THE HOLIDAY SEASON ALSO TONIGHT

STREET JUSTICE IS BACK AND YOU

WILL NOT WANT TO MISS A MINUTE.

LET'S START WITH THE

IMPEACHMENT, AS WE LOOK AHEAD TO

THE SENATE TRIAL, MY NEXT GUEST

FIGHT FOR IT PRESIDENT TRUMP IN

THE ANNALS BARRAGE OF NONSENSE

FROM THE DEMOCRATS.

THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

CONGRESSMAN MATT GAETZ JOINED ME

NOW.

THANK YOU FOR BEING WITH US.

AS ALL OF THIS HAS UNFOLDED, I

WANT TO LOOK BACK BEFORE WE LOOK

FORWARD TO THE SENATE AND WHAT

WILL HAPPEN IN THE NEW YEAR.

CLEARLY THIS IMPEACHMENT IN

NANCY PELOSI ANSWERED A PRESS

QUESTION THAT SHE'S BEEN WORKING

ON IMPEACHMENT FOR TWO AND HALF

YEARS.

SO I GUESS SHE'S PRETTY MUCH

ADMITTED THIS IS NOT SOMETHING

THAT JUST CAME UP BECAUSE OF

UKRAINE.

>> THAT IS RIGHT, THE RADICAL

LEFT DEMOCRATS FILLED THE

STOCKINGS OF THE ANTITRUST BASE

WITH RUMOR AND INNUENDO AND

IMPEACHMENT.

BUT THE REST OF AMERICA GOT A

LUMP OF COAL, WE DID NOT GONNA

INFRASTRUCTURE BILL BECAUSE

NANCY PELOSI HAS BEEN PLANNING

THIS IMPEACHMENT SINCE THE

MOMENT SHE TOOK POWER IN JERRY

NADLER THE CHAIRMAN OF JUDICIARY

COMMITTEE EVEN CAMPAIGNED TO THE

FELLOW DEMOCRATS ON THE NOTION

HE WOULD BE THE PERSON TO BRING

US TO THIS POINT.

THE REAL QUESTION WHY DEMOCRATS

FAILED TO MEET THE STANDARD THEY

SET FOR THEMSELVES.

THEY PROMISED US A BIPARTISAN

IMPEACHMENT IN THE ONLY

BIPARTISAN VOTE WAS A FIVE

PERSON VOTE AGAINST IMPEACHMENT.

THEY PROMISED US THE HEARINGS

WOULD EMANATE PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR

IMPEACHMENT AND WE HAVE NOT SEEN

THAT EITHER.

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HATE THIS

AND IF CONGRESS CONTINUES THEY

MAY END UP HATING US.

>> IN THE END TRUTHFULLY

CONGRESS MOVE QUICKLY TOWARD THE

END OF THE YEAR BECAUSE THEY

REALIZED THAT THE SUPPORT FOR

IMPEACHMENT IS ALMOST RIGHT NOW

AMONG THE INDEPENDENTS AND THOSE

IN THE MIDDLE IT IS DECLINING

DAY AFTER DAY.

I THINK THEY MADE A DECISION TO

END THIS SOON.

LET'S TALK ABOUT IN LIGHT OF

WHAT YOU BEEN THROUGH AND THE

PRESIDENT WAS NOT ABLE TO

PRESENT A CASE AND CROSS-EXAMINE

WITNESSES AND ALL THE THINGS

THAT ALL THE OTHER PRESIDENTS

HAVE BEEN ENTITLED TO DO IN

ADDITION TO THE FACT THAT THIS

WAS NOT BY THE COUNCIL BUT BY

ONE PARTY AGAINST THIS

PRESIDENT, DO YOU SEE THINGS

CHANGING IN THE SENATE, HOW DO

YOU THINK THEY WILL HANDLE OVER

THERE?

>> I KNOW THE PRESIDENT WANTS AN

EXTENDED TRIAL IN THE SENATE AND

HE HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO

PRESENT EVIDENCE BUT IF THIS

WERE A CASE IN YOUR COURT,

BROUGHT BY ANY PARTY, YOU WOULD

DISMISS ON A MOTION TO DISMISS

DISMISS -- AND THE REASON YOU

WOULD DO THAT IS BECAUSE IT IS

NOT WORTH JUDICIAL LABOR FOR

SOMEBODY DESPITE THE FOOTBALL

WHEN THE OTHER SIDE HAS NOT MADE

THEIR CASE.

AS WE SAID BEFORE YOU NOW,

DEMOCRATS FAILED TO PRODUCE

DIRECT EVIDENCE AND FAILED TO

GET THE PUBLIC ON THEIR SIDE,

THERE WAS NO QUID PRO QUO IN THE

ONLY DIRECT EVIDENCE WAS THE

PRESIDENT SAYING HE DID NOT WANT

ANYTHING OTHER THAN PRESIDENT

ZELENSKY TO DO THE RIGHT THING

AND THE WORK HE CAMPAIGNED ON.

