Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • AND SO IN THAT WAY, DESPITE THE TAPE MIXUP, IT REALLY COULD HAVE

  • TAPE MIXUP, IT REALLY COULD HAVE THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.

  • THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL. ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING.

  • ESSENTIALLY THE SAME THING. WE ARE JOINED BY AUTHOR AND

  • WE ARE JOINED BY AUTHOR AND COLUMNIST MARK STEYN WHO IS

  • COLUMNIST MARK STEYN WHO IS WATCHING FROM THE VERY FIRST GAL

  • WATCHING FROM THE VERY FIRST GAL HAMMER.

  • HAMMER. YOU ARE ONE OF WHO I SAY IS ONE

  • YOU ARE ONE OF WHO I SAY IS ONE OF AMERICA’S GREAT EXPERTS ON

  • OF AMERICA’S GREAT EXPERTS ON THIS TRIAL GREEDILY CONSUMED

  • THIS TRIAL GREEDILY CONSUMED EVERY MOMENT OF IT.

  • EVERY MOMENT OF IT. WHAT’S THE ASSESSMENT SO FAR.

  • WHAT’S THE ASSESSMENT SO FAR. >> IT’S A COMPLETE SPHINCTER

  • NEW SAW THE PROBLEM WITH IT

  • NEW SAW THE PROBLEM WITH IT WITH DERSHOWITZ ON THE VIEW.

  • WITH DERSHOWITZ ON THE VIEW. A CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER

  • A CONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PUT HIMSELF IN

  • SHOULDN’T HAVE TO PUT HIMSELF IN THAT SITUATION AND THE PROBLEM

  • THAT SITUATION AND THE PROBLEM HERE IS LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS.

  • HERE IS LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS. THERE IS NO POINT MAKING LARGELY

  • THERE IS NO POINT MAKING LARGELY ARGUMENTS, THIS IS A COMPLETELY

  • ARGUMENTS, THIS IS A COMPLETELY POLITICAL PROCESS.

  • POLITICAL PROCESS. PEOPLE SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE

  • PEOPLE SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, THE TROUBLE WITH LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS

  • TROUBLE WITH LAWYERLY ARGUMENTS IS IF IT’S POLITICAL, THE

  • IS IF IT’S POLITICAL, THE PRESIDENT CAN’T BE DOING THIS,

  • PRESIDENT CAN’T BE DOING THIS, EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT EVERYTHING

  • EVEN IF YOU ACCEPT EVERYTHING THAT JOHN BOLTON SAYS, THAT’S A

  • THAT JOHN BOLTON SAYS, THAT’S A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME.

  • COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME. I THINK HE SHOULDVE ACTUALLY

  • I THINK HE SHOULDVE ACTUALLY DEFENDED HIMSELF.

  • DEFENDED HIMSELF. MY PROBLEM WITH THIS BOARD OF AN

  • MY PROBLEM WITH THIS BOARD OF AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, THE RATINGS

  • IMPEACHMENT TRIAL, THE RATINGS ARE SO LOW, ADAM SCHIFF MAY

  • ARE SO LOW, ADAM SCHIFF MAY ATTEMPT WITH THAT SKIFF ON

  • ATTEMPT WITH THAT SKIFF ON SUBBASEMENT LEVEL THREE.

  • SUBBASEMENT LEVEL THREE. THERE IS NOBODY WATCHING THIS.

  • THERE IS NOBODY WATCHING THIS. IT’S NOT ENOUGH OF A CIRCUS AND

  • IT’S NOT ENOUGH OF A CIRCUS AND TRUMP SHOULDVE DEFENDED HIMSELF

  • TRUMP SHOULDVE DEFENDED HIMSELF AND SHOVE THIS THING DOWN ADAM

  • AND SHOVE THIS THING DOWN ADAM SCHIFF’S THROAT DIRECTLY.

  • SCHIFF’S THROAT DIRECTLY. THE WHOLE PROCESS IS STUPID.

