Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • >> I AM MOLLY LINE IN FOR

  • SANDRA SMITH.

  • THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

  • MAKING THE CASE FOR WHY THEY

  • STILL NEED TO HEAR IN A NEW

  • COURT FILING.

  • THEY SAY HIS TESTIMONY COULD

  • PROVIDE MORE EVIDENCE

  • POTENTIALLY LEADING TO NEW

  • ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, BUT THE

  • WHITE HOUSE IS CLAIMING

  • EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.

  • >> MEANWHILE, BOTH SIDES ARE

  • SOUNDING OFF OVER RULES FOR A

  • SENATE TRIAL.

  • >> IF YOU THINK CHUCK SCHUMER'S

  • IMPARTIAL, DO YOU THINK

  • ELIZABETH WARREN IS IMPARTIAL,

  • BERNIE SANDERS IS IMPARTIAL?

  • LET'S GET THE CHARADE.

  • THIS IS A POLITICAL EXERCISE.

  • ALL I AM ASKING OF HUMOR IS THAT

  • WE TREAT TRUMP THE SAME WAY WE

  • TREATED CLINTON.

  • >> SENATOR McCONNELL HAS COME

  • UP WITH NO GOOD REASON WHY THE

  • TRIAL SHOULDN'T HAVE THESE

  • WITNESSES OR DOCUMENTS.

  • IS A LOT OF NAME CALLING, A LOT

  • OF PARTISANSHIP.

  • HE STILL HASN'T ANSWERED THE

  • QUESTION WHAT IS WRONG WITH

  • WITNESSES?

  • WHAT IS WRONG WITH DOCUMENTS?

  • ONE ARGUMENT, GIVE US ONE

  • ARGUMENT WHY THEY SHOULDN'T BE

  • PART OF THE TRIAL.

  • >> Leland: ARE MADE IN

  • WASHINGTON THIS MORNING,

  • GOOD MORNING.

  • >> LAWYERS SAY THEY ARE NOT

  • RULING OUT IMPEACHING THE

  • PRESIDENT AGAIN BUT THAT THE

  • DECISION DEPENDS ON WHAT

  • LAWMAKERS WOULD LEARN FROM THE

  • FORMER WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL.

  • AT THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS,

  • HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE DEMANDED

  • DON MCGANN TESTIFY, THE

  • WHITE HOUSE HAS BEEN BLOCKING

  • THAT AND IT HAS BEEN MAKING ITS

  • WAY THROUGH THE COURTS AND IN A

  • NEW FILING MONDAY, LAWYERS

  • ARGUED THAT HIS TESTIMONY IS

  • VITAL TO CONGRESSIONAL

  • OVERSIGHT.

  • THIS IS WHAT THE LAWYERS WROTE.

  • "IF MCGANN'S TESTIMONY PRODUCED

  • NEW EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE

  • CONCLUSION THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP

  • COMMITTED IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES,

  • THE COMMITTEE WILL PROCEED

  • ACCORDINGLY.

  • EARLIER THIS MONTH, THE

  • JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN JERRY NADLER

  • SAID IMPEACHMENT WAS NOT A ONE

  • OFF AND NOT A PUNISHMENT FOR BAD

  • BEHAVIOR.

  • IS ALSO UNCLEAR WHAT ADDITIONAL

  • IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES CONGRESS

  • COULD CONSIDER IN THE FUTURE.

  • MEANWHILE, THE STALEMATE OVER

  • LAST WEEK'S IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES

  • CONTINUOUS.

  • THE HOUSE HAS NOT YET SET

  • IMPEACHMENT TO THE SENATE.

  • HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY CLOSELY SAYS

  • THAT'S BECAUSE DEMOCRATS ARE

  • UNSURE WHAT KIND OF TRIAL THE

  • SENATE WILL CONDUCT AND SENATE

  • DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN SPEAKING OUT

  • QUITE A BIT TRYING TO PRESSURE

  • THE MAJORITY OF LEADERS TO ALLOW

  • A NEW EVIDENCE AND WITNESSES

  • BEING INTRODUCED IN THE SENATE

  • TRIAL.

  • >> IMAGINE A TRIAL NOT HAVING

  • DOCUMENTS AND WITNESSES.

  • IT'S GOING TO SEEM TO MOST OF

  • THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT IT IS A

  • SHAM TRIAL.

  • A SHOW TRIAL.

  • NOT TO GET AT THE FACTS.

  • >> PRESIDENT TRUMP IS WEIGHING

  • IN ON ALL OF THIS, HE WROTE

  • "EVERYTHING WE ARE SEEING FROM

  • SPEAKER PELOSI AND

  • SENATOR SCHUMER SUGGESTS THEY

  • ARE IN REAL DOUBT ABOUT THE

  • EVIDENCE THEY'VE BROUGHT FORTH,

  • SO FAR NOT BEING GOOD ENOUGH.

  • THAT WAS THE PRESIDENT ON

  • TWITTER TWO HOURS AGO.

  • NEGOTIATIONS ARE ONGOING ABOUT

  • HOW A TRIAL WILL GO BUT SINCE

  • OVER THE IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES.

  • NEVER A DULL MOMENT AROUND HERE

  • EVEN AT THE HOLIDAYS.

>> I AM MOLLY LINE IN FOR

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋

B2 中高級

眾議院民主黨考慮新的彈劾條款迫使麥加恩作證 (House Dems consider new impeachment articles to compel McGahn testimony)

  • 3 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日
影片單字