字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 INTERNET SENSATION. OVER TO YOU, BRIAN. OVER TO YOU, BRIAN. BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S BRIAN: AINSLEY, AHEAD OF TODAY’S CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE CLOSING ARGUMENTS IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IMPEACHMENT MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE MANAGER ADAM SCHIFF CLAIMS HE HAS NO REGRETS. HAS NO REGRETS. >> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD >> THERE’S NOTHING THAT I COULD SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE SEE THAT WE COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE AS THE SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE SENATORS HAVE ADMITTED, WE HAVE PROVED OUR CASE. PROVED OUR CASE. BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK BRIAN: GOP CONGRESSMAN MARK MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW MEADOWS AND JIM JORDAN, KNOW ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS ADAM SCHIFF QUITE WELL, HE SAYS HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE HE HAS NO REGRETS, WHAT WOULD HE ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE ACTUALLY SAY, DO YOU THINK HE BELIEVES IT? BELIEVES IT? [LAUGHTER] [LAUGHTER] >> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT, >> , NO HE DOESN’T BELIEVE IT, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM WE LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HE’S THE ONE THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO THAT TOLD US THAT HE HAD NO CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER, CONTACT WITH THE WHISTLEBLOWER, HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF HOW MANY TIMES HAS ADAM SCHIFF MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE OUR COUNTRY HAS LIVED THERE, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE IT FOR WHAT IT IS. IT IS. >> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE >> CONGRESSMAN, RIGHT NOW, WE WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME WILL HEAR MORE OF THE SAME RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A RHETORIC TODAY, WE WILL TAKE A PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY PAUSE TUESDAY AND THEN WEDNESDAY YOU’LL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY YOU’LL HAVE THE EXONERATION BY ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK ALL ACCOUNTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS ABOUT THE CHANCES OF DEMOCRATS FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN FLIPPING OVER FROM JOE MANCHIN ON DOWN? ON DOWN? >> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE >> WELL, THEY BASE IT ON THE FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN FACT THAT IT WILL BE MORE THAN JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU JUST JOE MANCHIN BUT WHEN YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST HAVE A BIPARTISAN VOTE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU IMPEACHMENT IN THE HOUSE AND YOU HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT HAVE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL, IT SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO SHOWS THAT, INDEED, THERE WAS NO MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WE’VE MERITS TO THIS CASE AND WE’VE GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING GOT TO STOP THIS FROM EVER BEING AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS AN IMPACT ON NOT ONLY THIS PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE PRESIDENT BUT ANY FUTURE PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC PRESIDENT, BUT I I’M OPTIMISTIC THAT THEY’LL BE A BIPARTISAN THAT THEY’LL BE A BIPARTISAN ACQUITTAL. ACQUITTAL. >> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW >> VERY INTERESTING, WE KNOW IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF IT’S NOT GETTING CLOSE TO 67, IF WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO WE GET MANCHIN AND WHO KNOWS WHO ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE ELSE, A FEW CROSS OVER IN THE HOUSE. HOUSE. SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE SPEAKING OF THE HOUSE, ARE WE GOING TO SEE MORE GOING TO SEE MORE INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY INVESTIGATIONS, CAROL MALOENY SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE SAYING BECAUSE THIS IS OVER THE INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO INVESTIGATIONS AREN’T GOING TO STOP, JORDAN? STOP, JORDAN? >> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO >> NO, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED STOP, REMEMBER THEY STARTED BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT, BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT, JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT JULY 2016 WHEN IMPEACHMENT REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA REALLY BEGAN, SO-TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE, COLLUSION WHICH WAS A JOKE, REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA REMEMBER, THEY WENT TO FISA COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17 COURT AND LIED TO THE COURT 17 TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING TIMES, INTERESTING HEARING COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE COMING UP THIS WEEK WITH THE IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S IMPEACHMENT IOWA CAUCUS, THERE’S A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR A HEARING WHERE FBI DIRECTOR CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN CHRIS WRAY WILL BE TESTIFYING IN FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, FRONT OF JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT WHAT’S GOING TO CHANGE WHEN IT COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN COMES TO FISA COURT OPERATES AN MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI MORE IMPORTANTLY WHAT THE FBI DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT. DOES WHEN THEY GO TO FISA COURT. >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S >> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT’S INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING INTERESTING, CAROL IS TALKING ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE ABOUT ADDITIONAL HEARINGS, ONE OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT OF THE HEARINGS SHE’S NOT WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR WILLING TO HAVE INSPECTOR HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK HOROWITZ TO COME IN AND TALK ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE ABOUT FISA ABUSE AND WHAT WE NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO NEED TO DO, WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE PROBLEM, SHE WANTS THE LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO OTHER WAY AND THIS IS NO DIFFERENT. DIFFERENT. BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT, BRIEN: WOULD THE SENATE DO THAT, CONGRESSMAN JORDAN? CONGRESSMAN JORDAN? I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR I WANT TO SEE HUNTER BIDEN OR ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF ARE THEY PLAYING A GAME, PART OF PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY PLAYING A GAME THAT ONLY BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE BENEFITS LAWMAKERS AND NOT THE COUNTRY. COUNTRY. >> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE >> WE SHOULD NEVER FORGET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS DONE A GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN GREAT JOB HAS PUT JOHN DURHAM IN LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL, LOOKING AT ISSUE AS WELL, SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT SENATOR JOHNSON ALSO SAID THAT HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE HE WANTS TO LOOK INTO THE ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL ISSUES, THE BIDEN ISSUE AS WELL AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I AS THE WHOLE FISA THING, SO I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE EXPECT THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE, THAT AND THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE, IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH IT’S NOT GOING TO GET DONE WITH JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY. JERRY NADLER AND CAROL MALONEY. BRIAN: YOU’LL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL BRIAN: YOU’LL HAVE PRESIDENTIAL RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S RESPECT AND EAR, IF THERE’S SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM SOMETHING TO BE LEARNED FROM THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS THIS ENTIRE PROCESS, IF IT WAS IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU IN FACT, AVOIDABLE, WHAT DO YOU HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM HOPE THE PRESIDENT TAKES FROM THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS THEM, THE VULNERABILITY WAS THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH THERE TO PUT THE HOUSE THROUGH THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU THE IMPEACHMENT, SO WHAT DO YOU HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS? HOPE HE LEARNS FROM THIS? >> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST >> WELL, I THINK THE BIGGEST THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN THING IS WE ARE IN A PARTISAN POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT POLITICAL DIVIDE RIGHT NOW, THAT IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT IT DOESN’T MATTER HOW PERFECT ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE ANYTHING IS, YOU HAVE TO BE PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS PREPARED FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO DO. ARE GOING TO DO. BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN BUT I THINK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, PEOPLE THEY HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN LISTEN, JIM AND I, WE WERE IN EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU EVERY SINGLE DEPOSITION, IF YOU LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY LOOKED AT THE FACTS THEY WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT WOULDN’T HAVE IMPEACHED HIM AT ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO ALL AND WOULDN’T HAVE GONE TO THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT THE SENATE, HE NEEDS TO CALL IT OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS, OUT FOR WHAT IT IS, POLITICS, HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET BACK ON FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S FOCUSING TO WHAT MATTERS, LET’S LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG PRICES AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT. AND GUESS WHAT, HE’S ON THAT. >> 20 SECOND. >> 20 SECOND. I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR I KNOW YOU HAVE RESPECT FOR TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW TACTICALLY AND POLITICALLY, HOW -- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE -- WHY DID HE PLAY THE WAY SHE DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID DID, WHY DO YOU THINK SHE DID THIS? THIS? >> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED >> YEAH, THEY NEVER EXPECTED WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU WHAT WAS GOING TO PLAY OUT, YOU GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH, GO BACK TO SEPTEMBER 24TH, BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY BRIAN, WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED THEY WILL DO IMPEACHMENT WILL DO IMPEACHMENT INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE INVESTIGATION, THEY WOULD HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY NEVER PREDICTED THAT EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE SINGLE REPUBLICAN IN THE HOUSE WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND WOULD VOTE AGAINST HIM, AND FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH FOURTH DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE WITH US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON US AND SWITCH PARTIES AND ON WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN WEDNESDAY WHEN IT’S A BIPARTISAN MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY MAJORITY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THEY HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT HAVE NEVER PREDICTED THAT EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL EITHER, SHE MESSED THIS UP ALL THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN THE WAY AROUND, BECAUSE AGAIN THE FACTS WERE ON THE THE FACTS WERE ON THE PRESIDENT’S SIDE. PRESIDENT’S SIDE. BRIAN: BELIEVE ME I WAS IN BRIAN: BELIEVE ME I WAS IN MIAMI, NOBODY WAS TALKING ABOUT MIAMI, NOBODY WAS TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. NO ONE TALKED ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.
B2 中高級 喬丹、梅多斯迴應希夫對民主黨的案子 "不後悔 (Jordan, Meadows react to Schiff having 'no regrets' about Dems' case) 3 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字