Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

  • Climate deal, shlimate deal, amirite? We don't actually have to do anything, do we?

    氣候協議,“汽後”協議,對嗎? 我們有需要做什麼嗎?不用吧?

  • At the recent COP21**** climate conference in Paris, 195 countries promised planet Earth

    最近,巴黎舉辦 COP21 氣候會議,與會的 195 個國家向地球掛保證:

  • we'd stop messing with her. The press is calling it a huge win for environmentalists, world

    不再騷擾地球; 據報導,環保人士、

  • cooperation, and for the health of our planet. President Obama said in a speech after the

    全球企業、地球健康大獲全勝; 歐巴馬總統

  • deal was signed, this could be "the best chance we have to save the one planet we have." But

    在會後表示:這可能是 “我們拯救地球的最好時機。” 不過

  • we just signed a piece of paper, we haven't done anything yet.

    我們只是簽了個名,還沒開始行動哩

  • The UN has held a Climate Change "Conference of the Parties," every year since the mid-90s,

    自 90 年代中期,聯合國每年都召開氣候變化《締約方會議》

  • but more often the narrative is about their shortcomings rather than successes. The U.S.

    可是大部分時候都落得失敗收場,美國

  • famously avoided the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, and at the 2009 Copenhagen conference the

    在 1997 年拒簽京都議定書,鬧得沸沸揚揚; 而 2009 年的哥本哈根會議上

  • rich European countries (who got rich by burning coal) told developing nations like China and

    透過燒煤致富的歐洲國家要求開發中國家,如中國和

  • India to agree to the same cuts they were imposing on themselves -- nah bro. There are

    印度,實施和歐洲同等的減排制度…老兄,不是這樣的

  • a lot of examples of climate policy fails, but listing them all gets depressing. While

    氣候政策失敗的例子太多了,全講出來就太傷感情了

  • we fight over language, climate change continues to ravage the planet. Knowing this, decisionmakers

    我們試著打破國界溝通的同時,氣候災難也在各地肆虐。有鑑於此,各國

  • came to Paris with a different strategy!

    來到巴黎 COP21 ,訂定全新的氣候方針!

  • Unlike conferences in the past, Paris' COP21 let each country set its own goals for limiting

    不同以往,巴黎COP21改讓各國制定適合自己的

  • or slowing carbon emissions, fighting deforestation,

    減碳目標,包括打擊森林砍伐

  • and identifying the adverse effects of climate change. In the last year, every country submitted

    並自行鑑定災害是否導因於氣候變遷。去年,各國訂出

  • a set of goals, called Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs). Though each

    一系列目標,名為《國家自定預期貢獻》,簡稱 INDCs

  • are different, they're all based on keeping Earth under the dangerous 2C temperature increase

    各國進度不一,但都要避免地球溫度上升超過危險的 2℃

  • agreed on at Cancun's COP in 2010. Now everyone has the same finish-line, and their own map

    這是 2010 年在墨西哥坎昆立下的目標。現在,人人目標一致,

  • to get there, AND they've all signed the COP21 deal! We're on our way y'all!! Right? Maybe?

    但走的路徑不同,更重要的是,所有人都簽了 COP21 !我們正在朝相同目標前進了!應該吧?!

  • So next, is each country shifts their wooden-cogged bureaucracies into gear toward a net-zero

    接著,各國就要像齒輪組成零件一樣,把官僚手法轉換成

  • emissions goal. From now until 2018, when they meet next, they'll assess how to achieve the first steps laid

    零碳目標。到2018年,也就是下次見面時,各國會評估巴黎協議中的

  • out in the Paris accords; then they'll showcase their kickstarted plans. According

    第一步效果如何;屆時大家會展示自己的成果

  • to their INDCs: China is investing heavily in clean energy and will attempt to decrease

    各國的INDCs: 中國投注重資來發展潔淨能源,並打算在

  • after 2030; the U.S. will reduce carbon emissions by 26 percent from levels measured in 2005;

