Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • EDGE AND IT WILL DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF THIS TRIAL.

  • LENGTH OF THIS TRIAL. >> Laura: WE ARE ON IT AND

  • >> Laura: WE ARE ON IT AND THANK YOU FOR BEING THERE

  • THANK YOU FOR BEING THERE TONIGHT.

  • TONIGHT. EARLIER I MENTIONED THE NSC’S

  • EARLIER I MENTIONED THE NSC’S LETTER TO THE ATTORNEY OF

  • LETTER TO THE ATTORNEY OF JOHN BOLTON.

  • JOHN BOLTON. I WANT YOU TO REMEMBER THE

  • I WANT YOU TO REMEMBER THE CONTENTS OF HIS UNPUBLISHED

  • CONTENTS OF HIS UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT WERE LEAKED TO

  • MANUSCRIPT WERE LEAKED TO "THE NEW YORK TIMES" A FEW DAYS

  • "THE NEW YORK TIMES" A FEW DAYS AGO BUT ACCORDING TO AN NSC

  • AGO BUT ACCORDING TO AN NSC LAWYER, THE MANUSCRIPT APPEARS

  • LAWYER, THE MANUSCRIPT APPEARS TO CONTAIN CLASSIFIED, PERHAPS

  • TO CONTAIN CLASSIFIED, PERHAPS EVEN TOP-SECRET INFORMATION.

  • EVEN TOP-SECRET INFORMATION. JOINING WHEN I WAS WHITE HOUSE

  • JOINING WHEN I WAS WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL OR KELLYANNE CONWAY.

  • COUNSEL OR KELLYANNE CONWAY. DOES THE WHITE HOUSE CONSIDER

  • DOES THE WHITE HOUSE CONSIDER THIS A LEAK OF CLASSIFIED

  • THIS A LEAK OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION?

  • INFORMATION? >> PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO

  • >> PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO USE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.

  • USE CLASSIFIED INFORMATION. I HAVE NOT SEEN THE MANUSCRIPT

  • I HAVE NOT SEEN THE MANUSCRIPT OR SEEN THE BOOK, I THINK

  • OR SEEN THE BOOK, I THINK ADAM SCHIFF OR THE MANAGERS ARE

  • ADAM SCHIFF OR THE MANAGERS ARE STUCK HOLDING A BOOK WE HAVEN’T

  • STUCK HOLDING A BOOK WE HAVEN’T SEEN, WE WIN AND IT COULD BE

  • SEEN, WE WIN AND IT COULD BE WRAPPED UP BY THIS WEEKEND.

  • WRAPPED UP BY THIS WEEKEND. I CAN’T BELIEVE HOW PEOPLE ARE

  • I CAN’T BELIEVE HOW PEOPLE ARE LIKE ANTS ON A SUGAR CUBE EVERY

  • LIKE ANTS ON A SUGAR CUBE EVERY TIME THERE’S A NEW PERSON -- YOU

  • TIME THERE’S A NEW PERSON -- YOU KNOW WITH THE BOMBSHELL

  • KNOW WITH THE BOMBSHELL INTERVIEW WITH JOHN BOLTON WAS,

  • INTERVIEW WITH JOHN BOLTON WAS, IT HAPPENED ON AUGUST 29TH.

  • IT HAPPENED ON AUGUST 29TH. I THINK IT’S TERRIFIC, HE TALKS

  • I THINK IT’S TERRIFIC, HE TALKS ABOUT THE CALL, THAT

  • ABOUT THE CALL, THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS WITH

  • PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS WITH PRESIDENT ZELENSKY.

  • PRESIDENT ZELENSKY. >> I WILL BE MEETING

  • >> I WILL BE MEETING PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, HE AND

  • PRESIDENT ZELENSKY, HE AND PRESIDENT TRUMP HAVE SPOKEN

  • PRESIDENT TRUMP HAVE SPOKEN TWICE, THE PRESIDENT CALLED TO

  • TWICE, THE PRESIDENT CALLED TO CONGRATULATE PRESIDENT ZELENSKY

  • CONGRATULATE PRESIDENT ZELENSKY ON HIS ELECTION AND ON HIS

  • ON HIS ELECTION AND ON HIS SUCCESS IN THE PARLIAMENTARY

  • SUCCESS IN THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION, THEY WERE WARM AND

  • ELECTION, THEY WERE WARM AND CORDIAL CALLS, THEY WERE HOPING

  • CORDIAL CALLS, THEY WERE HOPING THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET IN

  • THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET IN WARSAW AFTER A FEW MINUTES

  • WARSAW AFTER A FEW MINUTES TOGETHER.

