字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 IT'S ALL POSSIBLE BUT I STILL THINK PERSONALITY HAS IT IN THINK PERSONALITY HAS IT IN CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA. THIS IS A RACE IN WHICH BERNIE THIS IS A RACE IN WHICH BERNIE IS THE LEADER. IS THE LEADER. >> I THINK EVERYBODY AGREES >> I THINK EVERYBODY AGREES BERNIE IS LEADING, BUT THAT BERNIE IS LEADING, BUT THAT MOMENTUM SLOWED DOWN LAST NIGHT MOMENTUM SLOWED DOWN LAST NIGHT AND JOE BIDEN -- AND JOE BIDEN -- >> HE WAS RIGHT THERE. >> HE WAS RIGHT THERE. >> -- WAS THERE WHEN HE NEEDED >> -- WAS THERE WHEN HE NEEDED TO BE. TO BE. >> YES, HE WAS. >> YES, HE WAS. HE CAME TO PLAY. HE CAME TO PLAY. >> HE IS DOWN TO HIS LAST CARD >> HE IS DOWN TO HIS LAST CARD OR TWO AND SO, YEAH, HE HAS TO OR TWO AND SO, YEAH, HE HAS TO HAVE A BIG WIN IN SOUTH CAROLINA HAVE A BIG WIN IN SOUTH CAROLINA AND HAS TO PROPEL HIM FORWARD IF AND HAS TO PROPEL HIM FORWARD IF HE HAS ANY CHANCE TO CHALLENGE HE HAS ANY CHANCE TO CHALLENGE SAND SNEERS BEFORE SHE FELL BACK SAND SNEERS BEFORE SHE FELL BACK INTO FOCUSING SOLELY ON MIKE INTO FOCUSING SOLELY ON MIKE BLOOMBERG ELIZABETH WARREN BEGAN BLOOMBERG ELIZABETH WARREN BEGAN HER NIGHT WITH A DIRECT HER NIGHT WITH A DIRECT CHALLENGE TO BERNIE SANDERS OVER CHALLENGE TO BERNIE SANDERS OVER WHO IS BEST TO CARRY THE WHO IS BEST TO CARRY THE PROGRESSIVE MANTEL INTO THE PROGRESSIVE MANTEL INTO THE WHITE HOUSE. WHITE HOUSE. FROM THERE OTHER CANDIDATES FROM THERE OTHER CANDIDATES JUMPED IN TO TAKE ON SANDERS ON JUMPED IN TO TAKE ON SANDERS ON RUSSIA, ELECTABILITY AND GUNS. RUSSIA, ELECTABILITY AND GUNS. >> BERNIE AND I AGREE ON A LOT >> BERNIE AND I AGREE ON A LOT OF THINGS, BUT I THINK I WOULD OF THINGS, BUT I THINK I WOULD MAKE A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN MAKE A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN BERNIE AND THE REASON FOR THAT BERNIE AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS THAT GETTING A PROGRESSIVE IS THAT GETTING A PROGRESSIVE AGENDA ENACTED IS GOING TO BE AGENDA ENACTED IS GOING TO BE REALLY HARD AND IT'S GOING TO REALLY HARD AND IT'S GOING TO TAKE SOMEONE WHO DIGS INTO THE TAKE SOMEONE WHO DIGS INTO THE DETAILS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. DETAILS TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. BERNIE AND I BOTH WANTED TO HELP BERNIE AND I BOTH WANTED TO HELP REIN IN WALL STREET. REIN IN WALL STREET. IN 2008 WE BOTH GOT OUR CHANCE, IN 2008 WE BOTH GOT OUR CHANCE, BUT I DUG IN, I FOUGHT THE BIG BUT I DUG IN, I FOUGHT THE BIG BANKS, I BUILT THE COALITIONS BANKS, I BUILT THE COALITIONS AND I WON. AND I WON. BERNIE AND I BOTH WANT TO SEE BERNIE AND I BOTH WANT TO SEE UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, BUT UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, BUT BERNIE'S PLAN DOESN'T EXPLAIN BERNIE'S PLAN DOESN'T EXPLAIN HOW TO GET THERE, DOESN'T SHOW HOW TO GET THERE, DOESN'T SHOW HOW