>>> SHE HATES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

PARTY. SHE HATES ALL OF THE PEOPLE THAT

SHE HATES ALL OF THE PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR HER.

VOTED FOR HER. >> THAT WAS THE PRESIDENT ON

>> THAT WAS THE PRESIDENT ON CHRISTMAS EVE MORNING SHORTLY

CHRISTMAS EVE MORNING SHORTLY AFTER HE PARTICIPATED IN A VIDEO

AFTER HE PARTICIPATED IN A VIDEO CONFERENCE WHERE HE EXCHANGED

CONFERENCE WHERE HE EXCHANGED HOLIDAY GREETINGS WITH MEMBERS

HOLIDAY GREETINGS WITH MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY STATIONED AROUND

OF THE MILITARY STATIONED AROUND THE GLOBE.

THE GLOBE. THE ANGER FOR NANCY PELOSI

THE ANGER FOR NANCY PELOSI CONTINUED INTO THE NIGHT WHERE

CONTINUED INTO THE NIGHT WHERE HE QUESTIONED WHETHER THE HOUSE

HE QUESTIONED WHETHER THE HOUSE HAD THE AUTHORITY TO IMPEACH

HAD THE AUTHORITY TO IMPEACH HIM.

HIM. HE TWEETED LAST NIGHT PART,

HE TWEETED LAST NIGHT PART, QUOTE, WHY SHOULD CRAZY NANCY

QUOTE, WHY SHOULD CRAZY NANCY PELOSI, AGAIN, ON CHRISTMAS,

PELOSI, AGAIN, ON CHRISTMAS, JUST BECAUSE SHE HAS A SLIGHT

JUST BECAUSE SHE HAS A SLIGHT MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE BE ALLOWED

MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE BE ALLOWED TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT OF THE

TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?

UNITED STATES? PERHAPS THE PRESIDENT SHOULD DO

PERHAPS THE PRESIDENT SHOULD DO SOMETHING THAT HE'S NEVER DONE

SOMETHING THAT HE'S NEVER DONE BEFORE AND READ THE CONSTITUTION

BEFORE AND READ THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

OF THE UNITED STATES. HE MIGHT ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND HOW

HE MIGHT ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND HOW THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE HAS

THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE HAS THAT POWER.

THAT POWER. OF EITHER PARTY.

OF EITHER PARTY. MEANWHILE, ONE KEY REPUBLICAN

MEANWHILE, ONE KEY REPUBLICAN SENATOR LISA MUR KOWSKOWSKI IS

SENATOR LISA MUR KOWSKOWSKI IS DISAPPOINTED WITH MITCH

DISAPPOINTED WITH MITCH McCONNELL TO BE --

McCONNELL TO BE -- >> WHEN I HEARD THAT I WAS

>> WHEN I HEARD THAT I WAS DISTURBED.

DISTURBED. IF WE ARE TASKED AS THE FULL

IF WE ARE TASKED AS THE FULL SENATE TO DO IMPARTIAL JUSTICE

SENATE TO DO IMPARTIAL JUSTICE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE

UNDER THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAW, THAT'S THE OATH THAT WE

LAW, THAT'S THE OATH THAT WE WILL SWEAR TO UPHOLD AT THE

WILL SWEAR TO UPHOLD AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THIS PROCEEDING,

COMMENCEMENT OF THIS PROCEEDING, THEN, TO ME, IT MEANS THAT WE

THEN, TO ME, IT MEANS THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE THAT STEP BACK FROM

HAVE TO TAKE THAT STEP BACK FROM BEING HAND IN GLOVE WITH THE

BEING HAND IN GLOVE WITH THE DEFENSE.

DEFENSE. AND SO I -- I HEARD WHAT LOOERPD

AND SO I -- I HEARD WHAT LOOERPD McCONNELL HAD SAID.

McCONNELL HAD SAID. I HAPPEN TO THINK THAT THAT HAS

I HAPPEN TO THINK THAT THAT HAS FURTHER CONFUSED THE PROCESS.

FURTHER CONFUSED THE PROCESS. >> MURKOWSKI'S REMARKS ARE

>> MURKOWSKI'S REMARKS ARE SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE A 51-VOTE

SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE A 51-VOTE SIMPLE MAJORITY IS ALL THAT'S

SIMPLE MAJORITY IS ALL THAT'S NEEDED TO SET IMPEACHMENT RULES.

NEEDED TO SET IMPEACHMENT RULES. REPUBLICANS ONLY HAVE 53 VOTES,

REPUBLICANS ONLY HAVE 53 VOTES, MEANING DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED

MEANING DEMOCRATS WOULD NEED FOUR REPUBLICANS TO BREAK RANKS

FOUR REPUBLICANS TO BREAK RANKS AND ACTUALLY CALL FOR WITNESSES.

AND ACTUALLY CALL FOR WITNESSES. CALL FOR EVIDENCE.

CALL FOR EVIDENCE. CALL FOR THE VERY THINGS, DEPUTY

CALL FOR THE VERY THINGS, DEPUTY VIRTIONS FOR

VIRTIONS FOR DEPOSITIONS, THE VERY THINGS

DEPOSITIONS, THE VERY THINGS THAT REPUBLICANS CALLED FOR AND

THAT REPUBLICANS CALLED FOR AND GOT IN '99 AND GOT WITH