  • TOGETHER. >> Laura: WE HAVE AN

  • >> Laura: WE HAVE AN INTERESTING FLASHBACK FROM 2010

  • INTERESTING FLASHBACK FROM 2010 WHEN JOHN BOLTON WAS TALKING

  • WHEN JOHN BOLTON WAS TALKING ABOUT SOMETIMES HE MIGHT NEED TO

  • ABOUT SOMETIMES HE MIGHT NEED TO LIVE FOR HIS SAKE OF HIS VIEW OF

  • LIVE FOR HIS SAKE OF HIS VIEW OF NATIONAL SECURITY.

  • NATIONAL SECURITY. >> DID YOU EVER LIVE FOR YOUR

  • >> DID YOU EVER LIVE FOR YOUR COUNTRY?

  • COUNTRY? >> I DON’T THINK SO KNOWINGLY

  • >> I DON’T THINK SO KNOWINGLY BUT I CERTAINLY AM ABLE TO SPIN

  • BUT I CERTAINLY AM ABLE TO SPIN THINGS AND A GOOD DIPLOMAT IS

  • THINGS AND A GOOD DIPLOMAT IS ABLE TO SPIN THINGS JUST LIKE

  • ABLE TO SPIN THINGS JUST LIKE AMERICAN POLITICIANS.

  • AMERICAN POLITICIANS. >> YOU WOULD LIE IN ORDER TO

  • >> YOU WOULD LIE IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE TRUTH?

  • PRESERVE THE TRUTH? >> IF I HAD TO SAY SOMETHING I

  • >> IF I HAD TO SAY SOMETHING I KNEW WAS FALSE TO PROTECT

  • KNEW WAS FALSE TO PROTECT AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY, I

  • AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY, I WOULD DO IT.

  • WOULD DO IT. >> Laura: HE WOULD LIKE TO

  • >> Laura: HE WOULD LIKE TO PRESERVE NATIONAL SECURITY,

  • PRESERVE NATIONAL SECURITY, PERHAPS JOHN BOLTON THINKS

  • PERHAPS JOHN BOLTON THINKS DONALD TRUMP IS A THREAT TO

  • DONALD TRUMP IS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY AND THAT’S WHY

  • NATIONAL SECURITY AND THAT’S WHY HE’S GOING TO SPIN WHAT HE

  • HE’S GOING TO SPIN WHAT HE SPENDS NOW.

  • SPENDS NOW. >> I WAS REALLY STRUCK BY HIS

  • >> I WAS REALLY STRUCK BY HIS AUGUST 29TH INTERVIEW.

  • AUGUST 29TH INTERVIEW. A FULL FIVE WEEKS AFTER HIS

  • A FULL FIVE WEEKS AFTER HIS SECOND ZELINSKI CALL.

  • SECOND ZELINSKI CALL. JOHN BOLTON’S INTERVIEW AND

  • JOHN BOLTON’S INTERVIEW AND DONALD TRUMP DONALD TRUMP’S CALL

  • DONALD TRUMP DONALD TRUMP’S CALL OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY ARE

  • OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY ARE SIMILAR IN THIS WAY.

  • SIMILAR IN THIS WAY. I DON’T HEAR THE WORD AID,

  • I DON’T HEAR THE WORD AID, DEMAND, I DON’T HEAR JOHN BOLTON

  • DEMAND, I DON’T HEAR JOHN BOLTON TALKING ABOUT BIDEN OR COOKING

  • TALKING ABOUT BIDEN OR COOKING UP SOME DRUG DEAL, THAT COMES UP

  • UP SOME DRUG DEAL, THAT COMES UP LATER AFTER HE LEFT THE

  • LATER AFTER HE LEFT THE WHITE HOUSE.

