ARE SERVING TIME FOR MANSLAUGHTER.

是服務時間爲過失殺人罪的囚犯

THIS IS AN

這是一個了不起的故事

AMAZING STORY.

這些犯人，和他們假設 該囚犯就不會

APPARENTLY THE HARVARD TEAM FACED OFF WITH

準備充足的爭論。 因為他們低估了這些條款，

THESE INMATES, AND THEY ASSUMED THAT THE INMATES WOULD NOT BE

他們失去了大的時間。一個After 小時快速移動的辯論，

WELL PREPARED FOR THE DEBATE.

法官決定， 犯人韓元。

SINCE THEY UNDERESTIMATED THEM,

“全場響起

THEY LOST BIG-TIME.

出熱烈的掌聲。

AFTER AN HOUR OF THE FAST-MOVING DEBATE,

，收錄了約 七十五歲的PRISONERSí的

THE JUDGES DECIDED THAT THE INMATES WON.

同學AT THE BARD 監獄倡議，它提供

"THE AUDIENCE BURST

嚴格的學院經驗

INTO APPLAUSE.

男子在東方紐約 懲教設施。“

THAT INCLUDED ABOUT SEVENTY-FIVE OF THE PRISONERSí

他們正試圖恢復 這些人使

FELLOW STUDENTS AT THE BARD PRISON INITIATIVE, WHICH OFFERS

當他們過了監獄，他們 不回去了監獄。

A RIGOROUS COLLEGE EXPERIENCE TO

累犯是一個非常嚴重 問題IN THE UNITED

MEN AT EASTERN NEW YORK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY."

國中，多數囚犯結束 回到監獄。

THEY ARE TRYING TO REHABILITATE THESE INDIVIDUALS SO THAT

其結果是，也有一些 那些試圖舉措

WHEN THEY ARE OUT OF PRISON THEY DO NOT GO BACK TO PRISON.

打擊這種。

RECIDIVISM IS A VERY SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE UNITED

“拜占庭有它的第一 辯論在春天2014年，

STATES, MOST PRISONERS END UP GOING BACK TO PRISON.

擊敗美國

AS A RESULT, THERE ARE SOME INITIATIVES THAT ARE TRYING

軍校在 西點，紐約。

TO COMBAT THAT.

用於製備這些辯論HAS 挑戰。

"THE BYZANTINE HAD ITS FIRST DEBATE IN THE SPRING 2014,

囚犯不能使用 互聯網研究。

BEATING THE U.S.

監獄當局必須 APPROVE請求書籍

MILITARY ACADEMY AT WEST POINT, NEW YORK.

和篇，其中 可能需要數週。“

PREPARING FOR THESE DEBATES HAS ITS CHALLENGES.

他們在顯著 缺點，和頂部的

INMATES CANNOT USE THE INTERNET FOR RESEARCH.

他們BEAT學生說 要去哈佛。

THE PRISON ADMINISTRATION MUST APPROVE REQUESTS FOR BOOKS

首先，它是 七十五個囚犯誰

AND ARTICLES, WHICH CAN TAKE WEEKS."

那裡觀看，而不是七十五

THEY WERE AT A SIGNIFICANT DISADVANTAGE, AND ON TOP OF

個百分點。 MUCH更重要的是， 法官承認，嗨，你看，

THAT THEY BEAT STUDENTS THAT ARE GOING TO HARVARD.

我們在這有偏狀況。 每個人都希望以根為

FIRST OFF, IT WAS SEVENTY-FIVE PRISONERS WHO WERE

主隊，每個人都想 CHEER，他們承認這一點。

THERE TO WATCH, NOT SEVENTY-FIVE

所以他們是非常嚴格的 場均的標準，

PERCENT.

在經批准的 辯論主義。

MUCH MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE JUDGES RECOGNIZE, HEY LOOK,

法官們知道你 要根為

WE ARE IN THIS BIASED SITUATION.

處下風，所以就 帶著一點考慮在內。

EVERYBODY WANTS TO ROOT FOR THE

這就是為什麼他們輸給了西部 點在複賽。

HOME TEAM, EVERYBODY WANTS TO CHEER, AND THEY RECOGNIZE THAT.

THEY合法擊敗 哈佛辯論隊。

SO THEY ARE VERY STRICT ABOUT SCORING AT STANDARDS THAT

那就是瘋了。

ARE APPROVED IN THE DEBATE SYSTEM.