    2030後開始減排。美國將會依據2005年所測得的CO2值減排26%

  • the European Union will cut 40 percent, Brazil will cut 37 percent and curb deforestation

    歐盟國打算減四成;巴西則打算減37%,並減少砍伐森林

  • to keep the Amazon carbon sink in tact -- trees suck up carbon! Yay! India (the third largest

    如此才能讓亞馬遜區的CO2消失—因為樹能吸收二氧化碳嘛!印度是第三大

  • CO2 emitter) is planning to promote clean energy generation and consumption. And even

    排放國,打算推動產生潔淨能源與消耗,包括

  • many Pacific Islands (some of which will be underwater before the 2100 target date) are

    許多太平洋小島,有些預測會在2100年沉入海中,這些島國也都

  • submitting INDCs! The Paris agreement is exceedingly complex, but COP21 guarantees each nation

    交出INDCs!巴黎協議非常複雜,但本次會議確保每一個國家

  • has their own, reachable, goals! The politicians involved are calling this a huge diplomatic

    訂下自己可達成的目標;與會外交官則稱此次會議為外交上大

  • success; but is that the scientific reality? [[skeptical noise]].

    成功;那麼科學上也大成功嗎? [懷疑…]

  • Vox put together a chart from Climate Action Tracker data, and found without COP21's plan

    VOX利用氣候行動追蹤資料製成一張圖表,發現若我們不訂定COP21計劃

  • we'd hit a 3.8C increase by 2100. With the Paris pledges we'll still hit 2.7C! WAY over

    地球將於2100年暖化3.8℃,有了COP21,則會上升2.7℃。比

  • the 2C upper limit! The agreement calls for deep reductions. And we need DEEP cuts, but

    2℃上限要高太多了!協議呼籲進一步減排,而我們也真的需要多減一些

  • they will hurt. So, to help developed nations overachieve their goals, rich countries pledged

    這很難達成,所以為了讓已開發國家更成功,這些富有國承諾

  • 100 billion dollars per year in public and private investment by 2020 to will help the

    在2020年前,每年會從公私營企業撥出1000億元來幫助

  • poorer countries get affordable clean energy and lessen their struggles to meet ambitious

    窮國負擔潔淨能源,減輕負擔,儘速達成遠大的

  • climate goals.

    氣候目標

  • Look, in the end, the Paris talks are revolutionary on one hand because nearly 200 countries recognized

    一方面來說,巴黎峰會成功首開先例,有近200個國家

  • publicly that lowering carbon emissions to curb climate change is important! So what

    承認減排及對抗氣候變遷是當務之急!那麼

  • happens now? The diplomats have to convince the governing bodies of their home nations

    接下來,外交官必須說服國內政府

  • to follow the pledge. What we have to do now is as citizens, keep the pressure on our leaders.

    落實承諾。而身為公民,我們必須對政府施壓

  • While the actual GOALS aren't legally punishable, they will HAVE to show up in public transparently,

    雖然目前的協定並不真的具有法律效力,但各國元首必須現身公眾場合

  • and say WHY they didn't meet them every five years. In the end, most are seeing this as

    說明“為什麼”沒有達成目標,每五年一次。大部分人視此規定

  • the first step of a long, hard road. But a road that will have our children and descendants

    為漫漫長路的第一大步,但這條路會帶領我們的子孫

  • breathing easier. Of course, some countries won't be breathing

    走向乾淨的未來。可惜有些國家已經無法享受乾淨的未來了

  • at all, because climate change will have already drowned some of them, overrunning their land

    由於氣候變遷的影響,這些地方已經被淹沒了,整個陸地

  • with ocean. Check that video out here

    被海水淹沒。請參考下方的影片

Climate deal, shlimate deal, amirite? We don't actually have to do anything, do we?

氣候協議,“汽後”協議,對嗎? 我們有需要做什麼嗎?不用吧?

字幕與單字

單字即點即查 點擊單字可以查詢單字解釋