字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 MAKE NO MISTAKE, THE DEMOCRATS IN CHARGE OF THE HOUSE, THIS CHARADE IS NEVER, EVER GOING TO STOP. JOINING US NOW WITH MOORE'S MINORITY WHIP CAUCUS CHAIRMAN ANDY BIGGS. GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US. CONGRESSMAN SCULLY'S COME WITH THE PRESS CONFERENCE HOW THEY WANT MORE EVIDENCE. AREN'T THEY KIND OF DE FACTO TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT WITHOUT EVIDENCE? AM I READING THIS RIGHT? THEY ALREADY TOOK A BOAT, KNOW THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH. THIS SEEMS BACKWARDS. >> WE SET THIS ALL ALONG, THERE WAS NO CRIME. IT WAS AN IMPEACHMENT IN SEARCH OF A CRIME AND THEY NEVER FOUND ONE. ALL OF THEIR WITNESSES, STAR WITNESSES SAID THERE WAS NO CRIME, NO BRIBERY AND NOW YOU'VE GOT PELOSI CARRYING OUT HER OWN QUID PRO QUO. SHE IS TRYING TO SAY COME I WON'T GIVE YOU THE PAPERS UNLESS YOU DO THIS. AND IS THAT WHAT THEY WERE ACCUSING PRESIDENT TRUMP OF? JOE BIDEN DID QUID PRO QUO HE BRAGGED ABOUT. I WILL TAKE THE TAXPAYERS MONEY IF YOU DON'T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR. BUT THEY IMPEACHED HIM FOR IT. THIS IS BIZARRE. AND LOOK, THERE IS NO FAITH. IT'S DIMMICK IT IS TIME FOR HER TO GIVE THIS UP AND FINALLY WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. WE CAN DO MORE ON DRUG PRICES. WE CAN HAVE A SECURE BORDER AND SO MANY OTHER THINGS, BUT THEY ARE THE PARTY OF IMPEACHMENT. THIS IS ALL THEY HAVE. >> Dan: CONGRESSMEN BEFORE I GO TO CONGRESSMAN BIGGS, IF IT IS FASCINATING THEY ALLEGED QUID PRO QUO WITH THE PRESIDENT AND THE FIRST WITNESS SAID NEVER HAPPEN GORDON SONDLAND AND YET THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE COUNTRY CONCERNED ABOUT CORRUPTION IN FOREIGN AID. HE SAID THAT MANY TIMES AND YET, NOW WE HAVE NANCY PELOSI WITH UNCONSTITUTIONAL USURPATION OF THE SENATE POWERS AND WHERE IS THE MEETING ON THIS? CELEBRATING HOW WONDERFUL NANCY PELOSI IS. AM I READING THIS WRONG? >> YOU ARE SPOT ON. LOOK, THE MEDIA WHEN THEY WERE KEPT OUT OF THE ROOM BY ADAM SCHIFF, WHERE WAS THE MEDIA THEY ARE SAYING WE WILL NOT LET YOU IMPEACH IN SECRET BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THIS IS NANCY PELOSI, LITERALLY SAYING SHE HAS NO CASE. SHE'S ALREADY LOST ONE DEMOCRAT OVER THIS FIASCO LAST WEEK. JEFF ANDREWS HAD ENOUGH ALREADY. I WILL NOT BE A PART OF THIS ANYMORE. WHO KNOWS HOW MANY MORE SHE WILL GET TO SWITCH OR BEAT NEXT YEAR BECAUSE THE COUNTRY IS FED UP WITH THIS THEATRICS, THIS DRAMA BY SPEAKER PELOSI, NOW TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE SENATE. SHE HAS NO CASE IN THE HOUSE. SHOULDN'T MOVED IMPEACHMENT IN THE FIRST PLACE BUT THEY DID IT ANYWAY PAIR THE COUNTRY SAYS LOOK, FOCUS ON LOWER DRUG PRICES AND CARE ABOUT THE WORKING FAMILIES. FORTUNATELY, PRESIDENT TRUMP CARES ABOUT THOSE FAMILIES AND DELIVERING A GREAT ECONOMY WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE AND A LOT MORE MONEY IN THEIR PAYCHECKS THIS CHRISTMAS. >> Dan: CONGRESSMAN BIGGS, I HAVE TO BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATS AS MUCH AS I DISAGREE WITH THEIR RANCID POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, THEY ARE NOT STUPID, THEY ARE NOT. THEY ARE USUALLY TACTICALLY EFFICIENT. THEY HAVE TO KNOW THIS HAS BEEN A SPECTACULAR FACE PLANT, PUBLIC POLLING IS DOWN, INDEPENDENTS MOVING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION, SWING STATE POLLS DEVASTATING, MINORITY SUPPORT FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP GOING UP. I STOLE SOME NUMBER RAISING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON THE DAY OF IMPEACHMENT FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP! ARE YOU SENSING ON THE HILL THAT SOME OF THESE 31 DEMOCRATS AND TRUMP DISTRICT'S ARE STARTING TO SAY, WE HAVE A PROBLEM HERE AND WE MAY WANT TO SLOW THIS DOWN. IS THIS WHERE THIS IS COMING FROM? >> SOME ARE CONCERNED BY OTHERS ARE STUCK IN THE MIDDLE WITH NANCY PELOSI. SO I THINK YOU'VE GOT SOME THAT ARE MORE RATIONAL THAT ARE SAYING, HEY, THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM FOR US, BUT, YOU KNOW, DAN WHAT YOU ARE SEEING IS A REFLECTION OF AUTHORITARIAN NATURE OF THE LEFT DEMOCRATIC PARTY. SO NANCY PELOSI IS GOING TO GO OUT THERE AND BASICALLY COMPEL THE MEMBERS GO FOR AN IMPEACHMENT THAT DOES NOT HAVE POPULAR SUPPORT AND DOES NOT COME AS YOU POINTED OUT, HAVE EVIDENCE. IF THEY GET THROUGH THIS AND IF IT GETS OVER TO THE SENATE IT NEEDS TO BE ACQUITTED WHICH WE ALL KNOWS HE WILL BE. THEY WILL DO IT AGAIN. THAT IS THE AUTHORITARIAN NATURE YOU SEE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT ACTUALLY BEATS DOWN ON THE 31 DEMOCRATS WITHIN THOSE SWING DISTRICTS. THEY ARE ALL IN TROUBLE. >> Dan: CONGRESSMAN SCALISE IS THAT AOC LEFT LEANING -- WINNING TO THE PARTY? DO THEY HAVE THIS MUCH POWER? I WAS TALKING ABOUT BEFORE CONGRESSMAN BIGS AND MY QUESTION HERE IS SHE HAS TO KNOW THIS HAS TO LEAD TO AN ELECTORAL DISASTER. THE REPUBLICAN TAKING OF THE HOUSE, THE SENATE COMMITTEE LANDSLIDE VICTORY FOR DONALD TRUMP, THIS IS GOING TO STAY IN HER LEGACY FOREVER. I THOUGHT NANCY PELOSI WOULD BE SMARTER THAN THIS. YOU ARE IN A LEADERSHIP POSITION BUT AGAIN, WHAT AM I MISSING? SHE IS USUALLY TACTICALLY SMARTER THAN THIS. >> WELL, YOU KNOW, SHE USED TO BE IN CONTROL OF THAT CAUCUS. NOW WITH THIS NEW SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AOC AS YOU WERE INDICATING, AOC IS DRIVING THE TRAIN NOW. IT'S HER PARTY. IF YOU GO BACK TO THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY, SHE WAS NOT GOING TO DO AN IMPEACHMENT AND WHEN WE CAN AOC TWEETED THAT THE REAL CRIME IS THE DEMOCRAT MAJORITY NOT IMPEACHING PRESIDENT TRUMP. LITERALLY, TWO DAYS LATER, NANCY PELOSI SAID SHE WOULD IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT. AOC IS DRIVING THIS PARTY. WHY SO MANY MODERATES HAVE NO PLACE LEFT. THERE ARE NO BLUE DOGS LEFT IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY VIRTUALLY HERE AND SHE'S RUN THEM OFF BECAUSE THEY ARE TIRED OF THE SOCIALIST STYLE. THAT'S ALL SHE'S GOT AND THEY ARE CONTROLLING THINGS RIGHT NOW. >> I FORGOT ABOUT THAT. >> Dan: CONGRESSMAN BIGS, NOTHING THEY TOLD US ABOUT THIS IMPEACHMENT WAS STREWN NO QUID PRO QUO, FIRST-HAND WITNESSES TOLD US THE EXACT OPPOSITE. GORDON SONDLAND SAID THEY BEEN CRYSTAL CLEAR NO QUIT PRO QUOTE AND THEY DON'T DO EVIDENCE FROM THE LEFT BUT EVERYTHING THEY TOLD US ABOUT EXTREME NATURE TO BE RUSHED, HE HAS SUCH A DANGER TO NATIONAL SECURITY IS NONSENSE. SO THEY RAN A RATIONALE THEY WANT TO SLOW DOWN. I CAN COME A LITTLE BIT OF DISCONNECT WITH THE MESSAGE. >> ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. AND IT SHOWS THE DISARRAY. I THINK NANCY PELOSI IS NORMALLY STRATEGIC BUT SHE'S GETTING PRESSURE FROM THE LEFT. THEY ARE IN DISARRAY RIGHT NOW. AND IT ACTUALLY IS UNDERMINING THE VERY NATURE OF WHAT THEY THINK THEY ARE GOING TO DO IN THE FUTURE IN THE 2020 ELECTION. SO IT REALLY HAS CONSEQUENCES ARE ELECTORALLY, IT HAS CONSEQUENCES CONSTITUTIONALLY AND OF COURSE THE INSTITUTION ITSELF. SHE HAS MISREAD THIS THING TERRIBLY. I DON'T KNOW WHO IS ADVISING HER RIGHT NOW, BUT SHE OUGHT TO FIRE
B2 中高級 佩洛西是否承認民主黨沒有足夠的證據彈劾特朗普? (Is Pelosi admitting Dems didn't have enough on Trump to impeach?) 2 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字