Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

自動翻譯
  • now I just spent six months running to be mayor of London and I got a taste of politics taste and in America you look at America now and you see a potential a few hard fork opportunities, right?

    現在我剛剛花了六個月時間競選倫敦市長,我嚐到了政治的滋味,在美國,你現在看美國,你看到了潛在的一些硬分叉機會,對嗎?

  • And again, there's also innovation there.

    同樣,那裡也有創新。

  • So look at the way florida and texas dealt with the pandemic and they chose different things to do versus California and new york and they got Different results in different economies and people move there on the back of it, which is kind of maybe a hard fork vote in some way if you move from one protocol to another called a state.

    是以,看看佛羅里達州和德克薩斯州處理大流行病的方式,他們選擇了與加利福尼亞和紐約不同的事情,他們在不同的經濟中得到了不同的結果,人們在它的背後移動到那裡,如果你從一個協議移動到另一個稱為州的協議,這在某種程度上可能是一個硬分叉的投票。

  • So you can see how politics has, this is why when I ran for London you can't necessarily hard fork London, although there are, you know, 32 boroughs and each one makes some independent decision making.

    是以,你可以看到政治是如何,這就是為什麼當我競選倫敦時,你不一定能硬分叉倫敦,雖然有,你知道,32個區,每個區都做出一些獨立的決策。

  • But also politics can be a little frustrating that Britain and America called the tyranny of the majority, right?

    但是,政治也會讓人有點沮喪,英國和美國稱之為多數人的暴政,對嗎?

  • I mean majority rule sounds good and that's how democracy works.

    我的意思是多數人統治聽起來不錯,這就是民主的運作方式。

  • Exactly.

    正是如此。

  • And you can't fork, you know, you're kind of like stuck so you, you have to like grow the minority.

    你不能分叉,你知道,你有點像被卡住了,所以你,你必須像少數人一樣成長。

  • But in in weaponry, what happens is that uh, with decentralization, you can basically take that code and and fork it and say that, okay, this is our vision, this is how we're going to differentiate if you're early, you get more incentivized and people follow some people follow just because of the incentives and some people follow because of the frustration.

    但在武器裝備中,發生的情況是,呃,隨著權力下放,你基本上可以採取該代碼和和分叉,並說,好吧,這是我們的願景,這是我們將如何區分,如果你是早期,你得到更多的激勵,人們跟隨一些人跟隨只是因為激勵,一些人跟隨是因為挫折感。

  • But this kind of like a forking ensures that you have an ecosystem where if there isn't large enough consensus, which is important in decentralization because otherwise you are back into the centralized model.

    但這種像分叉一樣的做法確保你有一個生態系統,如果沒有足夠大的共識,這在去中心化中是很重要的,因為否則你就會回到中心化模式。

  • So what happens is that you don't have white consensus, You see forks and they evolve something And some of the folks might be opportunistic, they don't go anywhere.

    是以,發生的情況是,你沒有白色的共識,你看到岔路,他們演化出一些東西,有些人可能是機會主義,他們沒有去任何地方。

  • I think.

    我認為。

  • I'm not sure like many of the Bitcoin forks will uh so why if at some point, but then again, when you have, let's say for 2030 and one certain protocols, you know, there might be like a different way of building things and that's totally fine.

    我不確定像許多比特幣分叉會呃那麼為什麼如果在某些時候,但話說回來,當你有,比方說對於2030年和一個特定的協議,你知道,可能有像一個不同的方式來構建的東西,這是完全可以的。

  • So I think that will be like the key thing and we don't see folks often because it's very radical measure.

    所以我認為這將是像關鍵的事情,我們不經常看到人們,因為這是非常激進的措施。

  • It's kind of like rage quitting from a dow.

    這有點像怒氣衝衝地退出了下線。

  • But it's just a way of when you need to radically take a new direction of what you're building.

    但這只是一種方式,當你需要從根本上對你正在建造的東西採取一個新的方向。

  • Yeah.

    是的。

  • And again, you spoke earlier about how compose ability is a really important piece, which means what you build is a piece of lego that other people can use to go create whatever they want and the more you can make it complete, not owned by you.

