Name: 伊朗導彈襲擊英國美國迭戈加西亞基地！ BBC 新聞報導 (Iran Fires Missiles at UK-US Diego Garcia Base | BBC Newscast)
Uploaded: 2026-03-22T16:36:14.000Z
Duration: 26 min 12 s

情態助動詞 B1

Who would have thought that the news would be asking if an Iranian missile could go nearly 4,000 kilometers towards Diego Garcia?

誰能想到新聞會問伊朗的飛彈能不能飛將近4000公里到迪亞哥加西亞？

程度副詞

And who would have thought when what seemed like a very arcane debate about a British base that seems like in the middle of nowhere.

誰又能想到，一個看似偏僻、位於荒郊野外的英國基地，竟然會引發如此深奧的爭論。

情態副詞

Diego Garcia today is actually at the center of the headlines in the latest developments in the war in Iran.

如今的迪亞哥加西亞，竟然成了伊朗戰爭最新發展的頭條新聞中心。

You have been talking to sources within the government and you will reveal all in Saturday's newscast.

你一直在與政府內部消息人士溝通，並將在週六的新聞播報中揭露一切。

好了，我們就來告訴你我們所知道的。

So we know at the moment that Iran, as part of its retaliation for the war that was being waged on it by Israel and the US has attempted to fire missiles at Diego Garcia, which is a tiny island in the middle of nowhere that is the host to British and American military assets.

我們目前知道的是，伊朗為了報復以色列和美國對其發動的戰爭，試圖向迪亞哥加西亞發射飛彈。迪亞哥加西亞是一個位於荒郊野外的小島，駐紮著英國和美國的軍事資產。

We know that the attack was in the last few days.

我們知道這次攻擊發生在幾天前。

The attack also was before the UK Said late on Friday that it would allow America to use British bases to protect the Straits of Hormuz, which Keir Starmer's critics have seen as another step down the slippery slope in Trump's war.

這次攻擊也發生在英國週五晚間表示將允許美國使用英國基地保護荷姆茲海峽之前。基爾·斯塔默的批評者認為這是川普戰爭中又一步滑坡。

But crucially, that means that Iran had already tried to hit a British target many miles further than people might have thought Iran was capable of doing before Britain changed its position.

但關鍵是，這意味著在英國改變立場之前，伊朗已經試圖攻擊一個比人們想像中伊朗有能力做到的還要遠的英國目標。

that is a reminder that this, the plans put in place for years by Iran, if attacked, were to weaponize the Straits of Hormuz, Strait of Hormuz, and

這提醒了我們，伊朗多年來制定的計畫，如果遭到攻擊，就是武器化荷姆茲海峽，

to take on bases in the region and threaten oil production, and

並攻擊該地區的基地並威脅石油生產，而且

now, it seems, threaten military assets belonging to the United Kingdom used by the United States as well, thousands of kilometers away.

現在，似乎也威脅到屬於英國、被美國使用的軍事資產，距離數千公里遠。

So it represents a reminder this is not Venezuela.

所以這提醒了我們，這裡不是委內瑞拉。

And President Trump has been schooled publicly, along with Benjamin Netanyahu, who wanted this to happen before Donald Trump even came to the White House, has been schooled in what years and years of defensive planning looks like from the regime in Iran.

而川普總統和班傑明·納坦雅胡一樣，後者甚至在川普總統上任前就希望發生這種事，都已經被教導了伊朗政權多年來的防禦計畫是什麼樣子。

And we should say that a bit later in the podcast, we'll be hearing from David Miliband, and

我們也應該說，稍後在播客中，我們會聽到大衛·米利班德的聲音，

we'll talk to him about the humanitarian impact on all of this.

我們會和他談談這一切對人道的影響。

But today, as we record at 10 past 1, and

不過今天，我們錄音時間是下午一點十分，

goodness knows what will have happened by the end of today, the focus of most of the headlines in the UK is on this attack on Diego Garcia.

