Placeholder Image

字幕列表 影片播放

自動翻譯
  • yeah, there's that old expression the harder I work, the luckier I get.

    是的,有一個古老的說法,我越努力工作,我就越幸運。

  • So you guys were putting in the work and you know you did all the development and then it happened and it was part of market fit and you guys took advantage of it but it wasn't exactly like you bought a lottery ticket uh to be there, talk to me about this purchase of mermaids because when I saw it I put my old investment banking hat on and I thought my first reaction Sandeep was, who advised on that was that Goldman Sachs advised and then I realized, oh my gosh, this is a completely token transaction.

    是以,你們正在投入工作,你知道你們做了所有的開發,然後它發生了,它是市場適應的一部分,你們利用了它,但它並不完全像你買了一張彩票呃在那裡,跟我談談這次購買美人魚,因為當我看到它時,我把我的老投資銀行的帽子戴上,我想我的第一反應桑迪普是,誰建議是高盛建議,然後我意識到,哦,我的天啊,這是一個完全代幣交易。

  • Uh, it's sizeable.

    呃,它是有規模的。

  • It was notable talk to me about how that happened and that gets you what in the ZK zero knowledge space a little bit more.

    這是值得注意的,跟我談談那是如何發生的,這讓你在ZK零知識空間裡多一點什麼。

  • But tell me about that merger is impressive really.

    但告訴我那個合併案真的令人印象深刻。

  • Yes, so basically, I mean as, as you at the start of the session also said that polygon is a multi chain ethereum right?

    是的,所以基本上,我的意思是,正如你在會議開始時也說,Polygon是一個多鏈的以太坊,對嗎?

  • So we intend to add multiple, multiple types of change, like there will be zero knowledge change, there will be a bigger zero knowledge smart contract execution engines.

    所以我們打算增加多種,多種類型的變化,比如會有零知識的變化,會有更大的零知識智能合約執行引擎。

  • Uh, there will be, there is already proof of stake chain, there is already a polygon SDK abstain kind of architecture and all that.

    呃,會有的,已經有了股權鏈的證明,已經有了多邊形SDK棄權的那種架構和所有這些。

  • So we are basically building all of these different, different different architectures and developers will be able to choose what they like the best right for their, their, their applications and uh, helmets acquisition is a step in that uh, you know, in that direction because of zero knowledge, we believe that you know, uh we we had uh like the like our commentators or not computers meaning the other players in the regional space had already had a head start off like a 6-12 months, right?

    是以,我們基本上是建立所有這些不同的,不同的不同的架構,開發人員將能夠選擇他們喜歡的最適合他們的,他們的,他們的應用程序和呃,頭盔的收購是一個步驟,呃,你知道,在這個方向上,因為零知識,我們相信,你知道,呃我們有呃像我們的評論員或不是計算機意味著其他玩家在區域空間已經有一個頭開始關閉像一個6-12個月,對嗎?

  • And we needed to, you know, become become at par with the existing zero or less solution providers.

    我們需要,你知道,成為與現有的零或更少的解決方案供應商看齊。

  • So the inorganic way of doing was to, you know, kind of much with much with the multiple such uh such platforms And uh and to get the zero knowledge expertise uh within the polygon umbrella and that's what we have done in the last 3-4 months as I said that Hamas is basically the tip of the iceberg, there is more stuff coming and uh in terms of the acquisition, in terms of like you know this acquisition, what we actually did is like, you know, we spoke to the Hermes team and they also know what we are doing, they know that capability of polygon in terms of its business development and it's uh you know, it's not only about building a technology like you know, many of the projects feel that okay, You know, we build the technology, people will come, but then it's also about business development, it's also about you know helping and supporting the ecosystem developers and all that building the entire ecosystem around and they realize that we are pretty good at that and they have this expertise on the Jordi bolena.

    是以,無機的做法是,你知道,在多個這樣的平臺上,多多益善,並在polygon的保護傘下獲得零知識專長,這就是我們在過去3-4個月所做的,正如我所說,Hamas基本上是冰山一角,還有更多的東西要做,就收購而言,就像你知道這次收購,我們實際上做的是,你知道,我們與Hermes團隊談過,他們也知道我們在做什麼。他們知道Polygon在業務發展方面的能力,而且你知道,這不僅僅是建立一個技術,就像你知道的那樣,許多項目覺得好吧,你知道,我們建立技術,人們就會來,但是,這也是關於業務發展,這也是關於你知道的幫助和支持

  • He's basically uh, you know, he's one of the legendary theory, um, uh, developers and white hat hackers, he has helped, you know, people and, and build languages like Sercombe and all that.

