL HAVE THAT SUCCESS AT THE STATE, LOCAL, AND FEDERAL
AT THE STATE, LOCAL, AND FEDERAL LEVELS.
LEVELS. SO HOW DO YOU COMPARE THAT TO
SO HOW DO YOU COMPARE THAT TO >> Harris: DO YOU THINK THERE
>> Harris: DO YOU THINK THERE IS PRESSURE ON DEMOCRATS WHO
IS PRESSURE ON DEMOCRATS WHO DRIVE HARD IN THE LANE OF
DRIVE HARD IN THE LANE OF DIVERSITY AND VOICES FOR ALL AN
DIVERSITY AND VOICES FOR ALL AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL, DO YOU
OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL, DO YOU THINK THERE IS PRESSURE THAT IS
THINK THERE IS PRESSURE THAT IS WARRANTED ON DEMOCRATS?
WARRANTED ON DEMOCRATS? >> PRESSURE TO ELECT A WOMAN.
>> PRESSURE TO ELECT A WOMAN. >> Harris: NOT JUST TO ELECT
>> Harris: NOT JUST TO ELECT BUT FOR THAT PERSON TO BE VIABLE
BUT FOR THAT PERSON TO BE VIABLE ACROSS THE BOARD.
ACROSS THE BOARD. >> I THINK THE PRESSURE IS ON
>> I THINK THE PRESSURE IS ON ALL OF US TO BE VIABLE ACROSS
ALL OF US TO BE VIABLE ACROSS THE BOARD IF YOU ARE A WOMAN
THE BOARD IF YOU ARE A WOMAN CANDIDATE.
CANDIDATE. BUT IN THE END, THAT NOTION THAT
BUT IN THE END, THAT NOTION THAT I JUST SHARED IS THAT THIS YEAR
I JUST SHARED IS THAT THIS YEAR IS DIFFERENT.
IS DIFFERENT. WHO WAS THE BEST CANDIDATE TO
WHO WAS THE BEST CANDIDATE TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP?
BEAT DONALD TRUMP? THAT’S WHERE THE REAL PRESSURE
THAT’S WHERE THE REAL PRESSURE IS AND THAT SKEWS WHETHER THIS
IS AND THAT SKEWS WHETHER THIS PRESSURE TO HAVE A WOMAN NOMINEE
PRESSURE TO HAVE A WOMAN NOMINEE OR NOT.
OR NOT. BUT AGAIN, AMERICA HAS A LONG
BUT AGAIN, AMERICA HAS A LONG WAY TO GO ON THAT GENDER
WAY TO GO ON THAT GENDER QUESTION AND THE RACE QUESTION.
QUESTION AND THE RACE QUESTION. WE CAN ALWAYS BE BETTER AND WE
WE CAN ALWAYS BE BETTER AND WE ARE ALWAYS TRYING TO BE THERE.
ARE ALWAYS TRYING TO BE THERE. >> Harris: I HEARKEN BACK TO
>> Harris: I HEARKEN BACK TO ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE WHO
ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE WHO RAN TO CHAIR THE DNC AND SHE
RAN TO CHAIR THE DNC AND SHE POINTED OUT SHE THOUGHT ALSO WAS
POINTED OUT SHE THOUGHT ALSO WAS SEXISM, I JUST WONDER IF YOUR
SEXISM, I JUST WONDER IF YOUR PARTY IF YOU NEED TO TAKE A
PARTY IF YOU NEED TO TAKE A HARDER LOOK.
HARDER LOOK. I WILL BRING YOU BACK ON ANOTHER