Name: 簽下RB阿倫-瓊斯是包裝工的明智之舉嗎？| 起床 (Was re-signing RB Aaron Jones a smart move by the Packers? | Get Up)
Uploaded: 2021-03-16T19:15:37.000Z
Duration: 3 min 10 s

the Packers last season when he was off the field, their production running, the ball went down across the board.

包裝工上賽季他下場的時候，他們的生產運行，球速全面下降。

You see the numbers, fewer yards per play and few hours, two touchdowns and everything else.

你看數據，每場比賽碼數少，小時數少，兩次達陣，什麼都有。

程度副詞

They're just a better team with him on the field.

有他在場上，他們只是一支更好的球隊。

And so let me sort of phrase the question this way.

是以，讓我這樣來表述這個問題。

For those of us who have looked at the championship window of of Aaron Rodgers and said the Packers need to be aggressive.

對於我們這些人誰看了冠軍窗口的阿倫-羅傑斯和說包裝工需要積極進取。

The kind of aggressive win now kind of move that signals they're going in that direction absolutely greedy, and we've got to give them credit.

現在那種咄咄逼人的贏利舉動，標誌著他們往那個方向走絕對是貪婪的，我們得給他們點贊。

He is a key piece to the offense if you go back.

他是進攻的關鍵一環，如果你回。

Over the last couple years, we've all been critical about how they've drafted or not drafted skill players.

在過去的幾年裡，我們都在責備他們如何選拔或不選拔技能球員。

But they kept Erin Jones, and if you go back, they kept Davante Adams.

但他們留住了艾琳-瓊斯，如果你回去，他們留住了達文特-亞當斯。

Now he did get hurt, so we do have to give them credit.

現在他確實受傷了，所以我們必須給他們點贊。

I still think they need to add another bonafide receiver outside the numbers, but Erin Jones is prolific out of the backfield 47 catches last year.

我仍然認為他們需要在數據之外增加另一個骨幹接球手，但艾琳-瓊斯去年在後場47次接球中多產。

And if you pair him with last year's second round pick A J.

而如果把他和去年的第二輪選秀權A J搭配起來。

Dillan out of Boston College, who's a bigger thicker between the tackles running back, they really complement one another.

來自波士頓學院的迪倫，他是一個更大的厚實的擒拿手之間的跑衛，他們真的是相得益彰。

And again, they were in the final four year ago.

而同樣，他們在四年前的決賽中。

This was a really good signing the Final Four each of the last two years.

這是一個非常好的籤位過去兩年每年都能進入四強。

As a matter of fact, Danny, what do you think?

Their mindset this year has to be Super Bowl or bust because of the Aaron Rodgers contract situation because of the addition of Jordan Love last year in the draft.

他們今年的心態必須是超級碗，否則就會因為去年選秀中喬丹-洛夫的加入，而導致阿倫-羅傑斯的合同情況。

And everyone continues to ask the question of, Well, how did the Packers take the next step for me?

而大家繼續問的問題是：嗯，包裝工是如何為我邁出下一步的？

And this is part of that movie is making sure that you keep on your football team the best zone run game running back in the NFL and also like my team mentioned, this guy is a big time pass catching threat in the NFL, and then I know the conversation is what you don't pay running backs.

而這是這部電影的一部分，就是確保你在你的足球隊中保留了NFL中最好的區域跑動遊戲跑衛，也像我的團隊提到的那樣，這個傢伙是NFL中的一個大時間傳球威脅，然後我知道談話是你不付給跑衛什麼。

You don't make running backs the financial center point of your organization like the Cowboys did with Zeke.

你不會像牛仔隊對Zeke那樣，把跑衛作為組織的財務中心點。

There's a big difference, and I think they just decided to pay Erin Jones.

有一個很大的區別，我認為他們只是決定支付艾琳瓊斯。

But they didn't make them the financial center piece of the organization.

但他們並沒有讓他們成為組織的財務中心片。

So a ton of sense for this move, very, very, very important person on their football team.

所以這個舉動很有意義，非常非常非常重要的人，在他們的足球隊。

Yeah, I'm surprised because when they use the second round pick last year on A J.

是啊，我很驚訝，因為當他們用第二輪選秀權去年在A J。

Dillan, I assumed that was because they kind of ascribed to this philosophy of not playing running backs, and I thought they weren't gonna pay them.

Dillan，我以為那是因為他們不打跑衛的哲學，我以為他們不會給他們錢。

But if you look at the way that they play and I think Mike T pointed this out, is they kind of play different positions?

但如果你看看他們的打法，我想邁克-T也指出了這一點，他們是那種打法不同的位置？

I know they're both listed as running back, but the things that they asked him to do are different so they can have them both on the same on the field at the same time.

我知道他們都被列為跑衛，但他們要求他做的事情是不同的，所以他們可以讓他們兩個同時在場上。

It's important to their offense that is very run focused, despite the fact that they have one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time, that they have to healthy, dynamic running backs for them to make this run.

這對他們的進攻非常注重跑動，儘管他們有一個最偉大的四分衛，但重要的是，他們必須健康，充滿活力的跑衛，他們必須進行這種運行。

So I like the move, and I'm never gonna argue against paying anybody.

所以，我喜歡這個舉動，我也不會反對付錢給任何人。

So let's see, they got one of their errands is happy.

所以，讓我們來看看，他們得到了一個他們的差事是快樂的。

Now let's see if the other Aaron is happy enough to make one more run at Thank you for watching ESPN on YouTube for live streaming sports and premium content.

現在，讓我們看看另一個亞倫是否足夠快樂，讓一個更多的運行在感謝您在YouTube上觀看ESPN的直播流體育和優質內容。