“What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money… Money is

the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”

He also says -

“Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers

of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again to be Jews is perhaps no more

than a historic coincidence.”

“We discern in Judaism… a universal antisocial element of the present time.”

“As soon as society succeeds in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism - huckstering

and its conditions - the Jew becomes impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an

object… The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”

Karl Marx also hated on individual Jews personally, such as his words against Joseph Moses Levy

- the publisher of the Daily Telegraph.

“The Weekly Mail maintains that although Levy really fools no one, he has changed "i"

into "y", and it is true that among the 22,000 Levites whom Moses counted in the journey

through the wilderness, there was not a single Levi who spelled his name with a "y". Just

as Edouard Simon spares no effort to be regarded as belonging to the Romance people, so Levy

is determined to be an Anglo-Saxon. Therefore, at least once a month he attacks the un-English

policies of Mr. Disraeli, for Disraeli, "the Asiatic mystery", is, unlike the Telegraph,

not an Anglo-Saxon by descent. But what does it profit Levy to attack Mr. D'Israeli and

to change "i" into "y", when Mother Nature has inscribed his origins in the clearest

possible way right in the middle of his face. The nose of the mysterious stranger of Slawkenbergius

(see Tristram Shandy) who had got the finest nose from the promontory of noses was just

a nine days' wonder in Strasbourg, whereas Levy's nose provides conversation throughout

the year in the City of London.”

And Engels praised this book and this passage, as does Marxists.org, describing it as one

of the most brilliant of Marx’s writings. In one letter to Engels, Marx also called

someone a “Jewish n*****”.

And, in his last book, Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx says:

“The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly

they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what

is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”

There are even more anti-semitic statements by Karl Marx besides those shown here. But

I’m going to go back to the first quote, because I think this one is the key to understanding

why Karl Marx hated the Jews.

“What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? Money… Money is

the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”

In order to understand this passage in full, context is needed. We first need to understand

what Karl Marx means when he says “money”.

In Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx makes it clear over and over that he thinks money is

a commodity. The shortest quote I have of this is -

“That money is a commodity is therefore a new discovery...”

He goes on to say that, when money is used to buy and sell commodities, it becomes capital.

And it is the person who’s sole motive is the accumulation of more and more money (capital,

or profit) that makes someone a capitalist.

So, in this passage, Karl Marx is saying that money is Capital, and that Capitalism is Jewish.

To Karl Marx, the Jews are the Capitalists. Money, in Karl Marx’s eyes, is the Jewish

God. And Karl Marx thinks that their sole motive is the accumulation of more money,

which Karl Marx says is what a Capitalist does. So, money (which is Capital, in Karl

Marx’s eyes) is Judaism. In other words, Capitalism is Judaism. And Judaism is Capitalism.

That’s why when Karl Marx refers to the Capitalists, he’s actually referring to

the Jews.

We can see this in several other passages, including this one again, which at first glance,

doesn’t really make any sense.

“The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly

they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what

is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”

Think about it: why would commodities be “inwardly circumcised Jews”? It doesn’t make any

sense on its own. But now that we know that Karl Marx thinks Capitalists are Jews, and

that capitalists produce commodities, we can piece this together to discover the true message

of what Karl Marx is saying here.

As he’s already admitted, when he says “capitalist”, he means “Jews”. And when he says “commodities”,

he means the “products” of the Jews. Or, the “offspring” of the Jews. So if we

replace the words with their actual meaning, this quote actually reads: “The Jews know

that their offspring… are inwardly circumcised Jews…” And now this passage makes sense.

In this next quote, Karl Marx uses the word “Pharisee”, which means a member of an

ancient Jewish sect.

“The Pharisee of a capitalist represented by one of his servants, accompanies this action,

of course, with the unctuous phrase: “That’s for mother,” yet he knows well enough that

the poor children must sit up and help.”