天曉得今天結束前還會發生什麼事，英國大部分頭條新聞的焦點都集中在這次對迪亞哥加西亞的攻擊上。

And can I ask you, do you think it's important from the government's perspective to get that timeline information briefed?

我可以問你嗎，你認為從政府的角度來看，取得這份時間線的簡報很重要嗎？

It's incredibly important to the government to get this timeline briefed, which is, I think, exactly why I was told about the timeline this morning.

對政府來說，取得這份時間線的簡報非常重要，我認為這也是我今天早上被告知時間線的原因。

So what happened yesterday was the UK said, sure, President Trump, who'd been calling NATO allies cowards and also sorts of things for not helping the US protect the Straits of Hormuz in a military way.

所以昨天發生的事是，英國說，當然，川普總統，他一直在稱北約盟友是懦夫，還說了很多其他話，說他們沒有在軍事上幫助美國保護荷姆茲海峽。

The UK and others said, okay, you can, you can use our bases to launch attacks on missile sites in Iran that have been chucking things at the Straits of Hormuz and clogging up the world's shipping with all the implications for the oil price.

英國和其他國家說，好的，你們可以使用我們的基地來發動攻擊，目標是伊朗的飛彈陣地，這些飛彈陣地一直在朝荷姆茲海峽發射物體，並因為對油價的所有影響而堵塞了全球航運。

At the same time, Iran responded to that, essentially saying to the uk, ah, you're playing with fire.

同時，伊朗對此做出了回應，基本上是告訴英國，啊，你們在玩火。

They there was a very strong Iranian response to that UK decision.

他們，伊朗對英國的這項決定做出了非常強烈的回應。

So Downing street does not want it to look like the attack on Diego Garcia was a direct response to the decision that they publicized yesterday.

所以唐寧街不希望這次對迪亞哥加西亞的攻擊看起來像是對他們昨天公佈的決定的直接回應。

You've essentially got three things that happen here.

你們這裡基本上發生了三件事。

Missiles try to fall on Diego Garcia, fired by Iran, they don't make it, but

飛彈試圖落在迪亞哥加西亞，由伊朗發射，但它們沒能成功，不過

it's the first time we understand they've got an attack that far away.

這是我們第一次知道他們有這麼遠的攻擊能力。

Second of all, the UK after that attack says to the US yes, you can use our bases for what to some people looks like an escalation in the war.

其次，英國在那次攻擊後告訴美國，是的，你們可以使用我們的基地，這對某些人來說看起來像是戰爭升級。

Third thing, Iran responds and says, UK that means that you are going to be a target for us, too.

第三件事，伊朗回應說，英國，這意味著你們也將成為我們的目標。

So you can see why with those three steps, Downing street does not want it to give the impression that the headlines today about Iranian missiles being thrown at a British base are a direct result of a decision that the Prime Minister and his colleagues took yesterday to give the US permission.

所以你可以理解，有了這三個步驟，唐寧街不希望給人一種印象，今天的頭條新聞關於伊朗飛彈被投向英國基地，是首相和他的同事們昨天決定給予美國許可的直接結果。

Also, as we sat down, I was reading from the BBC's defense correspondent.

另外，當我們坐下來時，我正在讀 BBC 的國防記者報導。

There is chatter in the military expert circles about whether Iran does possess a missile that can travel that far.

軍事專家圈子裡有人在討論伊朗是否擁有能夠飛那麼遠的飛彈。

So people have been naming the individual missiles that they know Iran has, the ballistic missiles and then questioning what we know about their technical specifications and if they could even reach, in which case you'd have to wait a bit to know more.

所以人們一直在說出他們知道伊朗擁有的個別飛彈名稱，那些彈道飛彈，然後質疑我們對它們的技術規格瞭解多少，以及它們是否能到達，如果是這樣，你可能需要等一下才能知道更多。

But you could say that the targeting is a message in itself.

不過你可以說，這次的目標本身就是一個訊息。

But it reminds me of what you've said every week in this short war.

