Name: 你需要知道的關於英語和其他語言的一切!- 精神線散漫 (Everything You Need to Know About English and Other Languages! - Mental Floss Scatterbrained)
Uploaded: 2021-01-14T07:28:43.000Z
Duration: 11 min 49 s
Description: 【看影片學英語】數萬部 YouTube 影片，搭配英漢字典即點即查，輕鬆掌握單字發音與用法，長久累積看電影不必再看字幕。

Hi welcome to mental floss video today we're gonna talk about language

everything from Bhutanese to Navi and I'm not kidding about that let's get started.

A polyglot is someone who has mastered multiple languages and one

famous polyglot is Ziad Fazah who allegedly knows over 50 languages he was

born in 1954 in Monrovia, Liberia. According to one source he learned

almost all of those languages while he was a teenager picking up three to four

every three months. He has since written books about language in, get this,

various languages because if ya got it, flaunt it. During the 1990s Fazah's name

appeared in the Guinness Book of World Records for the number of languages he

knew. That is no longer the case. Back then he apparently knew somewhere

between 54 and 56 the number lately some sources claim is up to 59.

Just to give you a sense of what that means according to The Economist an

english-speaking adult knows the meaning of about thirty thousand words but to be

fluent in a foreign language someone might know one-tenth of that. That would

give Ziad a vocabulary of like one hundred and seventy seven thousand total

words. That's a lot. If you're getting skeptical your instincts are totally

correct. Many people started to find holes in Fazah's supposed knowledge

over the years. Like the bloggers ardent agnostic noticed that on the back of one

of phases books he listed Dzongkha and Bhutanese as languages he knows but

those are synonyms so his counting one has to there.

But he really got busted on the Chilean show viva el lunes in 1997. People asked him

questions in multiple languages he was supposed to know including Finnish,

Chinese, and Greek. He answered some incorrectly others got answers in the

wrong language. He contends that the TV show tricked him and edited his answers

but no matter what it was a disaster. You might be wondering how many languages

can one person actually speak. Well, it's complicated. There's not really a good

test for this kind of thing except for putting a person on a Chilean talk show.

And there are many historical legends of polyglots that now seem unrealistic. One

of the more modern examples though is Dr. Kenneth Hale who passed away in 2001.

According to his New York Times obituary he'd mastered over 50 languages. What am

Certain grammar and vocabulary rules can just feel impossible to remember so

we're gonna do a quick refresher for you. But it's important to note here that

language is constantly changing especially informal language so a lot

of these are formal rules that sometimes fade away. But we're gonna talk about

that too. All right let's start with who and whom. You should use who when you're

talking about the subject of a sentence like in the question "who did this?" who is

clearly the subject. And whom is the object of a verb or a preposition so

you'd say "for whom do I vote?" or" whom do I vote for?" if you want to end a sentence

with a preposition which by the way I think is fine. Also with quantifiers like

"all of" or "many of" those should come before whom not who. If you want to check

to make sure you're doing this right you should be able to substitute who with he

and whom with him or her. But this is a perfect example of a pretty formal rule

that doesn't always apply like we don't often say "whom" out loud you're more

likely to hear "who" or even "that" but for formal writing you may want to know the

difference if only because it's nice to know the rules when breaking them.

Moving on, lay or lie. Oh I mean, I still can't do lay or lie.  Okay, they're both present tense.

You use lay when a *subject* is putting down an object like I the subject lay

down my Suicide Squad blu-ray *object* it just isn't as good on DVD you miss some

of the details of Harley Quinn's makeup. Lie is when the subject is the thing in the

horizontal position like "I just watched Suicide Squad and now I need to lie down

to try to process all of the metaphorical resonances." The past tense

of lay is laid. The past tense of lie unhelpfully is lay. Then there are the

past participles which are respectively laid and lain. Really, it's just cruel.

Okay let's move on to "whether" vs "if". This is another one that doesn't apply

often in casual language but formally you want to use if when you have a

conditional sentence. So that would be something like "Watch Suicide Squad if

you want to see the best movie of 2014." What's that? it came out in 2016?

Years are so long now! You should use whether when you're trying to state that

there are two options like "Kylie didn't know whether Kendall or Kourtney would

call but she knew one of them would call because they always do." There are two

clear possibilities there. Compare that to "Kylie didn't know if Kendall or

Kourtney would call" that sentence leaves three options open.

Kendall will call. Kourtney will call. Or neither will call which seems very

unlikely. Whether is also often used after prepositions, before infinitive

verbs, and to start clauses. The definition of irony has been annoying everyone for

years so let's talk about it. There are a few different types of irony but the one

that probably gives us the most trouble is situational irony. That's when

someone's intended result gets a reversal like a famous example of this

is at the end of The Wizard of Oz after a long journey they all learned that

they had what they were seeking all along like Dorothy was already able to

get home. That is the formal meaning so there are a lot of people who say that

irony is not a coincidence or a paradox and that that Alanis Morissette song is

full of things that aren't ironic which is the only irony in it. But according to

Merriam-Webster people have been using the term imprecisely for almost 100

years at least. So using it to mean coincidence isn't necessarily wrong it's

just a more modern usage. "That" and "which" is a very controversial one but the AP

style guide says to use that for clauses that are essential to the meaning of a

sentence and which if the clause is adding more information but isn't

essential. Here's how I do it. If I think to myself I would like there to be a

comma there I use which and otherwise I use that. An example "Kristen Stewart

received an MTV Movie Award comma which she dropped." The which clause is adding

information but it isn't changing the meaning. Whereas "All of the MTV Movie

Awards that have been dropped are dented" wouldn't be true without the "that have

been dropped" part. But that rule isn't super strict either like I would argue

that you can also say "Kristen Stewart received an MTV Movie Award that she

dropped" if you don't feel like using a comma. I will however defer on this issue

to merriam-webster which claims that for non-restrictive clauses you should

definitely use which but for restrictive ones you can make a stylistic choice and

As thatprevious list showed you language is constantly changing including words so what is the route word needs to take in

order to get into the dictionary? After it's coined people start to use the word

in conversation as well as writing. Usage spreads from there.

Lexicographers are the people paying attention to that proliferation. They're

the ones who write and edit dictionaries so a merriam-webster lexicographer will

notice words in popular websites books journals and even comic strips.

And they're not just looking for new words they're also looking for new spellings

and meanings of older words. Oxford English Dictionary's have over 250

specialists who do similar research. Their reading program of recruited

readers has been around since 1857. My, how has language changed since then.

字幕列表影片播放

你需要知道的關於英語和其他語言的一切!- 精神線散漫 (Everything You Need to Know About English and Other Languages! - Mental Floss Scatterbrained)

constantly

specific

phrase

essential