更令人驚訝的的事實 ，隨著全日空告訴過你，他們

THE JUDGES ARE AWARE THAT YOU WANT TO ROOT FOR THE

沒有互聯網。 THAT 一些老派的材料。 THAT

UNDERDOGS, AND SO THEY TOOK THAT INTO ACCOUNT.

就是我會做當我是一個 KID。你會去

THAT IS WHY THEY LOST TO WEST POINT IN THE REMATCH.

庫，使用目錄指標 系統上，進入下架，FIND

THEY LEGITIMATELY BEAT THE HARVARD DEBATE TEAM.

這本書，讀了這本書。 那是多麼他們正在準備，

THAT IS CRAZY.

他們仍然擊敗哈佛

EVEN MORE AMAZING BY THE FACT THAT, AS ANA TOLD YOU, THEY

辯論隊。香蕉。但是沒有關係 是不是最有趣的部分

DON'T HAVE THE INTERNET.

的故事。作者：對我來說，最

THAT IS SOME OLD-SCHOOL STUFF.

這個故事有趣的地方 IS，作為一個國家，我們花$器212

THAT

BILLION監禁230萬

IS WHAT I WOULD DO WHEN I WAS A KID.

人在這個國家。這是 不是百分之一的國家，

YOU WOULD GO TO THE

但抵達那裡。 THAT IS一個令人難以置信的數字。 WE

LIBRARY, USE THE CATALOG INDEXES SYSTEM, GO TO THE SHELF, FIND

圄人均多的人 幾乎比其他任何地方

THE BOOK AND READ THE BOOK.

世界。

THAT IS HOW THEY ARE PREPARING,

，罪犯​​平均成本 $ 29000 YEAR TO關入監獄。

THEY STILL BEAT THE HARVARD

所以，當你說的，只是把它們 在監獄裡，毒品戰爭，無論ñ

DEBATE TEAM.

有些人需要被 囚禁？當然可以。

BANANAS.

我們希望殺人犯，強姦犯， 兒童性騷擾者在監獄裡劫匪。

BUT THAT IS NOT THE MOST INTERESTING PART

我們需要他們的監禁。

OF THE STORY.

他們是一個威脅社會。

TO ME, THE MOST

但要記住，任何時候 你推對於較硬規律的研究

INTERESTING PART OF THIS STORY IS, AS A COUNTRY WE SPEND $212

一切，一切，每 囚犯花費$ 29,000名你對

BILLION TO IMPRISON 2.3 MILLION

TAXPAYERíS錢。我們的累犯 率為百分之六十八。

PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY.

68％。

THAT IS NOT ONE PERCENT OF THE COUNTRY,

好了，現在，他們得到再次被捕。

BUT IT IS GETTING THERE.

對這些，某個部分， 緩刑或無罪，

THAT IS AN UNBELIEVABLE NUMBER.

ETC.因此，有五十 百分比回到監獄。

WE

在三十年，五 ％的回監獄。

IMPRISON MORE PEOPLE PER CAPITA THAN ALMOST ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE

有些人認為有 什麼，

WORLD.

你可以做這一點。

THE AVERAGE PRISONER COSTS $29,000 A YEAR TO KEEP IN PRISON.

原來，這是 不符合事實。

SO WHEN YOU SAY, JUST PUT THEM IN PRISON, WAR ON DRUGS, WHATEVER ñ

研究表明，這些 高，昂貴的價格。

DO SOME PEOPLE NEED TO BE IMPRISONED?

累犯下降到不足 兩成IF

OF COURSE.

監獄提供顯著 教育機會TO

WE WANT THE MURDERERS, RAPISTS, THE CHILD MOLESTERS, THE ROBBERS IN PRISON.

嵌頓男人和女人。

WE NEED THEM IN PRISON.

其中FORMERLY嵌頓 BARD學生，不到兩

THEY ARE A THREAT TO SOCIETY.

％的人送回監獄。

BUT REMEMBER, ANY TIME THAT YOU PUSH FOR HARDER LAWS ON

想想吧。忘記 BARD一秒鐘，忘記了這一點

EVERYTHING, ON EVERYTHING, EACH PRISONER COSTS $29,000 OF YOUR

特定的程序。明顯 這是工作，他們擊敗了

TAXPAYERíS MONEY.

哈佛大學辯論隊，等等。但 如果你只是EDUCATE俘虜，

OUR RECIDIVISM RATE IS SIXTY-EIGHT PERCENT.

