B1 中級 美國腔 13116 分類 收藏
開始影片後,點擊或框選字幕可以立即查詢單字
字庫載入中…
回報字幕錯誤
Since around 1750
we've been living in a highly distinctive era in the history of love
that we can call "romanticism".
Romanticism emerged as an ideology in Europe in the mid 18th century
in the minds of poets, artists and philosophers.
And it's now conquered the world.
No single relationship ever follows the romantic template exactly.
But it's broad outlines are frequently present, nevertheless.
And can be summed up as follows:
Romanticism is deeply hopeful about marriage.
Romanticism took marriage,
hitherto seen as practical and emotionally temperate union,
and fused it together with a passionate love story
to create a unique proposition of a life-long, passionate love marriage.
Along the way romanticism united love and sex.
Previously people had imagined that they could have sex with characters they didn't love,
and that they could love someone without having extraordinary sex with them.
Romanticism elevated sex to the supreme expression of love.
Frequent, mutually satisfying sex became the bellwether of the health of any relationship.
Without necessarily meaning to, romanticism made infrequent sex and adultery into catastrophes.
Romanticism proposed that true love must mean an end to all loneliness.
The right partner must, it promised, understand us entirely
possibly without needing even to speak to us.
They would intuit our souls.
Romantics put a special premium on the idea that our partner might understand us without needing to say anything.
Romanticism believed that choosing a partner should be about letting oneself be guided by feelings,
rather than practical considerations.
You know you're in love because you have a special feeling.
Romanticism has manifested a powerful disdain for practicalities and money.
It feels cold or, as we say, unromantic
to say you know you're with the right person because the two of you make an excellent financial fit
or because you cherish the things like bathroom etiquette and attitudes to punctuality.
Romanticism believes that true love is synonymous with accepting everything about someone.
The idea that one's partner or oneself may need to change
is taken to be a sign that the relationship is on the rocks.
"You're going to have to change" is a last ditch threat.
This template of love is a historical creation.
It's a hugely beautiful and often enjoyable one.
But we can state boldly: romanticism has been a disaster for relationships.
It's an intellectual and spiritual movement
which has had a devastating impact on the ability of ordinary people
to lead succesful emotional lives.
The salvation of love lies in overcoming a succession of errors within romanticism.
These are some of the myths of romanticism.
That we should meet a person of extraordinary inner and outer beauty
and immediately feel a special attraction to them and they to us.
We should have highly satisfying sex, not only at the start, but forever.
We should never be attracted to anyone else
We should understand one another intuitively.
We don't need an education in love.
We may need to train to become a pilot or brain surgeon, but not a lover.
We'll pick that up along the way by following our feelings.
We should have no secrets and spend constant time together.
Work won't get in the way.
We should raise a family without any loss of sexual or emotional intensity.
Our lover must be our soulmate, best friend, co-parent, co-chauffeur, accountant, household manager and spiritual guide.
If we question the assumptions of the romantic view of love
it's not in order to destroy love, but to save it.
We need to piece together a post-romantic theory of couples
because in order to make a relationship last
we have to be disloyal to the romantic emotions that get us into it in the first place.
We need to replace the romantic template with a psychologically mature vision of love we might call "classical",
and which encourages in us a range of unfamiliar, but hopefully effective, attitudes.
For example:
That it's normal that love and sex may not always belong together.
That discussing money, early on, up front, in a serious way, is not a betrayal of love.
That realizing that we're rather flawed, and our partner is too, is a huge benefit to a couple
because it increases the amount of tolerance and generosity in circulation.
That we will never find everything in one person, nor they in us,
not because of some unique flaw, but because that's just the way human nature is.
That we need to make amends and often rather artificial sounding efforts to understand one another.
That intuition can't get us where we need to go.
And that spending two hours discussing whether bathroom towels should be hung up or can be left on the floor
is neither trivial nor unserious.
There is a special dignity around issues of laundry and time keeping.
All these attitudes and more belong to a new, more hopeful, post-romantic future for love.
提示:點選文章或是影片下面的字幕單字,可以直接快速翻譯喔!

載入中…

載入中…

想談場浪漫戀愛?其實「浪漫主義」可能是真愛殺手.... (How Romanticism Ruined Love)

13116 分類 收藏
VoiceTube 發佈於 2016 年 7 月 7 日    Ruby Lu 翻譯    Kristi Yang 審核
看更多推薦影片
  1. 1. 單字查詢

    在字幕上選取單字即可即時查詢單字喔!

  2. 2. 單句重複播放

    可重複聽取一句單句,加強聽力!

  3. 3. 使用快速鍵

    使用影片快速鍵,讓學習更有效率!

  4. 4. 關閉語言字幕

    進階版練習可關閉字幕純聽英文哦!

  5. 5. 內嵌播放器

    可以將英文字幕學習播放器內嵌到部落格等地方喔

  6. 6. 展開播放器

    可隱藏右方全文及字典欄位,觀看影片更舒適!

  1. 英文聽力測驗

    挑戰字幕英文聽力測驗!

  1. 點擊展開筆記本讓你看的更舒服

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