WE'RE GOING TO GET ENOUGH HOW WE'RE GOING TO GET ENOUGH ALLIES INTO IT AND DOESN'T SHOW ALLIES INTO IT AND DOESN'T SHOW ENOUGH ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO ENOUGH ABOUT HOW WE'RE GOING TO PAY FOR IT. PAY FOR IT. I DUG IN, I DID THE WORK AND I DUG IN, I DID THE WORK AND THEN BERNIE'S TEAM TRASHED ME THEN BERNIE'S TEAM TRASHED ME FOR IT. FOR IT. PROGRESSIVES HAVE GOT ONE SHOT PROGRESSIVES HAVE GOT ONE SHOT AND WE NEED TO SPEND IT WITH A AND WE NEED TO SPEND IT WITH A LEADER WHO WILL GET SOMETHING LEADER WHO WILL GET SOMETHING DONE. DONE. >> VLADIMIR PUTIN THINKS THAT >> VLADIMIR PUTIN THINKS THAT DONALD TRUMP SHOULD BE PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP SHOULD BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THAT'S OF THE UNITED STATES AND THAT'S WHY RUSSIA IS HELPING YOU GET WHY RUSSIA IS HELPING YOU GET ELECTED SO YOU WILL LOSE TO HAD ELECTED SO YOU WILL LOSE TO HAD I'M. I'M. >> LET ME TELL MR. PUTIN WHO >> LET ME TELL MR. PUTIN WHO INTERFERED IN THE 2016 ELECTION, INTERFERED IN THE 2016 ELECTION, TRY TO BRING AMERICANS AGAINST TRY TO BRING AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICANS, HEY, MR. PUTIN, IF AMERICANS, HEY, MR. PUTIN, IF I'M PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED I'M PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRUST ME YOU ARE NOT STATES TRUST ME YOU ARE NOT GOING TO INTERFERE IN ANY MORE GOING TO INTERFERE IN ANY MORE AMERICAN ELECTIONES. AMERICAN ELECTIONES. >> TELL YOU WHAT THE RUSSIANS >> TELL YOU WHAT THE RUSSIANS WANT, THEY DON'T HAVE A WANT, THEY DON'T HAVE A POLITICAL PARTY, THEY WANT CHAOS POLITICAL PARTY, THEY WANT CHAOS AND CHAOS IS WHAT IS COMING OUR AND CHAOS IS WHAT IS COMING OUR WAY. WAY. I MEAN, LOOK, IF YOU THINK THE I MEAN, LOOK, IF YOU THINK THE LAST FOUR YEARS HAS BEEN LAST FOUR YEARS HAS BEEN CHAOTIC, DIVISIVE, TOXIC, CHAOTIC, DIVISIVE, TOXIC, EXHAUSTING, IMAGINE SPENDING THE EXHAUSTING, IMAGINE SPENDING THE BETTER PART OF 2020 WITH BERNIE BETTER PART OF 2020 WITH BERNIE SANDERS VERSUS DONALD TRUMP. SANDERS VERSUS DONALD TRUMP. >> YOU KNOW, WE TALK ABOUT >> YOU KNOW, WE TALK ABOUT PROGRESSIVE. PROGRESSIVE. LET'S TALK ABOUT BEING LET'S TALK ABOUT BEING PROGRESSIVE. PROGRESSIVE. WALKING DISTANCE HERE MOTHER WALKING DISTANCE HERE MOTHER EMANUEL CHURCH, NINE PEOPLE SHOT EMANUEL CHURCH, NINE PEOPLE SHOT DEAD BY A WHITE SUPREMACIST. DEAD BY A WHITE SUPREMACIST. BERNIE VOTED FIVE TIMES AGAINST BERNIE VOTED FIVE TIMES AGAINST THE BRADY BILL AND WANTED A THE BRADY BILL AND WANTED A WAITING PERIOD -- NO, LET ME WAITING PERIOD -- NO, LET ME FINISH -- AND WAITED -- AND FINISH -- AND WAITED -- AND WAITED -- A WAITING PERIOD OF 12 WAITED -- A WAITING PERIOD OF 12 HOURS. HOURS. I'M NOT SAYING HE'S RESPONSIBLE I'M NOT SAYING HE'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NINE DEATHS BUT THAT MAN FOR THE NINE DEATHS BUT THAT MAN WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET THAT WEAPON WITH THE WAITING THAT WEAPON WITH THE WAITING PERIOD HAD BEEN WHAT I SUGGEST PERIOD HAD BEEN WHAT I SUGGEST UNTIL YOU ARE CLEARED. UNTIL YOU ARE CLEARED. >> ALL RIGHT. >> ALL RIGHT. THAT WAS TOUGH STUFF. THAT WAS TOUGH STUFF. JOHN HEILEMANN, IT'S JOHN HEILEMANN, IT'S INTERESTING, ELIZABETH WARREN INTERESTING, ELIZABETH WARREN STARTED WITH HER FIRST APPROACH, STARTED WITH HER FIRST APPROACH, MEASURED, ACTUALLY WENT AFTER MEASURED, ACTUALLY WENT AFTER THE GUY WHO HAS THE BEST SHOT OF THE GUY WHO HAS THE BEST SHOT OF WINNING THIS INNING AND THEN WINNING THIS INNING AND THEN TURNED TO BLOOMBERG, A GUY WHO I TURNED TO BLOOMBERG, A GUY WHO I THINK WAS HURTING HIMSELF THINK WAS HURTING HIMSELF WITHOUT ANYBODY ELSE'S HELP AND WITHOUT ANYBODY ELSE'S HELP AND KEPT THIS FOCUS IN A REALLY KEPT THIS FOCUS IN A REALLY EXTREME FOCUS. EXTREME FOCUS. >> IT WAS UNCOMFORTABLE. >> IT WAS UNCOMFORTABLE. >> ON MIKE BLOOMBERG, IN A WAY, >> ON MIKE BLOOMBERG, IN A WAY, AGAIN, I WANT TO BRING THIS UP, AGAIN, I WANT TO BRING THIS UP, THAT NOBODY THAT I'VE TALKED TO, THAT NOBODY THAT I'VE TALKED TO, NOBODY ON TWITTER COULD FIGURE NOBODY ON TWITTER COULD FIGURE OUT. OUT. IT MAKES NO SENSE TO KEEP IT MAKES NO SENSE TO KEEP ATTACKING THE GUY WITH ZERO ATTACKING THE GUY WITH ZERO DELEGATES WHO IS PERFORMING SO DELEGATES WHO IS PERFORMING SO POORLY IN THE DEBATE. POORLY IN THE DEBATE. DO YOU HAVE ANY INSIGHTS THAT WE DO YOU HAVE ANY INSIGHTS THAT WE DON'T? DON'T? >> WELL, I THINK IF YOU WATCHED >> WELL, I THINK IF YOU WATCHED IT, JOE, SHE SAID IN THE MIDDLE IT, JOE, SHE SAID IN THE MIDDLE OF ONE OF HER ATTACKS WHEN SHE OF ONE OF HER ATTACKS WHEN SHE WENT IN ON THE THING THAT I WENT IN ON THE THING THAT I THINK MADE PEOPLE THE MOST THINK MADE PEOPLE THE MOST UNCOMFORTABLE WHEN SHE RAISED UNCOMFORTABLE WHEN SHE RAISED THIS ALLEGATION THAT BLOOMBERG THIS ALLEGATION THAT BLOOMBERG TOLD A FEMALE EMPLOYEE IN THE TOLD A FEMALE EMPLOYEE IN THE PAST THAT SHE SHOULD HAVE A PAST THAT SHE SHOULD HAVE A PREGNANCY TERMINATED WHEN HE PREGNANCY TERMINATED WHEN HE SUPPOSEDLY USED THE WORDS KILL SUPPOSEDLY USED THE WORDS KILL IT WHICH HE DENIES. IT WHICH HE DENIES. WHEN SHE TOLD THAT STORY SHE WHEN SHE TOLD THAT STORY SHE SAID -- SHE PREFACED IT BY SAID -- SHE PREFACED IT BY SAYING THIS IS PERSONAL TO ME. SAYING THIS IS PERSONAL TO ME. IF YOU LOOK AT THE TAPE, WATCH IF YOU LOOK AT THE TAPE, WATCH IT AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE HER -- HER IT AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE HER -- HER EE MOMENT NLISM RISE WHEN SHE EE MOMENT NLISM RISE WHEN SHE SAYS T SHE SAYS THIS IS PERSONAL SAYS T SHE SAYS THIS IS PERSONAL TO ME AND SHE TELLS A STORY TO ME AND SHE TELLS A STORY ABOUT HERSELF AND RAISES THAT ABOUT HERSELF AND RAISES THAT ALLEGATION. ALLEGATION. I THOUGHT IT WAS PLAIN WHAT WAS I THOUGHT IT WAS PLAIN WHAT WAS GOING ON WHICH WAS TO A LARGE GOING ON WHICH WAS TO A LARGE EXTENT