速度次從SIXTY

68 PERCENT.

％，至百分之二。 這就免除人民的數百人。

OKAY, NOW, THEY GET REARRESTED.

他們為自己的時間，他們 所追求的不再是犯罪分子

OVER THOSE, SOME PORTION ARE PROBATION, OR ACQUITTED,

這一點。累犯是他們 不再做了另一個犯罪。

ETC.

您節省回去該人員 監獄，為您節省納稅人

SO, THERE IS A FIFTY PERCENT RETURN TO PRISON.

$ 29000一年幾百

WITHIN THREE YEARS, FIFTY PERCENT ARE BACK IN PRISON.

人民十萬。我們是 心理？為什麼我們不育

SOME PEOPLE THINK THERE IS NOTHING THAT

囚犯？我知道， 美國人更野蠻THAN

YOU CAN DO ABOUT THAT.

歐洲和我們看挪威， 我看怎麼舒服及其

TURNS OUT, THAT'S NOT TRUE AT ALL.

監獄，我想，你 瘋了，心軟歐洲人

RESEARCH INDICATES THAT THESE HIGH AND EXPENSIVE RATES OF

對不對？他們這樣做是為了一個 原因的，所以人們不

RECIDIVISM FALL TO LESS THAN TWO PERCENT IF

回來的一樣多。你不能 求解每個人的問題，有些

PRISONS OFFER SIGNIFICANT EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY TO

人們會 ANYWAY作案。

INCARCERATED MEN AND WOMEN.

但如果我們可以減少它 百分之六十八TO

AMONG FORMERLY INCARCERATED BARD STUDENTS, LESS THAN TWO

百分之二十二，多麼瘋狂 我們算不走

PERCENT HAVE RETURNED TO PRISON.

這一行動？

THINK ABOUT THAT.

實際上，你可以降低 再犯率

FORGET BARD FOR A SECOND, FORGET THIS

此外，如果更改了某些 政策囚犯

PARTICULAR PROGRAM.

之後，他們GET OUT監獄。

OBVIOUSLY IT IS WORKING, THEY BEAT THE

例如，現在， 雇主問要

HARVARD DEBATE TEAM, ETC.

不會有人HAS 被裁定犯有重罪。

BUT IF YOU JUST EDUCATE PRISONERS,

如果他們有，他們都做了， 他們不會找到一份工作。

THE RATE DROPS FROM SIXTY

我知道這人真 不安僱人

PERCENT TO TWO PERCENT.

世衛組織有犯罪記錄。

THAT FREES HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE.

究其原因人去的一個 回到監獄是他們

THEY SERVE THEIR TIME, AND THEY ARE NO LONGER CRIMINALS AFTER

沒有太多的機會 提供給他們後

THAT.

他們出。

RECIDIVISM IS THAT THEY NO LONGER DID ANOTHER CRIME.

如果我是監獄長或 總督在任何關係

YOU SAVE THAT PERSON GOING BACK TO PRISON, YOU SAVE TAXPAYERS

監獄和我看到這些 數字，這是最大的

$29,000 A YEAR FOR HUNDREDS OF

想都不用想所有的時間。作者： 當然，我會教育

THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE.

囚犯，我不希望他們 犯更多的罪，傷害

ARE WE MENTAL?

我的公民多了，我不 要支付納稅人的錢

WHY ARE WE NOT EDUCATING

監禁他們。當然你 應該教育他們。

THE PRISONERS?

不是因為你喜歡他們，而不是 因為你要被

I KNOW THAT AMERICANS ARE MORE BARBARIC THAN

友好的他們，但 因為它的工作原理。

EUROPE, AND WE LOOK AT NORWAY, AND I SEE HOW COMFORTABLE THEIR

它的作品，但我不認為 THOSE一定工作於

PRISONS ARE AND I THINK, YOU CRAZY, SOFTIE EUROPEANS,

監獄工業希望它的工作。

RIGHT?

我不認為那些法律 執法一定WANT IT

THEY ARE DOING IT FOR A REASON, SO THAT PEOPLE DON'T

工作。不要緊，如果

COME BACK AS MUCH.

你是在一個私人或 公共資助

YOU CAN'T SOLVE EVERYONE'S PROBLEMS, SOME

監獄ñ那些從事IN THE 監獄工業有

PEOPLE ARE GOING TO COMMIT CRIME ANYWAY.

