字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 >> Harris: FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR JOHN BOLTON ANNOUNCING HE WILL TESTIFY IN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S UPCOMING SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL IF HE RECEIVES A SUBPOENA. LAWMAKERS ARE RETURNING TO CAPITOL HILL WITH BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE STILL DIVIDED ON THE RULES FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP'S SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN LINDSEY GRAHAM SAYS "OF HOUSES BEAKER NANCY PELOSI DOES NOT HAND OVER THOSE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT TO THE UPPER CHAMBER SOON, HE WILL FIND A WAY TO START THE SENATE TRIAL WITHOUT THEM." >> WHAT I WILL DO IF SHE CONTINUES TO REFUSE TO SEND THE ARTICLES AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTITUTION, I WOULD WORK WITH SENATOR McCONNELL TO CHANGE THE RULES IN THE SENATE SO WE COULD START THE TRIAL WITHOUT HER IF NECESSARY. IF WE DON'T GET THE ARTICLES THIS WEEK, THEN WE NEED TO TAKE METALS INTO OUR OWN HANDS AND CHANGE THE RULES, SO WE CAN START THE TRIAL INVITE THE HOUSE SO THEY CAN PARTICIPATE. >> OKAY, KELLY, I WANT TO START WITH YOU. PREVIOUSLY, JOHN BOLTON SAID HE WAS UNDECIDED AS TO WHETHER HE WOULD TESTIFY OR NOT. THAT WAS WHEN IT WAS BACK IN THE HOUSE. THEY CHOSE NOT TO SUBPOENA HIM AS THEY SAID THEY WOULD WAIT FOR THE COURTS TO DECIDE. NOW HE IS SAYING HE WAS LOOKING FOR A FINAL JUDICIAL RESOLUTION. I HAVE CONCLUDED THAT IF THE SENATE ISSUE SUBPOENA FOR MY TESTIMONY, I AM PREPARED TO TESTIFY BECAUSE A FINAL JUDICIAL ROGER LUTHERAN APPEARS UNLIKELY BEFORE THE SENATE TRIAL. THE COURTS ARE WAITING TO DECIDE TO COMPEL HIM. NOW HE SAYS IF I GET A SUBPOENA I WILL GO. WHAT KIND OF RELEVANT INFORMATION DO YOU THINK HE HAS? >> Cully: NO IDEA, BUT I CAN TELL YOU ONE THING. JOHN BOLTON IS A REALLY SMART. CLARENCE THOMAS, WHEN HE GAVE A SPEECH AT MY ORGANIZATION YEARS AGO SAID THAT JOHN BOLTON WAS THE SMARTEST GUY IN LAW SCHOOL AND HAD THE HIGHEST GPA AT YALE LAW SCHOOL EVER. I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THAT'S TRUE TO THIS DAY, BUT HE IS A SAVVY CHARACTER. I THINK HE ALSO FEELS THAT IT IS PROBABLY HIS PATRIOTIC DUTY THAT IF THE SENATE SOUNDS I'M A SUBPOENA HE'S JUST GOING TO COMPLY WITH IT. WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO COME OUT OF JOHN BOLTON'S MOUTH, WE DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES HE WAS AT THE PRESIDENT SIDE. WE DO KNOW FROM PUBLISHED REPORTS THAT OVER TIME, HE STARTED LOSING THE PRESIDENTS HERE, ESPECIALLY NEAR THE END. SO, WHETHER HE WAS THERE FOR THE KEY UKRAINE STUFF, WE DON'T KNOW. >> Harris: KENNEDY, THAT IS IN FACT WHAT HE SAID IS THAT "I HAVE TRIED TO MEET MY OBLIGATIONS BOTH AS A CITIZEN AND AS A FORMAL NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR." THAT EIGHT IS HIS DUTY TO GO TESTIFY, WHAT DO YOU THINK? >> HE KNOWS HOW SMART HE IS, JOHN BOLTON HAS THE JOHN BOLTON WORLDVIEW, HE ALSO HAS A BOOK COMING OUT, NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS, I DO THINK HE IS GOING TO TELL THE TRUTH, HE'S GOING TO LAY OUT THE CARDS AS HE SEES IT. HE WANTS TO SET HIS OWN RECORD STRAIGHT IN PRINTS AND VERBALLY IN FRONT OF THE SENATE DURING THIS TRIAL. SO, I THINK THE NEWS