    再說一遍,你剛才講到作曲能力是非常重要的一塊,這意味著你建造的是一塊樂高,其他人可以用它去創造他們想要的東西,你越是能使它完整,而不是由你擁有。

  • That's a big part of the protocol as well as you like this concept of immutable code of having this piece of code out there that's a smart contract in and of itself does something and again, doesn't have and no one can change it.

    這也是協議的一個重要部分,因為你喜歡這種不可變的代碼的概念,有這段代碼在那裡,它是一個智能合約,本身做一些事情,而且沒有,沒有人可以改變它。

  • That's the most, that's the kind of like a perfect thing to do.

    那是最,那是一種像完美的事情。

  • But there's there's also issues related to that I think like a perfect protocol is when you build something only the most necessary part of the protocol and and and deploy it and see what other people will build.

    但也有與此相關的問題,我認為像一個完美的協議是當你建立的東西只有協議中最必要的部分,並和部署它,看看其他人會建立什麼。

  • So you have this kind of like a protocol.

    所以你有這種類似於協議的東西。

  • Uh, I would say like experimentation market fit or protocol market fit where you try something and see how the community reacts and what they can build because if you start to build everything in a monolithic way, uh, what happens is you get a community of more of like a Spectators or maybe parameters governors.

    呃,我會說像實驗性的市場適應性或協議性的市場適應性,在那裡你嘗試一些東西,看看社區的反應和他們可以建立什麼,因為如果你開始以單一的方式建立一切,呃,會發生什麼,你會得到一個更像旁觀者的社區,也許是參數管理人。

  • But what you want to essentially do is that you don't want to only decentralize people who govern the protocol, but you want to decentralize also people who build the protocol.

    但你想從本質上做的是,你不想只讓管理協議的人去中心化,但你也想讓構建協議的人去中心化。

  • So that way kind of like if the government wants to make different kinds of decisions and the builders aren't happy, you don't have anyone to implement those changes.

    是以,這種方式有點像如果政府想做出不同類型的決定,而建築商不滿意,你就沒有人去實施這些變化。

  • And for example have a protocol, you can delegate the voting power.

    比如說有一個協議,你可以把投票權下放。

  • So if you are a holder of, you can delegate to someone so called protocol politician, but you can also delegate the proposition power, which means that uh if you look at into the traditional system, usually like the lawmaking is mon apologized in a way that you have one lawmaker and then you have politicians who wrote in different kind of like ways.

    是以,如果你是一個持有人,你可以委託給某人,即所謂的禮賓政治家,但你也可以委託命題權,這意味著,呃,如果你看成傳統的系統,通常像立法是單歉的方式,你有一個立法者,然後你有政治家,他們以不同種類的方式寫。

  • But delegating proposition power means that you make the code makers lawmakers to compete on the proposals which this protocol politicians end of the day boat.

    但是下放提案權意味著你讓代碼制定者的法律制定者在這個協議的政治家結束時船的提案上競爭。

  • And that's why the decentralization of builders is like the last and biggest component that we need to kind of like uh work upon in the whole space.

    這就是為什麼建設者的權力下放是我們在整個空間中需要像呃工作的最後和最大的組成部分。

  • But the perfect manner you create a protocol that just has the essentials and see how others will build on top.

    但完美的方式是,你創建一個只有基本要素的協議,看看其他人會如何在上面建立。

  • That's like the most valuable scenario.

    這就像最有價值的情況。

now I just spent six months running to be mayor of London and I got a taste of politics taste and in America you look at America now and you see a potential a few hard fork opportunities, right?

現在我剛剛花了六個月時間競選倫敦市長,我嚐到了政治的滋味,在美國,你現在看美國,你看到了潛在的一些硬分叉機會,對嗎?

字幕與單字
自動翻譯

影片操作 你可以在這邊進行「影片」的調整,以及「字幕」的顯示

B1 中級 中文 協議 代碼 跟隨 共識 移動到 政治

Stani Kulechov談分叉、可組合性和構建完美協議? (Stani Kulechov On Forking, Composability & Building The Perfect Protocol ?)

  • 2 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 09 月 29 日
影片單字