中級 美國腔 3954 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
The first standardized tests that we know of
were administered in China over 2,000 years ago during the Han dynasty.
Chinese officals used them to determine aptitude for various government posts.
The subject matter included philosophy, farming, and even military tactics.
Standardized tests continued to be used around the world for the next two millennia,
and today, they're used for everything from evaluating stair climbs for firefighters in France
to language examinations for diplomats in Canada to students in schools.
Some standardized tests measure scores only in relation to the results of other test takers.
Others measure performances on how well test takers meet predetermined criteria.
So the stair climb for the firefighter could be measured by comparing the time of the climb to that of all other firefighters.
This might be expressed in what many call a bell curve.
Or it could be evaluated with reference to set criteria,
such as carrying a certain amount of weight a certain distance up a certain number of stairs.
Similarly, the diplomat might be measured against other test-taking diplomats,
or against a set of fixed criteria, which demonstrate different levels of language proficiency.
And all of these results can be expressed using something called a percentile.
If a diplomat is in the 70th percentile, 70% of test takers scored below her.
If she scored in the 30th percentile, 70% of test takers scored above her.
Although standardized tests are sometimes controversial, they are simply a tool.
As a thought experiment, think of a standardized test as a ruler.
A ruler's usefulness depends on two things.
First, the job we ask it to do.
Our ruler can't measure the temperature outside or how loud someone is singing.
Second, the ruler's usefulness depends on its design.
Say you need to measure the circumference of an orange.
Our ruler measures length, which is the right quantity,
but it hasn't been designed with the flexibility required for the task at hand.
So, if standardized tests are given the wrong job,
or aren't designed properly, they may end up measuring the wrong things.
In the case of schools, students with test anxiety may have trouble performing their best on a standardized test,
not because they don't know the answers,
but because they're feeling too nervous to share what they've learned.
Students with reading challenges may struggle with the wording of a math problem,
so their test results may better reflect their literacy rather than numeracy skills.
And students who were confused by examples on tests that contain unfamiliar cultural references may do poorly,
telling us more about the test taker's cultural familiarity than their academic learning.
In these cases, the tests may need to be designed differently.
Standardized tests can also have a hard time measuring abstract characteristics or skills,
such as creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration.
If we design a test poorly, or ask it to do the wrong job, or a job it's not very good at,
the results may not be reliable or valid.
Reliability and validity are two critical ideas for understanding standardized tests.
To understand the difference between them,
we can use the metaphor of two broken thermometers.
An unreliable thermometer gives you a different reading each time you take your temperature,
and the reliable but invalid thermometer is consistently ten degrees too hot.
Validity also depends on accurate interpretations of results.
If people say the results of a test mean something they don't, that test may have validity problem.
Just as we wouldn't expect a ruler to tell us how much an elephant weighs, or what it had for breakfast,
we can't expect standardized tests alone to reliably tell us how smart someone is,
how diplomats will handle a tough situation,
or how brave a firefighter might turn out to be.
So standardized tests may help us learn a little about a lot of people in a short time,
but they usually can't tell us a lot about a single person.
Many social scientists worry about test scores resulting in sweeping and often negative changes for test takers,
sometimes with long-term life consequences.
We can't blame the tests, though.
It's up to us to use the right tests for the right jobs, and to interpret results appropriately.
If you would like to learn more about this topic, we highly recommend a best selling book called
The End of Average by Harvard Professor Todd Rose.
In it, Rose investigated the rampant misuse of standardized test with clarity and urgency.
He also proposes a solution to a problem.
You can download the audio version of this book for free on audible.com/teded.
And every free trial encourages audible to continue supporting Ted-Ed nonprofit mission.
We are very passionate about this issue. And, we are very grateful to
any Ted-Ed community members, who take time to read or listen to this important book.
Thanks for watching. And, thanks for your support.
    您必須登入才有此功能
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

【TED-Ed】我們該去除標準化測驗法嗎? (Should we get rid of standardized testing? - Arlo Kempf)

3954 分類 收藏
osmend 發佈於 2018 年 1 月 23 日   陳美瑩 翻譯   Ann 審核

影片學習單字重點

loading

影片討論

載入中…
  1. 1. 單字查詢佳句收藏

    選取單字或佳句,可即時查詢字典及收藏!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