I am Luke and you're watching “Science of Victory”

我是 Luke，您現在收看的是「勝利方程式」

You asked tons of questions after our heavy tanks episode and I can't leave them unanswered.

在我們上集關於重型戰車的節目播出之後，大家問了很多問題，對於這些問題，我不能置之不理

Many of you wrote that you manage win team battles using tanks we didn't recommend.

許多人都寫到：他們利用不是我們推薦的那些戰車成功在團隊作戰中取勝

Well, I touched on it in that episode but I'll stress it again; any tier 8 can be used for Team Battles if you're good enough.

我在那集節目中提到過，但是今天我再次強調：如果你能力夠強，任何 8 階戰車都能用來參加團隊作戰

However, in a battle of equal skill, those tanks are usually superior for one reason or another.

不過，如果戰鬥雙方技能相當，那麼出於種種原因，那些戰車通常表現更好

Nevertheless, today we will talk about the tier 8 tanks we didn't cover in the previous episode as you requested it.

儘管如此，今天我們將按照大家的要求，討論一下上集節目中沒有提到的戰車

Sl1de from Na`Vi will be our consultant as usual.

與往常一樣，我們請來了來自 Na`Vi 戰隊的 Sl1de 做顧問

The most comments were regarding the Soviet premium tank IS-6.

評論最多的是關於蘇聯金幣戰車 IS-6

Many players claim that this tank is as good as the IS-3.

許多玩家稱這輛戰車與 IS-3 一樣優秀

Is that so? – Let's see.

是這樣嗎？我們來看看

The mobility of the IS-6 is a little bit worse.

IS-6 的靈活性稍差一些

The hull armor is almost the same, but the IS-6's turret is pretty weak; though shells tend to bounce from it.

兩者車體裝甲幾乎相同，但 IS-6 的炮塔相當脆弱，雖然炮彈也會從上面彈開

Let's also compare the guns: the one-shot damage is the same for IS-6 and IS-3,

我們再來比較一下主砲：IS-6 與 IS-3 單次射擊所造成的傷害相同

the damage per minute is better for the IS-6 thanks to the higher damage per minute, and the aim time is the same - 3.4 seconds.

但 IS-6 的射速較高，所以它每分鐘造成的傷害更大，雙方的瞄準時間同為 3.4 秒

So far so good, but if you take a look at the other IS-6 parameters there is no reason for joy.

到目前為止還算不錯，但是如果大家看一看 IS-6 的其他參數，就沒什麼好高興的了

The tank's accuracy is low and the armor penetration of AP shells is 175 mm, the penetration of the APCR's are 217 mm.

它的準確度較低，AP 炮彈的裝甲穿透力為 175 mm，而 APCR 的裝甲穿透力則為 217 mm

These numbers are lower than those of ALL other tier 8 tanks.

這些數字比所有其它 8 階戰車的相應參數都低

In fact the IS-6's gun is like the tier 7 IS's just but with a higher damage per minute.

事實上， IS-6 的主砲就相當於 7 階 IS 戰車的主砲，只是射速稍高一些

Enough with the numbers.

數字比較到此為止

Let's see some real examples.

我們來看一些實例

First of all the IS-6 can't tank normally, because of the low turret armor.

首先，由於 IS-6 炮塔裝甲較低，所以它不能站在太前線

Well, if you're up against experienced players, anyway.

呃…如果你面對的是經驗豐富的玩家，那就不重要了

This can be well seen when face-hugging.

正面衝突時就會很好地了解到

The IS-3 has no trouble penetrating the IS-6's mantlet but the premium tank has a hard time breaching the IS-3's armor.

IS-3 要穿透 IS-6 的防彈盾根本不費吹灰之力，但金幣戰車要撕裂 IS-3 的裝甲則很困難

The only option left is to shoot the top of the turret.

剩下的唯一選擇就是射擊砲塔頂部

When in a long distance firefight the situation is even worse because of the low accuracy.

由於其精準度較差，遠距離交火時情況更糟

You can see that it's not easy to hit the enemy's weak spots.

大家可以看到，要射擊敵人的弱點並不容易

Some tankers say that they can sidescrape better than any IS-3…

一些車長宣稱IS-6 採用「逆擺角」戰術可以比任何 IS-3 戰車做的都更好…

That is because many opponents just don't know how to penetrate this tank's armor.

這是因為許多對手根本不知道如何穿透這輛戰車的裝甲

You see a sidescraping IS-6?

你實際看過 IS-6 採用「逆擺角」戰術嗎？

Shoot at the front angled corner plate.

朝著前面傾斜的角板射擊

The shell will reach it at a good angle and will have an easy time penetrating.

砲彈會以很好的角度擊中角板，並且很容易穿透

If the opponent is looking straight at you – aim for the lower glacius or the driver's hatch.

如果對手直直的盯著你，瞄準首下或駕駛員艙

I'm not saying that the IS-6 is bad and can't be used in team battles.