Karl Marx is saying here that the “Pharisee of a capitalist” - in other words, the “Jewishness

of a capitalist” - is on show when he gives work to one of his servants. And this is confirmation

that Marx believes that the Jews are the Capitalists, and that the Capitalists are the Jews. He

then drives this point home here -

“In striking contrast with the great fact, that the shortening of the hours of labour

of women and children in English factories was exacted from capital by the male operatives,

we find in the latest reports of the Children’s Employment Commission traits of the operative

parents in relation to the traffic in children, that are truly revolting and thoroughly like

slave-dealing. But the Pharisee [or Jewishness] of a capitalist, as may be seen from the same

reports, denounces this brutality which he himself creates, perpetuates, and exploits,

and which he moreover baptises “freedom of labour.” “Infant labour has been called

into aid ... even to work for their own daily bread. Without strength to endure such disproportionate

toil, without instruction to guide their future life, they have been thrown into a situation

physically and morally polluted. The Jewish historian has remarked upon the overthrow

of Jerusalem by Titus that it was no wonder it should have been destroyed, with such a

signal destruction, when an inhuman mother sacrificed her own offspring to satisfy the

cravings of absolute hunger.”

So again, we have confirmation here that Karl Marx thinks that the Capitalists are the Jews.

And the whole of Das Kapital is anti-Semitic through and through. Here’s another quote -

“It is not because he is a leader of industry that a man is a capitalist; on the contrary,

he is a leader of industry because he is a capitalist. The leadership of industry is

an attribute of capital, just as in feudal times the functions of general and judge,

were attributes of landed property.”

At first glance, this doesn’t make sense. Why would a capitalist be a leader of an industry

simply by declaring himself to be a capitalist? That doesn’t make sense. If I declare myself

a Capitalist, that doesn’t make me a leader of industry. So clearly, that’s not what

Karl Marx is saying.

What Karl Marx has said in the previous quotes is that, Capitalists are Jews. And, if we

apply that belief that Karl Marx has to this quote, the message becomes clear. Karl Marx

is saying here that, because the Capitalist is Jewish, he is therefore a leader of industry.

This is implying that the Jewish-Capitalists didn’t become leaders of industry by merit

or anything else, but were appointed because of their Jewish faith, which is money (or capital).

And there are other clues that this is the correct way to interpret Karl Marx’s anti-Capitalism

and anti-Semitism (which are the same thing). In another passage in Das Kapital, Karl Marx

writes -

“That Philistine paper, the Spectator, states that after the introduction of a sort of partnership

between capitalist and workmen in the “Wirework Company of Manchester,” “the first result

was a sudden decrease in waste, the men not seeing why they should waste their own property

any more than any other master’s, and waste is, perhaps, next to bad debts, the greatest

source of manufacturing loss.” The same paper finds that the main defect in the Rochdale

co-operative experiments is this: “They showed that associations of workmen could

manage shops, mills, and almost all forms of industry with success, and they immediately

improved the condition of the men; but then they did not leave a clear place for masters.”

Quelle horreur!”

So, why would Marx feel the need to state that the Spectator is “Philistine”? What

relevance does this have? Well, it turns out that, the historical Philistines were anti-Jewish

and fought against the Jews. Karl Marx himself used the word “Philistine” to mean ethnically

“anti-Jewish” rather than spiritually anti-Jewish. So, Marx is pointing out that

the ethnically anti-Semitic newspaper (the Spectator) is praising the fact that the Socialist

experiments in Rochdale had left out the Jewish masters. Its hatred against the Jews, and

its praise of Socialism, gets rid of the Judeo-bourgeoisie class. And Karl Marx is on board with that,

which is why he sarcastically says that the “main defect” (meaning, it wasn’t really

a defect) was that it got rid of the Jews, and then says “source of horror!” at the

end. As in, “shock, horror, really!?” - meaning, of course Socialism got rid of

the Jews!

