Name: 納波利塔諾法官：溫斯坦案法官 "毫不留情 (Judge Napolitano: Judge in Weinstein case showing 'no mercy')
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T08:43:31.000Z
Duration: 5 min 29 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

DAVID: VERDICT IS IN FORMER HOLLYWOOD FILM PRODUCER HARVEY

HOLLYWOOD FILM PRODUCER HARVEY WEINSTEIN FOUND GUILTY OF

WEINSTEIN FOUND GUILTY OF CRIMINAL SEX ACT IN 2006, THIRD

CRIMINAL SEX ACT IN 2006, THIRD DEGREE RAIN OF A WOMAN IN 2013,

DEGREE RAIN OF A WOMAN IN 2013, HE COULD FACE TO 25 YEARS IN

HE COULD FACE TO 25 YEARS IN PRISON, WEINSTEIN WAS

PRISON, WEINSTEIN WAS HANDCUFFED,TAIN EP TO TAKEN TO C

HANDCUFFED,TAIN EP TO TAKEN TO C UNTIL HIS SENTENCES ON MARCH 11,

UNTIL HIS SENTENCES ON MARCH 11, HE WAS ACQUITTED ON TWO MOST

HE WAS ACQUITTED ON TWO MOST SERIOUS CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST

EACH CARRIES LIFE IN PRISON. WE BRING IN FOX NEWS JUDICIAL

WE BRING IN FOX NEWS JUDICIAL ANALYST, JUDGE ANDREW

THANK YOU. MANHATTAN PROSECUTOR, HE GOT TWO

MANHATTAN PROSECUTOR, HE GOT TWO OUT OF FIVE CONVICTIONS.

OUT OF FIVE CONVICTIONS. DO YOU THINK HE IS DISAPPOINTED.

DO YOU THINK HE IS DISAPPOINTED. >> I AM SURE HE IS.

>> I AM SURE HE IS. BUT YOU SAW FROM HIS PRESS

BUT YOU SAW FROM HIS PRESS CONFERENCE HE WILL TRY TO MAKE

CONFERENCE HE WILL TRY TO MAKE THE MOST OUT OF THIS HE WAS

THE MOST OUT OF THIS HE WAS DRAGGED KICKING AND SCREAMING.

DRAGGED KICKING AND SCREAMING. I EXAGGERATE TO BRING THIS --

I EXAGGERATE TO BRING THIS -- THESE CASES BEFORE A GRAND JURY.

THESE CASES BEFORE A GRAND JURY. BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN CAUGHT UP IN

BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN CAUGHT UP IN THIS VENT WHERE WEINSTEIN

THIS VENT WHERE WEINSTEIN LAWYERS HAVE BEEN MAKING

LAWYERS HAVE BEEN MAKING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIM.

CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIM. HE KNEW THAT LAWYERS REPRESENTED

HE KNEW THAT LAWYERS REPRESENTED WEINSTEIN AT THE TIME.

WEINSTEIN AT THE TIME. DAVID: COMPROMISE.

DAVID: COMPROMISE. >> AND HE DROPPED CHANGES, NOW

>> AND HE DROPPED CHANGES, NOW THESE CHARGES, BUT -- NOT THESE

THESE CHARGES, BUT -- NOT THESE BUT OTHERS, HE WAS RED FACED

BUT OTHERS, HE WAS RED FACED OVER IT, HE SAID OKAY I'M NOT

OVER IT, HE SAID OKAY I'M NOT TAKING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

TAKING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANY LAWYERS, WHO ARE

FROM ANY LAWYERS, WHO ARE REPRESENTING PEOPLE THAT MY

REPRESENTING PEOPLE THAT MY OFFICE IS PROSECUTING, IN

OFFICE IS PROSECUTING, IN WEINSTEIN CASE IT WAS TOO LITTLE

WEINSTEIN CASE IT WAS TOO LITTLE TOO LATE, HIGH GOT A.

TOO LATE, HIGH GOT A. HE WAS USING, A NOVEL STATUTE IN

HE WAS USING, A NOVEL STATUTE IN NEW YORK.