我不是說 IS-6 太差不適合團隊作戰

No! It's just clearly worse that the IS-3 in most situations and when two equal teams meet, this will matter.

絕對不是！只是很明顯在大多數情況下它比 IS-3 要差一些，當兩個戰隊旗鼓相當時，這點很重要

Also note that a player who has Team Battle experience and knows the where to penetrate any armor won't be a burden to any team.

另外還要注意：對於任何戰隊來說，有過團隊作戰經驗並且了解從哪裡可以穿透任何裝甲的玩家作用很大

Besides, they'll be able to get more credits.

此外，他們還能獲得更多的積分

So it's for you to decide.

因此，這是由你來決定的

Now we shall move on.

我們繼續來看

Another heavy we didn't mention last time was the British Caernarvon.

另一輛我們上次沒有提到的重型戰車是英國的 Caernarvon

This vehicle is pretty interesting – mobile, a great view range and good elevation angles.

這輛戰車很有意思 ─ 很靈活、視野範圍佳並且仰角很好

The damage per minute is close to its competitors and the aiming time plus accuracy are THE BEST among the tier.

它每分鐘製造的傷害很接近其競爭對手，而且瞄準時間和精準度是同級戰車中最好的

This tank is really good… for random battles!

這輛戰車真的很棒…很適合隨機戰鬥！

Note that it's not as all-purpose as the IS-3 and is also less suited for team battles.

注意：它不像 IS-3 那樣全能，而且也沒有 IS-3 那麼適合團隊作戰

This is because of the two main faults of the Caernarvon – its low armor and a very low damage per shot.

這是因為 Caernarvon 有兩大缺陷 ─ 裝甲和每次射擊所造成傷害較小

The tank's turret can be easily penetrated from the sides and above the mantlet.

可以從防彈盾側面和上方將這輛戰車的砲塔輕鬆射穿

Plus, experienced players often shoot at the joining of the turret and the hull for easy penetration.

而且，經驗豐富的玩家通常會射擊砲塔與車體的連接處

The lower glacius is also vulnerable and the side and rear armor of the Caernarvon outmatch only the paper-thin AMX 50 100.

這裡比較容易穿透，首下也很脆弱，Caernarvon 側面和後面的裝甲只比 AMX 50 100 紙一樣薄的裝甲厚一些

You won't be able to sidescrape with it.

用它是沒有辦法採取「逆擺角」戰術的

Not much to say about the damage.

關於傷害值則沒什麼需要說的

The maximum is 283 and the average is 230.

最大為 283，平均為 230

This is just too low for Team Battles

對於團隊作戰來說，這實在太低了

Another tank we were asked to talk about is the FCM 50t.

應大家要求，我們要討論的另外一輛戰車是 FCM 50t

This is the most mobile heavy of tier 8.

這是 8階戰車當中最為靈活的重坦

Even the AMX 50 100 isn't as mobile.

即使是 AMX 50 100，靈活性也不敵它

Plus the tank has good accuracy, fast aim and nice elevation angles.

再加上這輛戰車精準度好、瞄準快且仰角也好

To top it all off; the damage per minute is one of the best of the tier!

最棒的是：它每分鐘造成的傷害是同級戰車中最好的

That said; the FCM 50t is too vulnerable for team battles.

雖然如此，但 FCM 50t 太過脆弱，還是不適合團隊作戰

Almost any shot will penetrate.

幾乎任何砲彈都能把它穿透

This along with a low damage per shot make the tank poorly suited for Team Battles.

再加上其每次射擊所造成傷害較低，使得它非常不適於團隊作戰

Now we go back to the Soviet super-heavies: the KV-4 and KV-5.

現在，我們再回到蘇聯超級重坦 KV-4 和 KV-5

There were numerous comments about how the armor compensates for its other faults.

許多評論裡面都說它的裝甲能夠彌補其它一切的缺陷

Actually it can't hide these tanks' biggest weakness – its mobility.

實際上，這還是無法掩蓋這輛戰車的最大弱點 ─ 靈活性差

Well… let me give you two simple examples.

呃…我來給大家舉兩個簡單的例子

Cliff. The opponents have a KV-4.

地圖 Cliff，對手有一輛 KV-4

We send our heavies on a standard route.

我們派幾輛重型戰車沿標準路線前進

And the 1390 boldly goes to the enemy's ledge.

1390 大膽地挺進敵方岩架

Our light is in position whilst the KV-4 is still climbing up.

我們的輕型戰車已經就位，同時 KV-4 還在往上爬

Our scout easily unloads his magazine.

偵察員悠閒的開火輸出

This is about 1000 damage at the very beginning.

在戰鬥一開始就造成大約 1000 點傷害

So from here, just keep it up and you're going to win.

所以從此時起，只需再接再厲就能獲勝了

Second example.