    他基本上是呃,你知道,他是傳說中的理論之一,嗯,呃,開發人員和白帽黑客,他已經幫助,你知道,人們和,並建立像Sercombe和所有的語言。

  • So it for us it was a perfect mix in terms of like getting them for their competency and the skill set and for for there's, it was very, it was a good step in terms of getting them all this uh, you know, visibility in the community as well as access to, you know, hundreds and hundreds of these clients who can actually build on the solution.

    是以,對我們來說,這是一個完美的組合,就像讓他們獲得他們的能力和技能集,對他們來說,這是非常,這是一個很好的步驟,讓他們所有這些呃,你知道,在社區的知名度,以及獲得,你知道,數以百計的這些客戶,可以真正建立在解決方案上。

  • So it was kind of perfect much mix and we discussed and they discussed with their token holders and I think they got over overarching approval from their, uh, from their community.

    是以,這是一種完美的混合,我們與他們討論,他們與他們的代幣持有人討論,我認為他們從他們的,呃,從他們的社區得到了總體上的準許。

  • And then we decided, and then again, like from the polygon tragedy, like some tokens were moved into a smart contract and then whoever owns happens, he can go and slap and that's again like, you know, comes back to the, the paradigm shift in how human beings can collaborate.

    然後我們決定,然後又像從多邊形悲劇中,像一些代幣被轉移到智能合約中,然後誰擁有發生,他可以去拍打,這又像,你知道,回到了,人類如何合作的範式轉變上。

  • Like previously, if you had to do it, you would, you know, you would need like extreme level of like regulatory handhold ling and you know, uh, informing multiple of such institutions to, to, to support the, you know, swaps and you know, submit multiple kind of such people work here and there, but here in the Blockchain space, like it's all available on blocks and you don't need any more transparency than that like you know just move the tokens and you can see who is moving what and uh you know who's claiming how many tokens so uh you know it was very simple in that sense uh and we are happy that we kind of pioneered this thing and uh look and you know kind of hopeful to do more such things in the coming coming days.

    就像以前,如果你必須這樣做,你會,你知道,你會需要像極端水準的像監管的牽制,你知道,呃,通知多個這樣的機構來,來支持,你知道,交換,你知道,提交多種這樣的人在這裡和那裡工作,但在區塊鏈空間這裡。但在區塊鏈領域,這一切都可以在區塊上進行,你不需要比這更多的透明度,比如你知道只要移動代幣,你就可以看到誰在移動什麼,呃,你知道誰在申請多少代幣,所以呃,你知道在這個意義上,這是非常簡單的呃,我們很高興,我們有點開創了這個事情,呃看,你知道有點希望在未來的日子裡做更多這樣的事情。

  • So no Goldman Sachs involved in that, no sec involved in that you guys just got it done.

    是以,沒有高盛參與其中,也沒有證券公司參與其中,你們只是把它完成了。

  • Yeah I mean and how do how do you even involve sec?

    是的,我的意思是,你怎麼能讓秒速快三精準人工下注計劃參與其中呢?

  • Because you know like we this this entities like polygon entities based out of the V.

    因為你知道就像我們這個實體,比如基於V的多邊形實體。

  • I.

    I.

  • Harms entities based out of uh I think 23 entities like Cayman or Dubai and then you know they both the teams decided to share I.

    哈姆斯的實體設在開曼或迪拜等23個實體之外,然後你知道他們兩個團隊決定分享我。

  • P.

    P.

  • And then much that open into into this so you know sec doesn't even come into the into the purview of this.

    然後很多東西都開成了這個,所以你知道安全甚至沒有進入到這個的範圍內。

  • So uh yeah I mean it's like all uh way and unless and until like the uh you know most of the governments across the world come come together and you know create a global framework for it, it will remain hard to um uh kind of understand we involved all the legal kind of help and everything like to make it completely compliant and everything but then you know, how do you there are no guidelines for anything like that till now?

    所以,呃,是的,我的意思是,這就像所有的呃方式,除非和直到像呃你知道世界各地的大多數政府走到一起,你知道為它創建一個全球框架,它將仍然很難呃呃種理解我們涉及所有的法律種類的幫助和一切喜歡使它完全遵守和一切,但然後你知道,你怎麼有沒有任何類似的指導方針,直到現在?

  • And so that's why the Blockchain is the ultimate guideline.

    是以,這就是為什麼區塊鏈是最終準則。

  • Any advice to people that are going to go do mergers out there, anything you thought, you know, dues and don't of doing a deal like this now that you've done it and had a couple of months to process it, um, dues and don't, I would uh, like one of the biggest challenges comes is that when you have two listed tokens, like, you know, how do you decide the peg?

    對那些要去做合併的人有什麼建議嗎,你認為,你知道,做這樣的交易的注意事項,現在你已經做了,有幾個月的時間來處理,嗯,注意事項,我想嗯,比如最大的挑戰之一是,當你有兩個上市的代幣,比如,你知道,你怎麼決定掛鉤的問題?

