字幕列表 影片播放 列印英文字幕 ♪ BRIAN: LONG ANTICIPATED, HE IS FINALLY HERE, CONGRESSMAN JIM JORDAN, MEMBER OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, RANKING MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND MAYBE YOU CAN HELP ME, CONGRESSMAN, THINGS ARE CHANGING SO QUICKLY WITH THE CLOSED DOOR SESSIONS WITH THE IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. WHERE YOU GUYS CAN'T ASK ANY QUESTIONS AND THE PRESIDENT CAN'T GET REPRESENTED. AND WE DON'T GET TRANSCRIPTS. AFTER THURSDAY'S VOTE, WHAT CHANGES? >> WELL, I DON'T THINK ANYTHING. AND TO YOUR LIST, BRIAN, IT'S ALSO ALL DONE IN SECRET IN A BUNKER IN THE BASEMENT OF THE CAPITAL. SO I DON'T THINK ANYTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE. AND FRANKLY, EVEN IF THEY TRIED TO CHANGE SOMETHING TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT OF DUE PROCESS, WE ARE ALL STILL GOING TO VOTE AGAINST THIS BECAUSE THIS IS SUCH A SHAM AND BEEN SUCH A SHAM FROM THE BEGINNING. SO, YEAH, I DON'T THINK -- AND YOU CAN'T UNDO WHAT THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE. WE HAVE HAD THESE 8 DEPOSITIONS NOW. THEY HAVE BEEN LEAKING SELECTIVE PARTS OF IT. HAVEN'T BEEN FOLLOWING ANY TYPE OF BASIC DUE PROCESS. SO, YOU CAN'T UNDO WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. I THINK THIS IS JUST ONE MORE KIND OF MAKE IT UP AS YOU GO ALONG EXAMPLE. AND IT'S ALL BEEN DONE IN SECRET WITH THESE SECRET LEAKS. SO IT'S A CONTINUATION OF THE -- THEY ARE GOING TO DRESS IT UP A LITTLE BIT. AINSLEY: GO ON THE RECORD. SHE IS CALLING IT A FORMALIZED IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY. IT ESTABLISHES PROCEDURE AND AFFIRMS INVESTIGATIONS. >> YEAH. I THINK THE REASON SHE IS GOING TO HAVE THIS VOTE BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDERSTAND IT IS SHAM. THEY UNDERSTAND IT ISN'T FAIR. THE IDEA THAT THE PRESIDENT DOESN'T GET COUNSEL IN THE ROOM. THE PEOPLE FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT DON'T GET AGENCY COUNSEL. WE CAN'T SEE THE TRANSCRIPT UNLESS WE MAKE A SPECIAL APPOINTMENT AND SOME DEMOCRATS IN THE ROOM AS YOU ARE REVIEWING THE TRANSCRIPT. AND THEY GET TO SELECTIVELY LEAK THINGS BECAUSE WE FOLLOW THE RULES AND THEY DON'T. THIS IS ALL A RIDICULOUS UNFAIR AND PARTISAN PROCESS. AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SEE THROUGH IT. SO I THINK THE SPEAKER IS GOING TO TRY TO DRESS IT UP A LITTLE BIT. PUT A LITTLE LIPSTICK ON THE PIG AS THEY SAY AND INTEREST THIS VOTE ON THURSDAY. IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING. I THINK YOU WILL SEE EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN VOTE AGAINST IT. STEVE: THIS IS VINDICATION. THEY SAYING LEGITIMATE WE NEED TO HAVE THE VOTE ON IT. WITH THE VOTE, THAT'S GOING TO PUT SOME OF YOUR COLLEAGUES ACROSS THE AISLE IN THE HOT SEAT BECAUSE THEY, ESSENTIALLY, WILL HAVE TO GO ON THE RECORD WITH THIS PROXY VOTE ABOUT TRUMP AND IMPEACHMENT AND NEXT NOVEMBER THAT MIGHT NOT BE GOOD FOR THEM. >> YEAH. THINK ABOUT NEXT NOVEMBER. THESE 31 DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESSIONAL SEATS THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WON IN 2016. IF THEY VOTE FOR THIS NEXT FALL, LESS THAN 13 MONTHS FROM NOW, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO WALK IN THE VOTING BOOTH, VOTE FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THEN THE NEXT DECISION THEY HAVE TO MAKE