第二個例子

The enemy has a KV-5. Two of them, no less!

敵方有一輛 KV-5，兩輛，真不少！

No matter.

沒關係

The ninety scouts.

偵查車告知我們敵方戰車的位置

Now we know where the enemy tanks are and so we decide NOT TO shoot the KV at first.

因此我們決定先不向那輛 KV 射擊

We only shoot at the other targets, because the chance of penetration is much higher.

而只射擊其它的目標，因為這樣穿透裝甲的機率較高

We rush in and focus down three tanks then hide behind the hill to reload.

我們衝過去，火力對準三輛戰車，然後躲在山後面重新裝彈

Now we just finish them off.

現在我們就等把他們了結了

As you can see even the best armor won't save your enemy from defeat if you act with skill and cunning.

大家可以看到，如果你技能嫻熟、戰術狡詐，即使是最好的裝甲也不能保護敵人不戰敗

The enemy will have even more difficulties on city maps, but that's only two maps out of eight.

如果是城市地圖，敵人面臨的困難就更多了，但八幅地圖當中只有兩幅城市地圖而已

Well, enough of the KVs for today.

好了，關於 KV 今天就說這麼多

Now we talk about the Chinese heavies.

現在我們談談中國重型戰車

Many say that they're better than the IS-3.

許多人認為它們比 IS-3 更好

Let's review the details again.

我們再來詳細看一下

The 112 has good turret armor and a high max speed, but the acceleration is not so impressive.

112 砲塔裝甲很棒，最高速度也很高

The main fault is the cannon, though.

但加速度就有些差強人意了，不過

The one shot damage, accuracy, aim time and armor penetration with APs is similar to the IS-6.

它的主要缺點在於主砲，而單次射擊造成的傷害、精準度、瞄準時間和 AP 炮彈的裝甲穿透力與 IS-6 類似

The premium shells seem to have better penetration, but the damage per minute is lower than that of the Soviet tank.

加值砲彈穿透力似乎要好一些，但是射速要比蘇聯戰車的低，事實上

In fact, the 112 has HEAT shells.

112 使用 HEAT 炮彈

As we mentioned last time, they have trouble dealing damage through tracks and they aren't normalized.

正如我們上次提到的，它們比較難對履帶造成傷害，而且這些炮彈也不夠標準化

In addition; it has fuel tanks located in the front, so the tank is often set on fire by a frontal armor penetration.

此外，它的油箱位於前面，所以通常一經穿透正面裝甲就能使這些戰車著火

Now, the 110 is a pretty balanced vehicle.

不過，110 算是相當均衡的戰車

It is pretty similar to IS-3 in many aspects, but has worse acceleration.

它在很多方面都與 IS-3 很類似，但加速度稍差

The 110 is a pretty rare tank and most tankers don't know how to penetrate its armor.

110 非常罕見，大多數戰車手都不知道如何穿透它的裝甲

This is a clear advantage.

這是一個很明顯的優勢

At least until you have watched “Science of Victory”.

至少在你看過「勝利方程式」之前算是優勢

The 110 can be easily penetrated through the lower glacius and the commander's hatch.

110 的首下和指揮官艙可以很容易地被穿透

If the enemy is sidescraping then shoot at the hull's side plate.

如果敵人採取「逆擺角」戰術，就射擊車體側板

You have no guarantee of penetrating the driver's hatch though, so don't chance it.

但是能否射穿駕駛員艙則不能保證，所以還是不要冒險

Another thing that separates the 110 from the IS-3 is the cannon.

還有一個區分 110 和 IS-3 的一點就是主砲，實際上

The 110's is actually a bit more accurate and aims faster, but the damage per shot is lower.

110 更為精準且瞄準速度更快，但是單次射擊所造成的傷害較低

However; the damage per minute is 200 points higher thanks to the higher damage per minute.

不過，由於其射速較高，它每分鐘造成的傷害也高出了 200 點

Overall the tank is pretty good!

總體來說，這輛戰車還是相當不錯的！

If you don't own an IS-3 then you can easily take part in team battles driving a 110.

如果你沒有 IS-3，那麼駕駛一輛 110 也能很輕鬆地參與團隊作戰

Let's sum things up; we still think that the American T32, the IS-3 and the AMX 50 100 are the best choices for team battles,

我們來總結一下：我們仍然認為美國 T32、 IS-3 和 AMX 50 100 是團隊作戰的最佳選擇

but now you know more on why.

但現在大家應該更瞭解其中的原因了

I guess this is all we have for today.

我想今天就這些了

In the next episode we will talk about Tank Destroyers and even mention SPGs.

在接下來的節目當中，我們將討論驅逐戰車，甚至還會提到自行砲

Keep leaving your suggestions and feedback below and remember to like and subscribe to our new channel for more!

繼續在下方留下你們的建議與反饋，記得點讚並訂閱我們新的通道以獲取更多資訊！

See you!

再見！