但這讓我想起你在這場短暫的戰爭中，每週都說過的話。

It's about the map and it's about the clock.

Can they file missiles that could actually be successfully targeted as far as 4,000km away?

他們能否發射能夠成功鎖定四千公里遠目標的飛彈？

That has not been the assumption of the sort of defense establishment so far.

到目前為止，國防體系並沒有這樣假設。

Just to use the numbers, it was previously thought Iran's missiles had a range of about 2,000 kilometers.

就用數字來說，先前認為伊朗的飛彈射程大約是兩千公里。

Diego Garcia is nearly 4,000 kilometers from Iran.

迪亞哥加西亞島距離伊朗將近四千公里。

So if it has secretly developed missiles that can go that far, the potentially frightening consequence of that is it means that Iran in that scenario will would have the hypothetical ability to go for targets far beyond where this war is right now being conducted.

所以，如果他們祕密研發出射程能達這麼遠的飛彈，那潛在的可怕後果是，這意味著在這種情況下，伊朗將有能力攻擊遠超出目前戰爭進行範圍的目標。

Now, let's say take a breath as you've importantly told us, we don't know how close these missiles got, we don't know exactly what they were.

現在，讓我們深吸一口氣，就像你先前重要指出的那樣，我們不知道這些飛彈有多接近，也不知道它們到底是什麼。

Hopefully that will all become clearer in the next couple of days.

希望在接下來幾天，這一切都會更清楚。

But that's why this attempted attack on Diego Garcia has lit up the headlines this morning.

這就是為什麼今天早上，對迪亞哥加西亞島的這次未遂攻擊，引發了廣泛關注。

It's not just because it was a British US joint base.

這不只是因為它是英美聯合基地。

The Iranians have already been going after British assets since this war began.

自從這場戰爭開始以來，伊朗就一直在攻擊英國的資產。

We know at the beginning there was a strike that went into the side of a hangar an RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus.

我們知道一開始，賽普勒斯的 RAF Akrotiri 機棚側面就遭到一次攻擊。

But the Diego Garcia attempted attack has lit up the headlines because it suggests that Iran might have better military capability than was previously thought.

但對迪亞哥加西亞島的未遂攻擊之所以引發關注，是因為這暗示伊朗可能擁有比先前認為更強大的軍事能力。

A question for the youngest newscaster, which I think you could probably answer is when was a man called David Miliband the UK Foreign Secretary?

各位觀眾，特別是年輕的觀眾，我想請問一下，大衛·米利班德（David Miliband）是什麼時候擔任英國外交大臣的？

He was the Foreign Secretary in the latter years of the new Labour administration.

他是在新工黨政府後期擔任外交大臣的。

So I think from 2007 all the way up until the end of that period under Gordon Brown, 2010.

所以我想大概是從2007年到戈登·布朗（Gordon Brown）任期結束的2010年。

He is the brother of course of Ed Miliband who's on the left of the Labour government and is also of course someone who wants us to get off our fossil fuel addiction.

他當然是愛德·米利班德（Ed Miliband）的哥哥，愛德·米利班德在工黨政府裡屬於左派，而且他當然也希望我們擺脫對化石燃料的依賴。

His brother David Miliband is a little degree towards the right of the Labour Party.

他的哥哥大衛·米利班德在工黨內屬於稍微偏右一點的派別。

The job he's now doing is as boss of a very big organisation, the International Rescue Committee.

他現在的職位是國際救援委員會（International Rescue Committee）這個非常大的組織的負責人。

But also there's big news from the current Foreign Secretary.

但現任外交大臣也有個大消息。

So in order to try to find more money for defence, Yvette Cooper, the Foreign secretary is cutting 6 billion pounds from the budget for overseas aid.

所以為了試圖為國防籌措更多資金，外交大臣Yvette Cooper正從海外援助預算中削減60億英鎊。

That's the budget that does precisely the kind of thing that David Miliband organizes and runs now.

這筆預算正是David Miliband現在負責和營運的國際救援委員會（IRC）所做的那些事情。

It gives money to aid agencies around the world.