  • WHITE HOUSE. IF PEOPLE WEREN’T SOUNDING THE

  • IF PEOPLE WEREN’T SOUNDING THE ALARM’S AT THE TIME OF THE ONLY

  • ALARM’S AT THE TIME OF THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE SOUNDED THAT

  • PEOPLE WHO HAVE SOUNDED THAT ALARM ARE PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE

  • ALARM ARE PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE WITH THE PRESIDENT.

  • WITH THE PRESIDENT. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH

  • IF YOU DISAGREE WITH PRESIDENT ABOUT POLICY, I HAVE A

  • PRESIDENT ABOUT POLICY, I HAVE A GREAT IDEA, RUN FOR PRESIDENT,

  • GREAT IDEA, RUN FOR PRESIDENT, WIN, THEN YOU CAN SET THE POLICY

  • WIN, THEN YOU CAN SET THE POLICY POLICY.

  • POLICY. I THINK THIS ENTIRE IMPEACHMENT

  • I THINK THIS ENTIRE IMPEACHMENT IN THE SENATE -- I HAVE TO GIVE

  • IN THE SENATE -- I HAVE TO GIVE A LOT OF CREDIT TO THE

  • A LOT OF CREDIT TO THE WHITE HOUSE’S LAWYERS FOR THIS

  • WHITE HOUSE’S LAWYERS FOR THIS REASON.

  • REASON. THEY LOOK LIKE LAWYERS IN A

  • THEY LOOK LIKE LAWYERS IN A COURT ROOM, THEY ARE TAKING IT

  • COURT ROOM, THEY ARE TAKING IT VERY SOLEMNLY AND I THOUGHT

  • VERY SOLEMNLY AND I THOUGHT TODAY WAS GREAT BECAUSE YOU HAVE

  • TODAY WAS GREAT BECAUSE YOU HAVE CENTERS ASKING QUESTIONS, THAT’S

  • CENTERS ASKING QUESTIONS, THAT’S FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN

  • FAR MORE IMPORTANT THAN WITNESSES.

  • WITNESSES. WE HEARD FROM 17 WITNESSES, WE

  • WE HEARD FROM 17 WITNESSES, WE ARE 0 FOR 17 IN TERMS OF BEING

  • ARE 0 FOR 17 IN TERMS OF BEING ABLE TO CALL WITNESSES AND THAT

  • ABLE TO CALL WITNESSES AND THAT IS WHY SOME OF THESE SENATORS

  • IS WHY SOME OF THESE SENATORS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE UP FOR

  • EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE UP FOR REELECTION THIS YEAR ARE SAYING

  • REELECTION THIS YEAR ARE SAYING I DON’T NEED TO HEAR FROM THE

  • I DON’T NEED TO HEAR FROM THE 18TH, 19TH, 20TH WITNESS.

  • 18TH, 19TH, 20TH WITNESS. THE DEMOCRATS BLEW IT IN THE

  • THE DEMOCRATS BLEW IT IN THE HOUSE BECAUSE THERE WITNESSES

  • HOUSE BECAUSE THERE WITNESSES WERE A BUNCH OF LAW PROFESSORS

  • WERE A BUNCH OF LAW PROFESSORS AND EACH OTHER.

  • AND EACH OTHER. >> Laura: ALAN DERSHOWITZ WAS

  • >> Laura: ALAN DERSHOWITZ WAS UP LATE TONIGHT ONE OF THE LAST

  • UP LATE TONIGHT ONE OF THE LAST PEOPLE TO SPEAK AND HE WAS

  • PEOPLE TO SPEAK AND HE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE PHRASE THEY

  • TALKING ABOUT THE PHRASE THEY KEEP THROWING OUT, "NOBODY IS

  • KEEP THROWING OUT, "NOBODY IS ABOVE THE LAW" AND HE TURNED IT

  • ABOVE THE LAW" AND HE TURNED IT ON THE DEMOCRATS.

  • ON THE DEMOCRATS. >> ANYTHING THE HOUSE WANTS TO

  • >> ANYTHING THE HOUSE WANTS TO DO TO IMPEACH IS IMPEACHABLE,

  • DO TO IMPEACH IS IMPEACHABLE, THAT IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED TODAY.