  • And uh, you know, there are a few ways of deciding the peg between these two tokens because both have, have a fluctuating value and you know, how volatile these markets are.

    而且,呃,你知道,有幾種方法來決定這兩種代幣之間的掛鉤,因為兩者都有,有一個波動的價值,你知道,這些市場是多麼的不穩定。

  • So it's hard to kind of get on a pricing, but then, you know, projects should see the, the kind of intrinsic value and try to freeze on some price between the two teams and then reach a consensus and once you reach the consensus, don't think about it.

    是以,很難有一種定價,但是,你知道,項目應該看到,那種內在的價值,並試圖在兩個團隊之間凍結一些價格,然後達成共識,一旦你達成共識,就不要想了。

  • Like whether you're like one token goes, you know, like crazy, I don't think like, you know, you ended up paying a higher price or lower price whatever, especially in terms of like how the team synergies, I think the good things is that, you know, both of our teams have gelled well and we have kind of uh we are building polygon in a, in a kind of a conglomerate way.

    無論你是像一個代幣去,你知道,像瘋了一樣,我不認為像,你知道,你最終支付了更高的價格或更低的價格,特別是在像團隊的協同作用方面,我認為好的事情是,你知道,我們兩個團隊已經融洽,我們有種呃我們正在建立多邊形在一個,在一種聯合的方式。

  • So it's like the world's first decent lives conglomerate kind of thing which have these small, small entities like harmonies and there will be a few more announced and they are working in a very autonomous way at their level.

    是以,它就像世界上第一個體面的生命聯合體那種東西,它有這些小的、小的實體,就像和聲一樣,還會有一些宣佈,他們在他們的水準上以非常自主的方式工作。

  • But since they use Matic token, so all the value, their network, a cruise, you know, eventually goes back to the medic token.

    但由於他們使用Matic令牌,所以所有的價值,他們的網絡,一個巡航,你知道,最終回到醫療令牌上。

  • And that's how I think it's like a very new paradigm in that sense.

    這就是我認為在這個意義上它就像一個非常新的範式。

  • Think of it like a multiple autonomous entities working together.

    把它想成是一個多個自主的實體一起工作。

  • But all of them actually, the value approval is actually going into the token.

    但是所有的人實際上,價值準許實際上是進入了代幣。

  • And since there is like on the decent lives platforms, you don't need to make revenues.

    而且由於有像樣的生活平臺,你不需要做收入。

  • So you don't have any distrust issues that people are creating revenues and not displaying it and displaying or kind of contributing back to the main umbrella.

    是以,你不會有任何不信任的問題,即人們正在創造收入而不顯示它,並顯示或有點貢獻回主傘。

  • So because there are no revenues, all the things, all the teams are working to make the or are going to make sure to kind of make sure that the value approval of these activities goes to the magic token and then you don't need any kind of oversight and all that.

    是以,因為沒有收入,所有的事情,所有的團隊都在努力使或要確保一種確保這些活動的價值準許進入神奇的代幣,然後你不需要任何種類的監督和所有。

  • I think it's, it's like much more symbiotic, uh, you know, as you would imagine or, or as you would expect to have it in the real world and in the, in the crypto world, it, once you get into this, you get understand this business models of proof of taking all that, it's very, very symbiotic.

    我認為它,它就像更多的共生,呃,你知道,就像你想象的那樣,或者你期望在現實世界和加密世界中擁有它,它,一旦你進入這個,你理解這個商業模式的證明,所有這些,它是非常,非常共生的。

  • We don't even need to kind of uh, you know, uh, intervene into the autonomy of the individual teams.

    我們甚至不需要那種呃,你知道,呃,干預個別團隊的自主權。

  • They can fully build themselves.

    他們可以完全建立自己。

  • They have token allocations and all that.

    他們有代幣分配和所有這些。

  • If they grow their their value approval or their activities add to the value approval everybody benefits.

    如果他們增長了他們的價值認可或他們的活動增加了價值認可,每個人都會受益。

  • So it's very kind of symbiotic environment.

    是以,這是一種非常共生的環境。

yeah, there's that old expression the harder I work, the luckier I get.

是的,有一個古老的說法,我越努力工作,我就越幸運。

字幕與單字
自動翻譯

影片操作 你可以在這邊進行「影片」的調整,以及「字幕」的顯示

B1 中級 中文 實體 團隊 價值 準許 收購 區塊鏈

Sandeep Nailwal解釋Polygon的合併和區塊鏈生態系統? (Sandeep Nailwal Explains Polygon Merger & Blockchain Ecosystem ?)

  • 3 0
    林宜悉 發佈於 2021 年 09 月 26 日
影片單字