動機將LOCKING人民 UP。他們不希望降低

BUT IF WE CAN REDUCE IT FROM SIXTY-EIGHT PERCENT TO

重新犯罪率，他們將

TWENTY-TWO PERCENT, HOW CRAZY ARE WE THAT WE DON'T TAKE

是出於工作。 這將鬧心，不是嗎？

THAT ACTION?

你不能這樣做。我們有 必須是在更負責

YOU CAN ACTUALLY LOWER THE RECIDIVISM RATE

公民。是何許人 運行監獄

FURTHER, IF YOU CHANGE CERTAIN POLICIES FOR PRISONERS

政府官員。我知道 他們希望自己的工作，他們希望

AFTER THEY GET OUT OF PRISON.

利潤，他們希望所有的 隨之而來好吃的東西你

FOR INSTANCE, RIGHT NOW, EMPLOYERS ASK WHETHER OR

已經得到結束這種胡說八道。 最終不會監獄，你

NOT SOMEBODY HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF A FELONY.

JUST DO在一個更聰明的方式。 如果這是真的，他們說的

IF THEY HAVE, THEY ARE DONE, THEY WON'T GET A JOB.

BARD，我也不會拿自己 的話，我會做很多

I KNOW THAT PEOPLE ARE REALLY UNEASY ABOUT HIRING SOMEONE

更多的研究，但如果事實證明 指出，這會降低你的

WHO HAS A CRIMINAL RECORD.

再犯率，每個人 國家應該這樣做。如果IT

ONE OF THE REASONS PEOPLE GO BACK TO PRISON IS THAT THEY

是真實的，邀請他們參加。世衛組織 不想要再犯率

DON'T HAVE MANY OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE TO THEM AFTER

？兩成什麼是錯的 和你在一起？你為什麼要傷害

THEY GET OUT.

您的同胞們呀？

IF I AM A WARDEN OR A GOVERNOR, IN ANY WAY RELATED TO

PRISONS, AND I SEE THESE NUMBERS, THIS IS THE BIGGEST

NO-BRAINER OF ALL TIME.

OF COURSE I AM GOING TO EDUCATE THE

PRISONERS, I DON'T WANT THEM TO COMMIT MORE CRIMES AND HURT

MORE OF MY CITIZENS, AND I DON'T WANT TO PAY TAXPAYER MONEY TO

IMPRISON THEM.

OF COURSE YOU SHOULD EDUCATE THEM.

NOT BECAUSE YOU LIKE THEM, NOT BECAUSE YOU WANT TO BE

FRIENDLY TO THEM, BUT BECAUSE IT WORKS.

IT WORKS, BUT I DON'T THINK THOSE NECESSARILY WORKING IN THE

PRISON INDUSTRY WANT IT TO WORK.

I DON'T THINK THOSE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT NECESSARILY WANT IT

TO WORK.

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF

YOU ARE IN A PRIVATE OR PUBLICLY FUNDED

PRISON ñ THOSE WORKING IN THE PRISON INDUSTRY HAVE AN

INCENTIVE TO KEEP LOCKING PEOPLE UP.

THEY DON'T WANT TO LOWER

THE RECIDIVISM RATE, THEY WILL

BE OUT OF A JOB.

THAT WILL SUCK, WON'T IT?

YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

WE HAVE GOT TO BE MORE RESPONSIBLE

CITIZENS.

THE PEOPLE WHO ARE RUNNING THE PRISONS ARE

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

I KNOW THEY WANT THEIR JOBS, THEY WANT

PROFITS, THEY WANT ALL THE GOODIES THAT COME WITH IT, YOU

HAVE GOT TO END THIS NONSENSE.

YOU DON'T END THE PRISONS, YOU

JUST DO IT IN A SMARTER WAY.

IF IT IS TRUE WHAT THEY SAY ABOUT

BARD, AND I WOULDN'T TAKE THEIR WORD FOR IT, I WOULD DO MANY

MORE STUDIES, BUT IF IT TURNS OUT THAT THIS LOWERS YOUR

RECIDIVISM RATE, EVERY PERSON IN THE COUNTRY SHOULD DO IT.

IF IT

IS TRUE, SIGN THEM UP.

WHO DOESN'T WANT A RECIDIVISM RATE

OF TWO PERCENT?

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

WHY DO YOU WANT TO HURT

YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS THAT WAY?