  • THAT IS WHAT HAS HAPPENED TODAY. THAT PLACES THE HOUSE OF

  • THAT PLACES THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ABOVE THE LAW,

  • REPRESENTATIVES ABOVE THE LAW, WE HEARD MUCH ABOUT HOW NO ONE

  • WE HEARD MUCH ABOUT HOW NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, THE HOUSE OF

  • IS ABOVE THE LAW, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IS NOT ABOVE THE

  • REPRESENTATIVES IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW.

  • LAW. >> Laura: THEY WANT TO BE ABLE

  • >> Laura: THEY WANT TO BE ABLE TO CALL THE PRESIDENT GUILTY OF

  • TO CALL THE PRESIDENT GUILTY OF EXTORTION, CONSPIRING WITH THE

  • EXTORTION, CONSPIRING WITH THE RUSSIANS, THEY WERE SAYING ALL

  • RUSSIANS, THEY WERE SAYING ALL THIS STUFF DEFAMING THE

  • THIS STUFF DEFAMING THE PRESIDENT, NONE OF THAT WAS IN

  • PRESIDENT, NONE OF THAT WAS IN THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.

  • THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. THEY THINK THEY CAN DO IT WITH

  • THEY THINK THEY CAN DO IT WITH IMPUNITY BECAUSE THEY HAVE

  • IMPUNITY BECAUSE THEY HAVE IMMUNITY, THEY WERE SAYING IT IN

  • IMMUNITY, THEY WERE SAYING IT IN THE HALLS OF CONGRESS.

  • THE HALLS OF CONGRESS. >> THE LAWYERS AREN’T DOING

  • >> THE LAWYERS AREN’T DOING THAT, THE HOUSE MANAGERS ARE.

  • THAT, THE HOUSE MANAGERS ARE. IT’S A TERRIBLE MISTAKE FOR

  • IT’S A TERRIBLE MISTAKE FOR DEMOCRATS TO PUT UP A NAKEDLY

  • DEMOCRATS TO PUT UP A NAKEDLY PARTISAN POLITICIANS WERE

  • PARTISAN POLITICIANS WERE PREENING FOR THE CAMERA AS THEIR

  • PREENING FOR THE CAMERA AS THEIR PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY

  • PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY OFFENDED THE JURY.

  • PROBABLY OFFENDED THE JURY. WHEN YOURE GIVING YOUR OPINION,

  • WHEN YOURE GIVING YOUR OPINION, CONJECTURE, ASSUMPTION, WISHFUL

  • CONJECTURE, ASSUMPTION, WISHFUL THINKING, YOURE NOT PROVIDING

  • THINKING, YOURE NOT PROVIDING EVIDENCE OR FACTS.

  • EVIDENCE OR FACTS. SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WHERE DO

  • SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WHERE DO YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE OF X, THEY

  • YOU HAVE ANY EVIDENCE OF X, THEY REPEATED THEMSELVES, THEY THINK

  • REPEATED THEMSELVES, THEY THINK THEY ARE ON A TV SHOW.

  • THEY ARE ON A TV SHOW. >> Laura: A LOT OF FOLKS ARE

  • >> Laura: A LOT OF FOLKS ARE REACHING OUT ON TWITTER TO ME,

  • REACHING OUT ON TWITTER TO ME, WEVE BEEN COVERING THE LEGAL

  • WEVE BEEN COVERING THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF THIS CASE SAYING WHY

  • ASPECTS OF THIS CASE SAYING WHY IS IT THE WHITE HOUSE SEEMS TO

  • IS IT THE WHITE HOUSE SEEMS TO HAVE PEOPLE BURROWED IN FROM

  • HAVE PEOPLE BURROWED IN FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR CIA WHO ARE

  • OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR CIA WHO ARE WORKING PERHAPS RIGHT NOW

  • WORKING PERHAPS RIGHT NOW AGAINST THE PRESIDENT’S AGENDA

  • AGAINST THE PRESIDENT’S AGENDA IN FOREIGN POLICY, DOMESTIC

  • IN FOREIGN POLICY, DOMESTIC POLICY AND IS THAT NOT A

  • POLICY AND IS THAT NOT A CONTINUING ACHILLESHEEL FOR

  • CONTINUING ACHILLESHEEL FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION IF THEY ARE

  • THIS ADMINISTRATION IF THEY ARE STILL IN THE WHITE HOUSE TODAY?

