字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 GENERAL'S DEATH. LET'S BRING IN DAN CRENSHAW NOW, MEMBER OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY, FORMER NAVY SEAL, SERVED IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN, NOW SERVING IN REAL COMBAT IN WASHINGTON AS WELL WHICH IS ALSO PHYSICAL AND ALSO VERY, I GUESS YOU COULD CALL IT, TRENCH WARFARE. FIRST OFF, CONGRESSMAN, ARE WE SAFER WITH THE GENERAL DEAD? >> FIRST OF ALL, THANKS FOR HAVING ME. AND THE ANSWER IS, ABSOLUTELY YES. SULEMANI WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATH OF HUNDREDS OF AMERICANS. HE PLANNED EXECUTED ATTACKS ON AMERICANS, GAVE IEDs TO SHIA MILITIAS IN IRAQ THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OVER 600 AMERICAN DEATHS NOT TO MENTION ALL THE DEATHS AROUND THE REGION, SYRIA, LEBANON, IRAQ AND ELSEWHERE, HOUTHI REBELS IN YEMEN. SO THIS GUY'S BEEN A FORCE OF DESTRUCTION AND DEATH IN THE REGION FOR A LONG TIME. THE HE'S THE HEAD OF ONE OF THE LARGEST TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN THE WORLD, THE IRANIAN QUDS FORCE, SO, YES, WE ARE SAFER. ARE THERE GOING TO BE CONSEQUENCES? OF COURSE THERE WOULD BE. I WOULD FULLY EXPECT THE IRANIANS TO PLAN SOME KIND OF RETRIBUTION. BUT HERE'S THE THING, WE HAVE TO DISABUSE OURSELVES OF THIS NOTION THAT WE SHOULD SIMPLY CONTINUE TO TAKE PUNCHES, OKAY? IRAN ATTACKED OUR BASE RECENTLY, THEN THEY ATTACKED OUR EMBASSY WHERE THEY FULLY SUPPORTED THE SHIA MILITIAS THAT DID IT. ARE WE SUPPOSED TO JUST LET THAT HAPPEN? AND TO SAY YES WOULD BE ABSURD, AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHEN AMERICANS BECOME SO FEARFUL. YOU KNOW, WE -- THE COUNTLESS PEOPLE ON THE LEFT TWEETING OUT APOLOGIES AND BLAMING OUR OWN GOVERNMENT FOR TAKING ACTION TO KILL A MAN WHO HAS KILLED AMERICANS. AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THIS AMERICAN SELF-LOATHING CAME FROM AND, FRANKLY, THANK GOD THEY'RE NOT IN CHARGE. STEVE: ACROSS THE AISLE FROM YOU THERE ARE A NUMBER OF DEMOCRATS, WE'VE GOT A TWEET FROM ILHAN OMAR, THEY WANT THE PRESIDENT TO EXPLAIN WHAT LEGAL AUTHORITY HE USED TO CARRY OUT THIS ATTACK. WE HAD SECRETARY OF STATE MIKE POMPEO ON WITH US A LITTLE WHILE AGO, AND HE SAID IT WASN'T FOR WHAT SULEMANI HAS ORCHESTRATED SO FAR, IT WAS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THEY WERE PLOTTING MORE ATTACKS. >> YEAH. WELL, I CAN CERTAINLY -- [INAUDIBLE] I MEAN, FIRST OF ALL, YEAH, THIS WAS A, THIS WAS A STRIKE THAT WAS IN RESPONSE TO ARE RECENT STRIKES -- TO VERY RECENT STRIKES AGAINST US. SO THERE WAS A SELF-DEFENSE MECHANISM TO THIS. FURTHERMORE, THE PREVENTIVE MEASURES. BUT BEYOND THAT, THIS HAPPENED IN IRAQ AGAINST AN ENEMY THAT ATTACKS US IN IRAQ IN WHICH WE HAVE PLENTY OF AUTHORIZATION TO BE OPERATING IN. THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK ON THE IRANIANS. IT'S LIKE SAYING WHEN THERE WAS FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ THROUGHOUT THE IRAQ WAR, THAT WE SHOULD NOT HAVE LET OUR SOLDIERS ENGAGE WITH THEM BECAUSE WE HADN'T DECLARED WAR UPON THAT PARTICULAR COUNTRY. THAT'S AN ABSURD THING TO SAY. AND THESE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS KNOW THAT, OR MAYBE THEY DON'T KNOW THAT. I'M HERE TO TELL THEM THAT. AND ALL THIS HAND-WRINGING THAT THEY'RE DOING CERTAINLY DIDN'T OCCUR DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, AND I WISH THEY WOULD JUST LEE THE HYPOCRISY ASIDE, THE PARTISANSHIP ASIDE. WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER. WE SHOULD BE TALKING ABOUT AS A CONGRESS WHAT AUTHORIZATIONS WE SHOULD GIVE TO THE PRESIDENT JUST IN CASE THESE DISTURBANCES AROUND THE REGION CONTINUE TO ESCALATE. THE LAST THING WE SHOULD BE DOING IS LOOKING TO OUR PAST, AND I'M FRIENDS WITH TULSI GABBARD, BUT TO SAY THAT WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING IS LOOKING TO OUR PAST AND TRYING TO ANALYZE WHY THIS HAPPENS, THAT'S ABSURD. THAT'S A GREAT ACADEMIC ARGUMENT, BUT IT DOESN'T HELP US IN OUR CURRENT REALITY. WE HAVE AN ENEMY THAT DOES WANT TO DESTROY US. AND WE DO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT. WE DIDN'T LOOK AT HISTORICAL TEXTBOOKS TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. WE HAVE A CHOICE BETWEEN PEACE AND WAR, AND IF WE WANT PEACE, WE CAN SURRENDER TO THEM RIGHT NOW. OF COURSE, STEALING THAT QUOTE FROM REAGAN. BUT THAT'S NOT A GOOD STRATEGY. ALL RIGHT? IT'S A FEARFUL STRATEGY. IT'S CERTAINLY NOT A STRATEGY FOR A COUNTRY LIKE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AINSLEY: DAN -- BRIAN: THE ONE THING WE'VE GOT TO WORRY ABOUT IS THE NEXT TEN. BE PREPARED FOR THE NEXT STEP. IF YOU WERE IN COMMAND CONTROL NOW KNOW WE JUST TOOK OUT THE NUMBER TWO MOST IMPORTANT PERSON IN IRAQ, WHAT WOULD YOU BE MOST FOCUSED ON AT THIS HOUR? >> WHAT WE KNOW THE IRANIANS ARE VERY GOOD AT IS SURROGATE WARFARE. THIS WAS WHAT SULEMANI DID, OKAY? HE BUILT SURROGATES TROUT THE REGION -- THROUGHOUT THE REGION THAT COULD ATTACK US ON OWL FRONTS. WE SHOULD BE BOLSTERING DEFENSES IN OUR BASES IN IRAQ, IN BAHRAIN AND ELSEWHERE. AND HELPING OUR ALLIES IN ISRAEL. THAT'S WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING IN THE SHORT MATERIAL.
B1 中級 眾議員丹-克倫肖就蘇萊曼尼罷工一事抨擊民主黨人的辯解者。 (Rep. Dan Crenshaw slams Democrat apologists over Soleimani strike) 2 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字