ELIZABETH WARREN IS AN EXTENT ELIZABETH WARREN IS AN INCREDIBLY COMPOSED DEBATER AND INCREDIBLY COMPOSED DEBATER AND SHE RARELY SEEMS TO LET HER SHE RARELY SEEMS TO LET HER EMOTIONS GET THE BETTER OF HER EMOTIONS GET THE BETTER OF HER ON THE DEBATE STAGE N THAT ON THE DEBATE STAGE N THAT MOMENT IT DID SEEM LIKE SHE WAS MOMENT IT DID SEEM LIKE SHE WAS TELLING US THE TRUTH WHICH IS TELLING US THE TRUTH WHICH IS SHE FEELS A PERSONAL ANIMUS SHE FEELS A PERSONAL ANIMUS TOWARDS PLUME BERG ON THIS TOWARDS PLUME BERG ON THIS FRONT. FRONT. SHE ALSO MENTIONED NOT JUST THAT SHE ALSO MENTIONED NOT JUST THAT PERSONAL STORY ABOUT HER LIFE IN PERSONAL STORY ABOUT HER LIFE IN RELATION TO THIS ABORTION RELATION TO THIS ABORTION QUESTION, SHE ALSO TOLD -- QUESTION, SHE ALSO TOLD -- MENTIONED THAT PLUME BERG AT MENTIONED THAT PLUME BERG AT SOME POINT HAD BACKED SCOTT SOME POINT HAD BACKED SCOTT BROWN IN THE RACE IN HER SENATE BROWN IN THE RACE IN HER SENATE RACE AND SHE MENTIONED IT IN RACE AND SHE MENTIONED IT IN PASSING THAT BLOOMBERG -- AS SHE PASSING THAT BLOOMBERG -- AS SHE WAS GOING THROUGH VARIOUS WAS GOING THROUGH VARIOUS REPUBLICANS WHO PLUME BERG HAD REPUBLICANS WHO PLUME BERG HAD BACKED, THOSE ARE POLITICALLY BACKED, THOSE ARE POLITICALLY DAMAGING CRITIQUES OR DAMAGING CRITIQUES OR ALLEGATION -- NOT ALLEGATIONS, ALLEGATION -- NOT ALLEGATIONS, CHARGES AGAINST BLOOMBERG, CHARGES AGAINST BLOOMBERG, FACTS, BUT BOTH THOSE TWO THINGS FACTS, BUT BOTH THOSE TWO THINGS FELT TO ME LIKE THEY WERE A KEY FELT TO ME LIKE THEY WERE A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT'S GOING ON TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT'S GOING ON WITH ELIZABETH WARREN AND MIKE WITH ELIZABETH WARREN AND MIKE BLOOMBERG. BLOOMBERG. SHE DOES REALLY SEE -- YOU HAVE SHE DOES REALLY SEE -- YOU HAVE A PERSONAL THING HERE. A PERSONAL THING HERE. >> WE ALL -- >> WE ALL -- >> DO I THINK IT'S STRATEGIC, I >> DO I THINK IT'S STRATEGIC, I DON'T. DON'T. >> WE ALL HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE >> WE ALL HAVE PEOPLE WHO HAVE TRIED TO KILL US POLITICALLY. TRIED TO KILL US POLITICALLY. IF YOU EVER GET INTO POLITICS. IF YOU EVER GET INTO POLITICS. >> I KNOW. >> I KNOW. >> THE PEOPLE WHO TRIED TO KILL >> THE PEOPLE WHO TRIED TO KILL ME POLITICALLY AND WERE THE ME POLITICALLY AND WERE THE NASTIEST TO ME DURING CAMPAIGNS, NASTIEST TO ME DURING CAMPAIGNS, THEY ARE THE FIRST PEOPLE I THEY ARE THE FIRST PEOPLE I CALLED UP AFTER THE CAMPAIGNS CALLED UP AFTER THE CAMPAIGNS WERE OVER. WERE OVER. LIKE YOU SEE IT TIME AND AGAIN LIKE YOU SEE IT TIME AND AGAIN WHERE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO BEAT WHERE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO BEAT OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS RACE OR OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS RACE OR THAT RACE. THAT RACE. I JUST DON'T -- AGAIN, THIS I JUST DON'T -- AGAIN, THIS IS -- MIKE, THIS IS THE