Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • So I wanted to redo this one. The original didn't make any sense. I'll keep it one as

  • "unlisted" and can be accessed from here, link in description. But it should have been

  • like a side notes thing. So this is that, a more coherent form... of that entirely unqualified

  • conjecture. Viruses, the things that can give you a cold

  • or herpes, are basically just some DNA or RNA with a little something to protect them

  • and ... that's... it. They don't really do anything and most of them don't have any moving

  • parts. They work by: if they bump into a cell and the DNA enters, the components of the

  • cell will produce proteins from that viral DNA. Then those proteins will go on to form

  • more DNA in capsules, more viruses. There's tons of diversity with viruses, they infect

  • different cells in different ways and there can be proteins and other stuff in there too

  • in there too. But essentially viruses are just some DNA with a little delivery mechanism.

  • So if that's all they are... are they alive? What does it even mean to be alive, to be

  • an organism? I mean, I have this idea that I am me, I am...one thing. Even though I'm

  • a butt load of cells. And all organisms on the planet, us, plants,

  • fungi, bacteria, protists, are all cells. 1 cell or lots of cells together. Except for viruses.

  • the virus. Which is why they're often considered to be not really alive.

  • If you just removed the DNA from a cell, it's wouldn't be considered alive, right?

  • But then again, none of the individual components of the cell would really be considered alive.

  • They can be in a shape that is unique and assembled by living systems. But enzymes,

  • cell membranes, ribosomes, nutrients, water. None of the stuff that's in there is alive

  • either. Life might not be a bunch of objects that

  • you can hold like that. Maybe it's what they do together that makes life life?

  • But if we look at the way each component interacts, we wouldn't see any phenomena that you wouldn't

  • be able to explain... studying physics or chemistry. What I mean is everything going

  • on happens predictably and just follows the fundamental physical properties of the atoms

  • like attraction and repulsion and different ways of bonding.

  • But the interesting thing taking place is, well it's kind of like a rube Goldberg machine.

  • Each aspect is inanimate, but each product of one interaction goes off and interacts

  • with another, and another and etcetera. In such a way that the system looks animated.

  • But this machine isn't alive. Where's the "life" happening? A rube Goldberg machine

  • behaves with potential energy, one bit setting off another bit. And when it's done... it's

  • done, until someone puts that energy back into it by resetting the bits.

  • In a cell, the machine is branching and elaborate in ways I couldn't begin to break down....

  • here represented by these lines with arrows. But some of the components are able to get

  • energy from light or chemicals and gather other molecules as nutrients. and in that

  • way they supply themselves with the tools to reset or remake the pieces and it continues

  • the motion on its own. Also another thing the cell machine can do

  • is assemble other machines that are structured very similar to the original. This is what

  • allows us not to just see the machine. But to continue to see the machine? Organisms

  • breaking down or getting eaten is pretty inevitable, if organisms didn't assemble new organisms

  • then all life would eventually end. Those seem to be the differences. It's like

  • a multi-branched, reproducing rube Goldberg machine that doesn't stop.

  • What do viruses fit in? Viruses can kind of show us how central DNA

  • is to the whole process. DNA isn't just another domino or cog in one stretch of the machine.

  • It stores the information for the structure of all the proteins of the cell. Since proteins

  • basically do or control or build everything in the cell, DNA controls what each component

  • looks like, so it sort of designs the whole machine and the processes it does.

  • Different DNA means different components and different processes.

  • That's why you can have a different set of instructions come in and code for different

  • proteins that do different things. In this case, just make more DNA in capsules.

  • Could you have that DNA come in and instruct the cell to do something else? Like let's

  • say the a virus came in and told a cell to make a bunch of enzymes or something. That's

  • fine I guess, that could theoretically exist. But then after, you would never see that virus

  • again. Just like with all DNA, viral DNA has to code for something that helps that DNA

  • reproduce or you won't see it anymore. It just so happens that there's plenty of

  • cells around for this viral DNA to interact with without ever needing to code for or keep

  • its own cell. And it works well as a "strategy" that DNA

  • can take. Viruses are one of, if not, the most numerous organism on the planet. If they

  • are an organism.... Are viruses alive?

  • Maybe virus itself is an object that doesn't live any more than any other cell component.

  • But a virus inside a cell is performing life just like the other components of that cell.

  • Are they an individual? I guess that depends. Is the code the individual? Such that any

  • set of DNA travelling and reproducing together is 1 organism. Is the code with the cell the

  • individual? since the cell is the smallest unit that performs life. Or is it about how

  • things are attached and that's why we can consider ourselves to be one organism. Same

  • with those trees that can be an entire forest large and thousands of years old since they've

  • all stemmed from the same cloning root system. I think "how things are attached" is the generally

  • accepted definition of the organism. But then where do viruses fit in? Is this

  • one organism and this another organism? How about now, is this an entirely new organism

  • or is this more analogous to a parasite infecting a host? Or is this just some special case

  • since viruses aren't alive at all so we don't even call them an organism.

  • Maybe trying to point out which of these sets of objects is alive as an individual life

  • form distracts from the processes that demonstrates what life is?

  • Maybe life is the cycling interactions and it doesn't matter how it's attached?

  • Viruses have a discrete set of DNA with genes that reproduce on their own incentives so

  • it's convenient to just call it an organism? Anyways, I don't know. I'm just talking outta

  • me butt. Let me know what your butts have to say in the comments.

  • ....those blueprins aren't evolving. Keep in mind, it's not the DNA itself changing.

  • It's just the information: the order of nucleotides, that's being copied and changed. New DNA is

  • assembled with each new cell, and the old DNA eventually falls apart.

  • The thing that passes from one individual to the next, is the information, for the order

  • of the nucleotides. Overtime, the incidental and random changes in the sequence, and whatever

  • works long to reproduce again, results in all the different genomes and organisms we

  • see.

So I wanted to redo this one. The original didn't make any sense. I'll keep it one as

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