CLAIM THAT CLAPPER DENIES.

JOINING ME NOW WITH REACTION TO

THESE BIG DEVELOPMENTS IS THE

ATTORNEY FOR MICHAEL FLYNN,

SIDNEY POWELL.

SIDNEY, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

I WANT TO GO BACK TO THAT POINT

WHICH IS MADE HERE.

IN YOUR FILING, TO SAY THAT

SOMEBODY IS TAKING A "KILL SHOT"

IS DRAMATIC.

IN THE FILING IT SAYS THE

DEFENSE HAS REQUESTED THE PHONE

RECORDS OF JAMES CLAPPER TO

CONFIRM HIS CONTACT WITH

"WASHINGTON POST" REPORTER

IGNATIUS, ESPECIALLY ON

JANUARY 10TH 2017 WHEN CLAPPER

TOLD IGNATIUS, INWARDS TO THE

EFFECT OF "TAKE THE KILL SHOT ON

FLYNN."

DID HE ACTUALLY SAY TAKE THE

KILL SHOT ON FLYNN?

WHAT DO YOU SAY "WORDS TO THE

EFFECT OF?"

>> OBVIOUSLY I WASN'T A PARTY TO

THE CONVERSATION, SO I AM TRYING

TO GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE

DOUBT THERE.

BUT YES, WE REQUESTED HIS PHONE

RECORDS TO COOPERATE THE TIMING

AND EVERYTHING ABOUT THAT CALL

THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY COOPERATE.

IT'S VERY CONCERNING, OF COURSE

THERE WAS A LEAK OF THE

TRANSCRIPT OF THE CALL WITH

KISLYAK THE SAME TIME.

AND TWO DAYS AFTER THAT, THE

IGNACIO STORY BREAKS LESS THAN

TWO DAYS ACTUALLY.

>> Jason: WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE

THAT CONVERSATION AND THOSE

WORDS ARE THE EFFECT OF THOSE

WORDS ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE?

>> I CANNOT REVEAL THE SOURCE

RIGHT NOW BUT I DO HAVE A VERY

GOOD SOURCE FOR THAT INFORMATIO

INFORMATION.

>> Jason: YOU'D BELIEVE THE

DEFERMENT OF JUSTICE IS

WITHHOLDING THAT INFORMATION

FROM YOU?

>> I BELIEVE THE DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE IS WITHHOLDING A LOT OF

INFORMATION AS IT IS WITH

MR. CLAPPER, MR. BRENNAN AND ON

THE PEOPLE WHO PURCHASE PAID IN

THE COMPLETE SET UP OF

GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN.

WE HAVE FOUND ADDITIONAL TEXT

MESSAGES THAT THE GOVERNMENT

SUPPRESSED INCLUDING WHERE AGENT

STROZK, THE PRECASE FOR

GENERAL FLYNN, THEY KNEW THERE

WAS NO LOGAN ACT VIOLATION.

THEY EXONERATED HIM COMPLETELY

OF BEING AN AGENT OF RUSSIA BY

THE END OF JANUARY AND YET

MR. COMEY STILL RUNS TO THE

WHITE HOUSE ON FEBRUARY 14TH AND

CONJURES UP THE ENTIRE

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE NARRATIVE

AGAINST THE PRESIDENT WHEN FLYNN

HAS BEEN CLEARED LONG BEFORE

THAT.

ALSO INFORMATION THAT THESE

AGENTS DID MANIPULATE THE 302.

IT WAS LONG AND OVER WITH THE

LIBERTY OF" DATE WHICH IS HIGHLY

UNUSUAL IN AND OF ITSELF.

A COMPARISON OF THE

FEBRUARY 10TH AND FEBRUARY 11TH

302 PLURALIST WHICH SHOWS THE

ADDITION OF SUBSTANTIAL CLAIMS

THAT WERE NOT IN THERE BEFORE

AND NOT SUPPORTED BY THE NOTES

WHICH WE ALSO ATTACHED.

SO PEOPLE CAN GO TO THE ACTUAL

DOCUMENT AND READ IT AND SEE IT

FOR THEMSELVES.

IT'S EXTREMELY CONCERNING.

IT'S OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT

MISCONDUCT.

THE AGENTS DELIBERATELY

CALCULATED AND MET TO PLAN AND

STRATEGIZE HOW TO AMBUSH AND

REBUKE GENERAL FLYNN WITHOUT

LETTING HIM KNOW HE WAS

OFFICIALLY UNDER ANY KIND OF

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, TO KEEP

THEM RELAXED, AND THEY WANTED TO

BE SEEN AS ALLIES WHEN IN FACT

THEY KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HE HAD

SAID IN THE CONVERSATIONS AND

THE INTENDED TO CREATE A

SITUATION IN WHICH ANYTHING HE

SAID COULD BE USED AGAINST HIM

LATER AS A FALSE STATEMENT

WITHOUT ANY WARNINGS TO THAT

EFFECT WHATSOEVER.

>> Jason: REALLY QUICKLY, I'VE

GOT TO GO HERE.

YOU BELIEVE LISA PAGE IS THE ONE

WHO EDITED THE SO-CALLED 302

WHICH IS THE SUMMARY OF THE

INTERVIEW WITH GENERAL FLYNN,

CORRECT?

>> SHE ADMITTED MAKING SOME

EDITS OF IT.

I DO NOT KNOW AND WE DO NOT KNOW

YET UNTIL WE GET THE MATED DATA

FROM THE FBI WHO MADE THE MAJOR

EDITS TO IT.