So I think it should be quite clear to you all by now that Karl Marx uses the word “capitalist”

to hide the word “Jew”, as a way to hide his anti-Semitism in plain sight. His greatest

book, Das Kapital (the Capital), means the “money-commodity” in Karl Marx’s own

words. Karl Marx says “money” is the “jealous god of Israel” - that money is the Jewish

religion. And so “Das Kapital” literally means “The Jewish religion” or just simply

“The Jew”. “Das Kapital” is “The Jew”! The entire thing is an anti-Semitic

hit-piece, disguised with euphemisms and doublespeak to hide its true meaning. The true ‘believers’

(the anti-Semites, the Marxists) of course, know what their ‘real’ Socialism is. At

its core, it’s anti-Semitism!

The fundamental belief of anti-Capitalism is that the Capitalists are stealing wealth

off the workers. This is untrue (because Value is Subjective, not based on Labour). But to

a racist, it is true, because a racist (who isn’t a “money-changer”, and therefore

has little idea about money) believes that the “workers” (people who are not Jews)

put the value of their Labour into the products that they produce. And they believe that the

Jews don’t work and just make money from the money they already have (they’re the

“money-changers”). So the racist believes that the Jewish “money-changers” are stealing

off of everyone else in society. This is factually untrue, but hopefully you can see now how

this fundamental belief is at the core of Socialist ideology. Anti-Capitalism comes

from anti-Semitism - the two concepts are entwined, and are one and the same.

And, when Karl Marx says the word “bourgeoisie”, he actually means two things. First, he means

“the Jews”, which includes ethnic Jews, but he also means the Capitalists (non-ethnic

Jews, whom he says are practicing the “Jewish faith” of Capitalism). Proof for this will

be shown shortly. But I need to explain the historic context first.

In the Dark Ages, the Christian Pope banned “usury”, which is the lending of money

and charging interest for that money. So, Christians couldn’t lend money. Only non-Christians

could, which is why, in the west, only the Jews could be bankers and money-lenders (hence

why Karl Marx calls them the “money-changers”). But at the same time, the Jews were not allowed

to own land (it was Christian Europe) and were forced to live in towns and cities. In

English, towns and cities were called “boroughs”, which is where we get the word “Bourgeoisie”

from, which is the French for “Townsfolk”. So, historically, due to old-fashioned anti-Semitism,

the Jews were a major element of the bourgeoisie. This is why racists like Karl Marx believed

that the Jews were the bourgeoisie, and that Capitalism was Jewish - it’s old fashioned

anti-Semitism which dated back to the medieval period.

And I know that some Marxists will claim that it is anti-Semitic to point out that historic-racism

led to the Jews being the bourgeoisie. No, denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism forced

the Jews to become the bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. It was because the Jewish people were forced

to live in towns and practice usury as a result of anti-Semitism, that gave Edward the 1st

of England the excuse to murder half the male Jews in England in 1279.

“Every single Jewish adult male in England was seized and imprisoned - at least 600 individuals

out of a total community of only 2,000 to 4,000 people. They, it seems, were the special

target of the sting operation. Of course, the Jews had a long-standing dominance of

the money and metalworking trades, so to some extent an investigation into coin-clipping

was bound to focus on their activities.”

“But Edward’s readiness to believe that all Jews were involved in devaluing his currency,

and the disproportionate conviction rate of Jews and Christians, tell us that there was

a darker dimension to the story.”

“Early in the new year of 1279, when the trials of the accused began, some twenty-nine

Christians were hanged for their crimes, but around ten times as many Jews suffered the

same fate. In his drive to improve his finances... Edward executed half of the adult males in

a minority population. Almost incidentally, he had committed the single biggest massacre

of Jews in British history.”

So, just to clarify this to the anti-Semitic Marxists - denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism

forced the Jews to become money-lenders and forced them to move into towns to become the

bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. Denying that that was what happened is anti-Semitic, and

is a denial of historic anti-Semitism.