  • THE WHOLE PROCESS IS STUPID. THE CHIEF JUSTICE READING OUT

  • THE CHIEF JUSTICE READING OUT THE HANDWRITTEN CARDS BY PATRICK

  • THE HANDWRITTEN CARDS BY PATRICK LEAHY WHICH IN FACT IS WRITTEN

  • LEAHY WHICH IN FACT IS WRITTEN FOR HIM BY SOME NO-NAME STAFFER

  • FOR HIM BY SOME NO-NAME STAFFER IN HIS OFFICE, YOU HAVE THE

  • IN HIS OFFICE, YOU HAVE THE CHIEF JUSTICE LIKE SOME GAME

  • CHIEF JUSTICE LIKE SOME GAME SHOW HOST, WHAT’S THE NEXT

  • SHOW HOST, WHAT’S THE NEXT QUESTION, JOHN -- THE WHOLE

  • QUESTION, JOHN -- THE WHOLE THING IS RIDICULOUS!

  • THING IS RIDICULOUS! TRUMP SHOULDVE REVISITED

  • TRUMP SHOULDVE REVISITED HIMSELF AND TURNED IT INTO A

  • HIMSELF AND TURNED IT INTO A REAL CIRCUS.

  • REAL CIRCUS. >> Tucker: THAT SUCH AN

  • >> Tucker: THAT SUCH AN INTERESTING POINT.

  • INTERESTING POINT. AS I WATCH THIS, I KEEP

  • AS I WATCH THIS, I KEEP THINKING, I WONDER IF THE

  • THINKING, I WONDER IF THE REPUBLICANS ARE BEING TOO

  • REPUBLICANS ARE BEING TOO LITERAL AND THAT’S THE REASON WE

  • LITERAL AND THAT’S THE REASON WE WENT FULL GAGA ON THE OPENING

  • WENT FULL GAGA ON THE OPENING TONIGHT BECAUSE IT’S HARD TO

  • TONIGHT BECAUSE IT’S HARD TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY AND IT’S HIM

  • TAKE IT SERIOUSLY AND IT’S HIM AND TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.

  • AND TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY. THE CHARGES DON’T EVEN MAKE

  • THE CHARGES DON’T EVEN MAKE SENSE.

  • SENSE. THE WHOLE THING IS SO NUTS!

  • THE WHOLE THING IS SO NUTS! MAYBE IT’S BETTER TO SAY THAT

  • MAYBE IT’S BETTER TO SAY THAT OUT LOUD!

  • OUT LOUD! >> I WOULDVE SAID, AS WE SAY IN

  • >> I WOULDVE SAID, AS WE SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS, SCHIFF SHOULDVE

  • ENGLISH COURTS, SCHIFF SHOULDVE MADE HIS CASE AND THE DEMOCRATS

  • MADE HIS CASE AND THE DEMOCRATS MAKE THEIR CASE, AND THE DEFENSE

  • MAKE THEIR CASE, AND THE DEFENSE SHOULDVE JUST STOOD UP AND SAY,

  • SHOULDVE JUST STOOD UP AND SAY, AS THEY SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS,

  • AS THEY SAY IN ENGLISH COURTS, NO CASE TO ANSWER.

  • NO CASE TO ANSWER. AND LEFT IT BACK.

  • AND LEFT IT BACK. THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IS

  • THE ONLY THING I WOULD ADD IS THAT THE ONLY REAL CRIME HERE,

  • THAT THE ONLY REAL CRIME HERE, TO GO BACK TO WHAT YOU WERE

  • TO GO BACK TO WHAT YOU WERE SAYING ABOUT UKRAINE, UKRAINE IS

  • SAYING ABOUT UKRAINE, UKRAINE IS OUR GREATEST EVER ALLY, UKRAINE

  • OUR GREATEST EVER ALLY, UKRAINE WAS THERE WHEN WE STORMED THE

  • WAS THERE WHEN WE STORMED THE BEACHES OF NORMANDY, UKRAINIANS

  • BEACHES OF NORMANDY, UKRAINIANS VOLUNTEERS WERE AT FORT SUMTER,

  • VOLUNTEERS WERE AT FORT SUMTER, THEYVE BEEN WITH US THROUGHOUT

  • THEYVE BEEN WITH US THROUGHOUT THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC IT.

  • THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC IT. THE ONLY CRIME IN THIS THING WAS

  • THE ONLY CRIME IN THIS THING WAS HUNTER BIDEN WHO STOLE THE

  • HUNTER BIDEN WHO STOLE THE WEALTH OF UKRAINE FROM THE

  • WEALTH OF UKRAINE FROM THE PEOPLE OF UKRAINE.

  • PEOPLE OF UKRAINE. HUNTER BIDEN’S RACKET IS NOT

  • HUNTER BIDEN’S RACKET IS NOT ACTUALLY A VICTIMLESS CRIME AND

  • ACTUALLY A VICTIMLESS CRIME AND THE VICTIM WAS UKRAINE.

  • THE VICTIM WAS UKRAINE. >> Tucker: THAT SUCH A GREAT

  • >> Tucker: THAT SUCH A GREAT POINT.

  • POINT. IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE UKRAINE IS

  • IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE UKRAINE IS OUR ESSENTIAL ALLY IMPORTANT

  • OUR ESSENTIAL ALLY IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO SEND YOUR SON TO GO

  • ENOUGH TO SEND YOUR SON TO GO DIE THERE WHICH IS THE CASE ADAM

  • DIE THERE WHICH IS THE CASE ADAM SCHIFF HAS MADE THE CASE, YOU’D

  • SCHIFF HAS MADE THE CASE, YOU’D BE UPSET THAT HUNTER BIDEN WAS T

  • BE UPSET THAT HUNTER BIDEN WAS T >> THEY WANT TO BUILD A UKRAINE

  • >> THEY WANT TO BUILD A UKRAINE SAFE ENOUGH FOR THE SONS OF

  • SAFE ENOUGH FOR THE SONS OF LIFETIME -- LOOK, THIS WHOLE

  • LIFETIME -- LOOK, THIS WHOLE THING IS A JOKE!

  • THING IS A JOKE! THIS WHOLE IDEA, I DO NOT LIKE

  • THIS WHOLE IDEA, I DO NOT LIKE THE IDEA OF THE LAWYERS

  • THE IDEA OF THE LAWYERS APPEARING TO RESIST.

  • APPEARING TO RESIST. THEY SHOULD SAY, JOHN BOLTON,

  • THEY SHOULD SAY, JOHN BOLTON, BRING HIM ON!

  • BRING HIM ON! LET’S HAVE HIM IN THE WITNESS

  • LET’S HAVE HIM IN THE WITNESS STAND FOR TWO WEEKS.

  • STAND FOR TWO WEEKS. THIS THING IS GOING SO GREAT FOR

  • THIS THING IS GOING SO GREAT FOR YOU.

  • YOU. LET’S HAVE THEM HERE AND ASK ALL

  • LET’S HAVE THEM HERE AND ASK ALL THE QUESTIONS YOU WANT, WE HAVE

  • THE QUESTIONS YOU WANT, WE HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR.

  • NOTHING TO FEAR. THIS

  • LET’S EXTEND THIS TO

  • LET’S EXTEND THIS TO NOVEMBER 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, SEE HOW

  • NOVEMBER 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, SEE HOW IT WORKS OUT, YOU LOSERS.

  • IT WORKS OUT, YOU LOSERS. >> Tucker: LITERALLY COULD

  • >> Tucker: LITERALLY COULD NOT AGREE MORE.

  • NOT AGREE MORE. THAT’S THE BEST CASE AGAINST

  • THAT’S THE BEST CASE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT I’VE HEARD SO FAR.

AND SO IN THAT WAY, DESPITE THE TAPE MIXUP, IT REALLY COULD HAVE

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

Mark Steyn:彈劾案的審判從頭到尾都是 "臭烘烘 (Mark Steyn: Impeachment trial a 'stinker' from beginning to end)

  • 1 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字