中級 15502 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
In 1845, Ireland's vast potato fields were struck by an invasive fungal disease
that rapidly infested this staple crop.
The effect was devastating.
One million people died of famine,
and over a million more were forced to leave Ireland.
Nowadays, we avoid such agricultural catastrophes with the help of pesticides.
Those are a range of manmade chemicals that control insects,
unwanted weeds,
funguses,
rodents,
and bacteria
that may threaten our food supply.
They've become an essential part of our food system.
As populations have grown, monoculture, single crop farming,
has helped us feed people efficiently.
But it's also left our food vulnerable to extensive attack by pests.
In turn, we've become more dependent on pesticides.
Today, we annually shower over 5 billion pounds of pesticides across the Earth
to control these unwanted visitors.
The battle against pests, especially insects,
has marked agriculture's long history.
Records from thousands of years ago
suggest that humans actively burned some of their crops after harvest
to rid them of pests.
There's even evidence from ancient times that we recruited other insects to help.
In 300 A.D., Chinese farmers specially bred ferocious predatory ants
in orange orchards to protect the trees from other bugs.
Later, as large-scale farming spread,
we began sprinkling arsenic, lead, and copper treatments on crops.
But these were incredibly toxic to humans as well.
As our demand for more, safer produce increased,
so did the need for effective chemicals
that could control pests on a grander scale.
This ushered in the era of chemical pesticides.
In 1948, a Swiss chemist named Paul Hermann Müller
was awarded a Nobel Prize for his discovery
of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, also known as DDT.
This new molecule had unparalleled power to control many insect species
until the 1950s, when insects became resistant to it.
Worse, the chemical actually drove dramatic declines in bird populations,
poisoned water sources,
and was eventually found to cause long-term health problems in humans.
By 1972, DDT had been banned in the United States,
and yet traces still linger in the environment today.
Since then, chemists have been searching for alternatives.
With each new wave of inventions, they've encountered the same obstacle -
rapid species evolution.
As pesticides destroy pest populations,
they leave behind only the most resistant individuals.
They then pass on their pesticide-resisting genes
to the next generation.
That's lead to the rise of super bugs,
such as the Colorado potato beetle,
which is resistant to over 50 different insecticides.
Another downside is that other bugs get caught in the crossfire.
Some of these are helpful predators of plant pests or vital pollinators,
so erasing them from agriculture wipes out their benefits, too.
Pesticides have improved over time
and are currently regulated by strict safety standards,
but they still have the potential to pollute soil and water,
impact wildlife,
and even harm us.
So considering all these risks, why do we continue using pesticides?
Although they're imperfect,
they currently may be our best bet against major agricultural disasters,
not to mention mosquito-born diseases.
Today, scientists are on a quest for alternative pest control strategies
that balance the demands of food production
with environmental concerns.
Nature has become a major source of inspiration,
from natural plant and fungal chemicals that can repel or attract insects,
to recruiting other insects as crop bodyguards.
We're also turning to high-tech solutions, like drones.
Programmed to fly over crops,
these machines can use their sensors and GPS
to carry out more targeted sprays
that limit a pesticide's wider environmental impact.
With a combination of biological understanding,
environmental awareness,
and improved technologies,
we have a better chance of finding a holistic solution to pests.
Chemical pesticides may never shake their controversial reputation,
but with their help,
we can ensure that agricultural catastrophes
stay firmly in our past.
    您必須登入才有此功能
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

【TED-Ed】真的有必要用殺蟲劑嗎? (Do we really need pesticides? - Fernan Perez-Galvez)

15502 分類 收藏
Jenny 發佈於 2017 年 6 月 2 日   gahui yu 翻譯   Colleen Jao 審核

影片簡介

Annually, we shower over 5 billion pounds of pesticides across the Earth to control insects, unwanted weeds, funguses, rodents, and bacteria that may threaten our food supply. But is it worth it, knowing what we do about the associated environmental and public health risks? Fernan Pérez-Gálvez weighs the pros and cons of pesticides.

影片學習單字重點

loading

影片討論

載入中…
  1. 1. 單字查詢佳句收藏

    選取單字或佳句,可即時查詢字典及收藏!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