LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT THIS.

IT'S FASCINATING WHAT SHE'S

DOING AND SOME OF THE ARGUMENTS

ARE THAT THERE IS CHAOS, I DON'T

THINK THERE IS, I THINK IN FACT

IT'S POSSIBLE IT WAS A POINT A

LOT OF LONG THAT THEY KNEW WHAT

THEY LOSE CONTROL.

THEY HAD NO INTENTION OF CARING

ABOUT THE NATURE OF WHAT THE

CONSTITUTION REQUIRED OTHERWISE

IT WOULDN'T HAPPEN THE FIRST

PLACE.

>> TO CLAIM WE HAVE TO RUSH

THROUGH THIS WITH ALMOST NO

EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES OR

ANYTHING, BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT

A RACE TO NATIONAL SECURITY AND

A THREAT TO THE REPUBLICANS,

NOBLE LIED ABOUT HER STOPPING

THE PROCESS AND HANGING ONTO THE

ARTICLES.

I THINK SHE HAD A COUPLE THINGS

IN MIND, FIRST OF ALL SHE WANTED

THE ARTICLES BEFORE THE FIRST OF

THE YEAR TO DAMAGE THE PRESIDENT

IN ELECTION YEAR AND I THINK

THAT BACKFIRED.

SECOND OF ALL, I THINK SHE WANTS

THE INFLUENCE OF THE SENATE

TRIAL EVEN UNDER ARTICLE ONE

SECTION THREE OF THE

CONSTITUTION, SHE HAS NO POWER

OF AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER.

IF SHE'S ACTUALLY TRYING TO

ENGAGE IN A QUID PRO QUO, AND AL

OF A

OF I'LL

SEND THE ARTICLES OVER TO YOU IF

SEND THE ARTICLES OVER TO YOU II

APPROVE OF THE PROCESS THAT YOU

DESIGNED AND SHE'S DOING EXACTLY

WHAT SHE IS FALSELY ACCUSING THE

PRESIDENT OF IN THE QUID PRO

QUO.

OF >> Tammy: OBVIOUSLY,

CONGRESSMAN, NO SHAME.

I THINK WHAT THEY'VE

UNDERESTIMATED HERE IS THE

AMERICAN PEOPLE'S REACTION TO

THIS.

IT'S A SHAM, BUT IT'S MORE THAN

A FRAUD.

THEY ARE DOING THINGS THAT

DELIBERATELY DAMAGE THE REPUBLI

REPUBLIC.

TO SAY THIS ABOUT THE PRESIDENT

OF THE UNITED STATES WHEN

MONUMENTAL THINGS ARE HAPPENING,

AROUND THE WORLD, FOREIGN

POLICIES AFFECTED BECAUSE OF THE

WAY THAT HE MIGHT BE VIEWED.

YET, YOU'RE IN THE POSITION

WHERE YOU NEED TO RUSH BECAUSE

IT AFFECTS WHAT YOU'RE ABLE TO

ACCOMPLISH.

>> YOU HAVE REAL FACT WITNESSES

AND I MADE A REQUEST AND

DOUG COLLINS SAID A LONG LIST

THAT WE TALKED ABOUT ABOUT

WITNESSES AND WE DON'T HAVE TIME

FOR THAT.

THEY'RE IN THE MAJORITY, THEY

CAN CHANGE THE RULES, AND IT

ALLOWS FOR A MINORITY WITNESS WE

DID NOT HAVE THEM MARTY

WITNESSED A BECAUSE TIME WAS OF

THE ESSENCE.

IF WE HAD TO MOVE ON AND GET

THIS TO THE SENATE.

IF I DON'T THINK SHE THOUGHT

THIS THROUGH AS WELL AS SOME

PEOPLE THINK.

SHE DID NOT WANT TO GET TO THIS

.9 MONTHS AGO AND THEN SHE

PUSHED INTO IT.