IS WHO DO I WANT TO SUPPORT FOR CONGRESS? AND THEY WILL BE THINKING I DO REALLY WANT TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON WHO JUST VOTED TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 13 MONTHS BEFORE AN ELECTION BASED ON SOME ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER WITH NO FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE WHO HAD A BIAS AGAINST THE PRESIDENT AND WORKED WITH JOE BIDEN? I THINK THEY ARE GOING TO THINK LONG AND HARD ABOUT THAT. WE WILL SEE. THEY ARE SO FAR DOWN THIS ROAD. I ASSUME THE DEMOCRATS ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR THIS AND CONTINUE THIS, AGAIN, THIS UNFAIR AND PARTISAN PROCESS. BRIAN: THE "WALL STREET JOURNAL" SAYS THIS VOTE SHOWS THAT THE CRITICS OF THE PROCESS ARE VINDICATED. BECAUSE NOW IT LOOKS LIKE THE PRESIDENT COULD BE GETTING DUE PROCESS BUT YOU ARE NOT OPTIMISTIC. SO WHAT'S GOING TO BE HAPPENING TODAY? LIEUTENANT COLONEL ALEXANDER VINMAN IS GOING TO BE COMING FORWARD. HE'S A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL. AND HE WAS DIRECTOR FOR EUROPEAN AFFAIRS. AND HE IS UPSET BY TWO SEPARATE INCIDENTS WHICH HE COMPLAINED ABOUT, ONE IN EARLY JULY AND THE CALL ON JULY 25TH. FROM HIS PREPARED STATEMENTS, WHAT SHOULD WE KNOW FROM IT? >> WELL, AGAIN, REMEMBER, WE HAVE NOW HEARD FROM EIGHT WITNESSES. LIEUTENANT COLONEL VINMAN WILL COME IN TODAY. NONE OF THEM HAVE CHANGED THE FUNDAMENTAL FACTS. THE FUNDAMENTAL FACTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE WE HAVE SEEN THE CALL TRANSCRIPT. NO CONDITIONS PLACED IN THE CALL BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP AND PRESIDENT ZELENSKY. NO QUID PRO QUO. THE TWO PEOPLE ON THE CALL NAMELY PRESIDENT TRUMP AND PRESIDENT ZELENSKY HAVE SAID NO PRESSURE NO, PUSHING WHATSOEVER. THE UKRAINIANS DIDN'T EVEN KNOW AID WAS WITHHELD AT THE TIME OF THE CALL. THE UKRAINIANS DID NOTHING TO GET THE AID TURNED BACK ON. NAMELY, THEY DIDN'T -- PRESIDENT ZELENSKY DIDN'T DO A STATEMENT SAYING HE WAS GOING TO DO CERTAIN THINGS. THEY DIDN'T START INVESTIGATIONS TO GET THE AID TURNED BACK ON. THE AID WAS TURNED BACK ON BECAUSE THE UNITED STATES SENATORSY TELLING THE PRESIDENT LET'S TURN THE AID BACK ON AND DO. THIS NOTHINGS THAT CHANGED THE FUNDAMENTAL FACTS. THE ONE THING THAT IS CLEAR IS THIS IS BASED ON SOME ANONYMOUS WHISTLEBLOWER. AND THERE ARE 435 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND ONLY ONE MEMBER KNOWS WHO THAT WHISTLEBLOWER IS. AND JUST AS IMPORTANTLY, WHO THE PEOPLE ARE WHO FORMED THE BASIS OF THAT WHISTLEBLOWER'S COMPLAINT. THESE HANDFUL OF PEOPLE THAT THE WHISTLEBLOWER IDENTIFIED IN HIS COMPLAINT. THAT INDIVIDUAL IS ADAM SCHIFF. HOW IS THAT FAIR? THAT ONLY ADAM SCHIFF KNOW HOW THIS WHOLE THING STARTED. AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DON'T KNOW THAT. THIS IS SOMETHING WE NEED TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF AND KNOW HOW THIS WHOLE THING STARTED AND WHY ADAM SCHIFF IS THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS THAT INFORMATION. STEVE: THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE PRESIDENT SAYS ADAM SCHIFF SHOULD BE IMPEACHED. AINSLEY: HIS TWEET LAST NIGHT. STEVE: JIM JORDAN JOINING
B1 中級 眾議員吉姆-喬丹:眾議院的彈劾投票不會改變任何事情。 (Rep. Jim Jordan: House impeachment vote won't change anything) 3 0 林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 01 月 14 日 更多分享 分享 收藏 回報 影片單字