它會將資金提供給世界各地的援助機構。

this is one of the reasons why there's such pressure on that budget, it also goes towards paying for asylum seekers here in the uk.

這也是為什麼這筆預算承受如此大壓力的原因之一，它也用於支付英國境內尋求庇護者的費用。

So there's been a controversy about whether that budget is being well spent.

所以關於這筆預算是否被妥善運用，一直存在爭議。

The original conception of overseas development under Tony Blair, the Department for International Development was it was much better to pump money into conflict torn or poverty restriction countries around the world to tackle problems at source to help people in need.

Tony Blair時期，國際發展部的海外發展的最初構想是，將資金投入飽受衝突蹂躪或貧困的國家，從源頭解決問題，幫助有需要的人，這樣會更好。

And that would be a help for peace and stability around the world, rather than just putting a sticking plaster on in the form of eventually trying to help deal with the products of conflicts, if you like.

這將有助於世界和平與穩定，而不是像你所說的，只是在事後像貼OK繃一樣，試圖處理衝突的後果。

But given the world we now live in, the government has again cut the aid budget.

但鑑於我們現在生活的世界，政府再次削減了援助預算。

It gives us an interesting tension, therefore, between someone like David Miliband, who's a former colleague of Yvette Cooper, former Labour politician, but

是以，這在像David Miliband這樣的人，他曾是Yvette Cooper的同事，也是前工黨政客，但

who's now dealing with the consequences of decisions that have been made by the people who are now in power here.

現在正處理現任執政者所做的決定的後果。

We have set out the reasons why you might want to listen, we hope you will, to David Miliband ON NEWSCAST and here's our chat.

我們已經說明瞭你為什麼會想聽，希望你會聽，David Miliband 在 NEWSCAST 上的訪談，這是我們的對話。

The war which everyone is very anxious to see end is you as Foreign Secretary.

大家都非常希望能結束的戰爭，就是你擔任外交大臣的時候。

You had problems with a nuclear armed Iran yourself.

你自己也曾處理過擁有核武的伊朗的問題。

It's not as though Trump's wrong to say that the world's worried about a nuclear Iran.

並不是說 Trump 說錯了，全世界都擔心伊朗擁有核武。

Well, you're right that the Iranian nuclear issue is a long standing one.

嗯，你說得對，伊朗核問題確實是個長久以來懸而未決的問題。

We didn't have a problem with a nuclear Iran in the sense that it hadn't gone nuclear, and

我們沒有核武伊朗的問題，因為他們還沒發展出核武，

they always insisted that they never would.

而且他們一直堅持說他們永遠不會。

But you'll remember that we discovered a secret site of military development in Iran in the course of my tenure as Foreign sec.

但你應該記得，在我擔任外交大臣期間，我們在伊朗發現了一個祕密的軍事發展基地。

And so the Iranian nuclear issue, the danger that Iran would become a nuclear weapons state, was certainly a very big issue.

所以伊朗核問題，也就是伊朗可能成為核武國家，確實是個非常嚴重的問題。

We were, I always said, 100% committed to the diplomatic political track to resolve the nuclear issue.

我一直說，我們百分之百致力於透過外交政治途徑來解決核武問題。

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of action in 2015 before a nuclear agreement was agreed.

在2015年簽署《聯合全面行動計畫》之後，才達成核武協議。

But of course, the American authorities, in my time and before they all looked at the military options, they all heard what the Iranians were saying about what they would do if there was any military action, and

不過，當然了，在我任內以及之前，美國當局都考慮過軍事選項，他們也都聽過伊朗人說，如果採取軍事行動他們會怎麼做，

they steered away from it precisely because they thought a.

他們正是因為這樣才避開了它，因為他們認為。

字幕列表影片播放

伊朗導彈襲擊英國美國迭戈加西亞基地！ BBC 新聞報導 (Iran Fires Missiles at UK-US Diego Garcia Base | BBC Newscast)

sort

prioritize

conflict

force