NEW YORK. CALIFORNIA HAS SAME STATUTE, IF

CALIFORNIA HAS SAME STATUTE, IF YOU CAN PROVE A RAPE WENT STATE

YOU CAN PROVE A RAPE WENT STATE OUT OF LIMITATION AND PROVE

OUT OF LIMITATION AND PROVE SIMILAR BEHAVIOR AT ANY OTHER

SIMILAR BEHAVIOR AT ANY OTHER TIME, IN THIS CASE ALLEGED TO

TIME, IN THIS CASE ALLEGED TO OCCUR IN 19.

>>,1992, THEN YOU CAN FIND THE DEFEND DEFENDANT GUILTY OF

THE DEFEND DEFENDANT GUILTY OF PREDATORY SEXUAL ACTIVITY, WHICH

PREDATORY SEXUAL ACTIVITY, WHICH HE FAILED AT.

HE FAILED AT. PROSECUTOR IN CALIFORNIA WILL

PROSECUTOR IN CALIFORNIA WILL ATTEMPT THE SAME CHARGE AGAINST

>> JUDGE, THIS IS GARY. THIS DIRTBAG WILL APPEAL, DOES

THIS DIRTBAG WILL APPEAL, DOES IT MATTER THAT THE SERIOUS

IT MATTER THAT THE SERIOUS CHARGES HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY

CHARGES HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF, DOES THAT HELP HIM IN HIS

OF, DOES THAT HELP HIM IN HIS APPEAL OR IT IS SEPARATE?

APPEAL OR IT IS SEPARATE? >> I THINK IT IS IRRELEVANT.

>> I THINK IT IS IRRELEVANT. HE WAS ACQUITTED, THE STATE

HE WAS ACQUITTED, THE STATE CANNOT APPEAL THAT ACQUITTAL,

CANNOT APPEAL THAT ACQUITTAL, ONLY TWO APPEALABLE CHARGES WILL

ONLY TWO APPEALABLE CHARGES WILL BE TWO FOR WHICH HE WAS

AND QUITE FROM. LY, THERE WERE ODD -- FRANKLY

LY, THERE WERE ODD -- FRANKLY THERE WERE ODD AT PECKS OF CASE,

THERE WERE ODD AT PECKS OF CASE, EVIDENCE OF GUILT IN THOSE CASES

EVIDENCE OF GUILT IN THOSE CASES RISING AND FALLS ON CREDIBILITY

RISING AND FALLS ON CREDIBILITY OF THE VICTIMS, THEY TOLERATED A

OF THE VICTIMS, THEY TOLERATED A WITHERING CROSS CROSS-EXAMINATIO

WITHERING CROSS CROSS-EXAMINATIO JURY BELIEVED THEM, I NEVER

JURY BELIEVED THEM, I NEVER HEARD OF A RAPE CASE,

HEARD OF A RAPE CASE, INVESTIGATED BY POLICE FOR 5

INVESTIGATED BY POLICE FOR 5 YEARS WHERE NOT A SINGLE COP

YEARS WHERE NOT A SINGLE COP TESTIFIED, IT BELIEVES THERE

TESTIFIED, IT BELIEVES THERE MUST HAVE BEEN A BREAK DOWN

MUST HAVE BEEN A BREAK DOWN BETWEEN PROSECUTOR OFFICE AND

BETWEEN PROSECUTOR OFFICE AND POLICE, THEY ALWAYS' POLICE TO

POLICE, THEY ALWAYS' POLICE TO SAY YES THAT IS WHAT SHE TOLD

SAY YES THAT IS WHAT SHE TOLD ME, AND THIS EVIDENCE COOPERATES

ME, AND THIS EVIDENCE COOPERATES THAT, UP IN OF THAT CAME IN.

THAT, UP IN OF THAT CAME IN. >> CERTIFICATE OF SORT OF SEEMS

>> CERTIFICATE OF SORT OF SEEMS TO TO SAY HE NEEDS TO BE

TO TO SAY HE NEEDS TO BE PUNISHED BUT MAYBE THERE WAS AND

PUNISHED BUT MAYBE THERE WAS AND CREDIBILITY ABOUT WITNESSES IS

>> I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO INTERPRET, TRYING.

INTERPRET, TRYING. VERDICTS IN CRIMINAL CASES FOR

SOMETIMES JURORS MAKE A COMPROMISE, THEY KNOW WHAT THE

字幕列表影片播放

納波利塔諾法官：溫斯坦案法官 "毫不留情 (Judge Napolitano: Judge in Weinstein case showing 'no mercy')

equivalent

compromise

period

exaggerate