IF I WERE ON THE SENATE I LOOK

TO GET THIS BEHIND US AND GET ON

TO THE WORK OF THE TRUMP AGENDA.

>> THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO SAY THE

REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN TREATED

LIKE GARBAGE BY THE HOUSE AND

THEY THROWN AWAY ALL THE RULES

NOT JUST IN CONGRESS BUT A DUE

PROCESS AND THEY DENIED THE

PRESIDENT EVERYTHING THAT EVER

OTHER PRESIDENT HAS BEEN GIVEN,

IT'S TOTALLY PARTISAN AND

PREDICTS, IS A BLUEPRINT FOR ANY

MAJOR PARTY THROWING OUT A

PRESIDENT OF THE OPPOSITE PARTY.

SO MAYBE IT'S TIME TO TAKE AWAY

THE VEIL AND TO IDENTIFY THE

WHISTLEBLOWER TO GET JOE BIDEN,

HUNTER BIDEN.

I AM ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT.

ADAM SCHIFF WANT TO KNOW WHO YOU

TOLD ABOUT IT, I WANT TO KNOW

WHAT YOUR RELATIONSHIP IS WITH

THE WHISTLEBLOWER AND ON AND ON.

I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE

ENTITLED TO THAT WE DON'T HAVE

TO VOTE FOR MONTHS.

DON'T YOU THINK HONESTY AND

TRANSFERENCE IS IMPORTANT.

>> THOSE ARE ALL REASONABLE

QUESTIONS, THEY WERE REASONABLE

WHEN THE PRESIDENT ASKED THEM

ABOUT THE BIDENS AND BURISMA AND

THE CORRUPT ACTIVITY THEY WERE

ENGAGED IN GLOBALLY.

WE CAN CONDUCT OVERSIGHT IN THE

ABSENCE OF IMPEACHMENT.

HERE'S WHAT I WOULD DO STEP ONE,

IMPEACHMENT IS DEAD, OFF THE

TABLE, OVER THAT THE PRESIDENT

AND HIS MINISTRATION CONTINUE

THE GREAT WORK FOR THE COUNTRY.

STEP TWO OVERSIGHT HEARINGS, AND

THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND

FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE.

LET'S FIND OUT WHICH WE MAY HAVE

HAD A U.S. MINISTRATION IN THE

OBAMA BIDEN ADMINISTRATION

CHEATING AND PARTICIPATING IN A

SHAKEDOWN SCHEME WHERE WE WERE

SELLING ACCESS BASED ON WHERE A

MEMBER OF THE SECOND FAMILY HAD

UNEXPLAINED EMPLOYMENT

AGREEMENT.

IF WE WERE ABLE TO DO THAT WE

WOULD FREE UP THE PRESIDENT TO

DO THE GREAT WORK OF THE COUNTRY

AND WE CAN GET THE ANSWERS THAT

YOU RAISED.

>> AS YOU RECALL BACK A FEW

WEEKS AGO THEY DECIDED IN

JUDICIARY NOT TO TAKE THE VOTE

AT NIGHT BECAUSE THEY WANTED THE

VOTE TO BE IN THE MORNING SO ALL

AMERICA COULD SEE IT.

ISN'T THAT A GOOD ARGUMENT TO

GET INTO THE SENATE, WITH ALL

DUE RESPECT THE SENATE DEALING

WITH IMPEACHMENT WILL GET A

LITTLE MORE ATTENTION THAN

OVERSIGHT.

>> I THINK IF LINDSEY GRAHAM

BRINGS HUNTER BIDEN BEFORE HE

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IT WILL NOT

MATTER WHETHER IT'S IMPEACHMENT

OR OVERSIGHT.

I THINK WILL BE TUNING IN BUT

WHERE I'M FROM THEY CALL THAT

ALL HAT AND NO CATTLE AND THAT'S

WHAT WE SAW FROM HOUSE

DEMOCRATS.

EVERYTHING FROM THEATRICAL

PERFORMANCE OF ADAM SCHIFF FROM

A

THEWHOLE DEAL WAS DRIVEN FOR

TELEVISION BECAUSE THEY HAD NO

ACTUAL EVIDENCE.

>> IT IS SAD AND HONESTLY I

THINK A LOT OF AMERICANS WANT TO

GET BACK TO THE BUSINESS OF

DOING AMERICANS BUSINESS AND I

DO TOO.

BUT THERE'S A PART OF ME THAT

SAID YOU TRIED TO TAKE THIS MAN