SECOND IS -- MIKE, THIS IS THE SECOND WEEK IN A ROW SHE HAS GONE AFTER WEEK IN A ROW SHE HAS GONE AFTER A GUY WHO IS GOING NOWHERE AND A GUY WHO IS GOING NOWHERE AND IF IT'S PERSONAL WITH HER, GOD IF IT'S PERSONAL WITH HER, GOD BLESS HER, BUT IF YOU WANT TO BLESS HER, BUT IF YOU WANT TO WIN YOU DON'T GO AFTER THE GUY WIN YOU DON'T GO AFTER THE GUY THAT'S GOING TO HAVE ZERO THAT'S GOING TO HAVE ZERO DELEGATES, YOU GO AFTER THE GUY DELEGATES, YOU GO AFTER THE GUY WHO SEEMS TO BE THE UNSTOPPABLE WHO SEEMS TO BE THE UNSTOPPABLE FREIGHT TRAIN. FREIGHT TRAIN. IF IT'S JUST PERSONAL, GO AT IT, IF IT'S JUST PERSONAL, GO AT IT, BUT SHE'S WASTING A LOT OF TIME BUT SHE'S WASTING A LOT OF TIME AND WASTING A LOT OF EFFORT IF AND WASTING A LOT OF EFFORT IF SHE WANTS TO BE THE NEXT SHE WANTS TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. >> WELL, SHE DOES WANT TO BE THE >> WELL, SHE DOES WANT TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. STATES. >> DOES SHE WANT TO MAKE A POINT >> DOES SHE WANT TO MAKE A POINT OR DOES SHE WANT TO WIN? OR DOES SHE WANT TO WIN? >> THAT'S AN INTERESTING >> THAT'S AN INTERESTING QUESTION. QUESTION. I'VE WATCHED HER FOR SEVERAL I'VE WATCHED HER FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW SINCE PRIOR TO YEARS NOW SINCE PRIOR TO BECOMING THE CANDIDATE FOR THE BECOMING THE CANDIDATE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE AGAINST UNITED STATES SENATE AGAINST SCOTT BROWN. SCOTT BROWN. SHE IS A SKILLFUL, HIGHLY SHE IS A SKILLFUL, HIGHLY DISCIPLINED DEBATER. DISCIPLINED DEBATER. MAYBE THE BEST DEBATER CERTAINLY MAYBE THE BEST DEBATER CERTAINLY ON THAT STAGE. ON THAT STAGE. PETE BUTTIGIEG IS VERY GOOD, BUT PETE BUTTIGIEG IS VERY GOOD, BUT ELIZABETH IS HIGHLY DISCIPLINED, ELIZABETH IS HIGHLY DISCIPLINED, YET IN THIS CASE NOW TWICE WITH YET IN THIS CASE NOW TWICE WITH MIKE BLOOMBERG TO HER RIGHT BOTH MIKE BLOOMBERG TO HER RIGHT BOTH TIMES HER DISCIPLINE DISAPPEARS. TIMES HER DISCIPLINE DISAPPEARS. IT LEAVES HER. IT LEAVES HER. AND I THINK IT'S HER UTTER AND I THINK IT'S HER UTTER CONTEMPT FOR MIKE BLOOMBERG THAT CONTEMPT FOR MIKE BLOOMBERG THAT CAUSES HER -- CAUSES HER -- >> I DISAGREE WITH YOU AND JOHN. >> I DISAGREE WITH YOU AND JOHN. I DON'T THINK AT THIS STAGE FOR I DON'T THINK AT THIS STAGE FOR A WOMAN WHO HAS RUN A A WOMAN WHO HAS RUN A DISCIPLINED CAMPAIGN AS SHE HAS DISCIPLINED CAMPAIGN AS SHE HAS RUN, I DON'T THINK THAT SHE JUST RUN, I DON'T THINK THAT SHE JUST CAN'T CONTROL HERSELF. CAN'T CONTROL HERSELF. I THINK SHE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT I THINK SHE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT SHE'S DOING. SHE'S DOING. SHE HAS A STRATEGY. SHE HAS A STRATEGY. SHE HAS A REASON SHE'S DOING
B1 中級 伊麗莎白-沃倫(Elizabeth Warren)參議員一開始很謹慎,然後轉向彭博社|Morning Joe|MSNBC。 (Sen. Elizabeth Warren Starts Off Measured, Then Turns To Bloomberg | Morning Joe | MSNBC) 1 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字