OF IRAN AND A POTENTIAL INVASION IN HIS BRAIN HAS GOT HIM SO EXCITED THAT HE NEEDS TO REINSERT HIMSELF AND ADD HIS TWO CENTS AT THIS CRITICAL STAGE. >> SO, JEANNIE, THIS IS A VERY INTERESTING CROSSROADS WHERE LINDSEY GRAHAM SAYS THAT MAYBE WE WILL TAKE THEM UP IF NANCY PELOSI DOESN'T TAKE THEM OVER AND DELIVER THEM. SHE IS BEEN SITTING ON THESE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE HYPOTHESES SAYING THE REASON WHY SHE IS DOING THAT IS BECAUSE SHE'S TRYING TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE SENATE IN ORDER TO HAVE A TRIAL AND BRING THESE WITNESSES FORTH. BUT SHE WAS NOT WILLING TO WAIT ON THOSE WITNESSES IN THE HOUSE, AND SUBPOENAING THEM AS JOHN BOLTON SIDE, HE NEVER DID RECEIVE A SUBPOENA. SHE WASN'T WILLING TO WAIT ON THE COURTS THEY ARE, BUT NOW, SHE IS WAITING, AND TRYING TO FORCE THE SENATE TO DO WHAT SHE HERSELF DID NOT HAVE THE PATIENCE TO DO. HOW DOES THAT LOOK POLITICALLY? >> I THINK POLITICALLY IT LOOKS VERY BAD FOR THE DEMOCRATS. I REALLY HAVE ALWAYS HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE CALENDAR ON THIS. WHICH WAS A CALENDAR DRIVEN BY THE POLITICS, CLEARLY. I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT THE DEMOCRATS SHOULD HAVE WAITED TO HEAR FROM THE COURTS, OR, FOR BURTON TO CHANGE HIS MIND AND TO AGREE TO A SUBPOENA REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE COURTS ESSAY TO GET ALL THE INFORMATION THAT THEY HAD AND THEN, IF THEY ARE GOING TO PUT SOME THING TOGETHER -- >> Harris: SO IS IT HELPFUL THAT BOLTS AND OTHERS ARE WILLING TO SPEED UP THE SITUATION FOR THE DEMOCRATS WESTERN MARK THEY ARE NOT DOING IT FOR THEM BUT -- THIS BEFORE I THINK IT IS SUCH A SHAME THAT THESE ARTICLES HAVE NOW GONE OUT. ARE THEY GOING TO GO BACK DEPENDING ON WHAT BOLTON HAS TO SAY AND REWRITE AS ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT? I SUPPOSE THEY COULD. YOU ARE THE LEGAL EXPERT, HERE, BUT YOU KNOW, TO ME, THIS SCREAMS A POLITICAL MESS FOR THE DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE, AND I THINK THEY HAVE SHOT THEMSELVES IN THE FOOT ON THIS. >> Harris: CULLY CAN ASK YOU, DO YOU MIND IF I JUST ASKED BETA QUICK QUESTION. WHAT LEGALLY CAN SOMEONE LIKE A JOHN BOLTON DO ON THE STAND? IT'S NOT REALLY THE STAND, BUT IN THE HEARING, CAN HE PLEAD THE FIFTH, CAN HEEM HAVE ANY KIND OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, CAN HE DOES NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS, WHAT HERS OPTIONS? >> Cully: REMEMBER, THIS IS NOT A CRIMINAL TRIAL. THIS IS A POLITICAL PROCESS, THAT IS WHAT IMPEACHMENT IS ALL ABOUT. THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES AND RULES DO NOT APPLY. BUT EVERYONE STILL ENJOYS A FOR THE AMENDMENT RIGHT. NOT TO SAY SOMETHING AGAINST THEIR OWN INTEREST. SO HE COULD COME ON A QUESTION BY QUESTION BASIS, NOT ON A BLANKET BASIS, AND I SUSPECT, I WOULD HAVE TO THINK MORE ABOUT IT, HE COULD PROBABLY ASSERT EXECUTIVE -- IF THE PRESIDENT EXERTS EXECUTIVE POINT ROAD LODZ ON THAT QUESTION BY QUESTION BASIS HE MIGHT THEN BE ABLE TO TESTIFY ABOUT THESE THINGS BUT NOT TESTIFY ABOUT THESE THINGS. I THINK JOHN BOLTON USUALLY PLAYS TRANCE WHEN MOST PEOPLE
B2 中高級 博爾頓稱若被傳喚將在參議院彈劾案中作證 (Bolton says he will testify in Senate impeachment trial if subpoenaed) 28 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字