  • STILL IN THE WHITE HOUSE TODAY? >> IT WOULD BE IF THAT IS TRUE,

  • >> IT WOULD BE IF THAT IS TRUE, I THINK PEOPLE TALK ABOUT THE

  • I THINK PEOPLE TALK ABOUT THE DEEP STATE, I TALK ABOUT THE

  • DEEP STATE, I TALK ABOUT THE SHALLOW STATE.

  • SHALLOW STATE. IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT DEEP

  • IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE THAT DEEP OR BE HERE THAT LONG, IF YOU ARE

  • OR BE HERE THAT LONG, IF YOU ARE WORKING AT CROSS PURPOSES TO THE

  • WORKING AT CROSS PURPOSES TO THE PRESIDENT’S AGENDA, HE

  • PRESIDENT’S AGENDA, HE APPRECIATES WHEN PEOPLE PUSH

  • APPRECIATES WHEN PEOPLE PUSH BACK OR HAVE A DISSENTING VIEW,

  • BACK OR HAVE A DISSENTING VIEW, DIVERSITY OF OPINION.

  • DIVERSITY OF OPINION. I WAS THERE WHEN THAT WAS

  • I WAS THERE WHEN THAT WAS EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING BUT

  • EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING BUT WORKING AT CROSS PURPOSES -- IF

  • WORKING AT CROSS PURPOSES -- IF YOU ARE ATTACKING THE PRESIDENCY

  • YOU ARE ATTACKING THE PRESIDENCY AND ATTACKING AGENDA AND THERE’S

  • AND ATTACKING AGENDA AND THERE’S SO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO

  • SO MANY PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO WANT TO SERVE IN THIS

  • WANT TO SERVE IN THIS ADMINISTRATION.

  • ADMINISTRATION. >> Laura: ARE YOU CONFIDENT --

  • >> Laura: ARE YOU CONFIDENT -- >> I’M NOT CONFIDENT, I’VE

  • >> I’M NOT CONFIDENT, I’VE EXPRESSED THAT MANY TIMES TOO

  • EXPRESSED THAT MANY TIMES TOO MANY PEOPLE, I AM CONFIDENT

  • MANY PEOPLE, I AM CONFIDENT ABOUT ONE THING.

  • ABOUT ONE THING. MAGA WORLD HAS A POINT WHEN THEY

  • MAGA WORLD HAS A POINT WHEN THEY SAY THERE’S SO MANY OF US WHO

  • SAY THERE’S SO MANY OF US WHO WOULD LOVE TO SERVE IN THIS

  • WOULD LOVE TO SERVE IN THIS ADMINISTRATION AND NEVER GOT A

  • ADMINISTRATION AND NEVER GOT A CHANCE, THAT’S A QUESTION FOR

  • CHANCE, THAT’S A QUESTION FOR PERSONNEL.

  • PERSONNEL. >> Laura: PRESIDENTIAL

  • >> Laura: PRESIDENTIAL PERSONNEL.

  • PERSONNEL. >> FOR TRANSITION, THERE WERE

  • >> FOR TRANSITION, THERE WERE PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO SERVE IN

  • PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO SERVE IN THE ADMINISTRATION, THEY CAN

  • THE ADMINISTRATION, THEY CAN JOIN US IN THE SECOND ONE.

  • JOIN US IN THE SECOND ONE. >> Laura: I KEPT SAYING

  • >> Laura: I KEPT SAYING THAT -- WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE AND

  • THAT -- WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE AND DIDN’T THAT WORK FOR JEB BUSH?

  • DIDN’T THAT WORK FOR JEB BUSH? GOD BLESS JEB BUSH BUT --

  • GOD BLESS JEB BUSH BUT -- >> I THINK THIS IS VERY

  • >> I THINK THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, THE DEMOCRATS ARE

  • IMPORTANT, THE DEMOCRATS ARE SAYING OUR EVIDENCE IS

  • SAYING OUR EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING, I THOUGHT WHEN

  • OVERWHELMING, I THOUGHT WHEN JERRY NADLER AND ZOE LOFGREN

  • JERRY NADLER AND ZOE LOFGREN WENT ON TV AFTER THE ARTICLES OF

  • WENT ON TV AFTER THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT PAST, THEY MADE A

  • IMPEACHMENT PAST, THEY MADE A BIG MISTAKE, THEY PROBABLY

  • BIG MISTAKE, THEY PROBABLY SHOULD NOT HAVE SPOKEN PUBLICLY

  • SHOULD NOT HAVE SPOKEN PUBLICLY BECAUSE THEY ALL SAID THE REASON

  • BECAUSE THEY ALL SAID THE REASON WE DID THIS IS BECAUSE THE

  • WE DID THIS IS BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE WAS OVERWHELMING, WE

  • EVIDENCE WAS OVERWHELMING, WE HAVE ALL WE NEED.