>> Tammy: OF COURSE, SHE WOULD

HAVE TO BECAUSE IT EFFECTIVELY

UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

PERHAPS, ALSO, THEY'VE BEEN

LOOKING AT THE FOCUS GROUPS ON

THE POLLING THROUGH THIS LIKE

WHICH WERE TO USED TO ACCUSE

HIM.

PERHAPS A WAY TO SEE TO IT

PERHAPS A WAY TO SEE TO IF ANY

OF THIS IS AFFECTING, AND THE

NUMBER OF PEOPLE OPPOSING

IMPEACHMENT ARE GOING UP.

>> I THINK SHE'S HOPING THAT IT

WILL AFFECT PEOPLE EVEN THE

LONGER THAT SHE HOLDS ONTO THE

ARTICLES THE LESS LIKELY THAT IT

IS AND WILL BE A BIGGER

BOOMERANG EFFECT.

THE OTHER THING IS, FRANKLY, I

JUST THINK SHE KIND OF HOPES

THAT SOME MAGICAL EVIDENCE WILL

DROP OUT OF THE SKY.

LIKE WHICH IS AN WITCH HUNT

WHICH REALLY DON'T EXIST.

>> Tammy: OR IN FACT, WHAT

STARTED THIS MAY BE ANOTHER

PHONE CALL FROM ANOTHER

ANONYMOUS WHISTLE-BLOWER WHICH

WOULD REQUIRE MORE INVESTIGATION

AND IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY AND

CERTAINLY.

THE OVERALL DYNAMIC,

CONGRESSMAN, IS ONE THAT TELLS

THE PEOPLE OF THE COUNTRY THAT

WE'VE GOT TO CONGRESS THAT IS

NOT DOING ITS OWN JOB.

IT IS TRYING TO STILL UNDO -- OR

STOP AT A ELECTED PRESIDENT AND

OF COURSE, IRONICALLY,

BECAUSE WE KNEW SOMETHING WAS

WRONG WITH CONGRESS AND SO WE

WERE PUTTING HIM IN THERE TO

CLEAN THIS UP AND AWAY.

IT'S AN BATTLE THAT IS

OCCURRING BECAUSE THESE ARE

INCORRECT IN 2016.

>> IT BECAUSE MANY OF THE

DEEP STATE THAT WE REALLY DIDN'T

HAVE IDENTIFIED A PERIOD OF THEY

POP THEIR HEADS UP.

THERE WE GO.

IN THE DAYS WE WILL BE ABLE TO

ELIMINATE THOSE SO THAT

PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL HAVE MORE

COOPERATION WITHIN THEIR OWN AND

ADMINISTRATION.

>> Tammy: PELOSI, GREG, HE'S

ARGUING THAT MITCH McCONNELL

MADE IT CLEAR HE'S NOT GOING TO

BE THERE.

THEY WANT ALL THOSE THINGS --

THEY KNOW, THEY KNOW THEY

WEREN'T BEING FAIR AND NOW

THEY'RE AFRAID LIKE MOST

LEFTISTS AND THOSE WHO PROTECT

THEY WERE OF THE SAME THING

THAT'S HAPPENING.

IF THEY WANT FAIRNESS, THEY WANT

WITNESSES, THEY WANT THE SAME

THINGS.

THIS IS CLEARLY A POLITICAL

ACTION AND THAT'S WHEN

IMPEACHMENT IS.

McCONNELL HAS NO OBLIGATION TO

EVEN LOOK AT THIS SHAM THAT'S

BEEN PROVIDED TO THEM.

THAT'S ONE OF MY CONCERNS, THE

ARGUMENT -- I THINK THEY'RE

RELYING ON THE PROCESS THAT THE

PROCESS WOULD MAKE THEM SEEM

LEGITIMATE WHERE IN FACT,

McCONNELL HAS EVERY RIGHT TO

BE SERIOUS ABOUT HOW HE LOOKS

AT THIS.

FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, A MEMBER OF

THE SAME PARTY.

>> IT'S IRONIC IF NOT

HYPOCRITICAL AS NANCY PELOSI TO

THE DEMAND DUE PROCESS OF THE

SENATES THAT SHE APPROVES WHILE