all told that it allows connectivity, allows us to create community. But the reverse is

actually true. It’s atomizing us. It’s not creating real community. It’s actually

separating us from people of different opinions of different cultures. It’s increasingly

an echo chamber effect where we’re only ever connected with people who agree with

us in the first place. But even more troubling, these social networks aren’t really social.

They’re platforms for the self. They’re platforms for us to build brands. The clearest

manifestation of this is our obsession with the selfie. The selfie becomes the cultural

form of the Internet. Wherever we go, we picture ourself in front of mausoleums, in front of

— as I say in the book in front of people committing suicide at Auschwitz. At every

imaginable place, in spite of all the bad taste associated with it, we are, in our minds

at least, our deluded minds, the center of our universe. I argue again in terms of progress

that we’ve gone back to a pre-Copernican understanding of the universe where everything

revolves around us. There’s nothing social about that. And the end consequence is twofold.

Firstly, we’re making complete fools of ourselves. That narcissism, that indulgence

is embarrassing. And in the long run we’re going to regret it both as a species and individually.

When we look back at those absurd photos of ourself, where we’re shamelessly exposing

our own self-importance, we’re going to be severely embarrassed by it. But secondly

it also reflects the reality of the Internet. It’s about the individual, it’s not about

the social. And the Internet is alienating, isolating, fragmenting ourselves. It’s weakening

community. That’s, of course, the reason why it hasn’t generated real political movements.

It creates explosions, the Arab Spring, Occupy, but no legacy, no political parties, no movements,

no real foundations of political change.