Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • INTERNET SENSATION. OVER TO YOU, BRIAN.

  • OVER TO YOU, BRIAN. BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S

  • BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE

  • CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT

  • IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE

  • MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE HAS NO REGRETS.

  • HAS NO REGRETS. >> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD

  • >> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE

  • SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE

  • DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE

  • SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE PROVED OUR CASE.

  • PROVED OUR CASE. BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK

  • BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW

  • MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS

  • ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE

  • HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE

  • ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE BELIEVES IT?

  • BELIEVES IT? [LAUGHTER]

  • [LAUGHTER] >> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT,

  • >> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT

  • HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM

  • WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE

  • THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO

  • THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER,

  • CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF

  • HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT

  • MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE

  • OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT

  • AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT IT IS.

  • IT IS. >> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE

  • >> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME

  • WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A

  • RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY

  • PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY YOULL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY

  • YOULL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK

  • ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS

  • ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN

  • FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN ON DOWN?

  • ON DOWN? >> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE

  • >> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN

  • FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU

  • JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST

  • HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU

  • IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT

  • HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO

  • SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WEVE

  • MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WEVE GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING

  • GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS

  • AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE

  • PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC

  • PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC THAT THEYLL BE A BIPARTISAN

  • THAT THEYLL BE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL.

  • ACQUITTAL. >> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW

  • >> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF

  • IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO

  • WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE

  • ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE HOUSE.

  • HOUSE. SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE

  • SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE GOING TO SEE MORE

  • GOING TO SEE MORE INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY

  • INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE

  • SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO

  • INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO STOP, JORDAN?

  • STOP, JORDAN? >> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO

  • >> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED

  • STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT,

  • BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT, JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT

  • JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA

  • REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE,

  • COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE, REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA

  • REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17

  • COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17 TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING

  • TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE

  • COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S

  • IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR

  • A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN

  • CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE,

  • FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT

  • WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN

  • COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI

  • MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT.

  • DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT. >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S

  • >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING

  • INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE

  • ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT

  • OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR

  • WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK

  • HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE

  • ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO

  • NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE

  • GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE

  • PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO

  • OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO DIFFERENT.

  • DIFFERENT. BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT,

  • BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT, CONGRESSMAN JORDAN?

  • CONGRESSMAN JORDAN? I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR

  • I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF

  • ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY

  • PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE

  • BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE COUNTRY.

  • COUNTRY. >> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE

  • >> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A

  • ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN

  • GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL,

  • LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL, SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT

  • SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE

  • HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL

  • ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I

  • AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT

  • THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE,

  • THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE, IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH

  • IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY.

  • JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY. BRIAN: YOULL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL

  • BRIAN: YOULL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S

  • RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM

  • SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS

  • THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU

  • IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM

  • HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS

  • THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH

  • THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU

  • THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS?

  • HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS? >> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST

  • >> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN

  • THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT

  • POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT

  • IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE

  • ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS

  • PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO DO.

  • ARE GOING TO DO. BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN

  • BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND,

  • PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN

  • LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU

  • EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY

  • LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT

  • WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO

  • ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT

  • THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS,

  • OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS, HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON

  • HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S

  • FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES

  • LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT.

  • AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT. >> 20 SECOND.

  • >> 20 SECOND. I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR

  • I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW

  • TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW -- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE

  • -- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID

  • DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID THIS?

  • THIS? >> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED

  • >> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU

  • WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH,

  • GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH, BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY

  • BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY WILL DO IMPEACHMENT

  • WILL DO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE

  • INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY

  • NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE

  • SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND

  • WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH

  • FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON

  • US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN

  • WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY

  • MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT

  • HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL

  • EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN

  • THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN THE FACTS WERE ON THE