  • HAVE ALL WE NEED. NOW THEY WANT MORE EVIDENCE THAT

  • NOW THEY WANT MORE EVIDENCE THAT WHAT YOU SAY IS VERY IMPORTANT

  • WHAT YOU SAY IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE I THINK HISTORY WILL

  • BECAUSE I THINK HISTORY WILL LOOK BACK AND SAY THAT’S

  • LOOK BACK AND SAY THAT’S TERRIBLE UKRAINE IT DIDN’T GET

  • TERRIBLE UKRAINE IT DIDN’T GET IT STAYED THAT YEAR, ACTUALLY IT

  • IT STAYED THAT YEAR, ACTUALLY IT DID -- IT GOT MORE.

  • DID -- IT GOT MORE. >> Laura: NONE OF THE FACTS

  • >> Laura: NONE OF THE FACTS CHANGED.

  • CHANGED. >> THE PRESIDENT HAS PUSHED BACK

  • >> THE PRESIDENT HAS PUSHED BACK ON A LOT OF THESE BOOKS, I’M NOT

  • ON A LOT OF THESE BOOKS, I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT THIS BOOK BUT A

  • TALKING ABOUT THIS BOOK BUT A LOT OF THESE BOOKS.

  • LOT OF THESE BOOKS. >> Laura: ALL OF THE PEOPLE

  • >> Laura: ALL OF THE PEOPLE WORKING THE WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT,

  • WORKING THE WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT, IF YOURE WORKING IN THE

  • IF YOURE WORKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT YOURE DOING

  • WHITE HOUSE TONIGHT YOURE DOING IT AS A CIVIL SERVANT, THE IDEA

  • IT AS A CIVIL SERVANT, THE IDEA THAT YOU DINE OUT ON HAVING

  • THAT YOU DINE OUT ON HAVING SERVED AND GETTING YOUR

  • SERVED AND GETTING YOUR TAXPAYER-FUNDED PAYCHECK -- I

  • TAXPAYER-FUNDED PAYCHECK -- I DON’T LIKE THE BOOK WRITERS.

  • DON’T LIKE THE BOOK WRITERS. I KNOW EVERYONE DOES IT COME I

  • I KNOW EVERYONE DOES IT COME I THINK IT’S DISLOYAL.

  • THINK IT’S DISLOYAL. >> THEY CAN USE IT TO FIGHT

  • >> THEY CAN USE IT TO FIGHT THEIR AGGRESSORS AND OBAMA WAS

  • THEIR AGGRESSORS AND OBAMA WAS BASICALLY LIKE --

  • BASICALLY LIKE -- >> Laura: THAT POINT HAS BEEN

  • >> Laura: THAT POINT HAS BEEN MADE TO.

  • MADE TO. >> THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO COME

  • >> THAT IS WHAT IS GOING TO COME OUT AFTER HE’S ACQUITTED, HE

  • OUT AFTER HE’S ACQUITTED, HE WILL SAY WHY DID UKRAINE GET HIS

  • WILL SAY WHY DID UKRAINE GET HIS AID TO?

  • AID TO? ’S BE WHAT I THINK RE-EXAMINE A

  • ’S BE WHAT I THINK RE-EXAMINE A LOT OF THE FOREIGN AID.

  • LOT OF THE FOREIGN AID. >> HE’S BEEN MAKING PEOPLE PAY

  • >> HE’S BEEN MAKING PEOPLE PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE, THAT’S WHERE

EDGE AND IT WILL DETERMINE THE LENGTH OF THIS TRIAL.

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B1 中級

康威如果你不同意總統的政策,就去參選吧 (Conway: If you disagree with the president's policies, run for president)

  • 7 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字